· Community foundation
Community Foundation for Greater Buffalo Inc
The mission of the community foundation for greater buffalo, inc.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 562 grants below total $33,418,104 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $38,236,066 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $4,817,962 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k84 grants · $593k
- $10k–50k325 grants · $7.0M
- $50k–250k124 grants · $12M
- $250k+29 grants · $14M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SAY YES BUFFALO SCHOLARSHIP INC | $1,790,661 |
| RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR THE SUNY ON BEHALF OF THE UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO | $993,396 |
| BUFFALO PHILHARMONIC ORCHESTRA SOCIETY | $946,103 |
| OPEN BUFFALO INC | $737,000 |
| SERVICE COLLABORATIVE OF WESTERN NEW YORK | $621,177 |
| RALPH WILSON PARK CONSERVANCY | $590,500 |
| BUFFALO FINE ARTS ACADEMY | $589,264 |
| BRYANT & STRATTON COLLEGE | $560,850 |
| BUFFALO SOCIETY OF NATURAL SCIENCES | $541,625 |
| MARGARET WOODBURY STRONG MUSEUM (DBA THE STRONG) | $500,000 |
| THE NATURE CONSERVANCY | $472,748 |
| THE SALVATION ARMY OF BUFFALO NY | $392,149 |
| CONNECTICUT COLLEGE | $349,644 |
| ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF BUFFALO | $330,680 |
| PUSH BUFFALO INC | $323,250 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $14.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 6% of Community Foundation for Greater Buffalo Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 88% of the giving stays in NY; read by stated purpose it is 81% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.
705 repeat relationships — 425 still active in FY2024, 280 since wound down; 119 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.7M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TRThe Research Foundation for The State University of New York8× · 2017–2024 · $5.9M · revenue +62%
BUFFALO PHILHARMONIC ORCHESTRA SOCIETY INC8× · 2017–2024 · $4.5M · revenue +16%
SAY YES BUFFALO SCHOLARSHIP INC6× · 2019–2024 · $4.4M · revenue +259%
Funded once
- CCCHILD CARE COALITION OF THE NIAGARA FRONTIER INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $440k · revenue +43%
- ULURBAN LEAGUE OF ROCHESTER NY INCone grant, 2021 · $350k · revenue +19%
- NCNATIONAL CENTER FOR VICTIMS OF CRIME INCgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $344k · revenue +29%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To acquire, remediate, and steward lands along wny's waterfronts prioritizing public access.
To attract new employers to the buffalo niagara region through outreach to growing companies around the world. to support business attraction, expansion and entrepreneurship, invest buffalo niagara collaborates with local businesses,…
The buffalo erie niagara land improvement corporation (benlic) seeks to confront and alleviate the problems distressed properties cause to communities by supporting municipal and regional revitalization efforts and strategically acquiring,…
To improve lives by mobilizing the caring power of our community.
The mission of the community foundation for greater buffalo, inc. (the foundation) is to connect people, ideas and resources to improve lives in western new york. since its establishment in 1919, the foundation has been committed to…
To strengthen the capacity of local united ways through their charitable human service activities to be leaders in achieving results that improve the lives of all new yorkers.
New york restoration project ("nyrp") believes that nature is a fundamental right of every new yorker. nyrp works collaboratively with residents in communities across the five boroughs to renovate gardens, restore parks, plant trees,…
The central new york land trust seeks to preserve and protect natural areas in order to provide our communities clean water, clean air, wildlife habitat, and a chance to connect with the land.
Food bank of central new york is a not-for-profit organization: our mission is to lead the effort to eliminate hunger in our region, through partnerships with others in our community, through education, advocacy, and distribution of…
The mission of humanities new york is to strengthen civil society and the bonds of community, using the humanities to foster engaged inquiry and dialogue around social and cultural concerns.
Support regional economic development in new york's 14 northernmost counties
University at buffalo neurosurgery, inc. is an academic neurosurgical group committed to excellence in patient care, research, and education. our mission is to develop and implement sound strategies that focus on quality medical services,…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Neighborhood Health Center of Wny Inc and the most unlike its peers is Lewiston Porter Alumni Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
1036 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1036 of the 1,265 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds The Research Foundation for The State University of New York ↗
- Who funds BUFFALO FINE ARTS ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds BUFFALO PHILHARMONIC ORCHESTRA SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds SAY YES BUFFALO SCHOLARSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds KABOOM INC ↗
- Who funds THE SKATEPARK PROJECT ↗
- Who funds BUFFALO SOCIETY OF NATURAL SCIENCES ↗
- Who funds University at Buffalo Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds BUFFALO PREP INC ↗
- Who funds EXPLORE & MORE A CHILDREN'S MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds WESTMINSTER ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVE INC ↗
- Who funds BRYANT & STRATTON COLLEGE INC ↗
- Who funds BUFFALO ARTS AND TECHNOLOGY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds BUFFALO NIAGARA WATERKEEPER INC ↗
- Who funds ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF BUFFALO INC ↗
- Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds ROSWELL PARK ALLIANCE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MARGARET WOODBURY STRONG MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds GATEWAY-LONGVIEW INC ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF BUFFALO ↗
- Who funds CANISIUS UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds VIA VISUALLY IMPAIRED ADVANCEMENT ↗
- Who funds FEEDMORE WNY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE BUFFALO TRANSPORTATION PIERCE-ARROW MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds ERIE COUNTY SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
- Who funds NIAGARA LUTHERAN HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF BUFFALO AND ERIE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds PEOPLE UNITED FOR SUSTAINABLE HOUSING INC ↗
- Who funds THE SERVICE COLLABORATIVE OF WNY ↗
- Who funds NYBDC LOCAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Open Buffalo Inc ↗
- Who funds CONNECTICUT COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL TERMINAL RESTORATION CORP ↗
- Who funds GERARD PLACE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND COMPANY INC ↗
- Who funds FOREST LAWN HERITAGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Michigan Street African American Heritage Corridor Commission Inc ↗
- Who funds MOUNT SAINT MARY ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds JOURNEY'S END REFUGEE SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds BUFFALO OLMSTED PARKS CONSERVANCY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The John R Oishei Foundation · The Western New York Foundation · First Niagara Foundation · Cullen Foundation · United Way of Buffalo and Erie County · The Margaret L Wendt Foundation · Buffalo Bills Foundation Inc · The Peter and Elizabeth C Tower Foundation · The Baird Foundation · The Frank G Raichle Foundation · James H Cummings Foundation Inc · Children's Foundation of Erie County Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Community Foundation for Greater Buffalo Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Joslin Diabetes Center Inc — 35% of income from government
- National Center for Victims of Crime Inc — 10% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
- Connecticut College — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.