Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Colburn-Keenan Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$342k
Granted FY2024still arriving
49
Grants FY2024still arriving
31
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Health$3.6MEducation$108kRecreation & Sports$63kYouth Development$34kHuman Services$28kFood & Nutrition$3kInternational$1k
02FY2024 · 49 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k44 grants · $140k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $35k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $167k
$3,500
Median grant
31
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$99,500
Individual grant recipient$67,858
NEW ENGLAND HEMOPHILIA ASSOCIATION$12,658
HEMOPHILIA FOUNDATION OF MICHIGAN$11,500
HEMOPHILIA FEDERATION OF AMERICA$11,000
PACIFIC NORTHWEST BLEEDING DISORDER$9,199
HEMOPHILIA FOUNDATION OF MARYLAND$8,500
NATIONAL BLEEDING DISORDERS FOUNDAT$7,500
HEMOPHILIA FOUNDATION OF NORTHERN C$7,500
HEMOPHILIA FOUNDATION OF SOUTHERN C$7,343
TENNESSEE HEMOPHILIA BLEEDING DISOR$5,821
NE CHAPTER NATIONAL BLEEDING DISORD$4,945
FLORIDA HEMOPHILIA ASSOCIATION INC$4,750
HEMOPHILIA ASSOC OF NEW YORK$4,750
HEMOPHILIA ASSOC OF THE CAPITAL ARE$4,750
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $102k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 8% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CHES FOUNDATION INC: $4k → 8%NEXT STEP FUND: $10k → 8%Lone Star Bleeding Disorders Foundation: $3k → 16%QUILTS OF VALOR FOUNDATION: $250 → 7%HEMOPHILIA OF NORTH CAROLINA: $11k → 8%COMPASSION DELIVERED: $3k → 13%VIRGINIA HEMOPHILIA FOUNDATION: $10k → 6%Virginia Hemophilia Foundation: $6k → 9%NSPIRATION: $1k → 8%The Next Step Fund: $5k → 8%LONE STAR BLEEDING DISORDERS FOUNDATION: $1k → 16%Hemophilia of North Carolina: $11k → 8%VIRGINIA HEMOPHILIA FOUNDATION: $9k → 6%Virginia Hemophilia Foundation: $5k → 9%CHES FOUNDATION INC: $750 → 8%Hemophilia of North Carolina: $5k → 8%VIRGINIA HEMOPHILIA FOUNDATION: $5k → 6%VIRGINIA HEMOPHILIA FOUNDATION: $2k → 9%LONE STAR BLEEDING DISORDERS FOUNDATION: $1k → 16%BLEEDING DISORDERS FOUNDATION OF NORTH CAROLINA: $5k → 8%Virginia Hemophilia Foundation: $1k → 9%VIRGINIA HEMOPHILIA FOUNDATION: $1k → 9%LONE STAR BLEEDING DISORDERS FOUNDA: $1k → 16%BLEEDING DISORDERS FOUNDATION OF NORTH CAROLINA: $3k → 8%Hemophilia of North Carolina: $1k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
ME
WA
ID
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
AZ
KS
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.3M · 87 repeat orgs$539k to everyone else

87 repeat relationships — 35 still active in FY2024, 52 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

87
48

Total granted

$3.3M
$492k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+68%

Still filing today

61%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $47k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NE
    NEW ENGLAND HEMOPHILIA ASSOCIATION INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $102k · revenue +65%
  • HF
    Hemophilia Foundation of Michigan
    8× · 2017–2024 · $65k · revenue +54%
  • UH
    United Hemophilia Foundation
    7× · 2018–2024 · $64k · revenue +223%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual Grants- see disclosure
    one grant, 2019 · $137k
  • IS
    Individual Scholarships- see diclos
    one grant, 2019 · $104k
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue +78%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Hemophilia Alliance Foundation

The hemophilia alliance foundation is dedicated to receiving and administering funds to enable eligible organizations in the inherited bleeding and thrombotic disorders community to build capacity in order to achieve their mission and to…

Health
2
Bleeding Disorders of Kentucky Inc

Bleeding disorders of kentucky (bdoky) is dedicated to improving the quality of life for individuals with inheritable bleeding disorders through education, engagement, and support.

Health
3
The Coalition for Hemophilia B Inc
Health
4
Cascade Hemophilia Consortium
Health
5
Hemophilia Foundation of Greater Florida Inc

Hemophilia foundation of greater florida is dedicated to improving the quality of life for people with related bleeding disorders and their families through education, information and referral services, advocacy and research.

Health
6
American Thrombosis and Hemostasis Network Inc

The american thrombosis and hemostasis network (athn) is a nonprofit organization dedicated to improving the lives of people affected by bleeding and clotting disorders. we're using technology to secure data, advance knowledge, transform…

Health
7
Asociacion Puertorriquena De Hemofilia Inc

Guarantee the rights of patients and people with a diagnosis of hemophilia and bleeding conditions

Health
8
Hemophilia of Georgia Inc

Hemophilia of georgia exists so that people in georgia affected by bleeding disorders live as normally and productively as possible.

Health
9
Hereditary Angioedema Association Inc
Health
10
Colburn-Keenan Foundation Inc
Philanthropy
11
The Hemophilia Alliance Group Purchasing Organization

The hemophilia alliance provides member hemophilia treatment centers with resources and services to sustain the comprehensive care model for individuals with bleeding and clotting disorders.

Health
12
Histiocytosis Association Inc

Histiocytosis association, inc. is dedicated to raising awareness about histiocytic disorders, providing education and emotional support, and funding research leading to better treatments and a cure.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New England Hemophilia Association Inc and the most unlike its peers is Compassion Delivered Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsCancer Support ServicesChristian Youth CampsOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Jewish Community Organizati…Military Veterans Support
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%6%5–10yr19%10%10–20yr16%58%20–35yr13%17%35–55yr16%10%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%1%5–10yr19%7%10–20yr16%67%20–35yr13%11%35–55yr16%14%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%1/75
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,490

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

71 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 71 of the 149 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
25
Early backer (in before they grew)
70/71
Grantees still filing
51/71
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $507,869 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $414,705 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $260,173 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $236,638 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual Grants- see disclosure — $136,596 · OtherIndividual Grants- see disclosureIndividual Scholarships- see diclos — $103,500 · Other+91 more — $897,015 · Other+91 moreHEMOPHILIA FEDERATION OF AMERICA — $258,000 · HealthHEMOPHILIA FEDERATION OF …ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $100,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEAR…Hemophilia Foundation of Michigan — $64,708 · HealthHemophilia Foundation of …United Hemophilia Foundation — $64,000 · HealthUnited Hemophilia Foundat…HEMOPHILIA ASSOCIATION OF THE CAPITAL AREA — $54,237 · HealthHEMOPHILIA ASSOCIATION OF…GREATER OHIO BLEEDING DISORDERS FOUNDATION — $40,338 · HealthNORTHERN CALIFORNIA BLEEDING DISORDERS FOUNDATION FORMERLY HEMOPHILIA FOUNDTN — $31,576 · HealthHEMOPHILIA ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK INC — $30,532 · Health+25 more — $231,192 · Health+25 moreNEW ENGLAND HEMOPHILIA ASSOCIATION INC — $102,280 · PhilanthropyHemophilia Foundation of MD Inc — $35,071 · PhilanthropyVIRGINIA BLEEDING DISORDERS FOUNDATION — $38,343 · Human ServicesBLEEDING DISORDERS FOUNDATION OF NORTH CAROLINA — $35,202 · Human ServicesTHE NEXT STEP FUND INC — $15,000 · Human ServicesCHES FOUNDATION INC — $5,500 · Human ServicesLONE STAR BLEEDING DISORDERS FOUNDATION — $5,500 · Human Services+2 more — $2,750 · Human ServicesCAMP HOLIDAY TRAILS — $38,418 · Recreation & SportsONE HEARTLAND — $23,000 · Recreation & SportsCAMP SUNSHINE AT SEBAGO LAKE INC — $21,981 · Recreation & Sports+3 more — $3,290 · Recreation & SportsTHE PAINTED TURTLE — $34,120 · Youth DevelopmentCAMP TAYLOR INC — $19,510 · Youth DevelopmentBleeding Disorders Association of South Carolina — $43,492 · Housing & ShelterWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $4,846 · Education
Other$2,556,496Health$874,583Philanthropy$137,351Human Services$102,295Recreation & Sports$86,689Youth Development$53,630Housing & Shelter$43,492Education$4,846

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHEMOPHILIA FEDERATION OF AMERICA — $258,000 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetNEW ENGLAND HEMOPHILIA ASSOCIATION INC — $102,280 over 8y, 1.7% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHemophilia Foundation of Michigan — $64,708 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetUnited Hemophilia Foundation — $64,000 over 7y, 5.7% of budgetPACIFIC NORTHWEST BLEEDING DISORDERS — $58,115 over 7y, 3.0% of budgetHEMOPHILIA ASSOCIATION OF THE CAPITAL AREA — $54,237 over 7y, 3.5% of budgetHEMOPHILIA ALLIANCE OF MAINE INC — $49,300 over 7y, 18% of budgetOKLAHOMA HEMOPHILIA FOUNDATION INC — $44,663 over 8y, 3.8% of budgetBleeding Disorders Association of South Carolina — $43,492 over 5y, 4.6% of budgetGREATER OHIO BLEEDING DISORDERS FOUNDATION — $40,338 over 7y, 1.7% of budgetCAMP HOLIDAY TRAILS — $38,418 over 7y, 1.5% of budgetVIRGINIA BLEEDING DISORDERS FOUNDATION — $38,343 over 7y, 2.2% of budgetBLEEDING DISORDERS FOUNDATION OF NORTH CAROLINA — $35,202 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetHemophilia Foundation of MD Inc — $35,071 over 6y, 2.7% of budgetNATIONAL BLEEDING DISORDERS FOUNDATION — $35,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFlorida Bleeding Disorders Association Inc — $34,500 over 6y, 2.6% of budgetTHE PAINTED TURTLE — $34,120 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetLOUISIANA HEMOPHILIA FOUNDATION — $33,675 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetNORTHERN CALIFORNIA BLEEDING DISORDERS FOUNDATION FORMERLY HEMOPHILIA FOUNDTN — $31,576 over 4y, 2.0% of budgetHEMOPHILIA ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK INC — $30,532 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetNEW YORK CITY HEMOPHILIA CHAPTER INC — $27,500 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetTHE HEMOPHILIA ASSOC OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY — $25,082 over 6y, 3.2% of budgetONE HEARTLAND — $23,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetGREAT LAKES HEMOPHILIA FOUNDATION INC — $22,189 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetCAMP SUNSHINE AT SEBAGO LAKE INC — $21,981 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetGateway Hemophilia Association — $21,718 over 6y, 2.7% of budgetAlaska Hemophilia Association — $21,659 over 5y, 3.8% of budgetBLEEDING DISORDERS COUNCIL OF CALIFORNIA formerly HEMOPHILIA COUNCIL OF CALIF — $20,535 over 4y, 4.2% of budgetCAMP TAYLOR INC — $19,510 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetTHE BOGGY CREEK GANG INC — $18,964 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetTEXAS CENTRAL HEMOPHILIA ASSOCIATION INC — $18,000 over 2y, 4.1% of budgetARIZONA HEMOPHILIA ASSOCIATION INC — $17,325 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetTRI-STATE BLEEDING DISORDER FOUNDATION — $17,100 over 5y, 4.2% of budgetHEMOPHILIA OF INDIANA INC — $17,057 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetTENNESSEE HEMOPHILIA & BLEEDING DISORDER FOUNDATIO — $15,967 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN HEMOPHILIA AND BLEEDING DISORDER ASSOCIATION — $15,743 over 3y, 3.3% of budgetTHE NEXT STEP FUND INC — $15,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetHOPE CHARITIES INC — $13,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetHEAR YOUR SONG INC — $11,200 over 2y, 4.2% of budgetUPPER MIDWEST BLEEDING DISORDERS ALLIANC — $11,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetMARY M GOOLEY HEMOPHILIA CENTER INC — $9,847 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHEMOPHILIA OF IOWA INC — $9,500 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetCENTRAL CALIFORNIA BLEEDING DISORDERS FOUNDATION — $9,500 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetMIDWEST HEMOPHILIA ASSOCIATION — $6,394 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetHEMOPHILIA AND BLEEDING DISORDERS OF ALABAMA INC — $6,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetCHES FOUNDATION INC — $5,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetLONE STAR BLEEDING DISORDERS FOUNDATION — $5,500 over 4y, 0.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HEMOPHILIA FEDERATION OF AMERICA
  • Who funds NEW ENGLAND HEMOPHILIA ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
  • Who funds Hemophilia Foundation of Michigan
  • Who funds United Hemophilia Foundation
  • Who funds PACIFIC NORTHWEST BLEEDING DISORDERS
  • Who funds HEMOPHILIA ASSOCIATION OF THE CAPITAL AREA
  • Who funds HEMOPHILIA ALLIANCE OF MAINE INC
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA HEMOPHILIA FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds Bleeding Disorders Association of South Carolina
  • Who funds GREATER OHIO BLEEDING DISORDERS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CAMP HOLIDAY TRAILS
  • Who funds VIRGINIA BLEEDING DISORDERS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds BLEEDING DISORDERS FOUNDATION OF NORTH CAROLINA
  • Who funds Hemophilia Foundation of MD Inc
  • Who funds NATIONAL BLEEDING DISORDERS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Florida Bleeding Disorders Association Inc
  • Who funds THE PAINTED TURTLE
  • Who funds LOUISIANA HEMOPHILIA FOUNDATION
  • Who funds NORTHERN CALIFORNIA BLEEDING DISORDERS FOUNDATION FORMERLY HEMOPHILIA FOUNDTN
  • Who funds HEMOPHILIA ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK INC
  • Who funds NEW YORK CITY HEMOPHILIA CHAPTER INC
  • Who funds THE HEMOPHILIA ASSOC OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY
  • Who funds ONE HEARTLAND
  • Who funds GREAT LAKES HEMOPHILIA FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds CAMP SUNSHINE AT SEBAGO LAKE INC
  • Who funds Gateway Hemophilia Association
  • Who funds Alaska Hemophilia Association
  • Who funds BLEEDING DISORDERS COUNCIL OF CALIFORNIA formerly HEMOPHILIA COUNCIL OF CALIF
  • Who funds CAMP TAYLOR INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Hemophilia Alliance FoundationFL118.2× affinity54 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Hemophilia Alliance Foundation · The Hemophilia Alliance Group Purchasing Organization · National Bleeding Disorders Foundation · Hemophilia Federation of America · Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America · Global Impact · Cascade Hemophilia Consortium · American Thrombosis and Hemostasis Network Inc · Indiana Hemophilia & Thrombosis Center Inc · Positudes Inc Dba the Alliance Pharmacy · Chc Creating Healthier Communities · Direct Relief

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Colburn-Keenan Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 130%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 10%
  • The Next Step Fund Inc10% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
13get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Colburn-Keenan Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Colburn-Keenan Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 149 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph