California · Nonprofit
Spatial Informatics Group Natural Assets Laboratory SIG-NAL
Spatial Informatics Group Natural Assets Laboratory SIG-NAL (California) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $2,323,737 to it, the largest being CALIFORNIA FIRE SAFE COUNCIL INC ($2,107,563). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
Spatial Informatics Group Natural Assets Laboratory SIG-NAL holds deeper cash reserves than three-quarters of the 881 environment nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 881 environment nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025
Three funders worth looking at
Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.
- Resources Legacy Fundshared fundersportfolio match
- Conservation Lands Foundationshared funders
- Environment Nowportfolio match
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
Government-grant reliance: 2020 48% · 2021 32% · 2022 38% · 2023 9% · 2024 17% · 2025 18%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.
75% of Spatial Informatics Group Natural Assets Laboratory SIG-NAL’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (88% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 5 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Who funds it, year by year
2022 → 2023: the base narrowed from 3 funders to 1 funder, grant income rose $540k → $757k.
From the IRS filings of Spatial Informatics Group Natural Assets Laboratory SIG-NAL’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
Spatial Informatics Group Natural Assets Laboratory SIG-NAL leans on a few funders — its largest provides 91% of grant income and the top three 98%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund Spatial Informatics Group Natural Assets Laboratory SIG-NAL.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2022 73% · 2023 100% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Where its funders are
91% of Spatial Informatics Group Natural Assets Laboratory SIG-NAL's grant income comes from California funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Funders to approach
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 5 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.
- Resources Legacy Fundshared fundersportfolio matchCA · backs 70 organizations that share your funders · its grantees resemble your mission
- Conservation Lands Foundationshared fundersCO · backs 21 organizations that share your funders
- Environment Nowportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Coalitions & Collaboratives Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- John S Kiewit Memorial Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- The Rose Foundation for Communities the Environmentportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- The Gamble Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- The Elizabeth R & William J Patterson Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Trees Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Peninsula Open Space Trustportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Environmental Federation of California Earthshare Californiaportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Leonardo Dicaprio Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Government funding Spatial Informatics Group Natural Assets Laboratory SIG-NAL receives
Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $1.6M on record.
- Department of Agriculture$1.6M
Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.
Organizations like Spatial Informatics Group Natural Assets Laboratory SIG-NAL
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In California
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
72% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Public support
62%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Footprint & structure
Files a return copy in 1 state
Part of a family of 1 related entity
- Spatial Informatics Group LLC · corp_trust
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Spatial Informatics Group Natural Assets Laboratory SIG-NAL: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds Spatial Informatics Group Natural Assets Laboratory SIG-NAL?
- Spatial Informatics Group Natural Assets Laboratory SIG-NAL (California) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $2,323,737 to it, the largest being CALIFORNIA FIRE SAFE COUNCIL INC ($2,107,563). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does Spatial Informatics Group Natural Assets Laboratory SIG-NAL have?
- IRS filings report 5 organizations giving $2,323,737 in grants to Spatial Informatics Group Natural Assets Laboratory SIG-NAL, 2 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of Spatial Informatics Group Natural Assets Laboratory SIG-NAL?
- CALIFORNIA FIRE SAFE COUNCIL INC is the largest funder on record, with $2,107,563 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like Spatial Informatics Group Natural Assets Laboratory SIG-NAL find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 5funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing