· Private foundation
Endowment For Health Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k13 grants · $46k
- $10k–50k38 grants · $803k
- $50k–250k49 grants · $4.0M
- $250k+5 grants · $1.5M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NH Legal Assistance | $334,000 |
| Disability Rights Center-NH Inc | $334,000 |
| ACLU Foundation of NH | $334,000 |
| New Futures | $265,000 |
| New Futures | $265,000 |
| University of NH | $233,000 |
| Health Strategies of NH Inc | $232,500 |
| University of NH | $227,605 |
| NH Center for Justice & Equity | $200,000 |
| Foundation for Healthy Communities | $200,000 |
| Foundation for Healthy Communities | $200,000 |
| NH Center for Justice & Equity | $150,000 |
| NH Fiscal Policy Institute | $150,000 |
| NH Center for Justice & Equity | $150,000 |
| NAMI NH | $120,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $871k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 24% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +54% since the first grant, against +24% for the ones you funded once.
66 repeat relationships — 30 still active in FY2025, 36 since wound down; 38 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 43% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.7M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NFNEW FUTURES INC9× · 2017–2025 · $5.0M · revenue +59% · 34% of their budget
- HSHealth Strategies of New Hampshire Inc8× · 2017–2024 · $3.4M · revenue +54% · 75% of their budget
- NHNEW HAMPSHIRE LEGAL ASSISTANCE INC9× · 2017–2025 · $1.4M · revenue +119%
Funded once
- BPBi-State Primary Care Association Incgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $83k · revenue +39%
- NHNew Hampshire Democracy Fundone grant, 2024 · $80k · revenue 0%
- MUMONADNOCK UNITED WAY INCone grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue -20%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Southern New Hampshire Health is dedicated to providing exceptional care that improves the health and well-being of individuals and communities we serve.
Northern New Hampshire Healthcare Collaborative, Inc. will ensure access to quality care within the communities in which our patients live, provide local and high quality care with positive outcomes to our patients in Coos County while…
The organization's purpose is to support efforts to education, inform, and engage of the people of New Hampshire to build civic participation and knowledge around important issues. The organization assesses the interests and needs of New…
The mission of the NH Providers Association is to represent its members in advancing substance use prevention, treatment and recovery through public policy, leadership, professional development, and quality member services. We envision a…
As a strong statewide voice for all working people, the NH AFL-CIO brings together the unions of New Hampshire into one labor movement that fights for economic and social justice in our workplaces and communities.
The NHHA mission is to lead through advocacy, education, and information in support of its member hospitals and health systems as they strive to improve the health of the individuals and communities they serve.
Develop, nurture and maintain an informed, engaged, and civil new hampshire citizenry.
NOFA-NH actively promotes organic, regenerative, ecologically sound farming, gardening, eating, and land care practices for healthy communities. NOFA-NH helps people build local, just, and sustainable food systems.
Harbor Care's mission is to provide vital services, including housing and healthcare to all in our communities needing assistance. Our vision is one where everyone gets to live safe, stable, and healthy lives, filled with purpose, respect…
Preservation of historic landmarks, communities and landscapes in order to protect and revitalize the character of the Statess communities and add to their economic vitality.
The holding company for 615 Amherst St, Harbor Care's licensed residential treatment center for individuals and families living with substance use disorder.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Hampshire Center for Nonprofits and the most unlike its peers is Fannie E Rippel Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
125 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 125 of the 189 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NEW FUTURES INC ↗
- Who funds Health Strategies of New Hampshire Inc ↗
- Who funds Foundation for Healthy Communities ↗
- Who funds NEW HAMPSHIRE LEGAL ASSISTANCE INC ↗
- Who funds EARLY LEARNING NEW HAMPSHIRE ↗
- Who funds MASSACHUSETTS IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE ADVOCACY COALITION INC ↗
- Who funds NEW HAMPSHIRE FISCAL POLICY INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds NAMI NEW HAMPSHIRE ↗
- Who funds NH Center for Justice & Equity ↗
- Who funds Marnitas Table Inc ↗
- Who funds Lamprey Health Care Inc ↗
- Who funds NEW HAMPSHIRE PUBLIC HEALTH ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds DISABILITY RIGHTS CENTER - NH INC ↗
- Who funds NEW HAMPSHIRE CENTER FOR NONPROFITS ↗
- Who funds GRANITE STATE ORGANIZING PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds NEW HAMPSHIRE COMMUNITY LOAN FUND INC ↗
- Who funds CONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds NEW HAMPSHIRE CHILDREN'S TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds NEW HAMPSHIRE PUBLIC RADIO INC ↗
- Who funds NACKEY S LOEB SCHOOL OF COMMUNICATIONS INC ↗
- Who funds Maine Council on Aging ↗
- Who funds LEADERSHIP NEW HAMPSHIRE ↗
- Who funds ORGANIZATION FOR REFUGEE AND ↗
- Who funds FANNIE E RIPPEL FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · Granite United Way · Point32health Foundation Inc · Cogswell Benevolent Trust · New Hampshire Children's Health Foundation · Arthur Jr Dobles & Olive G Dobles Crut · Mary Hitchcock Memorial Hospital · Dartmouth-Hitchcock Clinic · Eastern Bank Foundation · Eversource Energy Foundation Inc · Bangor Savings Bank Foundation · Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Endowment For Health Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Child Trends Inc — 50% of income from government
- Health Resources in Action Inc — 39% of income from government
- Fenway Community Health Center Inc — 27% of income from government
- Springfield Medical Care Systems Inc — 16% of income from government
- Massachusetts Immigrant and Refugee Advocacy Coalition Inc — 8% of income from government
- Third Sector New England Inc — 3% of income from government
- Resist Inc — 2% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.