· Public charity
Jsi Research & Training Institute Inc
Jsi is dedicated to improving lives through better health and education outcomes for individuals and communities and to providing an environment where people of passion can pursue this cause.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 214 grants below total $52,443,251 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $89,605,902 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $37,162,651 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k14 grants · $104k
- $10k–50k91 grants · $2.2M
- $50k–250k71 grants · $8.3M
- $250k+38 grants · $42M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE | $5,119,400 |
| PATH | $4,917,250 |
| MOMENTUM WHEELS FOR HUMANITY | $4,461,670 |
| TIDES CENTER | $2,855,577 |
| NEHCR STAFFING LLC | $2,799,067 |
| CLINTON HEALTH ACCESS I | $1,978,946 |
| INSTITUTE FOR HEALTHCARE | $1,909,653 |
| ALLIANCECHICAGO | $1,390,781 |
| JHPIEGO CORPORATION | $1,302,156 |
| UNIVERSITY RESEARCH CO (URC) | $1,210,042 |
| HANDICAP INTERNATIONAL | $988,788 |
| TRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEG | $926,946 |
| BETHANY CHRISTIAN SERVS | $812,861 |
| PROJECT HOPE | $769,178 |
| HELEN KELLER INTERNATIONAL | $734,004 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $7.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 90% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
Grants abroad, by region — $16M on the FY2024 return
Schedule F, as filed: 6 regions, $15M to organizations and $404k to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: GENERAL
Stated purpose: GENERAL
Stated purpose: GENERAL
Stated purpose: GENERAL
Stated purpose: GENERAL
Stated purpose: GENERAL
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +27% since the first grant, against +27% for the ones you funded once.
210 repeat relationships — 126 still active in FY2024, 84 since wound down; 85 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9.2M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PPATH6× · 2019–2024 · $21M · revenue +20%
Save The Children Federation Inc6× · 2019–2024 · $16M · revenue +18%- HKHELEN KELLER INTERNATIONAL6× · 2019–2024 · $14M · revenue +36%
Funded once
- FHFAMILY HEALTH INT'L FHI 360one grant, 2019 · $13M
- EGELIZABETH GLASER PEDIATRIC AIDS FOUNDATIONone grant, 2019 · $6.1M · revenue -32%
- UOUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTONone grant, 2019 · $1.1M
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The national nurse-led care consortium (nncc) strives to advance nurse-led healthcare through policy, consultation, and programs to reduce health disparities and meet people's primary care and wellness needs.
Public health institute generates and promotes research, leadership and partnerships to build capacity for strong public health policy, programs, systems and practices.
See schedule oto serve the public by:- assuring the qualifications of health care professionals- providing primary-source verification of credentials of health careprofessionals, as they serve throughout the world- supporting international…
Neighborhealth's mission is to promote and sustain healthy communities, families, and individuals by providing accessible, person-centered, and compassionate, high-quality health care services to all who live and work in our service area,…
Ahip is the national trade association representing the health insurance industry. ahip's members provide health care coverage, services and solutions to more than 200 million americans. we are committed to market-based solutions and…
To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustful environment through the expertise, committment, and compassion of our family of caregivers.
Improve the health of every person in our community through the efficient delivery of excellent, innovative and compassionate care.
Primary functions are the coordination and delivery of health care resources and services, health care education for the hospital service area, long range analysis of health care needs and development of programs, and arranging for…
Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.
(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.
The mission of the national coalition on health care (nchc) is to support research and analysis, develop and promote policy solutions, build consensus, and engage the public in order to ensure that america has a high quality health system…
Cvph medical center's mission is to provide quality health care for the north country region in upstate new york.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Catalyst Inc and the most unlike its peers is Traveling Tooth Fairies. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
210 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 210 of the 398 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds JHPIEGO CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds PATH ↗
- Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
- Who funds HELEN KELLER INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds Research Triangle Institute ↗
- Who funds MOMENTUM WHEELS FOR HUMANITY ↗
- Who funds ELIZABETH GLASER PEDIATRIC AIDS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COOPERATIVE LEAGUE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds TIDES CENTER ↗
- Who funds RESULTS FOR DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds CLINTON HEALTH ACCESS INITIATIVE INC ↗
- Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds PLAN INTERNATIONAL USA INC ↗
- Who funds WORLD EDUCATION INC ↗
- Who funds INSTITUTE FOR HEALTHCARE IMPROVEMENT ↗
- Who funds ALLIANCECHICAGO ↗
- Who funds THE POPULATION COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds UNITED STATES PHARMACOPEIAL CONVENTION ↗
- Who funds VITAL STRATEGIES INC ↗
- Who funds Micronutrient Forum ↗
- Who funds HANDICAP INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ALLIANCE OF STATE AND TERRITORIAL AIDS DIRECTORSDBA NASTAD ↗
- Who funds COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · Family Health International Inc · Northeast Delta Dental Foundation · Path · Endowment For Health Inc · Jhpiego Corporation · Gates Foundation · California Healthcare Foundation · Mary Hitchcock Memorial Hospital · Gavi Alliance · Johns Hopkins University · Granite United Way
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Jsi Research & Training Institute Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Jhpiego Corporation — 65% of income from government
- Health Resources in Action Inc — 39% of income from government
- Adventist Development & Relief Agency International — 35% of income from government
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology — 35% of income from government
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- Boston Medical Center Corporation — 23% of income from government
- Capital Link Inc — 18% of income from government
- Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
- Children's Hospital Corporation — 10% of income from government
- United States Pharmacopeial Convention — 6% of income from government
- Trustees of Boston College — 3% of income from government
- The Nemours Foundation — 0% of income from government
- Institute for Healthcare Improvement — 0% of income from government
- Glbtq Legal Advocates & Defenders Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Jsi Research & Training Institute Inc?
Find your warmest path to Jsi Research & Training Institute Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.