Skip to content

California · Nonprofit

Santa Monica Mountains Fund

Santa Monica Mountains Fund (California) receives grants from 35 organizations whose IRS filings report $7,571,323 to it, the largest being NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION ($4,332,015). 21 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$6.0M
Funders on record
35
Grants received
$7.6M
Net assets
$4.5M
21/35 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 88%
01What it does

What Santa Monica Mountains Fund does

Mission

Santa Monica Mountains Fund (the fund) operates as a not-for-profit organization located in thousand oaks, california. The fund was established on january 22, 1988, to protect and encourage appreciation and understanding of the national and state parklands in the santa monica mountains by supporting the national park service (nps) and california state parks (csp). The fund achieves this mission by partnering with nps and csp to further education, science and research; improving park facilities and trails; engaging community members and youth in education; and leading efforts to steward the natural and cultural resources of these beautiful mountains.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. HABITAT RESTORATION AND TRAILSThe Fund supports projects and programs that preserve the SMMNRA for public access and ecological resilience. The Seed Farm at Rancho Sierra Vista continues to serve as a vital site for ecological restoration, workforce development, and learning opportunities for local youth. In 2025, the nursery continued expanding its capacity to produce native plants used in habitat restoration and climate resilience projects across the mountains and surrounding communities.The nursery program includes the Oxnard Youth Ecologists (OYE) workforce program and the Monarch and Milkweed initiative. The OYE program provides youth with job skills and hands-on experience in ecological restoration, native seed collection and propagation, and conservation leadership. Youth participants helped cultivate tens of thousands of native plants and supported the distribution of milkweed plants across Los Angeles and Ventura counties to strengthen pollinator habitat and regional wildlife corridors.The Liberty Canyon nursery continued operating at full capacity to support restoration work associated with the Wallis Annenberg Wildlife Crossing and surrounding habitat connectivity…

    $2,524,957 spentof which $222,860 as grants
    62% of program spending
  2. EDUCATIONThe Fund delivers strategic education and workforce development programs that create pathways into conservation careers. The Fund provides funding for programming, transportation, and field-based learning experiences that connect young people to the Santa Monica Mountains.The Open Outdoors for Kids program continues to connect youth with the natural world. This program brings approximately 25,000 fourth graders to the park each year to learn about plants, animals, ecosystems, and Native American heritage.For college students and young adults, the Fund provides opportunities to work alongside National Park Service staff and conservation professionals. Youth workforce programs place students and interns in seasonal roles that support interpretation, restoration, science, and education programs while providing hands-on experience and mentorship that prepares participants for careers in environmental stewardship and public lands management.

    $792,224 spent
    20% of program spending
  3. WILDLIFE RESEARCH AND PROTECTIONThe Fund supports wildlife research and monitoring programs conducted in partnership with the National Park Service, California State Parks, and collaborating scientists. Research initiatives include long-term studies of mountain lions, mule deer, and federally listed California red-legged frogs.Interns and field technicians assist with wildlife monitoring through satellite tracking, camera traps, and field surveys that help scientists better understand wildlife movement patterns, habitat connectivity, and the impacts of urban development on native species.Community education programs also support wildlife protection through initiatives such as the Nature Neighbor program and the Break the Poison Chain campaign, which raise awareness about rodenticide impacts on wildlife. The Fund also supports volunteer programs and cultural interpretation activities at the Satwiwa Native American Indian Culture Center, where youth and community members participate in educational and cultural events that celebrate the regions Indigenous heritage.

    $389,507 spentof which $200,000 as grants
    10% of program spending
  4. OUTREACH AND OTHER SPECIAL INITIATIVESThe Fund provides annual support for volunteer programs that assist the National Park Service, California State Parks, and partner park organizations throughout the Santa Monica Mountains. These programs include the Mounted Volunteer Patrol, Mountain Bike Unit, National Trails Day events, habitat restoration volunteer days, and other stewardship activities that engage community members in caring for public lands.The Fund also supports cultural preservation and public engagement initiatives, including archaeological research projects and educational programming at the Satwiwa Native American Indian Culture Center developed in collaboration with Indigenous community members. These initiatives help ensure that the cultural, historical, and ecological significance of the Santa Monica Mountains is preserved and shared with future generations.

    $334,484 spent
    8% of program spending

The 4 programs described on its FY2025 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $4,041,172.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($1.5M) Expenses 100 ($1.3M) Net assets 100 ($1.5M)2018 Revenue 106 ($1.6M) Expenses 101 ($1.3M) Net assets 116 ($1.7M)2019 Revenue 130 ($1.9M) Expenses 85 ($1.1M) Net assets 171 ($2.5M)2020 Revenue 98 ($1.5M) Expenses 99 ($1.3M) Net assets 181 ($2.6M)2021 Revenue 186 ($2.8M) Expenses 123 ($1.6M) Net assets 259 ($3.8M)2022 Revenue 79 ($1.2M) Expenses 181 ($2.4M) Net assets 174 ($2.5M)2023 Revenue 159 ($2.4M) Expenses 159 ($2.1M) Net assets 190 ($2.8M)2024 Revenue 224 ($3.3M) Expenses 235 ($3.1M) Net assets 204 ($3.0M)2025 Revenue 402 ($6.0M) Expenses 334 ($4.5M) Net assets 308 ($4.5M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (402)Expenses (334)Net assets (308)

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2024 to 2025, from $3.3M to $4.7M (+43%).

$2.4M
$2.6M
$2.7M
$2.8M
$3.9M
$2.6M
$3.0M
$3.3M
$4.7M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 62% · 2018 36% · 2019 22% · 2020 45% · 2021 30% · 2022 53% · 2023 31% · 2024 55% · 2025 53%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$153k
’17
$234k
’18
$799k
’19
$145k
’20
$1.1M
’21
−$1.2M
’22
$244k
’23
$201k
’24
$1.5M
’25
3.5
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed121215111110111113
Joined·+1+5+2+0+2+4+3+4
No longer listed·12603332
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 5 funders to 15 funders, grant income rose $535k → $998k.

8 of 35 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 15% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of Santa Monica Mountains Fund’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 35 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

Santa Monica Mountains Fund leans on a few funders — its largest provides 57% of grant income and the top three 76%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

92% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund Santa Monica Mountains Fund.

57%
largest funder
76%
top three
~3
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 62% · 2018 91% · 2019 64% · 2020 89% · 2021 83% · 2022 39% · 2023 35% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

36% of Santa Monica Mountains Fund's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 60% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

Santa Monica Mountains Fund draws 90% of its grant income from funders outside California, across 9 states in all.

PA
CA
MO
VA
MD
NC
DC
TX
FL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $1.1M arriving through sponsors registered in 7 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Government funding Santa Monica Mountains Fund receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $10.8M on record.

Federal$10.8M
grants $10.8Mcontracts $0
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Top agencies
  • Department of the Interior$10.8M

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like Santa Monica Mountains Fund

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

91% of spending goes to programs.

Program 91%Management 6%Fundraising 3%

Governance

13
board members
0%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

95%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Santa Monica Mountains Fund: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds Santa Monica Mountains Fund?
Santa Monica Mountains Fund (California) receives grants from 35 organizations whose IRS filings report $7,571,323 to it, the largest being NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION ($4,332,015). 21 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does Santa Monica Mountains Fund have?
IRS filings report 35 organizations giving $7,571,323 in grants to Santa Monica Mountains Fund, 21 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of Santa Monica Mountains Fund?
NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $4,332,015 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like Santa Monica Mountains Fund find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 35 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing