· Public charity
Granite United Way
GRANITE UNITED WAY engages 20,000 donors and volunteers and hundreds of local decision making volunteers to raise and invest local dollars for our communities.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 55 grants below total $482,190 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,344,247 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,862,057 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k41 grants · $305k
- $10k–50k14 grants · $177k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER CONCORD | $16,500 |
| GRAFTON COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS | $15,500 |
| CASA OF NH | $15,500 |
| CONCORD COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS | $15,000 |
| THE FRIENDLY KITCHEN | $15,000 |
| PROJECT STORY | $14,000 |
| MAYNARD HOUSE | $12,500 |
| PEMI YOUTH CENTER | $11,030 |
| SPRINGFIELD TURNING POINT | $11,000 |
| UPPER VALLEY HAVEN | $10,800 |
| FAIR TIDE | $10,630 |
| COMMUNITY CAREGIVERS OF GREATER DERRY | $10,000 |
| FRIENDS OF VETERANS | $10,000 |
| 1269 CAFE | $10,000 |
| SECOND START | $9,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $1.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 46% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.
124 repeat relationships — 32 still active in FY2025, 92 since wound down; 23 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $182k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TGThe Granite Young Men's Christian Association4× · 2021–2024 · $638k · revenue +66%
- BGBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER MANCHESTER5× · 2019–2024 · $265k · revenue +24%
- NHNEW HAMPSHIRE LEGAL ASSISTANCE INC6× · 2019–2025 · $241k · revenue +75%
Funded once
- MUMONADNOCK UNITED WAY INCone grant, 2021 · $168k · revenue -28%
- NCNEWMARKET COMMUNITY CHURCHone grant, 2021 · $87k
- LHLamprey Health Care Incone grant, 2021 · $67k · revenue +20%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
ARCNH community recovery center is a Peer-to-Peer recovery coaching program that is designed to provide those on the path to recovery with individualized care and support from those with personal experiences with SUDS
Southern New Hampshire Health is dedicated to providing exceptional care that improves the health and well-being of individuals and communities we serve.
CityHope walks with individuals and families, empowering and equipping them with the necessary resources and skills needed to thrive in their communities. By providing support services to those experiencing financial hardships and housing…
The Well's mission is to deliver real solutions in behavioral health through compassion, innovation, and collaboration. By building an inclusive community, we offer comprehensive treatment and resources to empower individuals of diverse…
LRCABs mission is to provide peer support to those who are currently receiving or have received mental health services and to empower them to control their own lives and to influence the resources that affect their lives.
The holding company for 615 Amherst St, Harbor Care's licensed residential treatment center for individuals and families living with substance use disorder.
We support people age 60 and older persons with disabilities in their efforts to remain active healthy, financially secure, and in control of their own lives. The Agency connects people and the services they they need to live independently…
To provide legal representation and social services advocacy to new hampshire low-income and underserved children across multiple legal contexts.
Northern New Hampshire Healthcare Collaborative, Inc. will ensure access to quality care within the communities in which our patients live, provide local and high quality care with positive outcomes to our patients in Coos County while…
UVCHS in a not for profit organization that provides medical dental behavioral heath and pharmacy services. Our goal is to make quality care available to everyone regardless of demographic or economic status. We accept all major insurances…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Lakes Region Mental Health Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Hca Healthcare Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
169 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 169 of the 188 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds The Granite Young Men's Christian Association ↗
- Who funds Greater Seacoast Community Health ↗
- Who funds Manchester Neighborhood Housing Services Inc ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER MANCHESTER ↗
- Who funds NEW HAMPSHIRE LEGAL ASSISTANCE INC ↗
- Who funds Merrimack Valley Day Care Service ↗
- Who funds Amoskeag Health ↗
- Who funds HCA HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UPPER VALLEY HAVEN ↗
- Who funds MONADNOCK UNITED WAY INC ↗
- Who funds THE FRIENDS PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds THE UPPER ROOM A FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds Easter Seals New Hampshire Inc ↗
- Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF NEW HAMPSHIRE ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL AND NORTHERN NH INC ↗
- Who funds Grafton County Senior Citizens Council Inc ↗
- Who funds LAKES REGION COMMUNITY SERVICES COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ALLIANCE FOR TEEN SAFETY ↗
- Who funds PITTSFIELD YOUTH WORKSHOP INC ↗
- Who funds The Mental Health Center of Greater Manchester Inc ↗
- Who funds Blueberry Express Day Care Inc ↗
- Who funds CONCORD COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS ↗
- Who funds MANCHESTER POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds ST JOSEPH COMMUNITY SERVICES DBA MEALS ON WHEELS OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY ↗
- Who funds MEDIA POWER YOUTH ↗
- Who funds YWCA NEW HAMPSHIRE ↗
- Who funds THE FAMILY PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds COPPER CANNON CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds ROCKINGHAM NUTRITION AND MEALS ON WHEELS PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds SOUTHEASTERN VERMONT COMMUNITY ACTION INC ↗
- Who funds SECOND START ↗
- Who funds CITY YEAR INC ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CONCORD NH ↗
- Who funds MAYHEW ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · Cogswell Benevolent Trust · Arthur Jr Dobles & Olive G Dobles Crut · Agnes M Lindsay Trust · The Couch Family Foundation · Madelaine G Vonweber Trust Todd Fahey & William Tucker Co-Trustees · Mary Hitchcock Memorial Hospital · Endowment For Health Inc · Mascoma Bank Foundation · Bangor Savings Bank Foundation · Dartmouth-Hitchcock Clinic · Trust Uw Oleonda Jameson
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Granite United Way funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Twin Pines Housing Trust — 100% of income from government
- Second Wind Foundation — 85% of income from government
- Valley Court Diversion Programs Inc — 84% of income from government
- Southeastern Vermont Community Action Inc — 83% of income from government
- Tri-Valley Transit Inc — 81% of income from government
- Safeline Inc — 64% of income from government
- Dismas of Vermont Inc — 39% of income from government
- The Family Place Inc — 38% of income from government
- Upper Valley Haven — 38% of income from government
- Center On Rural Innovation Inc — 37% of income from government
- International Institute of New England Inc — 24% of income from government
- Turning Point Recovery Center of Springfield Vt Inc — 24% of income from government
- Willing Hands Enterprises Inc — 17% of income from government
- Epilepsy Foundation New England — 11% of income from government
- City Year Inc — 11% of income from government
- Treehouse Childrens School Inc — 11% of income from government
- Reach Out and Read Inc — 9% of income from government
- Ymca of the North Shore Inc — 6% of income from government
- Upper Valley Trails Alliance — 3% of income from government
- Cover Home Repair Inc — 3% of income from government
- Windsor Hospital Corporation — 1% of income from government
- Creative Lives Inc — 0% of income from government
- Zack's Place Enrichment Center Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.