Utah · Nonprofit
HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT ALLIANCE OF UTAH
HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT ALLIANCE OF UTAH (Utah) receives grants from 47 organizations whose IRS filings report $2,962,641 to it, the largest being The Chicago Community Trust ($1,130,426). 31 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 70% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
- Revenue FY2024
- $540k
- Funders on record
- 47
- Grants received
- $3.0M
- Net assets
- $562k
What Healthy Environment Alliance of Utah does
Mission
Heal utah's mission is to protect utah's environment and its people by promoting clean air, clean energy, and comprehensive solutions to radioactive and toxic waste.
As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.
Programs
Air quality the organization addresses three main air pollution emission sources-- vehicles, area sources, and industry--by working with the state legislature, regulatory agencies, the private business sector, and the general public. We believe that action on air pollution is action on climate change and that advocating for clean air is one of the most immediate ways we can protect communities and the environment. That's why heal utah works to strengthen and defend regulations and air quality standards while supporting policies and strategies that prioritize public health and frontline communities. Heal dedicated efforts to enhancing public input, transparency, and accountability within the I-15 highway expansion project, submitting its own technical comments as well as garnering over 500 public comments in the draft eis process. Heal was also actively involved in addressing ozone and regional haze pollution in utah through engagement with the epa and state processes. Although a district 10 judge ruled against heal in its legal challenge asking the epa to enforce its own pollution control rules on coal-fired power plants, heal then put additional efforts into supporting the…
$311,452 spentof which $87,270 as grants53% of program spendingRadioactive and toxic waste the organization addresses radioactive and toxic waste issues by harnessing the power of grassroots advocates, educating the public on the hazards of radioactive and toxic waste, and watchdogging corporations that profit from it. We recognize that radioactive and toxic materials pose an environmental and public health crisis in tandem with our climate crisis. Consequently, heal utah believes there is no inclusive clean energy future if we continue to ignore the impacts of extraction on public health and frontline communities. When it comes to past, present, and future harms, we must stand with and protect utah's communities. In 2023 heal continued to monitor and oppose the utah associated municipal power systems' "carbon free power project," a small modular nuclear reactor (smnr)proposal. We ultimately saw this project collapse in november 2023, due to concerns we had raised about high costs, slow timelines, and a lack of public transparency. Heal also opposed energy solutions' efforts to bring more toxic waste to utah, and the nrc rulemaking process that could make it easier to bring depleted uranium into utah. Additionally, heal continued to advocate…
$91,066 spentof which $800 as grants15% of program spendingTransition to clean energy the organization works to combat climate change by focusing on utah's transition from fossil fuels to renewable energy. The organization targets changes in industry, legislative and regulatory policy, and individual choices and behaviors. We believe that our energy system should be built for the people it serves and that advocating for clean energy requires a comprehensive approach. That's why heal utah works to advance a clean energy future that not only reduces emissions and stabilizes the climate, but also promotes adaptation, resilience, health equity, and economic opportunity in our communities. Heal continued to support the rollout of the utah renewable communities program to secure 100% renewable energy for over 18 municipalities and counties by 2030. As part of this program it provided input on the development of a low income cost mitigation program and actively helped prevent the exit of the program's largest member, ogden. In addition heal strengthened its ties with rural partners in the energy communities of carbon and emery counties, and became part of a labor coalition working to ensure that renewable communities can secure good jobs in the…
$185,254 spent31% of program spendingOther
$5,465 spent1% of program spending
The 4 programs described on its FY2023 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $593,237.
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2018, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2018, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
Balance sheet
Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2020 to 2021, from $610k to $1.0M (+71%).
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
Government-grant reliance: 2020 13% · 2021 9% · 2022 13% · 2023 24% · 2024 19%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.
97% of HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT ALLIANCE OF UTAH’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (88% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 7 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Leadership and staff
The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.
Who funds it, year by year
2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 13 funders to 17 funders, grant income rose $250k → $308k.
10 of 47 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 70% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT ALLIANCE OF UTAH’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 47 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT ALLIANCE OF UTAH leans on a few funders — its largest provides 38% of grant income and the top three 66%; half comes from just 2 funders.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left
79% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT ALLIANCE OF UTAH.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 47% · 2018 50% · 2019 39% · 2020 36% · 2021 25% · 2022 34% · 2023 39% — diversifying over time.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How long its funders stay
38% of HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT ALLIANCE OF UTAH's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 66% give in more than one year at all.
Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.
Where its funders are
70% of HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT ALLIANCE OF UTAH's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $881k that is directly attributable, 74% of it comes from funders outside Utah, across 14 states.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $2.1M arriving through sponsors registered in 8 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Against its field
HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT ALLIANCE OF UTAH is better cushioned than half of the 4,264 environment nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 4,264 environment nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024
Organizations like HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT ALLIANCE OF UTAH
Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In Utah
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
57% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Public support
82%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Footprint & structure
Files a return copy in 1 state
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT ALLIANCE OF UTAH: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT ALLIANCE OF UTAH?
- HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT ALLIANCE OF UTAH (Utah) receives grants from 47 organizations whose IRS filings report $2,962,641 to it, the largest being The Chicago Community Trust ($1,130,426). 31 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 70% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
- How many funders does HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT ALLIANCE OF UTAH have?
- IRS filings report 47 organizations giving $2,962,641 in grants to HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT ALLIANCE OF UTAH, 31 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT ALLIANCE OF UTAH?
- The Chicago Community Trust is the largest funder on record, with $1,130,426 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT ALLIANCE OF UTAH find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Utah. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2018–2024), and the filings of 47 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing