· Public charity
Gavi Alliance
To save lives and protect people's health by increasing equitable and sustainable use of vaccines.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 39 grants below total $151,169,405 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,912,788,961 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $2,761,619,556 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $10k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $42k
- $50k–250k10 grants · $1.2M
- $250k+26 grants · $150M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNICEF | $87,688,260 |
| CLINTON HEALTH ACCESS INITIATIVE | $12,569,078 |
| JSI RESEARCH & TRAINING INSTITUTE INC | $10,024,296 |
| JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY | $5,549,120 |
| PATH | $4,785,426 |
| CENTER FOR DISEASE CONTROL FOUNDATION | $4,762,977 |
| THE WORLD BANK (IBRD) | $2,778,000 |
| RESULTS FOR DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE | $2,550,948 |
| CAMPAIGN FOR TOBACCO-FREE KIDS (THROUGH GLOBAL HEALTH ADVOCACY INCUBATOR) | $2,450,677 |
| VILLAGE REACH | $2,441,687 |
| ZIPLINE INTERNATIONAL INC | $2,183,933 |
| NEXLEAF ANALYTICS | $1,623,092 |
| PAN AMERICAN SANITARY BUREAU | $1,617,453 |
| GDI SOLUTIONS LLC | $1,489,134 |
| INTEGRATE HEALTH INC | $1,487,180 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $639k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
Grants abroad, by region — $2.8B on the FY2024 return
Schedule F, as filed: 9 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: WORK PLAN · COUNTRY PROGRAMMES
Stated purpose: COUNTRY PROGRAMMES · WORK PLAN
Stated purpose: COUNTRY PROGRAMMES
Stated purpose: WORK PLAN · COUNTRY PROGRAMMES
Stated purpose: WORK PLAN · COUNTRY PROGRAMMES
Stated purpose: WORK PLAN · COUNTRY PROGRAMMES
Stated purpose: COUNTRY PROGRAMMES
Stated purpose: COUNTRY PROGRAMMES
Stated purpose: COUNTRY PROGRAMMES · WORK PLAN
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
33 repeat relationships — 27 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.7M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF5× · 2020–2024 · $361M · revenue +46%- CHCLINTON HEALTH ACCESS INITIATIVE INC5× · 2020–2024 · $28M · revenue +24%
JSI RESEARCH & TRAINING INSTITUTE INC5× · 2020–2024 · $28M · revenue +89%
Funded once
- TWTHE WORLD BANKone grant, 2020 · $7.4M
- TTTHE TASK FORCE FOR GLOBAL HEALTH INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $639k · revenue +94%
- KLKARNA LLCone grant, 2022 · $491k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.
To improve the lives of people through innovative scientific and engineering research.
Our mission is to improve the performance of health workers and strengthen the systems in which they work.
To save lives and protect people's health by increasing equitable and sustainable use of vaccines.
See schedule oto serve the public by:- assuring the qualifications of health care professionals- providing primary-source verification of credentials of health careprofessionals, as they serve throughout the world- supporting international…
Education and Research
Aahi is a nonprofit biotech research institute, bringing together the best experts, technologies, and platforms to create accessible, high-quality products and solutions for harnessing the immune system to alleviate disease.
Public health institute generates and promotes research, leadership and partnerships to build capacity for strong public health policy, programs, systems and practices.
Tb alliance is a not-for-profit organization dedicated to the discovery, development and delivery of better, faster-acting and affordable tuberculosis drugs that are available to those who need them.
The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).
The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…
Primary functions are the coordination and delivery of health care resources and services, health care education for the hospital service area, long range analysis of health care needs and development of programs, and arranging for…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Health International Inc and the most unlike its peers is Eleanor Crook Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 61 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
- Who funds CLINTON HEALTH ACCESS INITIATIVE INC ↗
- Who funds JSI RESEARCH & TRAINING INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR THE CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION INC ↗
- Who funds PATH ↗
- Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds VILLAGEREACH ↗
- Who funds Global Impact ↗
- Who funds RESULTS FOR DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds NEXLEAF ANALYTICS ↗
- Who funds JHPIEGO CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds CAMPAIGN FOR TOBACCO-FREE KIDS ↗
- Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds GDI-SOLUTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds Integrate Health Inc ↗
- Who funds Yale University ↗
- Who funds Albert B Sabin Vaccine Institute Inc ↗
- Who funds US ASSOCIATION FOR INTERNATIONAL MIGRATION ↗
- Who funds Khushi Baby Inc ↗
- Who funds Research Triangle Institute ↗
- Who funds POPULATION SERVICES INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds ELEANOR CROOK FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE TASK FORCE FOR GLOBAL HEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds Family Health International Inc ↗
- Who funds ELIZABETH GLASER PEDIATRIC AIDS FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Gates Foundation · Path · Jsi Research & Training Institute Inc · The Patrick J McGovern Foundation Inc · Johns Hopkins University · The Rockefeller Foundation · Jhpiego Corporation · Vital Strategies Inc · Good Ventures Foundation · The Skoll Foundation · Trustees of Boston University · Silicon Valley Community Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Gavi Alliance funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Jsi Research & Training Institute Inc — 69% of income from government
- Jhpiego Corporation — 65% of income from government
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology — 35% of income from government
- Trustees of Boston University — 12% of income from government
- Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
- Yale University — 12% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.