Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Je and le Mabee Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$78M
Granted FY2025still arriving
103
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$2.5M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Health$161MHuman Services$139MEducation$116MYouth Development$40MReligion$37MHousing & Shelter$37MFood & Nutrition$32MCrime & Legal$12MOther$0
02FY2025 · 103 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $9k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $78k
  • $50k–250k17 grants · $2.6M
  • $250k+81 grants · $76M
$500,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$799M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JOHN BROWN UNIVERSITY$2,500,000
THE CITY LIGHTS FOUNDATION OF OKLAHOMA$2,000,000
NEW LEAF INC$2,000,000
ARKANSAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$2,000,000
ORAL ROBERTS UNIVERSITY$2,000,000
METROPOLITAN ORGANIZATION TO COUNTER SEXUAL ASSAULT$2,000,000
SAMUEL U RODGERS HEALTH CENTER INC$2,000,000
OURCALLING INC$2,000,000
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY - GA$2,000,000
CENTER FOR CHRISTIAN GROWTH$2,000,000
HENDRIX COLLEGE$2,000,000
YOUNG LIFE COLORADO$2,000,000
YMCA OF WICHITA$2,000,000
MERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION ST LOUIS$1,910,000
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF GREATER KANSAS CITY$1,785,800
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $116.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 77% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HOSPICE OF WICHITA FALLS INC: $1.0M → 9%BROOKWOOD IN GEORGETOWN: $1.1M → 6%THE GRACE CENTER: $965k → 10%MANE GAIT: $1.6M → 5%ENVISION DALLAS LIGHTHOUSE FOUNDATION: $2.0M → 14%6 STONES MISSION NETWORK: $2.0M → 11%AUSTIN GROUPS FOR THE ELDERLY: $1.5M → 10%CHILDSAFE: $2.0M → 16%JUBILEE PARK & COMMUNITY CENTER: $1.0M → 14%OURCALLING INC: $2.0M → 14%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS: $2.0M → 14%COVENANT HOUSE TEXAS: $3.0M → 16%MORNINGSIDE MINISTRIES: $1.7M → 16%Women's Home: $1.0M → 16%COVENANT HOUSE TEXAS: $900k → 16%BUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES INC: $1.5M → 14%Baker Ripley: $2.0M → 16%METROCREST SERVICES: $2.0M → 14%Interfaith Family Services: $1.3M → 14%MEMORIAL ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES INC: $1.0M → 16%KIDS' MEALS INC: $2.0M → 16%YMCA OF THE GREATER HOUSTON AREA: $1.7M → 16%YMCA OF THE GREATER HOUSTON AREA: $1.0M → 16%DEPELCHIN CHILDREN'S CENTER: $1.7M → 16%MIDLAND CARE CONNECTION INC: $1.5M → 14%SYNERGY SERVICE INC: $1.0M → 8%Community Action Project of Tulsa County Inc: $1.0M → 15%EMPOWER EVERGREEN: $1.0M → 16%UNITED COMMUNITY BUILDERS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $1.0M → 17%SAMARITAN HOUSE COMMUNITY CENTER: $2.8M → 8%YMCA of the Greater Houston Area: $1.5M → 16%JOHN 316 MISSION: $1.3M → 14%CENTER OF GRACE INC: $1.0M → 5%YMCA OF WICHITA: $2.0M → 16%YMCA OF WICHITA: $1.0M → 16%WORLD SERVICES FOR THE BLIND: $884k → 17%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF KANSAS CITY ST JOSEPH: $900k → 15%THE CHILDRENS HOME SOCIETY OF MISSOURI: $1.3M → 11%Assistance League of Tulsa: $1.1M → 15%WINGS SPECIAL NEEDS ADULT COMMUNITY: $2.0M → 16%CROSSOVER COMMUNITY IMPACT INC: $1.5M → 15%LIFE SENIOR SERVICES INC: $2.0M → 15%Oklahoma Methodist Manor: $1.0M → 15%FAMILY & CHILDRENS SERVICES INC: $1.5M → 15%YMCA OF GREATER TULSA: $2.0M → 15%FOSTER ADOPT CONNECT: $1.2M → 15%HOPE CENTER INC: $960k → 15%YMCA OF GREATER TULSA: $1.9M → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
NY
NV
RI
CA
CO
NE
MO
AZ
NM
KS
AR
OK
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

30%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$188M · 108 repeat orgs$433M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +25% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

108 repeat relationships — 27 still active in FY2025, 81 since wound down; 76 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

108
575

Total granted

$188M
$379M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
0%

Still filing today

95%
76%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 30% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $55M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YL
    YOUNG LIFE
    6× · 2019–2025 · $10M · revenue +38%
  • TC
    The Children's Center Inc
    2× · 2023–2024 · $5.0M · revenue +27%
  • LC
    LUBBOCK CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2020–2025 · $4.9M · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • PB
    PERMIAN BASIN BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CENTER
    one grant, 2024 · $25M · revenue 0%
  • WB
    WILLIAMS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2024 · $4.2M
  • MH
    MERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION OKLAHOMA CITY
    one grant, 2022 · $4.0M · revenue -74%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Healing Hands Ministries Inc

Hmm health provides quality healthcare to all its neighbors with love, compassion, and respect.

Health
2
Christian Care Mesa Inc

Through christian love and excellence, we are dedicated to providing a fulfilling lifestyle and promoting independence to those we serve.

Human Services
3
Methodist Medical Center

Methodist Medical Center provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health regardless of a patient's ability to pay.

Health
4
Christian Care Surprise Inc

Through christian love and excellence, we are dedicated to providing a fulfilling lifestyle and promoting independence to those we serve.

Housing & Shelter
5
Christian Care Mesa Ii Inc

Through christian love and excellence, we are dedicated to providing a fulfilling lifestyle and promoting independence to those we serve.

Housing & Shelter
6
National Church Residences At Home Central Ohio

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors.

—
7
National Church Residences At Home Health and Wellness Central Ohio

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

—
8
National Church Residences At Home Hospice

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

—
9
National Church Residences At Home Hospice Central Ohio

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

—
10
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
11
Family and Child Guidance Center

Our mission is to provide quality mental health services to children and adults in low income families who are impacted by severe and persistent mental illness, emotional disturbances, child abuse and neglect, high-risk behaviors and…

Health
12
Cook Children's Medical Center

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease and injury.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Opportunity Center for the Homeless and the most unlike its peers is Hall-Voyer Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsAddiction Recovery ServicesFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Affordable Housing Developm…Senior Support ServicesCommunity FoundationsEquine Therapy ProgramsDevelopmental Disabilities …Child Abuse Advocacy Servic…Domestic Violence ServicesHealth Access Advocacy and …Ymca Youth DevelopmentFood Banks and PantriesLocal History MuseumsChristian Youth CampsFaith-Based Social ServicesChristian Missionary Organi…Jewish Community Organizati…Animal Rescue and ShelterWomen & Girls Leadership De…Community College Foundatio…Pregnancy Support ServicesCommunity Arts CentersYouth Development ServicesOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Youth Sports ProgramsCancer Support ServicesEnvironmental Conservation …Independent K-12 SchoolsUnited Way AffiliatesYouth Development Centers
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%2%<5yr14%6%5–10yr19%14%10–20yr16%20%20–35yr13%26%35–55yr16%32%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%4%5–10yr19%12%10–20yr16%16%20–35yr13%25%35–55yr16%44%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.5% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.5%3/655
the rest of the field
13%
240,393/1,818,910

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

624 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 624 of the 766 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

74
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
89
Early backer (in before they grew)
614/624
Grantees still filing
322/624
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ABILENE CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY — $8,000,000 · OtherABILENE CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITYPERMIAN BASIN AREA FOUNDATION — $5,000,000 · Other+71 more — $124,048,732 · Other+71 moreLUBBOCK CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY — $4,925,000 · EducationLUBBOCK CHRISTIAN UNIVE…WAYLAND BAPTIST UNIVERSITY — $4,308,230 · EducationBaylor College of Medicine — $4,200,000 · EducationHENDRIX COLLEGE — $4,000,000 · EducationMIDAMERICA NAZARENE UNIVERSITY — $4,000,000 · EducationORAL ROBERTS UNIVERSITY — $4,000,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF THE OZARKS — $3,500,000 · EducationEAST TEXAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY — $3,300,000 · EducationKansas City University — $3,000,000 · EducationSOUTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY — $2,900,000 · Education+28 more — $48,435,253 · Education+28 moreTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER TULSA — $4,360,000 · Human ServicesTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRIS…Young Men's Christian Association of the Greater Houston Area — $4,200,000 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSE TEXAS — $3,900,000 · Human ServicesSAMARITAN HOUSE COMMUNITY CENTER — $3,300,000 · Human ServicesTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF WICHITA KANSAS (2311) — $3,000,000 · Human Services+37 more — $62,526,242 · Human Services+37 morePERMIAN BASIN BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CENTER — $25,000,000 · HealthPERMIAN BASIN BEHAVIO…The Children's Center Inc — $5,000,000 · HealthThe Children's Center…Scott & White Healthcare Foundation — $3,122,023 · HealthThe Children's Mercy Hospital — $3,000,000 · HealthARKANSAS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION — $2,980,000 · HealthMIDLAND CHILDRENS REHABILITATION CENTER INC — $2,640,000 · Health+23 more — $36,281,172 · Health+23 moreYOUNG LIFE — $10,400,000 · Youth DevelopmentCHO-YEH CAMP AND CONFERENCE CENTER INC — $2,000,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF NOWATA — $1,564,402 · Youth DevelopmentSTONEY CREEK FOUNDATION — $1,072,000 · Youth DevelopmentNew Braunfels Youth Collaborative — $1,000,000 · Youth DevelopmentGirl Scouts Western Oklahoma Inc — $1,000,000 · Youth DevelopmentTULSA DAY CENTER INC — $2,600,000 · Housing & ShelterSARANAM LLC — $2,200,000 · Housing & ShelterSTAR OF HOPE MISSION — $2,000,000 · Housing & ShelterRESTORATION HOUSE OF GREATER KANSAS CITY — $1,135,467 · Housing & ShelterGRACEWOOD INC — $1,000,000 · Housing & ShelterNEW HOPE SHELTER INC — $1,000,000 · Housing & ShelterSt Luke's Methodist Church Foundation Inc — $2,000,000 · ReligionLUTHERAN OUTDOORS MINISTRY OF TEXAS INC — $1,575,000 · ReligionKanakuk Ministries — $1,482,000 · ReligionS O S Ministries INC — $1,450,000 · ReligionBARNABAS FOUNDATION INC — $1,362,600 · ReligionThe Way Retreat Center — $1,000,000 · Religion
Other$137,048,732Education$86,568,483Human Services$81,286,242Health$78,023,195Youth Development$17,036,402Housing & Shelter$9,935,467Religion$8,869,600

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetYOUNG LIFE — $10,400,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetABILENE CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY — $8,000,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetPERMIAN BASIN AREA FOUNDATION — $5,000,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetThe Children's Center Inc — $5,000,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetLUBBOCK CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY — $4,925,000 over 3y, 4.5% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC — $4,392,741 over 3y, 3.5% of budgetTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER TULSA — $4,360,000 over 3y, 9.9% of budgetWAYLAND BAPTIST UNIVERSITY — $4,308,230 over 3y, 3.5% of budgetYoung Men's Christian Association of the Greater Houston Area — $4,200,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetBaylor College of Medicine — $4,200,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHENDRIX COLLEGE — $4,000,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetMIDAMERICA NAZARENE UNIVERSITY — $4,000,000 over 3y, 3.8% of budgetA NEW LEAF INC — $4,000,000 over 3y, 9.8% of budgetORAL ROBERTS UNIVERSITY — $4,000,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetMERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION OKLAHOMA CITY — $4,000,000 over 1y, 23% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE TEXAS — $3,900,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF THE OZARKS — $3,500,000 over 2y, 4.1% of budgetSAMARITAN HOUSE COMMUNITY CENTER — $3,300,000 over 2y, 18% of budgetEAST TEXAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY — $3,300,000 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetScott & White Healthcare Foundation — $3,122,023 over 2y, 10% of budgetSAFE PLACE OF THE PERMIAN BASIN — $3,010,855 over 4y, 26% of budgetTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF WICHITA KANSAS (2311) — $3,000,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetThe Children's Mercy Hospital — $3,000,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK — $3,000,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetKansas City University — $3,000,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetARKANSAS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION — $2,980,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetSOUTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY — $2,900,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetUnion Gospel Mission of Tarrant County — $2,750,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetTULSA AREA UNITED WAY — $2,700,000 over 9y, 1.3% of budgetMIDLAND CARE CONNECTION INC — $2,650,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetMIDLAND CHILDRENS REHABILITATION CENTER INC — $2,640,000 over 3y, 89% of budgetENVISION DALLAS LIGHTHOUSE FOUNDATION — $2,600,000 over 2y, 28% of budgetTULSA DAY CENTER INC — $2,600,000 over 2y, 23% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR PURSUIT — $2,500,000 over 2y, 7.4% of budgetJOHN BROWN UNIVERSITY — $2,500,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetTabor College — $2,500,000 over 1y, 7.2% of budgetTEXAS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY — $2,400,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetLIFE SENIOR SERVICES INC — $2,250,000 over 2y, 21% of budgetSARANAM LLC — $2,200,000 over 1y, 80% of budgetTEXAS BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE — $2,200,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetBUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES INC — $2,100,000 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetBYNUM SCHOOL — $2,100,000 over 2y, 93% of budgetDallas Theological Seminary — $2,100,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK — $2,100,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetOKLAHOMA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY — $2,002,500 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetMULTI-ASSISTANCE CENTER AT MORGAN'S WONDERLAND — $2,000,000 over 1y, 53% of budgetAMERICAN ROYAL ASSOCIATION INC — $2,000,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetSTERLING COLLEGE — $2,000,000 over 1y, 8.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Sunderland Founda…Carl C Anderson Sr an…Meadows Foundation IncArvest FoundationScharbauer Foundation…The Anne and Henry Za…Sarkeys FoundationEl and Thelma Gaylord…Abell-Hanger Foundati…The Moody FoundationCommerce Bancshares F…Permian Basin Area Fo…
The Sunderland FoundationKS112.2× affinity91 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Sunderland Foundation · Carl C Anderson Sr and Marie Jo Anderson Charitable Foundation · Meadows Foundation Inc · Arvest Foundation · Scharbauer Foundation Inc · The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · Sarkeys Foundation · El and Thelma Gaylord Foundation · Abell-Hanger Foundation · The Moody Foundation · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Permian Basin Area Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Je and le Mabee Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 120%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Community Action Project of Tulsa County Inc — 37% of income from government
  • Tulsa Day Center Inc — 9% of income from government
  • Remerge Inc — 7% of income from government
  • Family & Childrens Services Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Oklahoma City Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Oral Roberts University — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
12get no government money at all
64report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Je and le Mabee Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Je and le Mabee Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 766 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines