Skip to content

Ohio · Nonprofit

Pregnancy Support Network

Pregnancy Support Network (Ohio) receives grants from 25 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,667,922 to it, the largest being The Abner and Esther Yoder Charitable Foundation ($340,900). 17 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 67% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2025
$2.9M
Funders on record
25
Grants received
$1.7M
Net assets
$3.6M
17/25 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 10%
01What it does

What Pregnancy Support Network does

Mission

The organization exists to provide communities with restorative choices in matters of crisis pregnancies, sexual lifestyle and sanctity of human life from a biblical worldview.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. To provide various services to clients relating to womens health issues. The network recevies a reduced rate of rent as a donation to assist the entity in carrying out its programs in the amount of $16,000.

    $653,572 spent
    48% of program spending
  2. To provide medically related services to clients regarding pregnancy and other womens health issues. Numerous supplies and materials are donated to assist with these services.

    $572,022 spent
    42% of program spending
  3. To provide education information regarding pregnancy and related health issues. Numerous supplies and materials are donated to assist with these services.

    $139,899 spent
    10% of program spending

The 3 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $1,365,493.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($1.1M) Expenses 100 ($1.1M) Net assets 100 ($1.3M)2018 Revenue 104 ($1.2M) Expenses 109 ($1.2M) Net assets 106 ($1.3M)2019 Revenue 110 ($1.2M) Expenses 111 ($1.2M) Net assets 105 ($1.3M)2020 Revenue 153 ($1.7M) Expenses 135 ($1.5M) Net assets 141 ($1.8M)2021 Revenue 205 ($2.3M) Expenses 162 ($1.8M) Net assets 182 ($2.3M)2022 Revenue 209 ($2.3M) Expenses 183 ($2.0M) Net assets 201 ($2.5M)2023 Revenue 234 ($2.6M) Expenses 204 ($2.3M) Net assets 228 ($2.9M)2024 Revenue 233 ($2.6M) Expenses 205 ($2.3M) Net assets 253 ($3.2M)2025 Revenue 266 ($2.9M) Expenses 225 ($2.5M) Net assets 289 ($3.6M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (266)Expenses (225)Net assets (289)

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2022 to 2023, from $2.7M to $3.3M (+24%).

$1.5M
$1.5M
$1.5M
$2.1M
$2.4M
$2.7M
$3.3M
$3.6M
$4.0M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 9% · 2018 9% · 2019 7% · 2020 12% · 2021 27% · 2022 18% · 2023 20% · 2024 7% · 2025 13%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

−$9k
’17
−$57k
’18
−$15k
’19
$185k
’20
$455k
’21
$266k
’22
$316k
’23
$295k
’24
$428k
’25
8.4
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Kayla Atchison

Chief Executive Officer

Board chair

Lauren Henslee

Board Chair

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

The chief executive listed changed between the FY2018 and FY2019, and between the FY2024 and FY2025 filings.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed1414912131411119
Joined·+4+1+6+2+2+1+4+1
No longer listed·46311443
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 9 funders to 13 funders, grant income rose $113k → $239k.

13 of 25 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 67% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of Pregnancy Support Network’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 24 of 25 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

Pregnancy Support Network has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 20% of grant income, and it takes 3 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left

76% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund Pregnancy Support Network.

20%
largest funder
54%
top three
~8
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 30% · 2018 38% · 2019 45% · 2020 33% · 2021 31% · 2022 25% · 2023 32% — broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

36% of Pregnancy Support Network's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 68% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

67% of Pregnancy Support Network's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $554k that is directly attributable, 98% of it comes from Ohio funders.

MN
OH
CT
CO

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Ohio out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $1.1M arriving through sponsors registered in 9 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Organizations like Pregnancy Support Network

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Ohio

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

55% of spending goes to programs.

Program 55%Management 34%Fundraising 11%

Governance

9
board members
89%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

98%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

OH

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Pregnancy Support Network: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds Pregnancy Support Network?
Pregnancy Support Network (Ohio) receives grants from 25 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,667,922 to it, the largest being The Abner and Esther Yoder Charitable Foundation ($340,900). 17 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 67% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does Pregnancy Support Network have?
IRS filings report 25 organizations giving $1,667,922 in grants to Pregnancy Support Network, 17 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of Pregnancy Support Network?
The Abner and Esther Yoder Charitable Foundation is the largest funder on record, with $340,900 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like Pregnancy Support Network find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Ohio. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Pregnancy Support Network →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 25 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing