· Private foundation
Stern Sidney Memorial Tuw
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k217 grants · $794k
- $10k–50k17 grants · $186k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $124k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE UCLA FOUNDATION | $63,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII FOUNDATION | $60,750 |
| ADVENTURE RABBI TRIPS | $15,000 |
| DUNN SCHOOL | $15,000 |
| SWARTHMORE COLLEGE | $14,750 |
| HILLEL THE FDN FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE | $11,500 |
| CLARKSTON COMMUNITY HEALTH INC | $10,000 |
| WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY | $10,000 |
| BRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE | $10,000 |
| INST FOR THE STUDY OF ETHICAL DIVERSITY | $10,000 |
| WORKING WARDROBES FOR A NEW START | $10,000 |
| JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES OF HAWAII | $10,000 |
| PERFORMANCE ZONE INC | $10,000 |
| OAHU JEWISH OHANA | $10,000 |
| CREDIT DO INC | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $269k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 74% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
274 repeat relationships — 167 still active in FY2025, 107 since wound down; 65 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $233k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- UOUNIVERSITY OF HAWAII FOUNDATION4× · 2021–2025 · $217k · revenue +64%
SWARTHMORE COLLEGE4× · 2021–2025 · $66k · revenue +5%- JCJEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES OF HAWAII3× · 2023–2025 · $53k · revenue +1%
Funded once
- NYNew York Universitygraduatedone grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue +30%
- FFFOUNDATION FOR HUMAN ENRICHMENTone grant, 2023 · $30k · revenue +19%
- ORO'AHU RESOURCE CONSERVATION ANDone grant, 2021 · $20k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.
California college of the arts educates students to shape culture and society through the practice and critical study of art, architecture, design, and writing. benefitting from its san francisco bay area location, the college prepares…
California western school of law is an independent, aba/aals and wasc senior college and university commission (wscuc) accredited s.d. law school that prepares graduates for the practice of law through a carefully sequenced program of…
The Television Academy is dedicated to celebrating excellence, innovation and the advancement of the telecommunications arts and sciences through recognition, education and leadership, while fostering a diverse, inclusive and accessible…
The AIA California, in collaboration with local components, is the voice of the architectural profession.
The california dental association is committed to the success of our members in service to their patients and the public.
The foundation's mission is to improve the oral health of all californians by supporting the dental profession and its efforts to meet community needs.
Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.
The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.
To distribute public affairs and other educational information in order to create an electronic bridge between californians and their public officials, and, in the process educate a new generation of voting citizens and civic leaders who…
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oneoc and the most unlike its peers is Bronfman Youth Fellowships to Israel in Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.7% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
525 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 525 of the 660 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds New York University ↗
- Who funds SWARTHMORE COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES OF HAWAII ↗
- Who funds THINKTECH HAWAII INC ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR HUMAN ENRICHMENT ↗
- Who funds DUNN SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds Adventure Rabbi Synagogue wo Walls ↗
- Who funds CHAMBER MUSIC PALISADES INC ↗
- Who funds THE MAESTRO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AUTRY MUSEUM OF THE AMERICAN WEST ↗
- Who funds CHAMINADE UNIVERSITY OF HONOLULU ↗
- Who funds PRISON UNIVERSITY PROJECT INC DBA MOUNT TAMALPAIS COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND ↗
- Who funds THE COLBURN SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds THE CITY TUTORS INC ↗
- Who funds THE GARRISON INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA SCIENCE CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HAWAII COUNCIL FOR HUMANITIES ↗
- Who funds California State University Fresno Alumni Association Incorporated ↗
- Who funds NORTH AMERICAN CONFERENCE ON BRITISH STUDIES ↗
- Who funds THE PERFORMANCE ZONE INC ↗
- Who funds CREDIT DO INC ↗
- Who funds Working Wardrobes For A New Start ↗
- Who funds AQUARIUM OF THE PACIFIC CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds BRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE ↗
- Who funds PHI ALPHA THETA HISTORY HONOR SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds UTAH SYMPHONY & OPERA ↗
- Who funds PUENTE LEARNING CENTER ↗
- Who funds Los Angeles Chamber Ballet ↗
- Who funds SCHOLARS' HOPE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WAIKIKI HEALTH ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Ahmanson Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · The Rose Hills Foundation · The Green Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · Weingart Foundation · S Mark Taper Foundation · Elbridge Stuart Foundation Dba Stuart Foundation · Atherton Family Foundation · Aloha United Way Inc · Henry L Guenther Foundation · California Community Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Stern Sidney Memorial Tuw funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Hias Inc — 88% of income from government
- Empower Her Network Inc Dba Empowered Network — 47% of income from government
- National Yiddish Book Center Inc — 2% of income from government
- Archaeological Institute of America — 1% of income from government
- Wesleyan University — 1% of income from government
- Keshet Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.