· Public charity
Association of Public Health Laboratories Inc
Shape national and global health outcomes by promoting the value and contributions of public health laboratories and continuously improving the public health laboratory system and practice.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 62% of ASSOCIATION OF PUBLIC HEALTH LABORATORIES INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 20 grants below total $10,028,632 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $20,642,024 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $10,613,392 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $9k
- $10k–50k11 grants · $271k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $636k
- $250k+3 grants · $9.1M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR THE CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION INC | $7,839,040 |
| UNIVERSITY OF IOWA | $878,347 |
| UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA | $395,310 |
| GENETIC ALLIANCE | $219,667 |
| UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY | $177,951 |
| HEALTH RESEARCH INC | $109,498 |
| ICONNECT CONSULTING CORP | $78,300 |
| SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL | $50,700 |
| ARIZONA DEPT OF HEALTH SERVICES | $47,272 |
| REGENTS OF THE UNIV OF MN | $43,093 |
| UNIVERSITY OF PUERTO RICO | $37,967 |
| STATE OF MICHIGAN - DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES | $26,558 |
| UTAH PUBLIC HEALTH LABORATORY | $21,948 |
| THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM | $21,652 |
| CINCINNATI CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL | $20,143 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 86% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 6% of Association of Public Health Laboratories Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
47 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2024, 30 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 20% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8.0M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HRHEALTH RESEARCH INC7× · 2017–2024 · $1.8M · revenue +57%
PUBLIC HEALTH FOUNDATION ENTERPRISES INC4× · 2020–2023 · $763k · revenue +398%- AOASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN FEED CONTROL OFFICIALS INC C/O FASS2× · 2017–2018 · $363k · revenue +22%
Funded once
- AOASSOCIATION OF FOOD AND DRUG OFFICIALSgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $221k · revenue +200%
- PIPACIFIC ISLAND HEALTH OFFICERS ASSOCIATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $125k · revenue +114%
- KDKANSAS DEPT OF HEALTHone grant, 2022 · $113k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Aahi is a nonprofit biotech research institute, bringing together the best experts, technologies, and platforms to create accessible, high-quality products and solutions for harnessing the immune system to alleviate disease.
We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.
2025 was a turbulent year for the medical and health research community, but our commitment to advocating for science never wavered. from pushing back against funding threats to elevating researchers' voices and equipping advocates, we…
Shape national and global health outcomes by promoting the value and contributions of public health laboratories and continuously improving the public health laboratory system and practice.
Please see schedule o
The mission of ctc-ri is to support the continuing transformation of primary care in rhode island as the foundation of an ever-improving integrated, accessible, affordable, and equitable health care system. ctc-ri brings together critical…
To create and lead alliances and public-private partnerships that advance breakthrough biomedical discoveries and improve the quality of people's lives
Altarum is focused on improving the health of individuals with fewer financial resources and populations disenfranchised by the health care system. we drive impactful changes in four domains: 1) transform health service delivery - we work…
Strengthening and promoting the education, research, service, and practice activities of ceph-accredited schools and programs and advocating for the investment in science needed to advance population health and for evidence-based public…
The critical path institute is a catalyst in the development of new approaches that advance medical innovation and regulatory science. this is achieved by leading teams that share data, knowledge and expertise resulting in sound, consensus…
To optimize the whole-person health of the more than 400,000 residents of the western colorado medical trade area qhn serves. qhn's health information exchange (hie) improves the efficiency, timeliness, and quality of the healthcare…
Alliancechicago is the continuation of an existing effort to bring together charitable federally qualified health centers (fqhcs) to collaboratively pursue their charitable missions by better serving their disadvantaged patients with…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Foundation for Health Leadership and Innovation and the most unlike its peers is American Society for Clinical Pathology. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 70 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR THE CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION INC ↗
- Who funds HEALTH RESEARCH INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR CLINICAL PATHOLOGY ↗
- Who funds PUBLIC HEALTH FOUNDATION ENTERPRISES INC ↗
- Who funds GENETIC ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN FEED CONTROL OFFICIALS INC C/O FASS ↗
- Who funds ASSOCIATION OF FOOD AND DRUG OFFICIALS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists Inc · Association of State and Territorial Health Officials · Association of Maternal and Child Health Programs · National Foundation for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Inc · Investor Protection Trust · National Fish and Wildlife Foundation · North American Association of Central Cancer Registries · The Pew Charitable Trusts · Recreational Boating and Fishing Foundation · American Bar Association · National Environmental Health Association · Trustees of Tufts College
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Association of Public Health Laboratories Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Genetic Alliance Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.