Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Abell-Hanger Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$12M
Granted FY2025still arriving
382
Grants FY2025still arriving
15
States reached
$1.1M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.

Education$23MHealth$12MHuman Services$9.2MArts & Culture$5.0MHousing & Shelter$3.7MCommunity Improvement$3.2MYouth Development$3.1MFood & Nutrition$3.0MOther$0
02FY2025 · 382 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k245 grants · $767k
  • $10k–50k80 grants · $1.6M
  • $50k–250k46 grants · $3.9M
  • $250k+11 grants · $6.0M
$6,250
Median grant
15
States reached
$135M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PERMIAN BASIN BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CENTER$1,150,000
HARMONY PUBLIC SCHOOLS$850,000
MIDLAND HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$800,000
YMCA OF MIDLAND$700,000
MIDLAND MEMORIAL FOUNDATION$650,000
MIDLAND COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC$385,788
MIDLAND COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC$326,480
MIDLAND SHARED SPACES INC (MSS)$300,000
MIDLAND ATHLETIC SYNDICATE INC$298,368
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS PERMIAN BASIN$250,000
BASIN DREAM CENTER FOR ORPHANS$250,000
ODESSA COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC$210,991
CITY OF MIDLAND$200,000
MISSION AGAPE$150,000
WEST TEXAS FOOD BANK$125,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $7.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AMERICA'S WARRIOR PARTNERSHIP: $170k → 18%AMERICA'S WARRIOR PARTNERSHIP: $150k → 18%AMERICA'S WARRIOR PARTNERSHIP: $120k → 18%MIDLAND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $400k → 12%SPRINGBOARD CENTER: $250k → 14%SPRINGBOARD CENTER: $250k → 14%NONPROFIT MANAGEMENT CENTER OF THE PERMIAN BASIN: $250k → 14%SPRINGBOARD CENTER: $170k → 14%UNITED WAY OF MIDLAND INC: $100k → 12%SPRINGBOARD CENTER: $165k → 14%SPRINGBOARD CENTER: $165k → 14%GREATER IDEAL FAMILY LIFE CENTER: $100k → 12%NONPROFIT MANAGEMENT CENTER OF THE PERMIAN BASIN: $125k → 14%GREATER IDEAL FAMILY LIFE CENTER: $75k → 12%SPRINGBOARD CENTER: $113k → 14%NONPROFIT MANAGEMENT CENTER OF THE PERMIAN BASIN: $110k → 14%GREATER IDEAL FAMILY LIFE CENTER: $75k → 12%GREATER IDEAL FAMILY LIFE CENTER: $75k → 12%GREATER IDEAL FAMILY LIFE CENTER: $75k → 12%NONPROFIT MANAGEMENT CENTER OF THE PERMIAN BASIN: $100k → 14%GREATER IDEAL FAMILY LIFE CENTER: $75k → 12%NONPROFIT MANAGEMENT CENTER OF THE PERMIAN BASIN: $90k → 14%GREATER IDEAL FAMILY LIFE CENTER: $75k → 12%NONPROFIT MANAGEMENT CENTER OF THE PERMIAN BASIN: $90k → 14%GREATER IDEAL FAMILY LIFE CENTER: $75k → 12%NONPROFIT MANAGEMENT CENTER OF THE PERMIAN BASIN: $90k → 14%BASIN DREAM CENTER FOR ORPHANS: $70k → 12%NONPROFIT MANAGEMENT CENTER OF THE PERMIAN BASIN: $80k → 14%NONPROFIT MANAGEMENT CENTER OF THE PERMIAN BASIN: $80k → 14%NONPROFIT MANAGEMENT CENTER OF THE PERMIAN BASIN: $75k → 14%SPRINGBOARD CENTER: $65k → 14%THE SPRINGBOARD CENTER: $65k → 14%SPRINGBOARD CENTER: $65k → 14%THE SPRINGBOARD CENTER: $64k → 14%UNITED WAY OF MIDLAND INC: $50k → 12%BUCKNER CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $50k → 14%BUCKNER CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $50k → 14%CENTERS FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC: $100k → 12%CENTERS FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC: $100k → 12%CENTERS FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC: $85k → 12%CENTERS FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC: $85k → 12%CENTERS FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC: $85k → 12%CENTERS FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC: $80k → 12%CENTERS FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC: $75k → 12%CENTERS FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC: $75k → 12%CENTERS FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC: $75k → 12%CENTERS FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC: $75k → 12%MANOR PARK INC: $300k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
NM
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
OK
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 12% of Abell-Hanger Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Abell-Hanger Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$65M · 225 repeat orgs$4.8M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +20% since the first grant, against +6% for the ones you funded once.

225 repeat relationships — 133 still active in FY2025, 92 since wound down; 27 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

225
128

Total granted

$65M
$4.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+6%

Still filing today

68%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $654k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationHealthArts & CultureReligionPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MC
    MIDLAND COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    8× · 2018–2025 · $6.4M · revenue +93% · 29% of their budget
  • WT
    WEST TEXAS FOOD BANK
    8× · 2018–2025 · $2.0M · revenue +110%
  • OC
    ODESSA COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $1.9M · revenue +206% · 30% of their budget

Funded once

  • RT
    Remember the Alamo Foundation
    one grant, 2023 · $500k · revenue -9%
  • MC
    MIDLAND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP
    one grant, 2022 · $400k · revenue -23% · 45% of their budget
  • CC
    CRISIS CENTER
    one grant, 2018 · $300k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Progress Texas Institute

The Progress Texas Institute provides research and strategic communications on issues with the ultimate goal of increasing civic engagement.

Civil Rights
2
Food Bank of West Central Texas

To procure and distribute nutritional food to qualified agencies that feed the hungry of West Central Texas.

Food & Nutrition
3
Meals On Wheels of Odessa Inc

Meals on Wheels of Odessa enables people to live with dignity by offering community support and sustenance through coordinated services and enable older adults to live in their own homes safely and independently as long as they are able.

—
4
Center for Public Policy Priorities

At the Every Texan, we believe in a Texas that offers everyone the chance to compete and succeed in life. We envision a Texas where everyone is healthy, well educated, and financially secure. We want the best Texas, a proud state that sets…

Public Benefit
5
Presbyterian Medical Care Mission

Operate a non-profit medical clinic exclusively for charitable purposes to provide medical health services to uninsured and low income adults in the Abilene area.

—
6
Texas Tribune Inc

The texas tribune promotes civic engagement and public education across the state by producing and sharing for free public data interactives, statewide events and intensive and daily reporting on texas public policy, politics and current…

Education
7
Lubbock Family Outreach Center Inc Dba Family Guidance & Outreach Center

The Family Guidance & Outreach Center of Lubbock is dedicated to the prevention of child abuse and neglect and supporting, mentoring, and educating parents.

Human Services
8
Progress Texas

Progress Texas is a non-profit media organization advocating for progressive ideals and policies in our state.

Civil Rights
9
Texas Girls and Boys Ranch

Sharing jesus, healing hearts, transforming lives.

Human Services
10
Feeding Texas

To lead a unified effort for a hunger-free texas.

Community Improvement
11
Commission Shift

Commission Shift is reforming oil and gas oversight by building public support to hold the Railroad Commission of Texas accountable to its mission in a shifting energy landscape.

Environment
12
Presbyterian Medical Services

Presbyterian medical services designs and delivers quality, integrated health, education, and human services in response to identified community needs of the multicultural people of the southwest.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Texas Public Policy Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Midland Project Graduation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity College Foundatio…Addiction Recovery ServicesAffordable Housing Construc…Military Veterans SupportFood Banks and PantriesCommunity Arts CentersChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Health Access Advocacy and …Policy Research and AdvocacyYouth Development ServicesChristian Missionary Organi…Dance Arts OrganizationsPublic Library OperationsCommunity FoundationsUnited Way AffiliatesYmca Youth DevelopmentAnimal Rescue and ShelterCommunity Food PantriesEquine Therapy ProgramsCancer Support ServicesElementary Literacy TutoringDomestic Violence ServicesFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Environmental Conservation …Senior Support ServicesYouth Sports ProgramsYouth Development CentersSchool District FoundationsDevelopmental Disabilities …Community FoundationsIndependent K-12 SchoolsLocal History Museums
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number26%3%<5yr16%6%5–10yr20%21%10–20yr16%27%20–35yr10%24%35–55yr13%19%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value26%1%<5yr16%2%5–10yr20%12%10–20yr16%28%20–35yr10%31%35–55yr13%26%55yr+

The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%4/274
the rest of the field
15%
20,231/136,530

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

251 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 251 of the 384 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

13
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
56
Early backer (in before they grew)
240/251
Grantees still filing
153/251
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MIDLAND MEMORIAL FOUNDATION — $2,879,400 · OtherMIDLAND MEMORIAL FOUNDATIONWEST TEXAS FOOD BANK — $2,019,100 · OtherWEST TEXAS FOOD BANKUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS OF THE PERMIAN BASIN — $1,563,555 · OtherMIDLAND HABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $1,215,350 · Other+114 more — $22,080,724 · Other+114 moreMIDLAND COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $6,418,054 · EducationMIDLAND COLLEGE FOUNDATIO…ODESSA COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $1,858,463 · EducationODESSA COLLEGE FOUNDATION…HARMONY PUBLIC SCHOOLS — $1,700,000 · EducationHARMONY PUBLIC SCHOOLSIDEA Public Schools — $1,355,524 · EducationIDEA Public SchoolsBYNUM SCHOOL — $1,171,550 · EducationBYNUM SCHOOLTexas Interscholastic League Foundation — $714,000 · Education+13 more — $2,451,718 · Education+13 moreTHE SPRINGBOARD CENTER — $1,496,177 · Human ServicesTHE SPRINGBOARD …The Nonprofit Management Center of the Permian Basin Inc — $1,414,426 · Human ServicesThe Nonprofit Ma…CENTERS FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC — $952,175 · Human ServicesCENTERS FOR CHIL…Young Men's Christian Association of Midland Texas — $804,400 · Human ServicesYoung Men's Chri…BASIN DREAM CENTER FOR ORPHANS — $706,500 · Human ServicesBASIN DREAM CENT…GREATER IDEAL FAMILY LIFE CENTER — $653,293 · Human ServicesGREATER IDEAL FA…SENIOR LIFE MIDLAND INC — $614,750 · Human ServicesSENIOR LIFE MIDL…HELPING HANDS OF MIDLAND INC — $570,925 · Human ServicesHELPING HANDS OF…AMERICA'S WARRIOR PARTNERSHIP INC — $444,000 · Human ServicesMIDLAND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP — $400,000 · Human ServicesBUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES INC — $375,000 · Human ServicesMANOR PARK INC — $374,650 · Human Services+15 more — $1,399,271 · Human Services+15 morePERMIAN BASIN BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CENTER — $2,311,000 · HealthPERMIAN BA…HIGH SKY CHILDRENS RANCH INC — $1,283,833 · HealthHIGH SKY C…MIDLAND CHILDRENS REHABILITATION CENTER INC — $677,858 · HealthMIDLAND CH…TEEN CHALLENGE-ADULT CENTERS OF TEXAS INC — $485,000 · HealthTEEN CHALL…PERMIAN BASIN REHABILITATION CENTER — $374,662 · HealthPERMIAN BA…MISSION HEALTH CARE INC — $303,750 · HealthMEADOWS MENTAL HEALTH POLICY INSTITUTE FOR TEXAS — $262,500 · Health+9 more — $524,500 · Health+9 morePERMIAN BASIN PETROLEUM MUSEUM LIBRARY AND HALL OF FAME — $1,519,225 · Arts & CultureMIDLAND COMMUNITY THEATRE INC — $902,795 · Arts & CultureRemember the Alamo Foundation — $500,000 · Arts & CulturePERMIAN BASIN PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS INC — $467,350 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF THE SOUTHWEST — $294,738 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL MEDAL OF HONOR MUSEUM FOUNDATION — $250,000 · Arts & Culture+6 more — $412,200 · Arts & CultureMIDLAND SHARED SPACES INC — $693,420 · Community ImprovementMIDLAND CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDATION INC — $646,200 · Community ImprovementBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF ODESSA — $372,500 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF MIDLAND INC — $227,500 · Youth DevelopmentBoys and Girls Clubs of the Permian Basin Inc — $192,600 · Youth DevelopmentRedirectional Outreach Program Efforts for Youth — $98,250 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNG LIFE — $87,750 · Youth DevelopmentCAMP FIRE WEST TEXAS — $50,000 · Youth Development
Other$29,758,129Education$15,669,309Human Services$10,205,567Health$6,223,103Arts & Culture$4,346,308Community Improvement$1,339,620Youth Development$1,028,600

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMIDLAND COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $6,418,054 over 8y, 29% of budgetPERMIAN BASIN BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CENTER — $2,311,000 over 2y, 9.0% of budgetWEST TEXAS FOOD BANK — $2,019,100 over 8y, 1.6% of budgetODESSA COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $1,858,463 over 8y, 30% of budgetHARMONY PUBLIC SCHOOLS — $1,700,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPERMIAN BASIN PETROLEUM MUSEUM LIBRARY AND HALL OF FAME — $1,519,225 over 8y, 26% of budgetTHE SPRINGBOARD CENTER — $1,496,177 over 8y, 5.9% of budgetThe Nonprofit Management Center of the Permian Basin Inc — $1,414,426 over 8y, 26% of budgetIDEA Public Schools — $1,355,524 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetHIGH SKY CHILDRENS RANCH INC — $1,283,833 over 7y, 6.1% of budgetMIDLAND HABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $1,215,350 over 6y, 12% of budgetBYNUM SCHOOL — $1,171,550 over 8y, 13% of budgetCENTERS FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC — $952,175 over 8y, 5.0% of budgetMIDLAND ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $942,700 over 6y, 5.5% of budgetMIDLAND COMMUNITY THEATRE INC — $902,795 over 8y, 8.2% of budgetYoung Men's Christian Association of Midland Texas — $804,400 over 6y, 6.1% of budgetTexas Interscholastic League Foundation — $714,000 over 7y, 10.0% of budgetBASIN DREAM CENTER FOR ORPHANS — $706,500 over 3y, 30% of budgetMIDLAND SHARED SPACES INC — $693,420 over 7y, 12% of budgetMIDLAND CHILDRENS REHABILITATION CENTER INC — $677,858 over 8y, 6.4% of budgetMARC INC — $659,250 over 4y, 3.0% of budgetGREATER IDEAL FAMILY LIFE CENTER — $653,293 over 8y, 29% of budgetMIDLAND CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDATION INC — $646,200 over 7y, 9.6% of budgetSENIOR LIFE MIDLAND INC — $614,750 over 8y, 3.4% of budgetHELPING HANDS OF MIDLAND INC — $570,925 over 8y, 7.2% of budgetMidland Rape Crisis Center Inc — $525,000 over 8y, 3.8% of budgetCASA OF WEST TEXAS — $506,603 over 8y, 5.0% of budgetRemember the Alamo Foundation — $500,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetMIDLAND ATHLETIC SYNDICATE INC — $489,368 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetTEEN CHALLENGE-ADULT CENTERS OF TEXAS INC — $485,000 over 8y, 5.5% of budgetPERMIAN BASIN PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS INC — $467,350 over 7y, 7.1% of budgetCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF THE PERMIAN BA — $463,400 over 8y, 3.8% of budgetUNITED WAY OF EL PASO COUNTY — $461,200 over 8y, 1.5% of budgetTEEN FLOW YOUTH MINISTRY — $457,958 over 8y, 14% of budgetAMERICA'S WARRIOR PARTNERSHIP INC — $444,000 over 3y, 5.1% of budgetEDUCATE MIDLAND — $440,000 over 4y, 33% of budgetLITERACY COALITION OF THE PERMIAN BASIN — $438,860 over 3y, 12% of budgetBill of Rights Institute — $425,000 over 7y, 2.6% of budgetCITY OF MIDLAND AQUATICS INC — $402,104 over 7y, 3.4% of budgetMIDLAND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP — $400,000 over 1y, 45% of budgetAPHASIA CENTER OF WEST TEXAS INC — $387,125 over 8y, 7.8% of budgetBUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES INC — $375,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetPERMIAN BASIN REHABILITATION CENTER — $374,662 over 8y, 1.8% of budgetMANOR PARK INC — $374,650 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF ODESSA — $372,500 over 5y, 7.1% of budgetUNLOCK MINISTRIES INC DBA OPPORTUNITY TRIBE — $346,150 over 6y, 5.9% of budgetI-20 WILDLIFE PRESERVE & JENNA WELCH NATURE STUDY CENTER — $345,217 over 7y, 30% of budgetCRISIS CENTER OF WEST TEXAS — $345,000 over 7y, 2.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MIDLAND COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PERMIAN BASIN BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds WEST TEXAS FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds ODESSA COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HARMONY PUBLIC SCHOOLS ↗
  • Who funds PERMIAN BASIN PETROLEUM MUSEUM LIBRARY AND HALL OF FAME ↗
  • Who funds THE SPRINGBOARD CENTER ↗
  • Who funds The Nonprofit Management Center of the Permian Basin Inc ↗
  • Who funds IDEA Public Schools ↗
  • Who funds HIGH SKY CHILDRENS RANCH INC ↗
  • Who funds MIDLAND HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
  • Who funds BYNUM SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds CENTERS FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC ↗
  • Who funds MIDLAND ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MIDLAND COMMUNITY THEATRE INC ↗
  • Who funds Young Men's Christian Association of Midland Texas ↗
  • Who funds Texas Interscholastic League Foundation ↗
  • Who funds BASIN DREAM CENTER FOR ORPHANS ↗
  • Who funds MIDLAND SHARED SPACES INC ↗
  • Who funds MIDLAND CHILDRENS REHABILITATION CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MARC INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER IDEAL FAMILY LIFE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds MIDLAND CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SENIOR LIFE MIDLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds HELPING HANDS OF MIDLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds Midland Rape Crisis Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds CASA OF WEST TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds Remember the Alamo Foundation ↗
  • Who funds MIDLAND ATHLETIC SYNDICATE INC ↗
  • Who funds TEEN CHALLENGE-ADULT CENTERS OF TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds PERMIAN BASIN PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS INC ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Permian Basin Area Fo…Scharbauer Foundation…Helen Greathouse Char…Wayne & Jo Ann Moore …Fmh FoundationThe Henry FoundationBeal FoundationPevehouse Family Foun…Warren Charitable Fou…Yarborough FoundationThe Fasken FoundationBryant Family Foundat…
Permian Basin Area FoundationTX202.4× affinity109 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Permian Basin Area Foundation · Scharbauer Foundation Inc · Helen Greathouse Charitable Trust · Wayne & Jo Ann Moore Charitable Foundation · Fmh Foundation · The Henry Foundation · Beal Foundation · Pevehouse Family Foundation · Warren Charitable Foundation · Yarborough Foundation · The Fasken Foundation · Bryant Family Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Abell-Hanger Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Americares Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
47report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 384 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines