· Public charity
Tyndale House Ministries
Minister to the spiritual needs of people, primarily through the publication of literature consistent with biblical principles and through grants to other charitable entities.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2026
- Under $10k35 grants · $249k
- $10k–50k150 grants · $3.7M
- $50k–250k32 grants · $2.5M
- $250k+3 grants · $905k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MEDIA ASSOCIATES INTERNATIONAL | $386,150 |
| INTERNATIONAL GENEROSITY FOUNDATION | $262,500 |
| SCHOLARLEADERS INTERNATIONAL | $256,000 |
| EPISCOPAL DIOCESE OF CHICAGO | $207,000 |
| MISSIONARY FURLOUGH HOMES FOUNDATION | $112,500 |
| OUTREACH COMMUNITY MINISTRIES | $108,000 |
| LANGHAM PARTNERSHIP USA | $105,000 |
| PIONEERS | $100,800 |
| MIDDLE EAST BIBLE OUTREACH | $100,000 |
| WYCLIFFE BIBLE TRANSLATORS | $98,000 |
| GO MINISTRIES | $95,000 |
| NEW HORIZONS FOUNDATION | $94,000 |
| IMPACT FRANCE | $88,000 |
| MESA GLOBAL | $86,000 |
| IFES | $86,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–26, $2.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 38% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +12% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
241 repeat relationships — 156 still active in FY2026, 85 since wound down; 53 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2026, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $842k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SLScholar Leaders International6× · 2021–2026 · $1.5M · revenue +576%
- WRWORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALS6× · 2021–2026 · $666k · revenue +134%
- OCOUTREACH COMMUNITY MINISTRIES7× · 2020–2026 · $592k · revenue +64%
Funded once
- GCGLOBAL CHRISTIAN BOOK FUND INC2× · 2023–2024 · $31k
- OFOUTREACH FOUNDATION OF THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH INCone grant, 2021 · $28k · revenue -14%
- ODOne Days Wagesone grant, 2025 · $27k · revenue -35%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…
Global City Mission Initiative is dedicated to cross-cultural evanglism, disciplemaking, church planting among diverse diaspora populations in strategic cities reaching out evangelistically to start multiply churches, training believers to…
Bible Translation and acts of Christian Services
Serving and pastoring overseas workers on their own turf and equipping nationals by training and empowering them in their work of advancing the gospel.
Raise Up Global Ministries is committed to educating Christian leaders in communities around the world. The three programs of Raise Up equip the global church by 1 Developing biblically based interactive materials and 2 Training…
CrossTalk Global is a Christian educational organization that empowers and trains global church leaders to effectively communicate the Scriptures and share the hope of Christ in their communities. These projects are carried out in the USA…
Reaching and teaching pastors in the majority world.
The organization is dedicated to reaching people for christ through an international network of christians who journey with the poor and marginalized, bringing practical and spiritual support with hope of a better future,(continued on…
Crossing Cultures International, Inc. exists to glorify God by equipping Christ followers globally with comprehensive training for effective ministry.
Heart Bridge International exists to equip and empower Christians around the world to fulfill the Great Commission. The organization provides free ministry training, discipleship resources, and practical coaching to under-resourced…
Spokens Mission is Deliver Truth...Where Written Words Cant Go. Most missiologists will agree that 2/3 of the world is populated with oral learners. Among this population, a person learns best by listening and interacting with stories,…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Commission to Every Nation and the most unlike its peers is Foreign Mission Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 24 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.7% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
325 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 325 of the 424 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MEDIA ASSOCIATES INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds Scholar Leaders International ↗
- Who funds WORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALS ↗
- Who funds OUTREACH COMMUNITY MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds The New Horizons Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP OF EVANGELICAL STUDENTS USA INC ↗
- Who funds MIDDLE EAST BIBLE OUTREACH ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL GENEROSITY FOUNDATION TRUST ↗
- Who funds GO MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds THE WHEATON SOCIETY FOR CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTION ↗
- Who funds Wheaton College ↗
- Who funds LANGHAM PARTNERSHIP USA INC NFP ↗
- Who funds Faith and Learning International NFP ↗
- Who funds IMPACT FRANCE INC ↗
- Who funds Taylor University ↗
- Who funds MISSIONARY FURLOUGH HOMES ↗
- Who funds MTELO MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds BIBLICA INC ↗
- Who funds Forum of Christian Leaders ↗
- Who funds THE ACADEMY OF CLASSICAL CHRISTIAN STUDIES INC ↗
- Who funds HOPE4MENA INC ↗
- Who funds FULLER THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY ↗
- Who funds CARING NETWORK NFP ↗
- Who funds Development Assoc International ↗
- Who funds GORDON COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds PUBLISH4AFRICA INC ↗
- Who funds CLC Ministries International ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR REFUGEES ↗
- Who funds VIVA NETWORK - NORTH AMERICA ↗
- Who funds FOREIGN MISSION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds OASIS INTERNATIONAL LTD NFP ↗
- Who funds SAT-7 NORTH AMERICA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: International Generosity Foundation Trust · The Maclellan Foundation Inc · First Fruit Inc · G II Charities · Gordon Christian Trust · Domanada Foundation · The Bolick Foundation · Summit Foundation · Henry P & Susan C Crowell Trust · From His Hand Foundation · Christian Community Foundation Inc · Christian Community Foundation of Memphis
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Tyndale House Ministries funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals — 67% of income from government
- Yale University — 12% of income from government
- Outreach Aid to the Americas — 9% of income from government
- Gordon College — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.