Skip to content

California · Nonprofit

UNIVERSITY LAB PARTNERS

UNIVERSITY LAB PARTNERS (California) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $3,646,535 to it, the largest being THE BEALL FAMILY FOUNDATION ($3,617,507). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2024
$5.5M
Funders on record
5
Grants received
$3.6M
Net assets
$2.5M
2/5 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 94%
01What it does

What University Lab Partners does

Mission

Ulp empowers economic development and job creation in orange county (ca) by combining a state-of-the-art life science co-working environment with workforce development and training opportunities.

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Accelerated growth of the biomedical industry via an open innovation platform that provides economical lab and office space, valuable technical resources, and a network of strategic partnerships.

    $1,903,428 spentof which $108 as grants$3,309,078 earned by the program
    67% of program spending
  2. The organization provides management and oversight services for the rapid acceleration of diagnostics (radx) initiative, a program sponsored by the u.s. National institutes of health (ni), to speed innovation in the development, commercialization, and implementation of technologies for covid-19 testing.

    $727,170 spent$481,244 earned by the program
    25% of program spending
  3. As part of its operation, the organization runs a workforce development project to provide hands-on training in the lab for entry level laboratory technicians, with the support and collaboration of other charitable organizations in orange county focusing on improving the lives of orange county residents seeking to improve their skill sets to qualify for better paying, more satisfying employment.

    $229,083 spent$299,409 earned by the program
    8% of program spending

The 3 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $2,859,681.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2019, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2019, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20192019 Revenue 100 ($2.7M) Expenses 100 ($661k) Net assets 100 ($2.1M)2020 Revenue 125 ($3.4M) Expenses 423 ($2.8M) Net assets 130 ($2.7M)2021 Revenue 138 ($3.8M) Expenses 612 ($4.0M) Net assets 116 ($2.4M)2022 Revenue 177 ($4.8M) Expenses 697 ($4.6M) Net assets 128 ($2.6M)2023 Revenue 182 ($5.0M) Expenses 777 ($5.1M) Net assets 120 ($2.5M)2024 Revenue 201 ($5.5M) Expenses 830 ($5.5M) Net assets 120 ($2.5M)
201920202021202220232024
Revenue (201)Expenses (830)Net assets (120)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2021 to 2022, from $3.2M to $8.7M (+175%).

$3.1M
$3.7M
$3.2M
$8.7M
$8.2M
$7.2M
201920202021202220232024
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2020 23% · 2021 8% · 2022 3% · 2023 4% · 2024 22%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

25% of UNIVERSITY LAB PARTNERS’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (51% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 8,611 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 6 reported years ran a deficit.

$2.1M
’19
$624k
’20
−$291k
’21
$238k
’22
−$164k
’23
$10k
’24
2.2
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Beall Kenneth L

CEO/president

As listed on its FY2024 Form 990.

201920202021202220232024
Listed566788
Joined·+1+0+1+1+0
No longer listed·00000
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2019 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 3 funders, grant income fell $2.6M → $25k.

2 of 5 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 1% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of UNIVERSITY LAB PARTNERS’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

UNIVERSITY LAB PARTNERS leans on a few funders — its largest provides 99% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund UNIVERSITY LAB PARTNERS.

99%
largest funder
100%
top three
~1
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2019 100% · 2020 100% · 2023 92% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

100% of UNIVERSITY LAB PARTNERS's grant income comes from California funders.

CA
MO

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’19
’20
’23
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $23k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

UNIVERSITY LAB PARTNERS has grown faster than half of the 8,121 health nonprofits its size.

Operating margin0% · below the median
Months of reserve2.2mo · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)15% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 8,121 health nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2024

Government funding UNIVERSITY LAB PARTNERS receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $21.1M on record.

Federal$21.1M
grants $0contracts $21.1M
24
25
Top agencies
  • Department of Health and Human Services$21.1M

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like UNIVERSITY LAB PARTNERS

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

52% of spending goes to programs.

Program 52%Management 48%Fundraising 0%

Governance

5
board members
80%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

56%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for UNIVERSITY LAB PARTNERS: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds UNIVERSITY LAB PARTNERS?
UNIVERSITY LAB PARTNERS (California) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $3,646,535 to it, the largest being THE BEALL FAMILY FOUNDATION ($3,617,507). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does UNIVERSITY LAB PARTNERS have?
IRS filings report 5 organizations giving $3,646,535 in grants to UNIVERSITY LAB PARTNERS, 2 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of UNIVERSITY LAB PARTNERS?
THE BEALL FAMILY FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $3,617,507 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like UNIVERSITY LAB PARTNERS find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds University Lab Partners →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2019–2024), and the filings of 5 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing