Skip to content

Michigan · Nonprofit

Hemophilia Foundation of Michigan

Hemophilia Foundation of Michigan (Michigan) receives grants from 16 organizations whose IRS filings report $17,952,038 to it, the largest being Cascade Hemophilia Consortium ($10,314,128). 11 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$4.4M
Funders on record
16
Grants received
$18M
Net assets
$2.8M
11/16 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 83%
01What it does

What Hemophilia Foundation of Michigan does

Mission

The Hemophilia Foundation of Michigan strives to improve the quality of life for all people affected by hemophilia, von Willebrand disease, other coagulation disorders, and related complications.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Medical Services - Provided administrative support and federal pass-through funding to treatment centers that delivered comprehensive care to those with hemophilia and other bleeding and clotting disorders.

    $1,013,770 spentof which $790,902 as grants
    25% of program spending
  2. Client Support Services - Assisted clients and their families in dealing with burden of living with hemophilia and other bleeding disorders. Financial Assistance Program - The Hemophilia Foundation of Michigan's financial assistance program assists the Michigan bleeding disorders community during some of its most challenging times. The program guidelines require that the applicant be a Michigan resident, have a congenital bleeding disorder, and have an immediate financial challenge.

    $2,545,882 spentof which $186,759 as grants
    63% of program spending
  3. HFM Camping Adventures was formed in order to provide a camp experience for children affected by hemophilia, hereditary bleeding disorders, and related complications.

    $511,676 spent
    13% of program spending

The 3 programs described on its FY2025 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $4,071,328.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($3.1M) Expenses 100 ($3.0M) Net assets 100 ($1.6M)2018 Revenue 108 ($3.3M) Expenses 108 ($3.2M) Net assets 104 ($1.6M)2019 Revenue 116 ($3.6M) Expenses 121 ($3.6M) Net assets 110 ($1.8M)2020 Revenue 120 ($3.7M) Expenses 107 ($3.2M) Net assets 149 ($2.4M)2021 Revenue 113 ($3.5M) Expenses 107 ($3.2M) Net assets 176 ($2.8M)2022 Revenue 124 ($3.9M) Expenses 123 ($3.7M) Net assets 174 ($2.8M)2023 Revenue 127 ($3.9M) Expenses 142 ($4.3M) Net assets 159 ($2.5M)2024 Revenue 154 ($4.8M) Expenses 146 ($4.4M) Net assets 190 ($3.0M)2025 Revenue 142 ($4.4M) Expenses 156 ($4.7M) Net assets 177 ($2.8M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (142)Expenses (156)Net assets (177)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2023 to 2024, from $2.9M to $4.4M (+50%).

$2.1M
$2.2M
$2.3M
$2.9M
$3.2M
$3.1M
$2.9M
$4.4M
$4.4M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 33% · 2018 32% · 2020 28% · 2021 29% · 2022 27% · 2023 26% · 2024 30% · 2025 23%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

97% of Hemophilia Foundation of Michigan’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (51% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 8,611 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$110k
’17
$103k
’18
−$11k
’19
$524k
’20
$298k
’21
$160k
’22
−$324k
’23
$420k
’24
−$282k
’25
4.8
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Susan Lerch

Executive Director

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed111212121112141314
Joined·+2+2+1+1+4+5+8+1
No longer listed·12123390
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 5 funders to 11 funders, grant income rose $1.6M → $1.8M.

1 of 16 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 0% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of Hemophilia Foundation of Michigan’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

Hemophilia Foundation of Michigan leans on a few funders — its largest provides 57% of grant income and the top three 97%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

42% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund Hemophilia Foundation of Michigan.

57%
largest funder
97%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 64% · 2018 63% · 2019 42% · 2020 62% · 2021 52% · 2022 57% · 2023 61% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

70% of Hemophilia Foundation of Michigan's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 69% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

58% of Hemophilia Foundation of Michigan's grant income comes from Michigan funders.

IL
MI
NY
IN
CT
CA
NC
DC
GA
FL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Michigan out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $2k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

Hemophilia Foundation of Michigan is better cushioned than half of the 4,665 health nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−6% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve4.8mo · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)4% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 4,665 health nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025

Government funding Hemophilia Foundation of Michigan receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $5.0M on record.

Federal$5.0M
grants $5.0Mcontracts $0
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Top agencies
  • Department of Health and Human Services$5.0M

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like Hemophilia Foundation of Michigan

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Michigan

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

87% of spending goes to programs.

Program 87%Management 10%Fundraising 3%

Governance

10
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

99%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

MI

Part of a family of 1 related entity

  • HFM Camping Adventures · exempt

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Hemophilia Foundation of Michigan: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds Hemophilia Foundation of Michigan?
Hemophilia Foundation of Michigan (Michigan) receives grants from 16 organizations whose IRS filings report $17,952,038 to it, the largest being Cascade Hemophilia Consortium ($10,314,128). 11 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does Hemophilia Foundation of Michigan have?
IRS filings report 16 organizations giving $17,952,038 in grants to Hemophilia Foundation of Michigan, 11 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of Hemophilia Foundation of Michigan?
Cascade Hemophilia Consortium is the largest funder on record, with $10,314,128 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like Hemophilia Foundation of Michigan find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Michigan. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 16 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing