· Private foundation
Cascade Hemophilia Consortium
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k2 grants · $12k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $173k
- $50k–250k13 grants · $2.0M
- $250k+9 grants · $4.1M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Hemophilia Foundation of Michigan | $850,000 |
| Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute | $536,833 |
| Ohio State University Hemophilia Center | $486,294 |
| Michigan State University | $447,786 |
| Hemophilia Foundation of Michigan | $418,718 |
| Various | $417,911 |
| University Pediatricians | $375,439 |
| University of Michigan Hemophilia Treatment Center | $326,362 |
| Nationwide Children's Hospital | $270,033 |
| Greater Ohio Bleeding Disorder Foundation | $235,350 |
| Akron Children's Hospital | $223,798 |
| University Hospitals of ClevelandCase Western | $218,085 |
| Hurley Medical Center | $179,995 |
| West Michigan Cancer CenterBronson Methodist Hospital | $177,101 |
| Toledo Children's Hospital Northwest Ohio Hemophilia Treatment Center | $174,986 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 50% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
32 repeat relationships — 27 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $235k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HFHemophilia Foundation of Michigan8× · 2017–2024 · $8.8M · revenue +54% · 35% of their budget
- UPUNIVERSITY PEDIATRICIANS8× · 2017–2024 · $2.1M · revenue +34%
- HFHENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM8× · 2017–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +69%
Funded once
- GOGreater Ohio Bleeding Disorder Foundationone grant, 2024 · $235k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide services to hemophilia patients nad their families in the state of Maryland
The national bleeding disorders foundation (formerly the national hemophilia foundation) is dedicated to finding cures for inheritable blood and bleeding disorders and to addressing and preventing the complications of these disorders…
Gateway Hemophilia Association is a non-profit, community based organization, dedicated to the advocacy, education and support of families affected by bleeding disorders.
The hemophilia alliance provides member hemophilia treatment centers with resources and services to sustain the comprehensive care model for individuals with bleeding and clotting disorders.
To provide expert comprehensive multidisciplinary care to patients with hemophilia and other bleeding and clotting disorders.
Education and financial assistance to families affected by bleeding disorders.
To support advocacy, education, and awareness efforts that build and sustain community among all people impacted by bleeding disorders.
Henry ford health macomb hospital (hfmh) is an affiliate of henry ford health system dba henry ford health ("hf health") serving the northeastern metropolitan detroit michigan communities. as an integrated component of one of the nation's…
The hemophilia alliance foundation is dedicated to receiving and administering funds to enable eligible organizations in the inherited bleeding and thrombotic disorders community to build capacity in order to achieve their mission and to…
Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Ohio Bleeding Disorders Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Burr Oak 4-H Club - Michigan State. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Hemophilia Foundation of Michigan ↗
- Who funds BARBARA ANN KARMANOS CANCER INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY PEDIATRICIANS ↗
- Who funds Burr Oak 4-H Club - Michigan State ↗
- Who funds HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM ↗
- Who funds GREATER OHIO BLEEDING DISORDERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HEMOPHILIA OF INDIANA INC ↗
- Who funds WEST MICHIGAN CANCER CENTER ↗
- Who funds FAMOHIO Inc ↗
- Who funds SOUTHWESTERN OHIO HEMOPHILIA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST OHIO HEMOPHILIA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TRI-STATE BLEEDING DISORDER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds The Children's Mercy Hospital ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Hemophilia Alliance Foundation · Colburn-Keenan Foundation Inc · National Bleeding Disorders Foundation · The Hemophilia Alliance Group Purchasing Organization · FAMOHIO Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Cascade Hemophilia Consortium funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.