Illinois · Nonprofit
LINCOLN PARK CONSERVANCY
LINCOLN PARK CONSERVANCY (Illinois) receives grants from 62 organizations whose IRS filings report $7,934,264 to it, the largest being Fulk Family Foundation Inc ($3,882,800). 34 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
LINCOLN PARK CONSERVANCY runs a healthier operating margin than half of the 15,485 recreation & sports nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 15,485 recreation & sports nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024
Three funders worth looking at
Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.
- The Siragusa Family Foundationshared funders
- Openlandsportfolio match
- Central Park Conservancy Incportfolio match
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
Government-grant reliance: 2021 3% · 2022 3%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.
96% of LINCOLN PARK CONSERVANCY’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (18% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Who funds it, year by year
2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 7 funders to 25 funders, grant income fell $631k → $449k.
13 of 62 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 20% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of LINCOLN PARK CONSERVANCY’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 62 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
LINCOLN PARK CONSERVANCY leans on a few funders — its largest provides 49% of grant income and the top three 75%; half comes from just 2 funders.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 80% · 2018 20% · 2019 26% · 2020 91% · 2021 37% · 2022 61% · 2023 45% — diversifying over time.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How long its funders stay
44% of LINCOLN PARK CONSERVANCY's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 55% give in more than one year at all.
Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.
Where its funders are
LINCOLN PARK CONSERVANCY draws 63% of its grant income from funders outside Illinois, across 10 states in all.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $1.6M arriving through sponsors registered in 9 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Funders to approach
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 62 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.
- The Siragusa Family Foundationshared fundersIL · backs 50 organizations that share your funders
- Openlandsportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Central Park Conservancy Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- The Van Dam Charitable Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- The Morton Arboretumportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Morgan Senior Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- WD Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Covington Charitable Trportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- The Brinson Foundationshared fundersIL · backs 46 organizations that share your funders
- The Bluhm Family Foundationshared fundersIL · backs 54 organizations that share your funders
- Patrick G and Shirley W Ryan Foundationshared fundersIL · backs 66 organizations that share your funders
- The Canning Foundationshared fundersIL · backs 58 organizations that share your funders
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Organizations like LINCOLN PARK CONSERVANCY
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In Illinois
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
64% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Public support
46%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Footprint & structure
Files a return copy in 1 state
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for LINCOLN PARK CONSERVANCY: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds LINCOLN PARK CONSERVANCY?
- LINCOLN PARK CONSERVANCY (Illinois) receives grants from 62 organizations whose IRS filings report $7,934,264 to it, the largest being Fulk Family Foundation Inc ($3,882,800). 34 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does LINCOLN PARK CONSERVANCY have?
- IRS filings report 62 organizations giving $7,934,264 in grants to LINCOLN PARK CONSERVANCY, 34 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of LINCOLN PARK CONSERVANCY?
- Fulk Family Foundation Inc is the largest funder on record, with $3,882,800 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like LINCOLN PARK CONSERVANCY find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Illinois. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 62funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing