Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Leslie L Alexander Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$28M
Granted FY2024still arriving
622
Grants FY2024still arriving
39
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Animals$76MHuman Services$28MFood & Nutrition$24MHealth$14MInternational$14MHousing & Shelter$12MEducation$7.3MYouth Development$3.6MOther$0
02FY2024 · 622 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $36k
  • $10k–50k427 grants · $12M
  • $50k–250k179 grants · $13M
  • $250k+8 grants · $3.9M
$35,000
Median grant
39
States reached
$291M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION$1,000,000
EVELYN ALEXANDER HOME FOR ANIMALS$640,000
UTHEALTH HOUSTON$500,000
RESCUED PETS MOVEMENT$500,000
THE CHILDREN'S PLACE AT HOME SAFE$500,000
REMOTE AREA MEDICAL$250,000
JACK AND JILL CHILDREN'S CENTER INC$250,000
BOCA RATON REGIONAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$250,000
THE AMERICAN JOINT JEWISH DISTRIBUTION COMMITTEE$200,000
GLOBAL FUND FOR CHILDREN$200,000
OSCAR'S PLACE ADOPTION CENTER & SANCTUARY$175,000
MAYA'S HOPE FOUNDATION$160,000
HARMONY FUND$150,000
OPERATION INTERNATIONAL LTD$150,000
LAKE WORTH CULTURAL RENAISSANCE FOUNDATION$150,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $29.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 89% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%RESCUE MISSION OF EL PASO: $400k → 21%TEAM BROWNSVILLE: $200k → 23%ECHO OF BRANDON: $325k → 13%CHILDREN IN CRISIS: $200k → 8%ECHO OF BRANDON: $275k → 13%HOSPICE BRAZOS VALLEY: $435k → 22%INTERFAITH CARING MINISTRIES: $300k → 14%HOSPICE BRAZOS VALLEY: $200k → 22%INTERFAITH CARING MINISTRIES: $275k → 14%JESUS HOUSE OF HOPE INC: $375k → 10%JESUS HOUSE OF HOPE INC: $360k → 10%DOROT: $210k → 17%WORLD FOOD PROGRAM USA: $2.0M → 14%WORLD FOOD PROGRAM USA: $600k → 14%CARIDAD CENTER: $402k → 11%CARIDAD CENTER: $375k → 11%THE GLADES INITIATIVE: $540k → 11%BRIDGEHAMPTON CHILD CARE AND RECREATIONAL CENTER: $390k → 7%BRIDGEHAMPTON CHILD CARE AND RECREATIONAL CENTER: $250k → 7%RAISE UP FAMILIES: $225k → 16%EPIPHANY COMMUNITY HEALTH OUTREACH SERVICES: $325k → 16%EPIPHANY COMMUNITY HEALTH OUTREACH SERVICES: $320k → 16%EL SOL JUPITER'S NEIGHBORHOOD RESOURCE CENTER: $420k → 11%HOMELESS COALITION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY: $250k → 11%HOMELESS COALITION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY: $235k → 11%AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CAREGIVING YOUTH: $225k → 11%SOUTH FLORIDA HUNGER COALITION: $265k → 13%AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CAREGIVING YOUTH: $195k → 11%SOUTH FLORIDA HUNGER COALITION: $200k → 13%COVENANT HOUSE FLORIDA INC: $395k → 13%COVENANT HOUSE FLORIDA INC: $275k → 13%TARGET HUNGER: $370k → 16%TARGET HUNGER: $310k → 16%GATEWAY COMMUNITY OUTREACH INC: $415k → 13%GATEWAY COMMUNITY OUTREACH INC: $250k → 13%THE COSAC FOUNDATION: $310k → 13%JACK & JILL CHILDREN'S CENTER INC: $310k → 13%FLORIDA'S CHILDREN FIRST: $225k → 13%THE COSAC FOUNDATION: $225k → 13%JACK AND JILL CHILDREN'S CENTER INC: $250k → 13%JACK AND JILL CHILDREN'S CENTER INC: $250k → 13%JACK AND JILL CHILDRENS CENTER: $250k → 13%KIDS MEALS INC: $700k → 16%KIDS MEALS INC: $225k → 16%THE CHILDREN'S PLACE AT HOME SAFE: $500k → 11%THE CHILDREN'S PLACE AT HOME SAFE: $250k → 11%RESTORATION BRIDGE INTERNATIONAL: $250k → 11%CHILD RESCUE COALITION: $345k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
NH
WA
MT
MN
IL
NY
MA
NV
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$177M · 772 repeat orgs$12M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +9% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

772 repeat relationships — 484 still active in FY2024, 288 since wound down; 137 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

772
225

Total granted

$177M
$8.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
0%

Still filing today

87%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4.1M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsHuman ServicesFood & NutritionHealthEducationPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RP
    RESCUED PETS MOVEMENT INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $3.8M · revenue +15% · 37% of their budget
  • FRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $2.6M · revenue +117%
  • MO
    MEALS ON WHEELS OF THE PALM BEACHES INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $1.8M · revenue +91% · 64% of their budget

Funded once

  • RM
    RESCUE MISSION OF EL PASO INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $400k · revenue +134%
  • GLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2022 · $300k · revenue -40%
  • WF
    Women for Afghan Women Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $250k · revenue -10%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pet Rescue Miami Inc
Animals
2
Hope Fur Paws Rescue

To help injured, abandoned and unwanted animals. We provide food, vet care that includes heartworm prevention and spay or neuter services, shelter and anything else needed.

Animals
3
Animal Rescue and Adoption Agency Inc

An animal rescue/adoption Agency. Rescued animals are from kill shelters or owner surrenders facing hardship then rehabbed/medical completed while in foster care then adopted into loving homes.

Animals
4
Saving Paws Rescue of Florida Inc

To assist in the medical care, misc care and rehoming of animals that do not have a home

Animals
5
Pets Without Partners

Find homes for homeless/abandoned dogs. Provide full vet car and housing while awaiting adoption,

Animals
6
Fur Animal Rescue

Animal rescue organization dedicated to finding homes for animals at the animal shelter. we also provde vet care foster homes, and assistance with homing for special needs animals.

Animals
7
Paws Animal Rescue Center

To help rescue unwanted pets

Animals
8
Tampa Bay Strays Inc

Animal rescue and adoption facilitator to permanent homes.

Animals
9
Shelters and Shelves Rescue Inc

foster based dog rescue working with shelters to save dogs

Animals
10
Dollys Legacy Animal Rescue

Foster-based animal rescue that rescues homeless and abandoned animals, providing them with veterinary care including specialized care, heartworm treatment, surgery, severe illness treatment & hospitalization, then placing them for…

Animals
11
Recycled Pets Rescue

To provide care for orphaned pets

12
Safe Haven Inc
Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feeding Pets of the Homeless Aka Pets of the Homeless and the most unlike its peers is From Kennels to Homes Llc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyAnimal Rescue and ShelterEquine Therapy ProgramsCommunity FoundationsCancer Support ServicesCommunity College Foundatio…Environmental Conservation …Military Veterans SupportChristian Missionary Organi…Senior Support ServicesJewish Community Organizati…Pregnancy Support ServicesSchool District FoundationsFaith-Based Social ServicesFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Lgbtq+ Community SupportDomestic Violence ServicesDevelopmental Disabilities …Volunteer Fire & Ems Servic…Youth Mentoring ProgramsYouth Sports ProgramsCommunity Food PantriesLocal Food System Organizat…Youth Development CentersImmigrant Worker SupportAffordable Housing Developm…Independent K-12 SchoolsChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Food Banks and PantriesHealth Access Advocacy and …
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 16 years old; the field is 16. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%5%<5yr14%17%5–10yr19%38%10–20yr16%26%20–35yr13%11%35–55yr16%4%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%2%<5yr14%8%5–10yr19%35%10–20yr16%31%20–35yr13%18%35–55yr16%6%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%13/989
the rest of the field
13%
240,383/1,818,576

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

898 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 898 of the 1,135 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

212
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
206
Early backer (in before they grew)
873/898
Grantees still filing
476/898
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC — $2,600,000 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD P…JACK AND JILL CHILDREN'S CENTER INC — $1,210,000 · Human ServicesKIDS' MEALS INC — $1,075,000 · Human ServicesCaridad Center Inc — $1,017,020 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSE FLORIDA INC — $970,000 · Human Services+41 more — $21,679,500 · Human Services+41 moreRESCUED PETS MOVEMENT INC — $3,800,000 · AnimalsRESCUED PETS MOVEMENT I…ANIMAL NATION INC — $820,000 · AnimalsHOUSTON PETSET — $815,000 · Animals+49 more — $18,393,655 · Animals+49 moreEVELYN ALEXANDER HOME FOR ANIMALS — $3,076,000 · OtherEVELYN ALEXANDER HOME FOR ANIMALSTHE LORD'S PLACE INC — $1,630,000 · Other+56 more — $32,225,000 · Other+56 moreMEALS ON WHEELS OF THE PALM BEACHES INC — $1,835,000 · Food & NutritionMEALS ON W…The Soup Kitchen Inc — $1,340,000 · Food & NutritionThe Soup K…FEED THE HUNGRY PANTRY OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC — $1,065,000 · Food & NutritionFEED THE H…BOCA HELPING HANDS INC — $820,000 · Food & NutritionBOCA HELPI…THE PANTRY OF BROWARD INC — $820,000 · Food & NutritionTHE PANTRY…Palm Beach County Food Bank Inc — $720,000 · Food & NutritionPalm Beach…EMERGENCY AID COALITION — $641,000 · Food & NutritionEMERGENCY …TREASURE COAST FOOD BANK INC — $600,000 · Food & NutritionTREASURE C…FARMWORKER COORDINATING COUNCIL OF PALM BEACH COUNTY — $570,000 · Food & NutritionFARMWORKER…+7 more — $1,940,000 · Food & Nutrition+7 moreThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc — $1,050,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $1,035,000 · InternationalGlobal Response Management Inc — $940,000 · InternationalSpirit of America Worldwide — $900,000 · InternationalREMOTE AREA MEDICAL — $775,000 · InternationalKIDSAVE INTERNATIONAL INC — $625,000 · InternationalNOVA UKRAINE — $400,000 · InternationalNO MORE TEARS INC — $340,000 · InternationalLIGHT OF THE WORLD CHARITIES INC — $330,000 · InternationalGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC — $300,000 · InternationalFriends of Youth Services and Palm Beach County Inc — $825,000 · HealthLittle Smiles Inc — $800,000 · HealthCLINICS CAN HELP INC — $715,000 · HealthFIGHTING CHANCE INC — $575,000 · HealthOPERATION INTERNATIONAL LTD — $550,000 · HealthTHE SOUTHAMPTON FRESH AIR HOME — $485,000 · HealthJESSICA JUNE CHILDREN'S CANCER FOUNDATION INC — $430,000 · HealthTOMORROW'S RAINBOW INC — $280,000 · HealthTHE BEACON OF DOWNTOWN HOUSTON — $270,000 · HealthTHE PET PROJECT FOR PETS INC — $267,500 · HealthMAYAS HOPE FOUNDATION INC — $1,060,000 · PhilanthropySweet Dream Makers Inc — $665,000 · PhilanthropyUndies for Everyone — $560,000 · PhilanthropySoi Dog Foundation USA — $507,000 · PhilanthropyREFUGEE HEALTH ALLIANCE — $405,000 · PhilanthropyEat Better Live Better Inc — $382,500 · PhilanthropyC & Ws RUSTIC HOLLOW SHELTER INC — $355,000 · PhilanthropyA CHANCE FOR THERAPY Inc — $320,000 · Philanthropy
Human Services$28,551,520Animals$23,828,655Other$36,931,000Food & Nutrition$10,351,000International$6,695,000Health$5,197,500Philanthropy$4,254,500

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetRESCUED PETS MOVEMENT INC — $3,800,000 over 5y, 37% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC — $2,600,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF THE PALM BEACHES INC — $1,835,000 over 5y, 64% of budgetTHE LORD'S PLACE INC — $1,630,000 over 5y, 4.2% of budgetThe Soup Kitchen Inc — $1,340,000 over 5y, 31% of budgetFLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $1,227,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetJACK AND JILL CHILDREN'S CENTER INC — $1,210,000 over 5y, 5.2% of budgetCHILD ADVOCATES INC — $1,100,000 over 3y, 8.7% of budgetKIDS' MEALS INC — $1,075,000 over 5y, 8.8% of budgetFEED THE HUNGRY PANTRY OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC — $1,065,000 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetMAYAS HOPE FOUNDATION INC — $1,060,000 over 3y, 44% of budgetThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc — $1,050,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $1,035,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCaridad Center Inc — $1,017,020 over 5y, 8.6% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC — $1,010,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetBoca Raton Regional Hospital Foundation Inc — $1,000,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE FLORIDA INC — $970,000 over 5y, 4.6% of budgetThe Children's Place at Home Safe Inc — $950,000 over 4y, 3.3% of budgetGlobal Response Management Inc — $940,000 over 5y, 9.7% of budgetHouston Hospice — $935,000 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetBridgehampton Child Care and Recreational Center Inc — $925,000 over 5y, 17% of budgetLight of the World Clinic Inc — $915,000 over 5y, 43% of budgetSpirit of America Worldwide — $900,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetTHE GLADES INITIATIVE INC — $890,000 over 5y, 21% of budgetTarget Hunger Inc — $885,000 over 5y, 6.5% of budgetWEST HOUSTON ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES INC — $885,000 over 5y, 5.1% of budgetEPIPHANY COMMUNITY HEALTH OUTREACH SERVICES — $870,000 over 5y, 12% of budgetOUR FATHERS HOUSE SOUP KITCHEN INC — $865,000 over 5y, 25% of budgetCASA VALENTINA INC — $840,000 over 4y, 29% of budgetFriends of Youth Services and Palm Beach County Inc — $825,000 over 5y, 13% of budgetBOCA HELPING HANDS INC — $820,000 over 4y, 3.5% of budgetANIMAL NATION INC — $820,000 over 3y, 45% of budgetTHE PANTRY OF BROWARD INC — $820,000 over 5y, 14% of budgetGATEWAY COMMUNITY OUTREACH INC — $815,000 over 4y, 36% of budgetHOUSTON PETSET — $815,000 over 5y, 12% of budgetSmall Steps Nurturing Center — $805,000 over 5y, 5.4% of budgetLittle Smiles Inc — $800,000 over 5y, 28% of budgetJESUS HOUSE OF HOPE INC — $785,000 over 3y, 4.8% of budgetREMOTE AREA MEDICAL — $775,000 over 3y, 4.7% of budgetINTERFAITH CARING MINISTRIES INC — $775,000 over 4y, 14% of budgetEl Sol Jupiters Neighborhood Resource Center Inc — $770,000 over 5y, 21% of budgetTHE SOUTHAMPTON ANIMAL SHELTER FOUNDATION INC — $770,000 over 5y, 14% of budgetFamily Promise of Southeast Florida Inc — $740,000 over 5y, 29% of budgetECHO OF BRANDON INC — $740,000 over 4y, 8.9% of budgetHOSPICE OF SOUTH TEXAS INC — $735,000 over 3y, 3.3% of budgetTHE COSAC FOUNDATION INC — $720,000 over 5y, 31% of budgetPalm Beach County Food Bank Inc — $720,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetCLINICS CAN HELP INC — $715,000 over 5y, 8.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Batchelor Foundation IncFL94.8× affinity75 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Batchelor Foundation Inc · Quantum Foundation Inc · Lost Tree Village Charitable Foundation · Houston Petset · The Jim Moran Foundation Inc · United Way of Palm Beach County Inc · Ibis Charities Foundation Inc · Community Foundation for Palm Beach and Martin Counties Inc · The Mary Alice Fortin Foundation · Ballenisles Charities Foundation Inc · Greater Good Charities · The Chamber of Nonprofit Health and Human Agencies in Palm Beach County Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Leslie L Alexander Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 710%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • Child Rescue Coalition Inc20% of income from government
  • The Lord's Place Inc12% of income from government
  • Center for Child Counseling Inc8% of income from government
  • Jesus House of Hope Inc3% of income from government
  • Jack and Jill Children's Center Inc2% of income from government
  • Treasure Coast Food Bank Inc2% of income from government
  • Covenant House Florida Inc1% of income from government
  • Palm Beach County Food Bank Inc0% of income from government
  • Big Dog Ranch Rescue Inc0% of income from government
  • Gateway Community Outreach Inc0% of income from government
  • Caridad Center Inc0% of income from government
  • The Cosac Foundation Inc0% of income from government
  • Pine Crest Preparatory School Inc0% of income from government
  • Global Empowerment Mission Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
71get no government money at all
59report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Leslie L Alexander Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Leslie L Alexander Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 1135 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph