· Private foundation
Leslie L Alexander Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k8 grants · $36k
- $10k–50k427 grants · $12M
- $50k–250k179 grants · $13M
- $250k+8 grants · $3.9M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION | $1,000,000 |
| EVELYN ALEXANDER HOME FOR ANIMALS | $640,000 |
| UTHEALTH HOUSTON | $500,000 |
| RESCUED PETS MOVEMENT | $500,000 |
| THE CHILDREN'S PLACE AT HOME SAFE | $500,000 |
| REMOTE AREA MEDICAL | $250,000 |
| JACK AND JILL CHILDREN'S CENTER INC | $250,000 |
| BOCA RATON REGIONAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | $250,000 |
| THE AMERICAN JOINT JEWISH DISTRIBUTION COMMITTEE | $200,000 |
| GLOBAL FUND FOR CHILDREN | $200,000 |
| OSCAR'S PLACE ADOPTION CENTER & SANCTUARY | $175,000 |
| MAYA'S HOPE FOUNDATION | $160,000 |
| HARMONY FUND | $150,000 |
| OPERATION INTERNATIONAL LTD | $150,000 |
| LAKE WORTH CULTURAL RENAISSANCE FOUNDATION | $150,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $29.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 89% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +9% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
772 repeat relationships — 484 still active in FY2024, 288 since wound down; 137 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4.1M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- RPRESCUED PETS MOVEMENT INC5× · 2020–2024 · $3.8M · revenue +15% · 37% of their budget
FRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC2× · 2021–2022 · $2.6M · revenue +117%- MOMEALS ON WHEELS OF THE PALM BEACHES INC5× · 2020–2024 · $1.8M · revenue +91% · 64% of their budget
Funded once
- RMRESCUE MISSION OF EL PASO INCgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $400k · revenue +134%
GLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2022 · $300k · revenue -40%- WFWomen for Afghan Women Incone grant, 2022 · $250k · revenue -10%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To help injured, abandoned and unwanted animals. We provide food, vet care that includes heartworm prevention and spay or neuter services, shelter and anything else needed.
An animal rescue/adoption Agency. Rescued animals are from kill shelters or owner surrenders facing hardship then rehabbed/medical completed while in foster care then adopted into loving homes.
To assist in the medical care, misc care and rehoming of animals that do not have a home
Find homes for homeless/abandoned dogs. Provide full vet car and housing while awaiting adoption,
Animal rescue organization dedicated to finding homes for animals at the animal shelter. we also provde vet care foster homes, and assistance with homing for special needs animals.
To help rescue unwanted pets
Animal rescue and adoption facilitator to permanent homes.
foster based dog rescue working with shelters to save dogs
Foster-based animal rescue that rescues homeless and abandoned animals, providing them with veterinary care including specialized care, heartworm treatment, surgery, severe illness treatment & hospitalization, then placing them for…
To provide care for orphaned pets
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feeding Pets of the Homeless Aka Pets of the Homeless and the most unlike its peers is From Kennels to Homes Llc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 16 years old; the field is 16. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
898 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 898 of the 1,135 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds RESCUED PETS MOVEMENT INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS OF THE PALM BEACHES INC ↗
- Who funds THE LORD'S PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds The Soup Kitchen Inc ↗
- Who funds FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds JACK AND JILL CHILDREN'S CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CHILD ADVOCATES INC ↗
- Who funds KIDS' MEALS INC ↗
- Who funds FEED THE HUNGRY PANTRY OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds MAYAS HOPE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds Caridad Center Inc ↗
- Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Boca Raton Regional Hospital Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds COVENANT HOUSE FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds The Children's Place at Home Safe Inc ↗
- Who funds Global Response Management Inc ↗
- Who funds Houston Hospice ↗
- Who funds Bridgehampton Child Care and Recreational Center Inc ↗
- Who funds Light of the World Clinic Inc ↗
- Who funds Spirit of America Worldwide ↗
- Who funds THE GLADES INITIATIVE INC ↗
- Who funds Target Hunger Inc ↗
- Who funds WEST HOUSTON ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds EPIPHANY COMMUNITY HEALTH OUTREACH SERVICES ↗
- Who funds OUR FATHERS HOUSE SOUP KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds CASA VALENTINA INC ↗
- Who funds Friends of Youth Services and Palm Beach County Inc ↗
- Who funds BOCA HELPING HANDS INC ↗
- Who funds ANIMAL NATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE PANTRY OF BROWARD INC ↗
- Who funds GATEWAY COMMUNITY OUTREACH INC ↗
- Who funds HOUSTON PETSET ↗
- Who funds Small Steps Nurturing Center ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Batchelor Foundation Inc · Quantum Foundation Inc · Lost Tree Village Charitable Foundation · Houston Petset · The Jim Moran Foundation Inc · United Way of Palm Beach County Inc · Ibis Charities Foundation Inc · Community Foundation for Palm Beach and Martin Counties Inc · The Mary Alice Fortin Foundation · Ballenisles Charities Foundation Inc · Greater Good Charities · The Chamber of Nonprofit Health and Human Agencies in Palm Beach County Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Leslie L Alexander Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Child Rescue Coalition Inc — 20% of income from government
- The Lord's Place Inc — 12% of income from government
- Center for Child Counseling Inc — 8% of income from government
- Jesus House of Hope Inc — 3% of income from government
- Jack and Jill Children's Center Inc — 2% of income from government
- Treasure Coast Food Bank Inc — 2% of income from government
- Covenant House Florida Inc — 1% of income from government
- Palm Beach County Food Bank Inc — 0% of income from government
- Big Dog Ranch Rescue Inc — 0% of income from government
- Gateway Community Outreach Inc — 0% of income from government
- Caridad Center Inc — 0% of income from government
- The Cosac Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
- Pine Crest Preparatory School Inc — 0% of income from government
- Global Empowerment Mission Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Leslie L Alexander Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Leslie L Alexander Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.