· Charitable trust
The Signatry Charitable Trust
The mission of The Signatry Charitable Trust (the "Trust") is to inspire and facilitate revolutionary biblical generosity across generations to solve the world's greatest problems.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k541 grants · $3.5M
- $10k–50k868 grants · $17M
- $50k–250k238 grants · $23M
- $250k+116 grants · $523M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Come Near Media Inc | $130,669,224 |
| Come and See Foundation Inc | $55,009,000 |
| Every Home for Christ (World Literature Crusade) | $47,328,600 |
| Servant Foundation | $36,912,683 |
| One Hope Inc | $35,200,674 |
| National Christian Foundation | $31,532,088 |
| Alliance Defending Freedom | $19,182,600 |
| YouVersion Inc | $18,436,650 |
| Highlands College | $17,510,000 |
| WaterStone (Christian Community Foundation Inc) | $11,000,000 |
| Answers in Genesis | $9,183,700 |
| Mission Mutual | $8,457,963 |
| LifeChurch Edmond | $7,113,250 |
| Conservative Partnership Institute | $5,600,532 |
| Evangel University | $5,000,100 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $138.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +14% since the first grant, against +2% for the ones you funded once.
11 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 1721 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 4% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $464M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AIANSWERS IN GENESIS INC2× · 2021–2024 · $18M · revenue +56%
- EEdify2× · 2022–2024 · $3.3M · revenue +32%
- POPRIORITY ONE SCHOOLS INC2× · 2021–2024 · $3.0M · revenue +7% · 32% of their budget
Funded once
- SASALT AND LIGHT LEADERSHIP TRAINING INCone grant, 2021 · $250k · revenue -56%
- EMElam Ministriesone grant, 2021 · $150k · revenue +2%
- CJChildrens Jubilee Fundone grant, 2022 · $8k · revenue -76%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…
Serving and pastoring overseas workers on their own turf and equipping nationals by training and empowering them in their work of advancing the gospel.
Global City Mission Initiative is dedicated to cross-cultural evanglism, disciplemaking, church planting among diverse diaspora populations in strategic cities reaching out evangelistically to start multiply churches, training believers to…
To provide strategic teaching about prayer, prophecy, and intercession in the US and abroad. Books, manuals, and audio teachings are also used to equip Christians in strategic level spiritual prayer and warfare.
As part of the body of Christ, to see that every young person in every people group in every nation has the opportunity to make an informed decision to be a follower of Jesus Christ and become a part of the local church.
Reaching and teaching pastors in the majority world.
To provide resources, training, and continuing support to leaders in the us and around the world in order that they may help others find freedom in christ.
Equipping and enabling believers worldwide to conduct church-based evangelism projects to reach unbelievers and make disciples.
Uncharted ministries informs, inspires and challenges the christian church to serve the people of the middle east and in uncharted lands.
With a desire to see the Gospel proclaimed in all nations, we exist to make and multiply disciples of the next generation through the vehicles of church-planting missions and missional leadership training.
Mobilization of churches in America by taking pastors and laymen on vision and service trips overseas in fulfillment of Jesus command to go ye into all the world, making disciples...
To get the good news to every nation this generation by showing and sharing god's love by providing opportunities and supporting christian missionaries in over fifty seven countries around the world.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Christian Hope Indian Eskimo Fellowship and the most unlike its peers is The Larry & Cathy Lung Cancer Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 31% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.4% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
1074 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1074 of the 1,767 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Servant Foundation ↗
- Who funds Come Near Media Inc ↗
- Who funds NATL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FDN INC ↗
- Who funds ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM ↗
- Who funds ANSWERS IN GENESIS INC ↗
- Who funds CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MISSION MUTUAL ↗
- Who funds Conservative Partnership Institute ↗
- Who funds Evangel University ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL GENEROSITY FOUNDATION TRUST ↗
- Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
- Who funds Edify ↗
- Who funds PRIORITY ONE SCHOOLS INC ↗
- Who funds The Eagle Sky Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds SANTA FE SOUTH SCHOOLS INC ↗
- Who funds PULSE OUTREACH ↗
- Who funds Vapor Ministries Inc ↗
- Who funds A LIGHT TO THE NATIONS ↗
- Who funds IMPACT INVESTING CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BIBLICA INC ↗
- Who funds FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ↗
- Who funds USATransform ↗
- Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗
- Who funds Save the Storks ↗
- Who funds PRISON FELLOWSHIP MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
- Who funds LEGACY STONE INC ↗
- Who funds The Rosser Foundation dba International Cooperating Ministries ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Servant Foundation · International Generosity Foundation Trust · The Maclellan Foundation Inc · The Shumard Foundation Inc · Christian Community Foundation Inc · GiveClear Foundation · First Fruit Inc · Dallas Seminary Foundation · Tyndale House Ministries · The Bolick Foundation · G II Charities · Chattanooga Christian Community Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Signatry Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Legal Aid Services of Oklahoma Inc — 13% of income from government
- Southern Nazarene University — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Signatry Charitable Trust?
Find your warmest path to The Signatry Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.