Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Private foundation

De Beaumont Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.4M
Granted FY2024still arriving
34
Grants FY2024still arriving
11
States reached
$750k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.

Health$15MPhilanthropy$3.3MEducation$3.0MHousing & Shelter$1.8MSocial Science$1.5MCommunity Improvement$1.4MCivil Rights$1.1MHuman Services$700kOther$0
02FY2024 · 34 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k12 grants · $44k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $295k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $579k
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.5M
$15,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$164M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VOSE RIVER CHARITABLE FUND$750,000
VOSE RIVER CHARITABLE FUND$469,649
PUBLIC GOOD PROJECTS$276,600
INCLUSION NEXTWORK INC$160,000
MEHARRY MEDICAL COLLEGE$125,000
VOSE RIVER CHARITABLE FUND$125,000
JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY$98,559
WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES$70,000
PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE$44,500
VOSE RIVER CHARITABLE FUND$43,000
BOSTON COLLEGE TRUSTEES$30,000
ASSOCIATION OF CHAMBER OF COMMERCE EXECUTIVES FOUNDATION$25,000
SEA EDUCATION ASSOCIATION INC$25,000
THE TASK FORCE FOR GLOBAL HEALTH INC$25,000
SHERIFFS MEADOW FOUNDATION$20,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $1.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 64% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICE: $150k → 12%TIDES CENTER: $150k → 10%BLACK HEALTH COMMISSION: $2k → 11%THE TASK FORCE FOR GLOBAL HEALTH INC: $25k → 14%SISTER CARMEN COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $100k → 12%NEW BRUNSWICK TOMORROW: $150k → 8%BAYOU DISTRICT FOUNDATION: $150k → 23%NORTHERN KENTUCKY REGIONAL ALLIANCE INC: $81k → 11%HEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICE: $100k → 12%NEW BRUNSWICK TOMORROW: $100k → 8%BAYOU DISTRICT FOUNDATION: $100k → 23%NORTHERN KENTUCKY REGIONAL ALLIANCE INC: $19k → 11%NEW BRUNSWICK TOMORROW: $20k → 8%BAYOU DISTRICT FOUNDATION: $4k → 23%BOSTON HEALTH CARE FOR THE HOMELESS PROGRAM INC: $5k → 16%NEW BRUNSWICK TOMORROW: $4k → 8%BOSTON HEALTH CARE FOR THE HOMELESS PROGRAM INC: $5k → 16%NEW BRUNSWICK TOMORROW: $900 → 8%BOSTON HEALTH CARE FOR THE HOMELESS PROGRAM INC: $5k → 16%COVENANT HOUSE: $10k → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
WA
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
NV
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
TN
NC
SC
DC
OK
LA
MS
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$23M · 71 repeat orgs$6.3M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +43% since the first grant, against +31% for the ones you funded once.

71 repeat relationships — 20 still active in FY2024, 51 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

71
65

Total granted

$23M
$5.9M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+31%

Still filing today

93%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $354k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VR
    VOSE RIVER CHARITABLE FUND
    4× · 2021–2024 · $4.7M · revenue +138% · 26% of their budget
  • NEO Philanthropy Inc
    3× · 2018–2020 · $2.4M · revenue +103%
  • AP
    AMERICAN PUBLIC HEALTH ASSOCIATION
    5× · 2018–2024 · $1.4M · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • THE ASPEN INSTITUTE INCgraduated
    2× · 2018–2020 · $1.5M · revenue +231%
  • TP
    THE PUBLIC GOODS PROJECTS INC
    one grant, 2023 · $500k
  • NF
    NATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR THE CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION INCgraduated
    2× · 2018–2021 · $488k · revenue +170%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Public Health Institute

Public health institute generates and promotes research, leadership and partnerships to build capacity for strong public health policy, programs, systems and practices.

Health
2
American College Health Association

The american college health association (acha) serves as the principal leadership organization for advancing the health of college students and campus communities through advocacy, education, and research.

Health
3
National Nurse-Led Care Consortium

The national nurse-led care consortium (nncc) strives to advance nurse-led healthcare through policy, consultation, and programs to reduce health disparities and meet people's primary care and wellness needs.

Health
4
University Health Inc

Primary functions are the coordination and delivery of health care resources and services, health care education for the hospital service area, long range analysis of health care needs and development of programs, and arranging for…

—
5
Intealth

See schedule oto serve the public by:- assuring the qualifications of health care professionals- providing primary-source verification of credentials of health careprofessionals, as they serve throughout the world- supporting international…

Education
6
The Greater Detroit Health Transition Company

Gdahc mission: together with our partners, we empower and improve the health and economic vitality of individuals, organizations and communities by catalyzing the power of collaboration. gdahc vision: healthy people. healthy community.…

—
7
America's Health Insurance Plans Inc

Ahip is the national trade association representing the health insurance industry. ahip's members provide health care coverage, services and solutions to more than 200 million americans. we are committed to market-based solutions and…

Membership Benefit
8
Highmark Health

As the parent entity of a blended health organization, highmark health seeks to improve the health and well-being of the people and communities it serves by providing affordable, accessible and high-quality healthcare.

Health
9
University of Maryland Anesthesiology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
10
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
11
National Coalition On Health Care

The mission of the national coalition on health care (nchc) is to support research and analysis, develop and promote policy solutions, build consensus, and engage the public in order to ensure that america has a high quality health system…

Health
12
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Michigan Public Health Institute and the most unlike its peers is Los Angeles Dysautonomia Network. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyHealth Access Advocacy and …Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Senior Support ServicesPregnancy Support ServicesEnvironmental Conservation …Cancer Support ServicesWomen & Girls Leadership De…Community FoundationsAffordable Housing Developm…Policy Research and AdvocacyUnited Way AffiliatesAffordable Housing Construc…Child Abuse Advocacy Servic…Community Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%2%<5yr14%3%5–10yr19%14%10–20yr16%29%20–35yr13%21%35–55yr16%31%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%18%5–10yr19%12%10–20yr16%25%20–35yr13%18%35–55yr16%27%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/139
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,426

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

131 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 131 of the 149 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
28
Early backer (in before they grew)
129/131
Grantees still filing
99/131
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

VOSE RIVER CHARITABLE FUND — $4,740,864 · HealthVOSE RIVER CHARITABLE FUNDAMERICAN PUBLIC HEALTH ASSOCIATION — $1,356,775 · HealthAMERICAN PUBLIC HEALTH ASSOCIATIONASSOCIATION OF STATE AND TERRITORIAL HEALTH OFFICIALS — $1,029,051 · HealthASSOCIATION OF STATE AND TERRITORIAL HEAL…Public Health Accreditation Board — $407,131 · HealthNATIONAL NETWORK OF PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTES INC — $400,000 · HealthTHE PUBLIC GOOD PROJECTS INC — $376,600 · Health+34 more — $2,666,654 · Health+34 moreTHE PUBLIC GOODS PROJECTS INC — $500,000 · OtherTHE PUBLIC GOODS PROJECTS INCWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES — $420,000 · OtherASSOCIATION OF PUBLIC HEALTH LABORATORIES INC — $361,057 · OtherGREENSBORO HOUSING COALITION INC — $354,000 · OtherNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR THE CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION INC — $488,319 · OtherNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR THE CE…UNITED WAY OF GREATER MILWAUKEE & WAUKESHA COUNTY INC — $274,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S LAW CENTER INC — $399,000 · OtherLIVEWELL GREENVILLE — $274,000 · Other+58 more — $5,049,290 · Other+58 moreDREXEL UNIVERSITY — $1,253,000 · EducationDREXEL UNIVERS…EQUAL MEASURE — $935,905 · EducationEQUAL MEASUREDUKE UNIVERSITY — $634,088 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSIT…TRUST FOR AMERICAS HEALTH — $202,500 · EducationTRUST FOR AMER…ASSOCIATION OF SCHOOLS AND PROGRAMS OF PUBLIC HEALTH INC — $160,696 · Education+17 more — $610,629 · Education+17 moreNEO Philanthropy Inc — $2,355,335 · Public BenefitNEO Philanthr…ChangeLab Solutions — $1,120,000 · Public BenefitChangeLab Sol…+2 more — $103,000 · Public BenefitTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC — $1,471,293 · Social Science+1 more — $10,000 · Social ScienceNew Brunswick Tomorrow — $274,900 · Human ServicesBAYOU DISTRICT FOUNDATION — $254,000 · Human ServicesHEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICE — $250,000 · Human ServicesTIDES CENTER — $154,000 · Human ServicesONE NKY ALLIANCE INC — $100,050 · Human ServicesSISTER CARMEN COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $100,000 · Human Services+4 more — $61,500 · Human ServicesPARKSIDE BUSINESS & COMMUNITY IN PARTNERSHIP INC — $254,000 · Housing & ShelterAvenue Community Development Corporation — $125,000 · Housing & ShelterPOLK COUNTY HOUSING TRUST FUND — $118,200 · Housing & ShelterFRIENDS OF BOSTON'S HOMELESS INC — $105,000 · Housing & ShelterTHE COMMUNITY BUILDERS INC — $103,000 · Housing & Shelter
Health$10,977,075Other$8,119,666Education$3,796,818Public Benefit$3,578,335Social Science$1,481,293Human Services$1,194,450Housing & Shelter$705,200

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetVOSE RIVER CHARITABLE FUND — $4,740,864 over 4y, 26% of budgetNEO Philanthropy Inc — $2,355,335 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC — $1,471,293 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetAMERICAN PUBLIC HEALTH ASSOCIATION — $1,356,775 over 5y, 2.8% of budgetDREXEL UNIVERSITY — $1,253,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetChangeLab Solutions — $1,120,000 over 4y, 6.7% of budgetASSOCIATION OF STATE AND TERRITORIAL HEALTH OFFICIALS — $1,029,051 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetEQUAL MEASURE — $935,905 over 5y, 6.2% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY — $634,088 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR THE CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION INC — $488,319 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetPublic Health Accreditation Board — $407,131 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetNATIONAL NETWORK OF PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTES INC — $400,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S LAW CENTER INC — $399,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetTHE PUBLIC GOOD PROJECTS INC — $376,600 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetASSOCIATION OF PUBLIC HEALTH LABORATORIES INC — $361,057 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetGREENSBORO HOUSING COALITION INC — $354,000 over 4y, 20% of budgetBIG CITIES HEALTH COALITION INC — $301,115 over 1y, 15% of budgetMICHIGAN PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE — $300,469 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetNew Brunswick Tomorrow — $274,900 over 3y, 8.3% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER MILWAUKEE & WAUKESHA COUNTY INC — $274,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetLIVEWELL GREENVILLE — $274,000 over 3y, 22% of budgetBAYOU DISTRICT FOUNDATION — $254,000 over 3y, 5.6% of budgetPARKSIDE BUSINESS & COMMUNITY IN PARTNERSHIP INC — $254,000 over 3y, 18% of budgetDELTA HEALTH ALLIANCE INC — $254,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCROSSROADS COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $254,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetTRUCKEE MEADOWS HEALTHY COMMUNITIES — $254,000 over 2y, 59% of budgetADVOCATES FOR HEALTHY CITIZENS DBA HEALTHNET GASTON — $254,000 over 3y, 26% of budgetPEE DEE COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP INC — $250,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetEAST BAY ASIAN LOCAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $250,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetHEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICE — $250,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetCOUNCIL OF STATE AND TERRITORIAL EPIDEMIOLOGISTS INC — $246,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetAMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS — $219,408 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCENTER FOR HEALTH POLICY DEVELOPMENT — $218,852 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY — $212,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTRUST FOR AMERICAS HEALTH — $202,500 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetPrevention Institute — $178,499 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetSEA EDUCATION ASSOCIATION INC — $175,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetEVERGREEN HABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $170,600 over 2y, 8.5% of budgetASSOCIATION OF SCHOOLS AND PROGRAMS OF PUBLIC HEALTH INC — $160,696 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetINCLUSION NEXTWORK INC — $160,000 over 1y, 41% of budgetSHERIFF'S MEADOW FOUNDATION — $157,500 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetLOUISIANA PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE — $155,770 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTIDES CENTER — $154,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE TEXAS HILL COUNTRY INC — $154,000 over 2y, 5.8% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH WATCH — $150,000 over 3y, 17% of budgetNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COUNTY AND CITY HEALTH OFFICALS — $140,021 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTRENTON HEALTH TEAM INC — $131,000 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetAvenue Community Development Corporation — $125,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Kresge FoundationThe Robert Wood Johns…National Foundation f…WK Kellogg FoundationVose River Charitable…East Bay Community Fo…National Network of P…Annie E Casey Foundat…Association of Matern…Association of State …Kaiser Foundation Hea…President and Fellows…
The Kresge FoundationMI32.1× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Kresge Foundation · The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation · National Foundation for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Inc · WK Kellogg Foundation · Vose River Charitable Fund · East Bay Community Foundation · National Network of Public Health Institutes Inc · Annie E Casey Foundation Inc · Association of Maternal and Child Health Programs · Association of State and Territorial Health Officials · Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Inc · President and Fellows of Harvard College

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization De Beaumont Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • Big Cities Health Coalition Inc — 100% of income from government
  • New Brunswick Tomorrow — 74% of income from government
  • Trenton Health Team Inc — 31% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
  • Health Care for All Inc — 29% of income from government
  • Marine Biological Laboratory — 20% of income from government
  • Gatekeepers Corporation — 13% of income from government
  • Trustees of Tufts College — 13% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University — 12% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
  • Sea Education Association Inc — 12% of income from government
  • Sudbury Valley Trustees Inc — 11% of income from government
  • Mental Health Association in Tulsa Inc dba Mental Health Association Oklahoma — 8% of income from government
  • Boston Health Care for the Homeless Program Inc — 8% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
  • The Community Builders Inc — 4% of income from government
  • Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts Inc — 3% of income from government
  • Third Sector New England Inc — 3% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston College — 3% of income from government
  • Sheriff's Meadow Foundation — 2% of income from government
  • Massachusetts Audubon Society Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Association of Public Health Laboratories Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
25report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 149 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines