· Private foundation
Brindle Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k10 grants · $26k
- $10k–50k59 grants · $1.4M
- $50k–250k3 grants · $165k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LAS CUMBRES COMMUNITY SERVICES (YEAR 2 OF TWO YEAR GRANT) | $60,000 |
| BREATH OF MY HEART BIRTHPLACE (YEAR 2 OF TWO YEAR GRANT) | $55,000 |
| CHILD AND FAMILY DEVELOPMENR CENTER SAN JUAN COLLEGE | $50,000 |
| LA FAMILIA MEDICAL CENTER | $47,000 |
| NM VOICES FOR CHILDREN | $45,000 |
| SANTA FE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM | $45,000 |
| WESTERN NEW MEXICO UNIVERSITY | $42,000 |
| FOOD DEPOT | $40,000 |
| PRESBYTERIAN HEALTHCARE FOUNDATIONNORTHERN ROOTS | $40,000 |
| NM CENTER ON LAW AND POVERTY (YEAR 1 OF TWO YEAR GRANT) | $40,000 |
| SANTA FE BIRTH CENTER | $35,000 |
| YOUTH SHELTERS AND FAMILY SERVICES | $35,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $34,500 |
| GERARD'S HOUSE | $33,000 |
| RAILYARD PARK CONSERVANCY | $30,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 59% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 7% of Brindle Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +85% since the first grant, against +79% for the ones you funded once.
100 repeat relationships — 45 still active in FY2024, 55 since wound down; 26 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $655k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LFLA FAMILIA MEDICAL CENTER8× · 2017–2024 · $597k · revenue +52%
- LCLAS CUMBRES COMMUNITY SERVICES6× · 2017–2022 · $440k · revenue +87%
- NMNEW MEXICO VOICES FOR CHILDREN8× · 2017–2024 · $350k · revenue +85%
Funded once
- LFLANL FOUNDATION TWO YEAR GRANTone grant, 2022 · $85k
- NMNEW MEXICO CENTER ON LAW & POVERTY TWO YEAR GRANTone grant, 2022 · $85k
- LCLAS CUMBRES COMMUNITY SERVICES TWO YEAR GRANTone grant, 2023 · $60k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of the new mexico perinatal collaborative is to convene stakeholders to achieve health equity through the promotion of evidence- based reproductive and perinatal health practices that: increase collaboration with communities…
The casa program is a community-based program that recruits, trains and supports citizen-volunteers to advocate for the best interests of abused and neglected children in courtrooms and communities. the organization serves children in…
Social and emotional learning (SEL) is integral to human development and education. Through reliable developmental relationships, young people learn who they are and imagine who they might become as healthy, contributing adults in their…
We promote and support healthy development and nurturing relationships for all infants and toddlers in New Mexico. NMAIMH works to facilitate, support, and encourage cooperation, coordination, collaboratin, and respect among those…
The mission of NMCNE is to advance and engage the nursing community to promote excellence and improve the health of all New Mexicans.
Grants and expenses for programs serving the physical, mental, educational and social needs of children and their families.
Provide respectful high quality legal advice, counsel, brief services and referral to low-income New Mexicans and help remove barriers to the civil justice system.
The new mexico humanities council (nmhc) supports and conducts innovative and imaginative programs throughout the state that lead to a greater understanding of, and motivate interest in, the richness of our human experience and heritage.…
New mexico ethics watch is dedicated to promoting ethics and accountability in government and public life.
Lcdf empowers and enriches families, individuals and communities by providing quality medical, dental, behavioral health and educational services for people of all cultures.
To champion equitable educational opportunities that honor and leverage the diverse linguistic and cultural assets of every learner. defender oportunidades educativas equitativas que honren y aprovechen los diversos recursos lingsticos y…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Mexico Center On Law and Poverty and the most unlike its peers is Commonsense Childbirth Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
96 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 96 of the 198 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LA FAMILIA MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds LAS CUMBRES COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds NEW MEXICO VOICES FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds WESTERN NEW MEXICO UNIVERSITY FOUND ↗
- Who funds SANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE FOOD DEPOT ↗
- Who funds SANTA FE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds New Mexico Association for the Education of Young Children ↗
- Who funds SANTA FE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds YOUTH SHELTERS & FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds Many Mothers Inc ↗
- Who funds GERARD'S HOUSE ↗
- Who funds REACH OUT AND READ INC ↗
- Who funds BREATH OF MY HEART BIRTH PLACE ↗
- Who funds NEW MEXICO CENTER ON LAW AND POVERTY ↗
- Who funds Presbyterian Healthcare Foundation ↗
- Who funds Youth Heartline ↗
- Who funds SAINT ELIZABETH SHELTER CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds NEW MEXICO CHILD ADVOCACY NETWORKS ↗
- Who funds RAILYARD PARK CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds ST VINCENT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NEW MEXICO KIDS MATTER INC ↗
- Who funds Esperanza Shelter Inc ↗
- Who funds Twirl A Play and Discovery Space Inc ↗
- Who funds KERES CHILDREN'S LEARNING CENTER ↗
- Who funds PROSPERITY WORKS ↗
- Who funds SOMOS UN PUEBLO UNIDO ↗
- Who funds NEW VISTAS ↗
- Who funds SANTA FE BIRTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds THINK NEW MEXICO ↗
- Who funds SAN JUAN COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds GROWING UP NEW MEXICOINC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Santa Fe Community Foundation · Con Alma Health Foundation Inc · Marshall L and Perrine D McCune Charitable Foundation Inc · Nusenda Foundation · Anchorum St Vincent · Albuquerque Community Foundation · Thornburg Foundation · New Mexico Community Foundation · The Frost Foundation · St Vincent Hospital · Los Alamos National Laboratory Foundation · Pnm Tnmp Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Brindle Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Reach Out and Read Inc — 9% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Brindle Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Brindle Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.