· Public charity
New Mexico Humanities Council
The NEW MEXICO HUMANITIES COUNCIL (nmhc) supports and conducts innovative and imaginative programs throughout the state that lead to a greater understanding of, and motivate interest in, the richness of our human experience and heritage.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 13 grants below total $179,805 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $220,762 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $40,957 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k2 grants · $15k
- $10k–50k11 grants · $165k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| AFROMUNDO | $18,254 |
| EL MORROW ARTS COUNCIL | $17,250 |
| NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY | $15,029 |
| INDIGENOUS WAYS | $15,000 |
| GEORGIA O'KEEFE MUSEUM | $15,000 |
| NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF FLAMENCO | $15,000 |
| THE LEOPOLD WRITING PROGRAM | $15,000 |
| INDIAN PUEBLO CULTURAL CENTER | $14,998 |
| BASEMENT FILMS INC | $14,980 |
| CENTER | $14,407 |
| SOCIETY OF THE MUSE (SOMOS) | $10,019 |
| TAOS CENTER FOR THE ARTS | $8,052 |
| CONGREGATION NAHALAT SHALOM | $6,816 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
39 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 29 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $32k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BFBASEMENT FILMS INC8× · 2017–2025 · $69k · revenue +232% · 32% of their budget
- NINATIONAL INSTITUTE OF FLAMENCO5× · 2020–2025 · $57k · revenue +145%
- AAFROMUNDO3× · 2023–2025 · $53k · revenue +326%
Funded once
- MRMILLICENT ROGERS MUSEUM INCgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $28k · revenue +44%
- SISOUTHWEST INDIAN FOUNDATIONone grant, 2022 · $25k
- TCTHE CHILDREN'S HOURone grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue +9%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Mission is to promote, present and preserve hispanic arts & culture of nm. showcasing, encourging & supporting participation of hispanics in local arts economy; and presenting creative & cultural richness of our heritage, including arts &…
The santa fe botanical garden celebrates, cultivates and conserves the rich botanical heritage and biodiversity of our region. in partnership with nature, we demonstrate our commitment through education, science, conservation, community…
The mission of the spanish colonial arts society is to preserve the cultural heritage of hispanic new mexico and its living traditions.
The Museo De Las Americas is dedicated to educating our community through collecting preserving interpreting and exhibiting the diverse arts and cultures of the Americas from ancient to contemporary through innovative exhibitions and…
The mission of the Cortez Cultural Center is to provide programs that enrich the lives of our community and its visitors by increasing cultural awareness, promoting the arts, and educating about the area's history, diversity and natural…
Shows the culture of the American southwest
The historic lensic - santa fe's performing arts center - enriches lives by bringing diverse art and people together. through its accessible and affordable programming, the lensic presents and supports locl and national artists and serves…
As part of the network of national chapters, the new mexico committee of the national museum of women in the arts enhances the mission of the national museum of women in the arts bringing recognition to the achievements of women artists by…
To respect and support the traditions and creative expressions of the native american peoples, and to present exhibitions and other public programs relating to them; to collect and document contemporary expressions of the navajo people…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Museum of New Mexico Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Roswell Artist-in-Residence Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 5% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
67 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 67 of the 102 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BASEMENT FILMS INC ↗
- Who funds 516 Arts ↗
- Who funds SILVER CITY MUSEUM SOCIETY CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF FLAMENCO ↗
- Who funds AFROMUNDO ↗
- Who funds INDIGENOUSWAYS INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds CENTER ↗
- Who funds Keshet Dance Company ↗
- Who funds Society of the Muse of the Southwest ↗
- Who funds GEORGIA O'KEEFFE MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds MUSEUM OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GILA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds JAPANESE AMERICAN CITIZENS LEAGUE NEW MEXICO CHAPTER ↗
- Who funds GILA RESOURCES INFORMATION PROJECT ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S READING ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds MILLICENT ROGERS MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds Little Globe Inc ↗
- Who funds NEW MEXICO BLACK LEADERSHIP COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds RENESAN INSTITUTE FOR LIFELONG LEARNING ↗
- Who funds LEOPOLD WRITING PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds INDIAN PUEBLO CULTURAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL SANTA FE ↗
- Who funds EMBUDO VALLEY LIBRARY AND COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOUR ↗
- Who funds NEW MEXICO ADVOCATES FOR THE ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds Historic Santa Fe Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds Mesa Prieta Petroglyph Project ↗
- Who funds SOUTHWEST SEMINARS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Marshall L and Perrine D McCune Charitable Foundation Inc · Santa Fe Community Foundation · Albuquerque Community Foundation · Pnm Tnmp Foundation · Con Alma Health Foundation Inc · Los Alamos National Laboratory Foundation · New Mexico Community Foundation · Gale Family Foundation · The Taos Community Foundation Inc · The Frost Foundation · Nusenda Foundation · Western States Arts Federation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization New Mexico Humanities Council funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.