· Public charity
Jhpiego Corporation
Jhpiego creates and delivers transformative health care solutions that save lives.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 35 grants below total $19,626,073 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $46,709,278 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $27,083,205 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k2 grants · $16k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $102k
- $50k–250k18 grants · $2.4M
- $250k+11 grants · $17M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SAVE THE CHILDREN | $5,894,255 |
| THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK | $3,696,785 |
| MCKINSEY & COMPANY INC WASHINGTON | $2,326,743 |
| PACT INC | $1,398,283 |
| COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC | $760,123 |
| THINK WELL LLC | $751,167 |
| PROGRAM FOR APPROPRIATE TECHNOLOGY (AKA PATH) | $547,755 |
| FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER | $518,451 |
| VIAMO PBC | $501,279 |
| MANAGEMENT SCIENCES FOR HEALTH | $444,917 |
| AVENIR HEALTH INC (AKA FUTURES INSTITUTE) | $275,225 |
| INSTITUTE FOR HEALTHCARE IMPROVEMENT | $241,221 |
| ZENYSIS TECHNOLOGIES INC | $221,367 |
| D-TREE INTERNATIONAL | $212,813 |
| MANAGEMENT SCIENCES FOR HEALTH | $211,524 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–19, $336k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 33% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
Grants abroad, by region — $27M on the FY2025 return
Schedule F, as filed: 7 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE IN MATERNAL AND CHILD SURVIVAL. · TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE WITH YOUTH-LED PROGRAMMING AT THE COMMUNITY LEVEL. · ADDRESS CRITICAL HUMAN RESOURCES CHALLENGES IN THE HEALTH SECTOR BY OPTIMIZING HEALTH WORKFORCE PRODUCTION, PERFORMANCE, AND MANAGEMENT.
Stated purpose: TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE IN MATERNAL AND CHILD SURVIVAL. · TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE TO ORGANIZE THE 9TH NATIONAL YOUTH CONFERENCE ON FAMILY PLANNING. · TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE IN HI-MNCH.
Stated purpose: TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE WITH SELF-INECTION. · TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE IN MATERNAL AND CHILD SURVIVAL. · TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE WITH THE EFFECTIVE MANAGEMENT OF NON-COMMUNICABLE DISEASES.
Stated purpose: TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE IN MATERNAL AND CHILD SURVIVAL.
Stated purpose: TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE IN MATERNAL AND CHILD SURVIVAL.
Stated purpose: TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE IN MITIGATING THE IMPACT OF HIV. · TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE IN MATERNAL AND CHILD SURVIVAL.
Stated purpose: TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE IN MATERNAL AND CHILD SURVIVAL. · TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE REQUIRED TO SUPPORT WORK UNDER THE ENHANCING GLOBAL HEALTH SECURITY
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 9% of Jhpiego Corporation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of 0% since the first grant, against -28% for the ones you funded once.
60 repeat relationships — 25 still active in FY2025, 35 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $803k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
Save The Children Federation Inc9× · 2017–2025 · $107M · revenue +21%- PIPACT INC9× · 2017–2025 · $15M · revenue +57%
THE HOWARD UNIVERSITY4× · 2020–2023 · $8.9M · revenue +40%
Funded once
- PIPLAN INTERNATIONAL USA INCone grant, 2017 · $571k · revenue -28%
- MCMCKINSEY & COMPANY INCone grant, 2023 · $533k
- CFCENTER FOR DISEASE DYNAMICS ECONOMICS & POLICY INCone grant, 2023 · $394k · revenue -31%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.
The Institute is a scientific research center dedicated to conducting basic and applied research to advance the understanding of human disease and the improvement of human health. The Institute fosters an innovative research environment…
We conduct fundamental infectious disease research to generate critical new knowledge about pathogens and their interactions with see schedule o for continuationhumans to enable the discovery and development of novel interventions,…
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
To improve the lives of people through innovative scientific and engineering research.
See schedule o for a more detailed description of ide's mission statement and achievements.
Primary functions are the coordination and delivery of health care resources and services, health care education for the hospital service area, long range analysis of health care needs and development of programs, and arranging for…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
For over 20 years, chai's mission has been to save lives and improve health outcomes in low-and middle-income countries around the world. we do this by enabling the government and private sector to strengthen and sustain quality health…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Health International Inc and the most unlike its peers is Gapps Global Alliance to Prevent Prematurity and Stillbirth. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
50 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 50 of the 83 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
- Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds PATH ↗
- Who funds PACT INC ↗
- Who funds POPULATION SERVICES INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds MANAGEMENT SCIENCES FOR HEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds THE HOWARD UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds ENGENDERHEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds MOREHOUSE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE ↗
- Who funds MEHARRY MEDICAL COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds CHARLES R DREW UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND SCIENCE ↗
- Who funds RESULTS FOR DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER ↗
- Who funds COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC ↗
- Who funds Family Health International Inc ↗
- Who funds AVENIR HEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds INSTITUTE FOR HEALTHCARE IMPROVEMENT ↗
- Who funds CHRISTIAN CONNECTIONS FOR INTERNATIONAL HEALTH ↗
- Who funds THE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds D-TREE INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
- Who funds CORE INC ↗
- Who funds IMPACT INNOVATORS AND ENTREPRENEURS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Research Triangle Institute ↗
- Who funds PLAN INTERNATIONAL USA INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Johns Hopkins University · Gates Foundation · Jsi Research & Training Institute Inc · Family Health International Inc · Population Services International · The Rockefeller Foundation · Clinton Health Access Initiative Inc · Path · Conrad N Hilton Foundation · Wellspring Philanthropic Fund Inc · Gavi Alliance · Global Communities
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Jhpiego Corporation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Management Sciences for Health Inc — 67% of income from government
- Danya Institute Inc — 54% of income from government
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- Center for Disease Dynamics Economics & Policy Inc — 16% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
- Project Medishare for Haiti Inc — 0% of income from government
- Institute for Healthcare Improvement — 0% of income from government
- Avenir Health Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.