· Private foundation
Usg Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k252 grants · $413k
- $10k–50k12 grants · $185k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $188k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NATIONAL MERIT SCHOLARSHIP CORPORATION | $87,535 |
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC | $50,000 |
| American Red Cross | $50,000 |
| Youth Conservation Corps | $25,000 |
| Lumity | $25,000 |
| Communities In Schools of Chicago | $15,000 |
| Career Transistions Center of Chicago | $15,000 |
| Easter Seals DuPage and the Fox Valley Region | $15,000 |
| MANUFACTURING INSTITUTE | $15,000 |
| South Suburban PADS | $15,000 |
| YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO | $15,000 |
| Preservation Foundation of the Lake County Forest Preserves | $15,000 |
| Big Brothers Big Sisters | $10,000 |
| Naperville Heritage Society | $10,000 |
| Wreaths Across America | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $415k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 82% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +24% since the first grant, against +9% for the ones you funded once.
233 repeat relationships — 119 still active in FY2025, 114 since wound down; 122 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $282k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NMNational Merit Scholarship Corporation5× · 2021–2025 · $371k · revenue +18%
- LLUMITY5× · 2020–2025 · $153k · revenue +143%
- MHMERCY HOUSING LAKEFRONT5× · 2020–2024 · $126k · revenue +4%
Funded once
- NMNATIONAL MERIT SCHOLARSHIP CORPORATone grant, 2020 · $50k
- UWUNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO INCone grant, 2020 · $30k · revenue -50%
- NSNATIONAL SAFETY COUNCILone grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +25%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Uchicago medicine network, inc. supports and encourages health and human service by providing support, directly or indirectly to ingalls memorial hospital, the university of chicago medical center, and other related tax-exempt…
To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.
Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…
See schedule onorc at the university of chicago conducts research and data science on critical societal issues to guide decision-making and the development of programs and public policy. our experts identify relationships and trends, and…
Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…
The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…
To promote public health, safety, and welfare through the improvement of the quality and quantity of drinking water and the development and furtherance of understanding of the problems relating thereto.
The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.
Rock river valley blood center, in partnership with our community, is dedicated to providing safe, high value blood products and services to people in need.
Our mission: to improve the quality of health care.our vision: better health care. better choices. better health.
The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…
The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feed My Starving Children Inc and the most unlike its peers is Voices of the Abused. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.6% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
574 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 574 of the 888 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds National Merit Scholarship Corporation ↗
- Who funds LUMITY ↗
- Who funds MERCY HOUSING LAKEFRONT ↗
- Who funds CAREER TRANSITIONS CENTER OF CHICAGO ↗
- Who funds CHICAGOLAND HABITAT FOR HUMANITY JAMES HARRIS TREASURER ↗
- Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INC ↗
- Who funds EASTER SEALS DUPAGE & THE FOX VALLEY REGION ↗
- Who funds YOUTH CONSERVATION CORPS ↗
- Who funds YWCA METROPOLITAN CHICAGO ↗
- Who funds NAPERVILLE HERITAGE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds SOUTH SUBURBAN PADS ↗
- Who funds ALL STARS PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds SWEETWATER HOUSE OF PEACE ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO INC ↗
- Who funds PRESERVATION FOUNDATION OF THE LAKE COUNTY FOREST PRESERVES ↗
- Who funds Maryfield Inc ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF CHICAGO ↗
- Who funds AUTISM SPEAKS INC ↗
- Who funds THE MANUFACTURING INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY ↗
- Who funds MUSIC OF THE BAROQUE ↗
- Who funds CHICAGO UNITED ↗
- Who funds PATRIOT PAWS SERVICE DOGS ↗
- Who funds GIRLS IN THE GAME NFP ↗
- Who funds WOUNDED WARRIORS UNITED-MINNESOTA ↗
- Who funds DUPAGE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds SHEDD AQUARIUM SOCIETY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: George M Eisenberg Foundation for Charities · Circle of Service Foundation · Polk Bros Foundation Inc · United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · Dr Scholl Foundation · Baxter International Foundation · Motorola Solutions Foundation · Cme Group Community Foundation F/K/A Nymex Foundation · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · First Bank Chicago Foundation · Robert R McCormick Foundation · Imc Chicago Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Usg Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Ellie Fund Inc — 15% of income from government
- Family Promise Inc — 2% of income from government
- Cradles to Crayons Inc — 2% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Usg Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Usg Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.