· Public charity
Association of State and Territorial Health Officials
To support, equip, and advocate for state and territorial health officials in their work of advancing the public's health and well-being.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 21 grants below total $2,106,109 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $5,562,232 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $3,456,123 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $8k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $134k
- $50k–250k13 grants · $1.0M
- $250k+2 grants · $936k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| COMPTROLLER OF MARYLAND DBA MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH | $615,000 |
| DEPARTMENT OF VERMONT HEALTH ACCESS | $321,213 |
| BIG CITIES HEALTH COALITION ASTHO-PHIP | $124,306 |
| COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF KERN | $105,000 |
| COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM FOR CENTRAL ARKANSAS | $100,000 |
| ENRICHMENT SERVICES PROGRAM INC | $100,000 |
| COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS | $90,000 |
| COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS DPH | $84,493 |
| HEALTH RESEARCH INC | $75,000 |
| GUAM'S ALTERNATIVE LIFESTYLE ASSOCIATION | $75,000 |
| CNMI COMMONWEALTH HEALTHCARE CORP | $75,000 |
| IOWA DEPT OF PUBLIC HEALTH | $50,000 |
| CENTER FOR MULTICULTURAL HEALTH | $50,000 |
| GRAND RAPIDS URBAN LEAGUE | $50,000 |
| LATINO CONNECTION LLC | $50,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your US giving — 80% of grant dollars ($37M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 20% that went abroad ($9.2M) is mapped below.
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $3.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
Beyond the US — 20% of all-years giving ($9.2M)
5 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 14% of Association of State and Territorial Health Officials’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
91 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2024, 72 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- RTResearch Triangle Institute3× · 2021–2023 · $1.7M · revenue +30%
- NANATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COUNTY AND CITY HEALTH OFFICALS3× · 2021–2023 · $1.4M · revenue +85%
- NCNATIONAL COALITION OF STD DIRECTORS3× · 2020–2022 · $1.0M · revenue +20%
Funded once
- CACOMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIPone grant, 2023 · $641k · revenue -33%
- NCNATIONAL COMMUNITY ACTION FOUNDATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $281k · revenue +25%
- PRPUERTO RICO DEPT OF HEALTH (EXECUSOURCE LLC)one grant, 2020 · $214k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The association of academic health centers (aahc) seeks to improve the nation's health care system by mobilizing and enhancing the strengths and resources of the academic health center enterprise in health professions, education, patient…
To provide optimal, equitable health and well-being for all.
Ahip is the national trade association representing the health insurance industry. ahip's members provide health care coverage, services and solutions to more than 200 million americans. we are committed to market-based solutions and…
Public health institute generates and promotes research, leadership and partnerships to build capacity for strong public health policy, programs, systems and practices.
To advance the health of all individuals and communities. The AHA leads, represents and serves hospitals, health systems and other related organizations that are accountable to the community and committed to equitable care and health…
Collaborating with our members and stakeholders, vhha works to ensure the sustainability of virginia's health care system and improve the health of all virginians.
Aupha fosters excellence and innovation in healthcare management and health policy education.
The national nurse-led care consortium (nncc) strives to advance nurse-led healthcare through policy, consultation, and programs to reduce health disparities and meet people's primary care and wellness needs.
To accelerate the nation's progress towards safe, efficient, high - quality health care and the improved health status of the american population.
Cahiim's mission is to provide innovative leadership that drives enhanced workforce competence by ensuring educational excellence. cahiim serves the public interest in advancing the value of health informatics and health information…
The american college health association (acha) serves as the principal leadership organization for advancing the health of college students and campus communities through advocacy, education, and research.
The mission of the Oklahoma Hospital Association is to promote the welfare of the public by representing its members and advocating on their behalf, providing services to assist its members in meeting the health care needs of their…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Civitas Networks for Health Association and the most unlike its peers is Mama Bird Doula Services. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.7% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
79 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 79 of the 148 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PUERTO RICO SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY AND RESEARCH TRUST ↗
- Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
- Who funds Research Triangle Institute ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COUNTY AND CITY HEALTH OFFICALS ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL COALITION OF STD DIRECTORS ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL PUBLIC HEALTH INFORMATION COALITION INC ↗
- Who funds Association of Immunization Managers ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM FOR CENTRAL ARKANSAS ↗
- Who funds ENRICHMENT SERVICES PROGRAMINC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF KERN ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN IMMUNIZATION REGISTRY ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP ↗
- Who funds CHARLESTON COUNTY HUMAN SERVICES COMMISSION INC ↗
- Who funds PICKENS COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION COMMITTEE & CDC INC ↗
- Who funds CIVITAS NETWORKS FOR HEALTH ↗
- Who funds WEST VIRGINIA HEALTH INFORMATION NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds PACIFIC ISLAND HEALTH OFFICERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds Healthy Schools Campaign ↗
- Who funds HEALTH RESEARCH INC ↗
- Who funds ACOG FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GUAMS ALTERNATIVE LIFESTYLE ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds HEALTH RESOURCES IN ACTION INC ↗
- Who funds COLORADO COMMUNITY MANAGED CARE NETWORK ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL COMMUNITY ACTION FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists Inc · Association of Public Health Laboratories Inc · Association of Maternal and Child Health Programs · Investor Protection Trust · North American Association of Central Cancer Registries · National Foundation for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Inc · The Pew Charitable Trusts · National Network of Public Health Institutes Inc · American Bar Association · Recreational Boating and Fishing Foundation · National Fish and Wildlife Foundation · Yale University
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Association of State and Territorial Health Officials funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Big Cities Health Coalition Inc — 100% of income from government
- Informed Green Solutions Inc — 100% of income from government
- Association of Immunization Managers — 52% of income from government
- Health Resources in Action Inc — 39% of income from government
- National Center for Healthy Housing Inc — 24% of income from government
- Medical Society of Delaware — 20% of income from government
- Brandeis University — 9% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
- Sky Lakes Medical Center Foundation — 2% of income from government
- The University of Vermont Medical Center — 1% of income from government
- Association of Public Health Laboratories Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.