Skip to content
Jsi Research & Training Institute Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Jsi Research & Training Institute Inc

Jsi is dedicated to improving lives through better health and education outcomes for individuals and communities and to providing an environment where people of passion can pursue this cause.

$63M
Granted FY2025still arriving
205
Grants FY2025still arriving
33
States reached
$4.9M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Health$77MInternational$74MCommunity Improvement$20MScience & Tech$18MEducation$14MHuman Services$8.4MPhilanthropy$4.7MArts & Culture$2.7MOther$0
02FY2025 · 205 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 205 grants below total $37,354,591, the rows itemized in this filing. The $63,233,792 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $25,879,201 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k16 grants · $118k
  • $10k–50k98 grants · $2.4M
  • $50k–250k63 grants · $6.9M
  • $250k+28 grants · $28M
$40,000
Median grant
33
States reached
$196M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTION$4,917,453
ALLIANCE CHICAGO$2,955,324
JHPIEGO CORPORATION$2,146,816
PATH$1,904,882
CLINTON HEALTH ACCESS I$1,832,682
TIDES CENTER$1,480,515
INSTITUTE FOR HEALTHCARE$1,473,234
NEHCR STAFFING LLC$1,221,620
CENTER FOR CARE INNOVATION$980,378
MOMENTUM WHEELS FOR HUMANITY$949,302
THE BOSTON CONSULTING GROUP$870,010
ENGENDERHEALTH INC$772,168
ADVOCATES FOR HUMAN$767,924
VILLAGEREACH$753,976
REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY$609,120
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $9.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 88% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%UPLIFT FAMILY SERVICES: $45k → 8%BETHANY CHRISTIAN SERVS: $813k → 11%NATIONAL HEALTH CARE FOR THE HOMELESS COUNCIL INC: $19k → 14%EL CENTRO INC: $42k → 14%EASTER SEALS NEW HAMPSHIRE: $45k → 7%UPLIFT FAMILY SERVICES: $15k → 8%CITYSQUARE: $40k → 14%NEW HAMPSHIRE CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $40k → 7%EASTER SEALS of New Hampshire: $44k → 10%ARCHWAYS: $30k → 7%FELLOWSHIP HEALTH RESOURCES INC: $16k → 14%GREATER TILTON AREA FAMILY: $27k → 7%PARENT SUPPORT NETWORK OF RHODE ISLAND: $16k → 7%ARCHWAYS: $26k → 7%GREATER TILTON AREA FAMILY: $18k → 7%RIVERWOODS AT EXETER: $23k → 5%MONADNOCK FAMILY SERVICES: $12k → 9%TRI-COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM BUSINESS OFFICES: $51k → 13%TIDES CENTER: $2.9M → 10%OCEAN STATE CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING: $20k → 7%GENESIS CENTER: $14k → 14%TIDES CENTER: $1.5M → 10%ZERO TO THREE: $120k → 14%SECOND START: $350k → 7%Tri County Community Action Program: $39k → 13%TIDES CENTER: $763k → 10%TIDES CENTER: $376k → 10%CALIFORNIA ALLIANCE OF CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: $43k → 12%SECOND START: $184k → 7%TIDES CENTER: $351k → 10%CACFS: $19k → 12%SECOND START: $182k → 7%Tides Center: $228k → 10%PROGRESO LATINO: $15k → 14%TRI COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM BUSINESS OFFICES: $33k → 13%CENTER FOR CARE INNOVATION: $128k → 10%TRI COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION: $33k → 13%TAMWORTH DENTAL CENTER: $25k → 13%POSSIBILITY LABS: $23k → 10%GATHER: $30k → 5%CENTER FOR CARE INNOVATION: $89k → 17%SECOND START: $14k → 7%FAMILIES USA FOUNDATION: $118k → 14%FAMILIES USA FOUNDATION: $70k → 14%THE POWER TO DECIDE: $60k → 14%THE POWER TO DECIDE: $41k → 14%THE POWER TO DECIDE: $34k → 14%THE ARC OF THE UNITED STATES: $13k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
VA
MD
DE
AZ
AR
NC
DC
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

Grants abroad, by region: $14M on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 7 regions, $14M to organizations and $39k to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

South Asia$6.0M · 43% · 15 grants · 1 person

Stated purpose: GENERAL

Sub-Saharan Africa$5.7M · 40% · 30 grants · 1 person

Stated purpose: GENERAL

East Asia and the Pacific$1000k · 7% · 15 grants

Stated purpose: GENERAL

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$995k · 7% · 9 grants

Stated purpose: GENERAL

Russia and Neighboring States$211k · 1% · 2 grants

Stated purpose: GENERAL

Middle East and North Africa$185k · 1% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: GENERAL

South America$13k · 0% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: GENERAL

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$222M · 258 repeat orgs$34M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +22% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

258 repeat relationships: 131 still active in FY2025, 127 since wound down; 70 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

258
136

Total granted

$222M
$30M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+8%

Still filing today

54%
49%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.8M went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthInternationalHuman ServicesEducationArts & CultureEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • P
    PATH
    7× · 2019–2025 · $22M · revenue +9%
  • Save The Children Federation Inc
    6× · 2019–2024 · $16M · revenue +18%
  • RT
    Research Triangle Institute
    6× · 2020–2025 · $15M · revenue +37%

Funded once

  • FH
    FAMILY HEALTH INT'L FHI 360
    one grant, 2019 · $13M
  • EG
    ELIZABETH GLASER PEDIATRIC AIDS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $6.1M · revenue -32%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON
    one grant, 2019 · $1.1M
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
National Committee for Quality Assurance

Our mission: to improve the quality of health care.our vision: better health care. better choices. better health.

Health
2
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
3
Altarum Institute

Altarum is focused on improving the health of individuals with fewer financial resources and populations disenfranchised by the health care system. we drive impactful changes in four domains: 1) transform health service delivery - we work…

Science & Tech
4
National Nurse-Led Care Consortium

The national nurse-led care consortium (nncc) strives to advance nurse-led healthcare through policy, consultation, and programs to reduce health disparities and meet people's primary care and wellness needs.

Health
5
Public Health Institute

Public health institute generates and promotes research, leadership and partnerships to build capacity for strong public health policy, programs, systems and practices.

Health
6
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
7
Civitas Networks for Health

Civitas networks for health is the leading voice and convener for organizations working to use data to improve health in communities across the country. by bringing together local implementers - health information exchanges (hies),…

Health
8
National Health Council Inc

To provide a united voice for people with chronic diseases and disabilities.

—
9
Massachusetts Health Quality Partners Inc

MHQP's mission is to improve the quality and equity of patient care experiences in Massachusetts through data-driven insights and collaboration. As an independent voice for healthcare quality and an advocate for the importance of listening…

Education
10
The University of Vermont Health Network Medical Group Inc

Serve as the governing organization for physicians who are employed to provide clinical services to affiliated member hospitals (the "affiliated hospitals") of the university of vermont health network ("uvm health network").

Health
11
Intealth

See schedule oto serve the public by:- assuring the qualifications of health care professionals- providing primary-source verification of credentials of health careprofessionals, as they serve throughout the world- supporting international…

Education
12
Regional West Health Services

Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Catalyst Inc; the most unlike its peers is Traveling Tooth Fairies. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

254 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 254 of the 469 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

10
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
35
Early backer (in before they grew)
254/254
Grantees still filing
150/254
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JHPIEGO CORPORATION: $21,241,753 · OtherJHPIEGO CORPORATIONFAMILY HEALTH INT'L FHI 360: $12,787,210 · OtherFAMILY HEALTH INT'L FHI 360THE MANOFF GROUP INC: $6,671,574 · OtherTHE MANOFF GROUP INCCOOPERATIVE LEAGUE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA: $5,825,291 · OtherCOOPERATIVE LEAGUE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AME…NEHCR STAFFING LLC: $4,280,353 · OtherAbt Associates Inc: $3,514,141 · Other+108 more: $49,491,748 · Other+108 morePATH: $22,408,602 · InternationalPATHSave The Children Federation Inc: $15,824,535 · InternationalSave The Children Federation IncHELEN KELLER INTERNATIONAL: $13,969,299 · InternationalHELEN KELLER INTERNATIONALCLINTON HEALTH ACCESS INITIATIVE INC: $4,865,832 · InternationalCLINTON HEALTH ACCESS INITIATIVE I…RESULTS FOR DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE INC: $4,752,560 · InternationalRESULTS FOR DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE …+21 more: $16,038,026 · International+21 moreMOMENTUM WHEELS FOR HUMANITY: $10,194,563 · HealthMOMENTUM WHEELS…ELIZABETH GLASER PEDIATRIC AIDS FOUNDATION: $6,096,691 · HealthELIZABETH GLASE…ALLIANCECHICAGO: $4,970,948 · HealthALLIANCECHICAGOUNITED STATES PHARMACOPEIAL CONVENTION: $1,229,106 · Health+33 more: $11,315,520 · Health+33 moreResearch Triangle Institute: $14,803,444 · Science & Tech+1 more: $237,151 · Science & TechJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $3,763,349 · EducationTRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE: $2,602,138 · EducationVILLAGEREACH: $1,448,109 · EducationMicronutrient Forum: $1,083,088 · EducationCornell University: $860,715 · EducationDREXEL UNIVERSITY: $721,383 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $480,640 · Education+3 more: $551,964 · EducationTIDES CENTER: $6,271,985 · Human ServicesBETHANY CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $812,861 · Human ServicesSECOND START: $730,351 · Human Services+5 more: $725,818 · Human ServicesINSTITUTE FOR HEALTHCARE IMPROVEMENT: $3,545,567 · Civil RightsGLBTQ LEGAL ADVOCATES & DEFENDERS INC: $452,756 · Civil RightsREPRODUCTIVE EQUITY NOW FOUNDATION INC: $175,000 · Civil Rights
Other$103,812,070International$77,858,854Health$33,806,828Science & Tech$15,040,595Education$11,511,386Human Services$8,541,015Civil Rights$4,173,323

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPATH: $22,408,602 over 7y, 2.2% of budgetJHPIEGO CORPORATION: $21,241,753 over 3y, 3.8% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $15,824,535 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetResearch Triangle Institute: $14,803,444 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetHELEN KELLER INTERNATIONAL: $13,969,299 over 6y, 4.2% of budgetMOMENTUM WHEELS FOR HUMANITY: $10,194,563 over 7y, 55% of budgetTIDES CENTER: $6,271,985 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetELIZABETH GLASER PEDIATRIC AIDS FOUNDATION: $6,096,691 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetCOOPERATIVE LEAGUE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA: $5,825,291 over 6y, 7.1% of budgetALLIANCECHICAGO: $4,970,948 over 3y, 24% of budgetCLINTON HEALTH ACCESS INITIATIVE INC: $4,865,832 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetRESULTS FOR DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE INC: $4,752,560 over 7y, 2.2% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $3,763,349 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR HEALTHCARE IMPROVEMENT: $3,545,567 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE: $2,602,138 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD VISION INC: $2,365,743 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetPLAN INTERNATIONAL USA INC: $2,297,525 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetWORLD EDUCATION INC: $2,080,550 over 5y, 2.8% of budgetVILLAGEREACH: $1,448,109 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetTHE POPULATION COUNCIL INC: $1,357,835 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetHANDICAP INTERNATIONAL: $1,266,405 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetVITAL STRATEGIES INC: $1,253,043 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetUNITED STATES PHARMACOPEIAL CONVENTION: $1,229,106 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetPROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $1,132,376 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetNATIONAL ALLIANCE OF STATE AND TERRITORIAL AIDS DIRECTORSDBA NASTAD: $1,100,580 over 7y, 3.1% of budgetMicronutrient Forum: $1,083,088 over 5y, 33% of budgetENGENDERHEALTH INC: $1,011,706 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $894,102 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN OF WASHINGTON: $867,706 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMedical Care Development Inc: $863,850 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetCornell University: $860,715 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBETHANY CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $812,861 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetNH Alcohol & Drug Abuse Counselors Association: $776,025 over 3y, 60% of budgetFamily Health International Inc: $763,507 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSECOND START: $730,351 over 4y, 8.4% of budgetNORTHWEST REGIONAL PRIMARY CARE ASSOCIATION: $728,876 over 3y, 7.9% of budgetDREXEL UNIVERSITY: $721,383 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation: $699,838 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBRAC USA INC: $604,715 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetADVENTIST DEVELOPMENT & RELIEF AGENCY INTERNATIONAL: $598,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCOLORADO COMMUNITY HEALTH NETWORK INC: $575,826 over 5y, 7.1% of budgetINTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS: $540,160 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COUNTY AND CITY HEALTH OFFICALS: $527,354 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetHOUSING WORKS HEALTH SERVICES III INC: $497,910 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetBOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION: $497,323 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDEVELOPMENT INITIATIVES POVERTY RESEARCH AMERICA INC: $481,621 over 3y, 33% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $480,640 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASSOCIATION OF CLINICIANS FOR THE UNDERSERVED INC: $478,000 over 2y, 11% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PATH ↗
  • Who funds JHPIEGO CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds Research Triangle Institute ↗
  • Who funds HELEN KELLER INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds MOMENTUM WHEELS FOR HUMANITY ↗
  • Who funds TIDES CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ELIZABETH GLASER PEDIATRIC AIDS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COOPERATIVE LEAGUE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCECHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds CLINTON HEALTH ACCESS INITIATIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds RESULTS FOR DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR HEALTHCARE IMPROVEMENT ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗
  • Who funds PLAN INTERNATIONAL USA INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD EDUCATION INC ↗
  • Who funds VILLAGEREACH ↗
  • Who funds THE POPULATION COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds HANDICAP INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds VITAL STRATEGIES INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES PHARMACOPEIAL CONVENTION ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ALLIANCE OF STATE AND TERRITORIAL AIDS DIRECTORSDBA NASTAD ↗
  • Who funds Micronutrient Forum ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

New Hampshire Charita…Family Health Interna…Northeast Delta Denta…PathEndowment For Health …Jhpiego CorporationGates FoundationCalifornia Healthcare…Mary Hitchcock Memori…Gavi AllianceJohns Hopkins Univers…Granite United Way
New Hampshire Charitable FoundationNH55.2× affinity57 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · Family Health International Inc · Northeast Delta Dental Foundation · Path · Endowment For Health Inc · Jhpiego Corporation · Gates Foundation · California Healthcare Foundation · Mary Hitchcock Memorial Hospital · Gavi Alliance · Johns Hopkins University · Granite United Way

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jsi Research & Training Institute Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jsi Research & Training Institute Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 18%
  • Jhpiego Corporation: 65% of income from government
  • Health Resources in Action Inc: 39% of income from government
  • Adventist Development & Relief Agency International: 35% of income from government
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology: 35% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Boston Medical Center Corporation: 23% of income from government
  • Capital Link Inc: 18% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation: 10% of income from government
  • United States Pharmacopeial Convention: 6% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston College: 3% of income from government
  • The Nemours Foundation: 0% of income from government
  • Institute for Healthcare Improvement: 0% of income from government
  • Glbtq Legal Advocates & Defenders Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
23report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Jsi Research & Training Institute Inc?

Find your warmest path to Jsi Research & Training Institute Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 469 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jsi Research & Training Institute’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home