· Public charity
Path
PATH makes good health more accessible in 70+ countries by improving the health care people receive, creating affordable health products, and advancing effective health policies.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 43 grants below total $22,765,327 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $79,436,374 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $56,671,047 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $8k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $228k
- $50k–250k14 grants · $1.9M
- $250k+20 grants · $21M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON | $2,606,100 |
| ICF MACRO INC | $2,504,577 |
| JHPIEGO | $1,773,479 |
| THE ALBERT B SABIN VACCINE INSTITUTE INC | $1,579,798 |
| CLINTON HEALTH ACCESS INITIATIVE | $1,311,719 |
| REGENSTRIEF INSTITUTE INC | $1,229,401 |
| JSI RESEARCH AND TRAINING INSTITUTE INC | $1,175,481 |
| CHILDRENS HOSPITAL BOSTON | $1,117,759 |
| OPENMRS INC | $945,971 |
| POPULATION SERVICES INTERNATIONAL INC | $896,289 |
| HJF MEDICAL RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL INC | $848,762 |
| TULANE UNIVERSITY | $752,801 |
| INDIANA UNIVERSITY | $718,838 |
| INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS | $659,848 |
| TECHCHANGE INC | $652,264 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 53% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
Grants abroad, by region — $57M on the FY2024 return
Schedule F, as filed: 9 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: AFRICA · PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT · GLOBAL HEALTH PROGRAMS
Stated purpose: PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT · GLOBAL HEALTH PROGRAMS · GLOBAL HEALTH PROGRAMS, PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT
Stated purpose: AMEE · GLOBAL HEALTH PROGRAMS · PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT
Stated purpose: AMEE, GLOBAL HEALTH PROGRAMS · AMEE, PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT · AMEE
Stated purpose: PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT · GLOBAL HEALTH PROGRAMS
Stated purpose: AMEE · AMEE, PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT
Stated purpose: PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT · GLOBAL HEALTH PROGRAMS
Stated purpose: GLOBAL HEALTH PROGRAMS · PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT
Stated purpose: PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
106 repeat relationships — 34 still active in FY2024, 72 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.7M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CHCLINTON HEALTH ACCESS INITIATIVE INC5× · 2020–2024 · $8.3M · revenue +24%
JSI RESEARCH & TRAINING INSTITUTE INC7× · 2018–2024 · $6.5M · revenue +26%- ABAlbert B Sabin Vaccine Institute Inc6× · 2017–2024 · $6.2M · revenue +342%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2017 · $2.1M
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2018 · $1.4M
- FUFRAUNHOFER USA INCone grant, 2017 · $599k · revenue -36%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To improve the lives of people through innovative scientific and engineering research.
Aahi is a nonprofit biotech research institute, bringing together the best experts, technologies, and platforms to create accessible, high-quality products and solutions for harnessing the immune system to alleviate disease.
See schedule oto serve the public by:- assuring the qualifications of health care professionals- providing primary-source verification of credentials of health careprofessionals, as they serve throughout the world- supporting international…
To discover, develop and deliver safe, effective and affordable vaccines for global public health. its vision is developing countries free of suffering from infectious disease.
The Institute is a scientific research center dedicated to conducting basic and applied research to advance the understanding of human disease and the improvement of human health. The Institute fosters an innovative research environment…
Primary functions are the coordination and delivery of health care resources and services, health care education for the hospital service area, long range analysis of health care needs and development of programs, and arranging for…
To save lives and protect people's health by increasing equitable and sustainable use of vaccines.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…
Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.
To conduct and support programs and activities aimed at solving some of the world's greatest public health challenges, with a specific focus on enabling health workers to have the greatest possible impact on the health of the people they…
To deliver preeminent medical care and service to our patients and communities through outstanding and innovative medical leadership and practice, while participating in and supporting excellence in education and research. We achieve this…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Health International Inc and the most unlike its peers is Gates Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
91 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 91 of the 164 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CLINTON HEALTH ACCESS INITIATIVE INC ↗
- Who funds JSI RESEARCH & TRAINING INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds Albert B Sabin Vaccine Institute Inc ↗
- Who funds HJF MEDICAL RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds Regenstrief Institute Inc ↗
- Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
- Who funds POPULATION SERVICES INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds JHPIEGO CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds THE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND ↗
- Who funds INTRAHEALTH INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗
- Who funds Children's Hospital Corporation ↗
- Who funds OpenMRS1 Limited DBA OPENMRS INC ↗
- Who funds SEATTLE BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds VILLAGEREACH ↗
- Who funds Medical Care Development Inc ↗
- Who funds MEDIC MOBILE INC ↗
- Who funds THE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds THE POPULATION COUNCIL INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Gates Foundation · Jsi Research & Training Institute Inc · Clinton Health Access Initiative Inc · Johns Hopkins University · Family Health International Inc · Gavi Alliance · Population Services International · Trustees of Boston University · The Rockefeller Foundation · President and Fellows of Harvard College · Mulago Foundation · United Nations Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Path funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Henry M Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine — 100% of income from government
- Jsi Research & Training Institute Inc — 69% of income from government
- Management Sciences for Health Inc — 67% of income from government
- Jhpiego Corporation — 65% of income from government
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology — 35% of income from government
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
- Yale University — 12% of income from government
- Children's Hospital Corporation — 10% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
- University of Miami — 5% of income from government
- Hjf Medical Research International Inc — 1% of income from government
- Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.