Loading…
Loading…
Maryland · Nonprofit
BIG CITIES HEALTH COALITION INC (Maryland) is funded by 8 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $2,351,623 in grants to it, the largest being THE KRESGE FOUNDATION ($701,000). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
BIG CITIES HEALTH COALITION INC is better cushioned than half of the 6,792 health nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 6,792 health nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2024
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
The funding model — what share of revenue comes from contributions, programs, investments and other sources — and whether it's shifting.
Government-grant reliance: 2024 70%. Grants only — government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.
99% of BIG CITIES HEALTH COALITION INC’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (52% for the typical peer).
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 3 reported years ran a deficit.
The base broadened — 2 funders to 4 as grant income moved $489k → $567k.
From the IRS filings of BIG CITIES HEALTH COALITION INC’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.
BIG CITIES HEALTH COALITION INC has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 30% of grant income, and it takes 3 funders to reach half.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2022 59% · 2023 39% · 2024 37% — diversifying over time.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
BIG CITIES HEALTH COALITION INC draws 75% of its grant income from funders outside Maryland — its reputation reaches beyond the state, across 5 states in all.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 8 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $5.8M on record.
Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
84% of spending goes to programs.
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2022–2024), and the filings of 8funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing