How much did JHPIEGO CORPORATION grant in FY2023?

International$111MEducation$41MHealth$2.8MCivil Rights$1.3MSocial Science$1.2MYouth Development$786kCommunity Improvement$454kHuman Services$301kArts & Culture$177kOther$79M

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

technical strengtheningmaternal newbornnewborn childtechnical planningplanning maternalchild mnchtechnical hiv

2020

technical hivtechnical guineaguinea deliverytechnical planningplanning maternalmaternal newbornnewborn child

2021

technical oraloral prepoutcomes livingliving urbanurban particularlyparticularly focusingfocusing children

2022

technical zambiazambia nutritiondelivery outcomestechnical underunder meetingtechnical deliverychildren

2023

technical zambiazambia nutritiondelivery outcomestechnical underunder meetingoutcomes livingliving urban

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2023 · 50 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

Under $10k1 grant · $7k
$10k–50k6 grants · $181k
$50k–250k18 grants · $2.3M
$250k+25 grants · $31M

$290,131

Median grant

States reached

$209M

Total assets

Largest grants

THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORKON BEHALF OF IC$6,789,445
SAVE THE CHILDREN$6,784,428
FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER$1,806,163
CHARLES R DREW UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND SCIENCE$1,352,468
PROGRAM FOR APPROPRIATE TECHNOLOGY (AKA PATH)$1,310,802
PACT INC$1,260,606
MANAGEMENT SCIENCES FOR HEALTH$1,254,328
PROGRAM FOR APPROPRIATE TECHNOLOGY (AKA PATH)$1,146,472
HOWARD UNIVERSITY$1,069,905
COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC$767,966
POPULATION SERVICES INTL (AKA PSI)$738,034
MEHARRY MEDICAL COLLEGE$675,907
THINK WELL LLC$646,650
INSTITUTE OF HEALTHCARE IMPROVEMENT$635,349
CHRISTIAN CONNECTIONS FOR INTERNATIONAL HEALTH$605,531

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–19, $301k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10% — the area typically sits at 11%. 26% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$233M · 47 repeat orgs$4.5M to everyone else

47 repeat relationships — 25 still active in FY2023, 22 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$233M

$2.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%

+83%

Still filing today

57%

75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.3M went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

InternationalEducationHealthCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesSocial ScienceOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

SAVE THE CHILDREN
6× · 2018–2023 · $66M · revenue +21%
TO
TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVESITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK
5× · 2018–2023 · $20M · revenue +13%
PI
PACT INC
6× · 2018–2023 · $10M · revenue +46%

Funded once

MI
MACRO INTL INC
one grant, 2018 · $1.3M
SAINT BONIFACE HAITI FOUNDATIONgraduated
one grant, 2018 · $224k · revenue +83%
IN
INTERNEWS NETWORKgraduated
one grant, 2022 · $177k · revenue +109%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

International Aids Vaccine

Translate scientific discoveries into affordable, globally accessible public health solutions

International

Harvard Medical Faculty Physicians At

As previously noted in this form 990, the mission of harvard medical faculty physicians at beth israel deaconess medical center, inc. is to provide extraordinary healthcare services, where the patient comes first, supported by world-class…

Health

Global Health Council

Global health council is the leading membership organization supporting and connecting advocates, implementers, and stakeholders around global health priorities worldwide. the global health council, inc. (the "council"ghc") was…

International

The California Medical Innovations

Bringing together physical and life science researchers, clinicians, engineers/ and computational scientists to address the significant health care challenges of heart and vascular disease, obesity, and metabolic disorders through a…

Education

Dartmouth-Hitchcock Clinic

Advancing health through research, education, clinical practice, and community partnerships; providing each person the best care in the right place, at the right time, every time.

Health

Institute for Public Health Innovation

Iphi develops multi-sector partnerships and innovative solutions to improve the public's health and well-being across maryland, virginia and the district of columbia. our work strengthens health systems and policy, enhances conditions that…

Human Services

Dhr Health Institute for Research

Philanthropy

Howard Hughes Medical Institute

The howard hughes medical institute is a philanthropy that serves society through the direct conduct of biomedical research and support for programs in science education.

Health

International Community Health Services

Provide health services to improve the health of asian pacific islander and other communities.

Health

University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of family medicine.

—

University Health Inc

Primary functions are the coordination and delivery of health care resources and services, health care education for the hospital service area, long range analysis of health care needs and development of programs, and arranging for…

—

The Administrators in Medicine

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Intrahealth International Inc and the most unlike its peers is Research Triangle Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 44 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

1%1/69

the rest of the field

11%

206,163/1,819,496

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

41 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

40/41

Grantees still filing

29/41

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

International$111,172,589Other$79,521,340Education$40,693,163Health$2,825,204Civil Rights$1,269,005Social Science$1,151,750Youth Development$785,552

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Johns Hopkins UniversityMD51× affinity25 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Johns Hopkins University · Family Health International Inc · Jsi Research & Training Institute Inc · Gates Foundation · Population Services International · Path · The Rockefeller Foundation · Clinton Health Access Initiative Inc · New Venture Fund · Margaret a Cargill Foundation · AIDS Vaccine Advocacy Coalition Inc · Project Concern International

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation JHPIEGO CORPORATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

2get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: GLOBAL ALLIANCE TO PREVENT PREMATURITY AND STILLBIRTHS (GAPP).

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

high risk

~1 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 7 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

7 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 814625437 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on GLOBAL ALLIANCE TO PREVENT PREMATURITY AND STILLBIRTHS (GAPP), cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 1 months of cash on hand.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 42% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Jhpiego Corporation?

Find your warmest path to Jhpiego Corporation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

JHPIEGO CORPORATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

41 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Jhpiego Corporation?

More from the funding graph

JHPIEGO CORPORATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

41 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Jhpiego Corporation?

More from the funding graph