California · Nonprofit
Pogo Park
Pogo Park (California) receives grants from 34 organizations whose IRS filings report $6,995,788 to it, the largest being FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ($1,398,200). 22 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- Revenue FY2024
- $6.5M
- Funders on record
- 34
- Grants received
- $7.0M
- Net assets
- $80k
What Pogo Park does
Mission
Pogo Park transforms dispirited city parks and playgrounds into safe, healthy, and magical outdoor public spaces for children to play and for the community to gather.
As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.
Programs
PlaceTO FOLLOW ARE ALL THE "PLACES" THAT POGO PARK IS IMPROVING: 1) Elm Playlot (Pogo Park #1); 2) Harbour-8 Park (Pogo Park #2); 3) Yellow Brick Road; 4) 23rd Street Greenway Bridge; and 5) Land Acquisition and Development (key parcels of land that surround Pogo Park's project sites.In 2023, Continued work to improve the Yellow Brick Road, a safe bike and walking route to connect Pogo Park's two parks (Harbour-8 Park and Elm Playlot) together, Work included planting 50 new trees.Welcomed over 7,000 visitors who live in Richmond's Iron Triangle, one of this citys most disadvantaged communities, to Elm Playlot, a safe, green, and clean city park that provides free enrichment programs for children and youth on a drop-in basis.
$3,597,721 spent98% of program spendingResearch & EvaluationEfforts to measure and evaluate the impact of Pogo Park's programs. Includes the efforts of Research & Evaluation Pogo Park's decade-long research partnership with UC Berkeley to measure the impact of Pogo Park's projects on community health.in 2023, Hired, trained, and empowered a core team of community residents to design and build Harbour-8 Park, Pogo Parks second park renovation project in the Iron Triangle neighborhood.Created 13 living-wage jobs for local residents.
$28,419 spent1% of program spendingPeopleTRAINING: on-the-job workforce development training in hard skills (basic carpentry, metalwork, fabrication, planting etc.) and soft skills (work ethic, initiative, production, positive communication, working as a team, email protocol, public speaking).GOLDEN TEMPLE: a source of support from Pogo Park for people living in Iron Triangle community. An example of expenses received and paid by the Golden Temple fund include: cost of funerals; dental and medical; food; transportation; school costs; clothes.in 2023, Used Elm Playlot as a trusted public space to provide 5,280 free meals to low-income children and Created 13 living-wage jobs for local residents.
$20,311 spent$3,141 earned by the program1% of program spendingOTHER PROGRAM SERVICES 4: Media & DocumentationEfforts to document (via videos and photos and interviews) Pogo Park's process to rebuild key public spaces in Iron Triangle community (parks and the streets that connect them). Cost to use media as a tool to communicate Pogo Park's activities, programs, and impact with funders, key stakeholders and the general public. OTHER PROGRAM SERVICES 5: Pogo Park ProductsPogo Park Products (PPP) is a social enterprise of Pogo Park. PPP does two things: it Pogo Park Products contracts with customers to provide design and installation services; and it sells a-la-carte products (picnic tables, benches, BBQ's, children play products etc.) to customers.
$7,181 spent0% of program spending
The 4 programs described on its FY2023 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $3,653,632.
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
Balance sheet
Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2023 to 2024, from $1.3M to $1.9M (+43%).
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
Government-grant reliance: 2020 26% · 2021 45% · 2022 51% · 2023 61% · 2024 74%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.
99% of Pogo Park’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (13% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 5 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Leadership and staff
The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.
Who funds it, year by year
2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 8 funders to 13 funders, grant income rose $712k → $848k.
14 of 34 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 43% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of Pogo Park’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 34 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
Pogo Park has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 20% of grant income, and it takes 4 funders to reach half.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 4 funders to its left
52% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund Pogo Park.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 41% · 2018 33% · 2019 20% · 2020 20% · 2021 29% · 2022 34% · 2023 36% — diversifying over time.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How long its funders stay
50% of Pogo Park's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 65% give in more than one year at all.
Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.
Where its funders are
Pogo Park draws 60% of its grant income from funders outside California, across 8 states in all.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $3.0M arriving through sponsors registered in 8 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Against its field
Pogo Park has grown faster than three-quarters of the 2,728 recreation & sports nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 2,728 recreation & sports nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2024
Organizations like Pogo Park
Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In California
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
94% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Public support
89%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Footprint & structure
Files a return copy in 1 state
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Pogo Park: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds Pogo Park?
- Pogo Park (California) receives grants from 34 organizations whose IRS filings report $6,995,788 to it, the largest being FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ($1,398,200). 22 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does Pogo Park have?
- IRS filings report 34 organizations giving $6,995,788 in grants to Pogo Park, 22 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of Pogo Park?
- FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND is the largest funder on record, with $1,398,200 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like Pogo Park find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
Play a game about who funds Pogo Park →
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 34 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing