Skip to content

Michigan · Private foundation

Cascade Hemophilia Consortium

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$7.4M
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
30
Grants FY2025
28
Organizations funded FY2024
4%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$250,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$850,000
Organizations funded a year
25 to 29
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
5
Total assets, FY2025
$109M
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 4% of the organizations Cascade Hemophilia Consortium funded were first-time grantees, receiving 4% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $235k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving28$7.4M4%
FY202428$6.3M4%
FY202329$5.6M3%
FY202228$4.3M11%
FY202125$5.1M4%
FY202025$3.9M0%
FY201926$4.3M0%
FY201827$4.0M0%
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$35MYouth Development$2.1MRecreation & Sports$196k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Hemophilia Foundation of Michigan$10,314,128935%
Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute$2,674,42392%
University Pediatricians$2,502,32790%
Burr Oak 4-H Club - Michigan State$2,438,4789n/a
Henry Ford Health System$1,459,48390%
Children's Hospital Medical Center$930,78190%
Greater Ohio Bleeding Disorders Foundation$596,771727%
Hemophilia of Indiana Inc$382,50095%
Regents of the University of Michigan$350,0004n/a
West Michigan Cancer Center$324,59040%
Show all 17 grantees
All grantees of Cascade Hemophilia Consortium by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Hemophilia Foundation of Michigan$10,314,128935%
Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute$2,674,42392%
University Pediatricians$2,502,32790%
Burr Oak 4-H Club - Michigan State$2,438,4789n/a
Henry Ford Health System$1,459,48390%
Children's Hospital Medical Center$930,78190%
Greater Ohio Bleeding Disorders Foundation$596,771727%
Hemophilia of Indiana Inc$382,50095%
Regents of the University of Michigan$350,0004n/a
West Michigan Cancer Center$324,59040%
FAMOHIO Inc$296,493735%
Northwest Ohio Hemophilia Foundation$282,234949%
Indiana Hemophilia & Thrombosis Center Inc$250,0001n/a
Southwestern Ohio Hemophilia Foundation$231,361824%
Tri-State Bleeding Disorder Foundation$211,339916%
The Children's Mercy Hospital$103,31040%
World AIDS Day Detroit$15,5002n/a

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 17 recipients with no EIN on record ($22M), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Cascade Hemophilia Consortium supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 4 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 13 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHemophilia Foundation of Michigan: $10,314,128 over 9y, 35% of budgetBarbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute: $2,674,423 over 9y, 2.2% of budgetUniversity Pediatricians: $2,502,327 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetHenry Ford Health System: $1,459,483 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Medical Center: $930,781 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetGreater Ohio Bleeding Disorders Foundation: $596,771 over 7y, 27% of budgetHemophilia of Indiana Inc: $382,500 over 9y, 5.0% of budgetWest Michigan Cancer Center: $324,590 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFAMOHIO Inc: $296,493 over 7y, 35% of budgetNorthwest Ohio Hemophilia Foundation: $282,234 over 9y, 49% of budgetSouthwestern Ohio Hemophilia Foundation: $231,361 over 8y, 24% of budgetTri-State Bleeding Disorder Foundation: $211,339 over 9y, 16% of budgetThe Children's Mercy Hospital: $103,310 over 4y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 13.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Hemophilia Alliance FoundationFL22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Hemophilia Alliance Foundation · Colburn-Keenan Foundation Inc · National Bleeding Disorders Foundation · The Hemophilia Alliance Group Purchasing Organization · FAMOHIO Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Cascade Hemophilia Consortium with peer funders

About Cascade Hemophilia Consortium

How much does Cascade Hemophilia Consortium give?
Cascade Hemophilia Consortium reported 30 grants totaling $7,360,625 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 25 and 29 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does Cascade Hemophilia Consortium fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Health (94%), Youth Development (6%), Recreation & Sports (1%).
Who are Cascade Hemophilia Consortium's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Hemophilia Foundation of Michigan ($10M), Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute ($2.7M), University Pediatricians ($2.5M).
Does Cascade Hemophilia Consortium fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 4% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Cascade Hemophilia Consortium accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Cascade Hemophilia Consortium?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include The Hemophilia Alliance Foundation, Colburn-Keenan Foundation Inc, National Bleeding Disorders Foundation.
Where is Cascade Hemophilia Consortium based?
Cascade Hemophilia Consortium is based in MI.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Cascade Hemophilia Consortium’s filings →

More from the funding graph