Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

National Network of Public Health Institutes Inc

The national network of public health institutes, inc.

$17M
Granted FY2025still arriving
55
Grants FY2025still arriving
26
States reached
$1.3M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0167% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.

Health$30MEducation$3.6MCommunity Improvement$2.1MScience & Tech$1.8MCivil Rights$1.3MHuman Services$1.1MFood & Nutrition$973kInternational$388kPublic Benefit$319kOther$22M
02FY2025 · 55 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 55 grants below total $9,395,626 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $17,453,535 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $8,057,909 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k20 grants · $630k
  • $50k–250k20 grants · $2.1M
  • $250k+12 grants · $6.7M
$54,580
Median grant
26
States reached
$14M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MICHIGAN PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE (MPHI)$1,316,252
UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON$855,207
PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE (PHI)$783,341
PUBLIC HEALTH MANAGEMENT CORPORATION (PHMC)$702,882
HEALTH RESOURCES IN ACTION (HRIA)$534,563
KANSAS HEALTH INSTITUTE$435,177
MISSISSIPPI PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE$406,379
VOSE RIVER CHARITABLE FUND$397,386
TRAILHEAD INSTITUTE$342,592
TEXAS HEALTH INSTITUTE (THI)$297,886
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CORONERS & MEDICAL EXAMINERS$297,085
LOUISIANA PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE$294,447
NATIONAL INDIAN HEALTH BOARD (NIHB)$206,213
NORTH CAROLINA INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC HEALTH$191,805
THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN$183,430
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 85% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HOPE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $54k → 10%COMMUNITY MINISTRY OF PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY: $10k → 11%NORTHERN VIRGINIA FAMILY SERVICE: $27k → 6%SOMALI HEALTH BOARD: $60k → 9%CHIEF SEATTLE CLUB: $14k → 9%INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC HEALTH INNOVATION (IPHI): $210k → 14%INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC HEALTH INNOVATION (IPHI): $168k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $154k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $112k → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $86k → 14%INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC HEALTH INNOVATION (IPHI): $39k → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $60k → 14%INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC HEALTH INNOVATION (IPHI): $32k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $32k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
ME
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
IA
IN
OH
PA
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
KY
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$60M · 84 repeat orgs$2.7M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +13% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

84 repeat relationships — 45 still active in FY2025, 39 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

84
86

Total granted

$60M
$2.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
0%

Still filing today

67%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $459k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementScience & TechCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Public Health Institute
    9× · 2017–2025 · $7.5M · revenue +130%
  • MICHIGAN PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE
    7× · 2019–2025 · $6.6M · revenue +103%
  • HEALTH RESOURCES IN ACTION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $3.8M · revenue +537%

Funded once

  • IU
    Indiana University School of Medicine
    one grant, 2024 · $336k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOR MEDICAL SCIENCES
    one grant, 2022 · $201k
  • SO
    STATE OF TENNESSEE
    one grant, 2021 · $78k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pacific Health Research & Education Institute

See schedule ophrei conducts health research and education that improves the health and well-being of veterans and all people in hawaii, central california, the pacific region, and throughout the u.s. driven by the values of excellence and…

—
2
Altarum Institute

Altarum is focused on improving the health of individuals with fewer financial resources and populations disenfranchised by the health care system. we drive impactful changes in four domains: 1) transform health service delivery - we work…

Science & Tech
3
Intealth

See schedule oto serve the public by:- assuring the qualifications of health care professionals- providing primary-source verification of credentials of health careprofessionals, as they serve throughout the world- supporting international…

Education
4
National Network of Public Health Institutes Inc

The national network of public health institutes, inc. (nnphi) is a national public health organization chartered on june 21, 2001. its mission is to support national public health system initiatives and strengthen public health institutes…

Health
5
American Public Health Association

To provide optimal, equitable health and well-being for all.

Health
6
Access to Advanced Health Institute

Aahi is a nonprofit biotech research institute, bringing together the best experts, technologies, and platforms to create accessible, high-quality products and solutions for harnessing the immune system to alleviate disease.

Health
7
University Health Inc

Primary functions are the coordination and delivery of health care resources and services, health care education for the hospital service area, long range analysis of health care needs and development of programs, and arranging for…

—
8
The Public Health Foundation

Advance the public health workforce to achieve organizational excellence.

—
9
National Institute for Public Employee Health Care

Our mission is to advance and safeguard the interests of public sector employees, retirees, and dependents by promoting access to affordable, high-quality health care. through policy research and analysis, we aim to raise awareness and…

Health
10
America's Health Insurance Plans Inc

Ahip is the national trade association representing the health insurance industry. ahip's members provide health care coverage, services and solutions to more than 200 million americans. we are committed to market-based solutions and…

Membership Benefit
11
Indiana University Health Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
12
Indiana University Health Care Associates Inc

To deliver preeminent medical care and service to our patients and communities through outstanding and innovative medical leadership and practice, while participating in and supporting excellence in education and research. We achieve this…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Michigan Public Health Institute and the most unlike its peers is The Fredric Rieders Family Renaissance Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsCommunity College Foundatio…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Policy Research and AdvocacySenior Support ServicesDomestic Violence ServicesImmigrant Worker SupportHealth Access Advocacy and …
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%1%<5yr14%7%5–10yr19%22%10–20yr16%28%20–35yr13%17%35–55yr16%25%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%2%<5yr14%5%5–10yr19%8%10–20yr16%14%20–35yr13%35%35–55yr16%36%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/180
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,385

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

91 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 91 of the 181 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

6
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
20
Early backer (in before they grew)
89/91
Grantees still filing
54/91
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Public Health Institute — $7,530,243 · HealthPublic Health InstituteMICHIGAN PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE — $6,602,582 · HealthMICHIGAN PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTEPublic Health Management Corporation — $3,271,815 · HealthPublic Health Management CorporationTEXAS HEALTH INSTITUTE — $2,427,450 · HealthTEXAS HEALTH INSTITUTELOUISIANA PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE — $1,908,709 · HealthLOUISIANA PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTETRAILHEAD INSTITUTE — $1,594,855 · HealthTRAILHEAD INSTITUTEVOSE RIVER CHARITABLE FUND — $1,158,947 · HealthMISSISSIPPI PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE — $1,011,902 · Health+25 more — $4,343,808 · Health+25 moreUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON — $5,713,481 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTONHEALTH RESOURCES IN ACTION INC — $3,811,754 · OtherHEALTH RESOURCES IN ACTION INCUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL — $2,113,417 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HI…INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CORONERS & MEDICAL EXAMINERS — $1,207,753 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN — $919,938 · OtherINTER-TRIBAL COUNCIL OF MICHIGAN INC — $972,935 · Other+108 more — $8,441,331 · Other+108 moreGEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC — $987,341 · EducationEmory University — $596,941 · EducationTHE FREDRIC RIEDERS FAMILY RENAISSANCE FOUNDATION — $576,075 · EducationFRAMEWORKS INSTITUTE — $376,741 · EducationICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI — $208,444 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $175,263 · EducationTemple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education — $159,311 · Education+9 more — $528,866 · EducationDOLORES C HUERTA FOUNDATION — $926,237 · Community ImprovementCHINESE AMERICAN CHAMBER OF COMMERC — $925,500 · Community ImprovementMOSES (METROPOLITAN ORGANIZING STRATEGY ENABLING STRENGTH) — $171,370 · Community Improvement+2 more — $119,549 · Community ImprovementPUERTO RICO SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY AND RESEARCH TRUST — $853,924 · Science & TechKANSAS HEALTH INSTITUTE — $853,619 · Science & Tech+1 more — $54,580 · Science & TechAFRICAN FAMILY HEALTH ORGANIZATION — $921,328 · Civil RightsALLIANCE OF TRIBAL COALITIONS TO END VIOLENCE — $214,227 · Civil RightsTruNorth Foundation — $122,832 · Civil RightsINSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC HEALTH INNOVATION — $449,316 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $444,134 · Human ServicesSOMALI HEALTH BOARD — $59,999 · Human ServicesHOPE COMMUNITY SERVICE INC — $54,368 · Human Services+3 more — $50,923 · Human Services
Health$29,850,311Other$23,180,609Education$3,608,982Community Improvement$2,142,656Science & Tech$1,762,123Civil Rights$1,258,387Human Services$1,058,740

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPublic Health Institute — $7,530,243 over 9y, 2.1% of budgetMICHIGAN PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE — $6,602,582 over 7y, 1.6% of budgetHEALTH RESOURCES IN ACTION INC — $3,811,754 over 9y, 1.6% of budgetPublic Health Management Corporation — $3,271,815 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetTEXAS HEALTH INSTITUTE — $2,427,450 over 9y, 28% of budgetLOUISIANA PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE — $1,908,709 over 7y, 5.2% of budgetTRAILHEAD INSTITUTE — $1,594,855 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetINTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CORONERS & MEDICAL EXAMINERS — $1,207,753 over 5y, 38% of budgetVOSE RIVER CHARITABLE FUND — $1,158,947 over 2y, 4.7% of budgetMISSISSIPPI PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE — $1,011,902 over 4y, 4.2% of budgetGEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC — $987,341 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetINTER-TRIBAL COUNCIL OF MICHIGAN INC — $972,935 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetDOLORES C HUERTA FOUNDATION — $926,237 over 4y, 3.9% of budgetCHINESE AMERICAN CHAMBER OF COMMERC — $925,500 over 3y, 35% of budgetAFRICAN FAMILY HEALTH ORGANIZATION — $921,328 over 3y, 30% of budgetPUBLIC HEALTH SOLUTIONS — $910,244 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetOCHIN INC — $863,256 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetPUERTO RICO SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY AND RESEARCH TRUST — $853,924 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetKANSAS HEALTH INSTITUTE — $853,619 over 3y, 8.4% of budgetIllinois Public Health Institute — $610,719 over 7y, 2.7% of budgetNATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR QUALITY ASSURANCE — $605,722 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetFlorida Public Health Institute Inc — $599,957 over 3y, 52% of budgetEmory University — $596,941 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FREDRIC RIEDERS FAMILY RENAISSANCE FOUNDATION — $576,075 over 5y, 6.1% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC HEALTH INNOVATION — $449,316 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $444,134 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR POPULATION HEALTH INC — $398,263 over 3y, 4.7% of budgetPROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $388,003 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFRAMEWORKS INSTITUTE — $376,741 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetTHE OHIO ORGANIZING COLLABORATIVE — $319,064 over 3y, 4.4% of budgetNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION — $285,040 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetALLIANCE OF TRIBAL COALITIONS TO END VIOLENCE — $214,227 over 2y, 32% of budgetICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI — $208,444 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY — $206,263 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL OPINION RESEARCH CENTER — $200,879 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $175,263 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMOSES (METROPOLITAN ORGANIZING STRATEGY ENABLING STRENGTH) — $171,370 over 3y, 15% of budgetPROVIDENCE HEALTH & SERVICES - OREGON — $164,531 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COUNTY AND CITY HEALTH OFFICALS — $163,844 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTemple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education — $159,311 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS FOR A HEALTHIER COMMUNITY INC — $155,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetHAWAII PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE — $130,013 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTruNorth Foundation — $122,832 over 2y, 17% of budgetTHE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY — $112,533 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetASSOCIATION OF SCHOOLS AND PROGRAMS OF PUBLIC HEALTH INC — $108,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetASSOCIATION FOR PROFESSIONAL IN INFECTION CONTROL & EPIDEMOLOGY INC — $99,868 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCENTER FOR HEALTH INNOVATION — $93,000 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetCARDEA SERVICES — $90,646 over 2y, 0.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Public Health Institute ↗
  • Who funds MICHIGAN PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds HEALTH RESOURCES IN ACTION INC ↗
  • Who funds Public Health Management Corporation ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS HEALTH INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds LOUISIANA PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds TRAILHEAD INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CORONERS & MEDICAL EXAMINERS ↗
  • Who funds VOSE RIVER CHARITABLE FUND ↗
  • Who funds MISSISSIPPI PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds INTER-TRIBAL COUNCIL OF MICHIGAN INC ↗
  • Who funds DOLORES C HUERTA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHINESE AMERICAN CHAMBER OF COMMERC ↗
  • Who funds AFRICAN FAMILY HEALTH ORGANIZATION ↗
  • Who funds PUBLIC HEALTH SOLUTIONS ↗
  • Who funds OCHIN INC ↗
  • Who funds PUERTO RICO SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY AND RESEARCH TRUST ↗
  • Who funds KANSAS HEALTH INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds Illinois Public Health Institute ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR QUALITY ASSURANCE ↗
  • Who funds Florida Public Health Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds Emory University ↗
  • Who funds THE FREDRIC RIEDERS FAMILY RENAISSANCE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC HEALTH INNOVATION ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR POPULATION HEALTH INC ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FRAMEWORKS INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds THE OHIO ORGANIZING COLLABORATIVE ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Foundation f…Association of State …Center for Technology…Council of State and …American Heart Associ…Emory UniversityJohns Hopkins Univers…De Beaumont Foundatio…Association of Matern…Yale UniversityAssociation of Public…Palmettopride the Gov…
National Foundation for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention IncGA37.5× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Foundation for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Inc · Association of State and Territorial Health Officials · Center for Technology and Civic Life · Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists Inc · American Heart Association Inc · Emory University · Johns Hopkins University · De Beaumont Foundation Inc · Association of Maternal and Child Health Programs · Yale University · Association of Public Health Laboratories Inc · Palmettopride the Governor's Council on Beautification & Litter

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization National Network of Public Health Institutes Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%4%15%34%60%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Health Resources in Action Inc — 39% of income from government
  • Maryland Association of Non-Profit Organizations — 27% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University — 12% of income from government
  • Partners for a Healthier Community Inc — 11% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
  • Ochin Inc — 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
22report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 181 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines