· Public charity
AIDS United
AIDS UNITED's mission is to end the aids epidemic in the united states.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 108 grants below total $5,157,168 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $5,657,388 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $500,220 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k12 grants · $86k
- $10k–50k66 grants · $1.3M
- $50k–250k30 grants · $3.7M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NEWARK BETH ISRAEL MEDICAL CENTER | $231,996 |
| THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS | $222,930 |
| COOPER UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL EIP | $179,670 |
| HEALTH EMERGENCY LIFELINE PROGRAMS | $169,830 |
| AIDS TASKFORCE OF GREATER CLEVELAND | $168,917 |
| GEORGIA HARM REDUCTION COALITION INC | $168,198 |
| POSITIVE IMPACT HEALTH CENTERS INC | $167,117 |
| HIV ALLIANCE | $161,414 |
| OUR LADY OF THE LAKE HOSPITAL INC | $154,031 |
| YALE UNIVERSITY | $151,312 |
| VIVENT HEALTH | $150,016 |
| THE REGENTS AT THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO | $149,213 |
| UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER | $148,839 |
| DAP HEALTH INC | $131,309 |
| BIRMINGHAM AIDS OUTREACH | $130,560 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $4.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 90% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +95% since the first grant, against +47% for the ones you funded once.
187 repeat relationships — 55 still active in FY2024, 132 since wound down; 52 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.6M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PIPOSITIVE IMPACT HEALTH CENTERS INC7× · 2017–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +974%
- TCTHE COOPER HEALTH SYSTEM A NEW JERSEY NON-PROFIT CORPORATION6× · 2017–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +96%
- EFEQUALITY FOUNDATION OF GA INC5× · 2017–2024 · $1.0M · revenue +65% · 31% of their budget
Funded once
- YSYoung Scholars For Academic Empowerment dba TruEvolution Incone grant, 2020 · $120k · revenue -35%
- NINAESM INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $109k · revenue +418%
- SASELMA AIR INCgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $104k · revenue +37%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide HIV/STD testing and support for those affected
Hiv/aids counseling/assistance
Aids community resources, inc. d/b/a acr health, is a community-based organization providing prevention, education, and support services to people with chronic illnesses, including hiv/aids, and those at risk for contracting hiv, stds, and…
Alianza's mission is to empower hard-to-reach, vulnerable, and underserved populations through education and supportive services aimed at working with everyone we serve to achieve better outcomes and higher quality of life.
Provides housing and support services to individuals and families impacted by hiv/aids
Aids service center of lower manhattan, inc., d/b/a alliance for positive change ("alliance") is a not-for-profit community organization founded in 1990 with a central mission of helping low-income new yorkers living with hiv and other…
Stap compassionately and competently meets the evolving needs of its communities by serving people affected by chronic illness and to improve public health through disease prevention, care coordination, and advocacy.
To promote health, well-being, and social justice for those living with HIV, LGBTQ+ individuals, and communities marginalized by society.
To address the health issues of persons living with HIV/AIDS.
San francisco aids foundation promotes health, wellness, and social justice for communities most impacted by hiv, through sexual health and substance use services, advocacy, and community partnerships.
To seek justice through health and housing.
To define, promote, and improve access to healthcare services and supports for people living with HIV/AIDS and/or viral hepatitis through advocacy, education, and networking. These services must be affordable to the people who need them…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Voices of Community Activists & Leaders (Vocal-Ny) Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Health Foundation of Greater Indianapolis Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 5% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
308 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 308 of the 370 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NEWARK BETH ISRAEL MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds POSITIVE IMPACT HEALTH CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds THE COOPER HEALTH SYSTEM A NEW JERSEY NON-PROFIT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds EQUALITY FOUNDATION OF GA INC ↗
- Who funds CENTRO ARARAT INC ↗
- Who funds Birmingham AIDS Outreach Inc ↗
- Who funds SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC ↗
- Who funds AIDS TASKFORCE OF GREATER CLEVELAND INC ↗
- Who funds AIDS CARE GROUP ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds Western North Carolina AIDS Project Inc ↗
- Who funds GRADY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds The Research Foundation for The State University of New York ↗
- Who funds University of Kentucky Research Foundation ↗
- Who funds HEALTH EMERGENCY LIFELINE PROGRAMS ↗
- Who funds MEHARRY MEDICAL COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN AIDS COALITION ↗
- Who funds Howard Brown Health Center ↗
- Who funds North Carolina Aids Action Network ↗
- Who funds PREVENTION POINT PHILADELPHIA INC ↗
- Who funds MOVEMENT STRATEGY CENTER ↗
- Who funds NOAIDS TASK FORCE ↗
- Who funds CAPITOL AREA REENTRY PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds LA CLINICA DEL PUEBLO INC ↗
- Who funds BROWARD HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds MISSISSIPPI CENTER FOR JUSTICE ↗
- Who funds Our Lady of the Lake Hospital Inc ↗
- Who funds HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM ↗
- Who funds THRIVE SS INC ↗
- Who funds MULTICULTURAL AIDS COALITION INC ↗
- Who funds THE POVERELLO CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds NORTH JERSEY AIDS ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds Helping Everyone Receive Ongoing Effective Support ↗
- Who funds VIVENT HEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds HIV ALLIANCE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Elton John AIDS Foundation Inc · Broadway Caresequity Fights AIDS Inc · The Mac AIDS Fund · Borealis Philanthropy · Emory University · The Estee Lauder Companies Charitable Foundation · National Alliance of State and Territorial AIDS Directorsdba Nastad · The Elizabeth Taylor AIDS Foundation · AIDS Healthcare Foundation · Drug Policy Alliance · National Harm Reduction Coalition · Groundswell Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization AIDS United funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Hiv Alliance — 54% of income from government
- Connecticut Harm Reduction Alliance Inc — 43% of income from government
- Multicultural Aids Coalition Inc — 41% of income from government
- Greater Lawrence Family Health Center Inc — 40% of income from government
- Guiding Right Inc — 28% of income from government
- North Jersey Aids Alliance Inc — 26% of income from government
- Basic Nwfl Inc — 23% of income from government
- Yale University — 12% of income from government
- Hyacinth Aids Foundation Inc — 9% of income from government
- Rebel Recovery Florida Inc — 8% of income from government
- University of Miami — 5% of income from government
- Broward House Inc — 5% of income from government
- Latinos Salud Inc — 2% of income from government
- The Cooper Health System a New Jersey Non-Profit Corporation — 0% of income from government
- Big Bend Cares Inc — 0% of income from government
- Prevention 305 Inc — 0% of income from government
- Miracle of Love Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.