· Private foundation
Scharbauer Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k12 grants · $54k
- $10k–50k28 grants · $574k
- $50k–250k14 grants · $1.3M
- $250k+12 grants · $25M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MIDLAND ATHLETIC SYNDICATE INC | $8,500,000 |
| MIDLAND MEMORIAL FOUNDATION | $7,000,000 |
| HARMONY PUBLIC SCHOOLS | $4,000,000 |
| PERMIAN BASIN MEDICAL CENTER (DBA THE BEACON ALLIANCE) | $1,237,348 |
| THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS OF THE PERMIAN BASIN | $1,190,282 |
| BYNUM SCHOOL | $750,000 |
| THE HOLDSWORTH CENTER | $750,000 |
| PERMIAN BASIN AREA FOUNDATION | $500,000 |
| MIDLAND COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC | $500,000 |
| MIDLAND COMMUNITY THEATRE | $425,000 |
| NORTHEAST MIDLAND COUNTY VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT | $350,000 |
| PERMIACARE | $255,000 |
| MISSION AGAPE | $200,000 |
| CASA DE AMIGOS OF MIDLAND TEXAS INCORPORATED | $185,000 |
| UNITED WAY OF MIDLAND INC | $150,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $6.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 7% of Scharbauer Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +18% since the first grant, against +9% for the ones you funded once.
99 repeat relationships — 42 still active in FY2024, 57 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 52% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PBPERMIAN BASIN BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CENTER2× · 2022–2023 · $12M · revenue +383%
- MCMIDLAND COLLEGE FOUNDATION8× · 2017–2024 · $8.6M · revenue +93%
- SLSENIOR LIFE MIDLAND INC4× · 2018–2023 · $3.7M · revenue +18% · 26% of their budget
Funded once
- IPIDEA PUBLIC SCHOOLS (PERMIAN BASIN)one grant, 2019 · $3.5M
- CFCOMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS (FBO MIDLAND DOWNTOWN PARK CONSERVANCY)one grant, 2021 · $2.0M
- PBPERMIAN BASIN PETROLEUM MUSEUM LIBRone grant, 2019 · $1.4M
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The Family Guidance & Outreach Center of Lubbock is dedicated to the prevention of child abuse and neglect and supporting, mentoring, and educating parents.
To support and enhance the operations, acquisitions, and funding of projects and programs that encourage lifelong learning through the Midland County Public Library System.
The Progress Texas Institute provides research and strategic communications on issues with the ultimate goal of increasing civic engagement.
To provide comprehensive primary care and preventive care to all persons regardless of their ability to pay.
Meals on Wheels of Odessa enables people to live with dignity by offering community support and sustenance through coordinated services and enable older adults to live in their own homes safely and independently as long as they are able.
Our mission is to enhance the behavioral and developmental health and wellness of our community by helping people live their best lives.
The H.O.R.S.E. Center is an established, multi-faceted equine facility committed to deepening the strength of emotional, physical, and conceptual connections utilizing diverse modalities to to elevate our clients to better themselves.
The Organizations mission is to bring unity and efficiency to investigations of child abuse through the use of a multi-disciplinary team and, thereby, to provide the best possible services to victims of child abuse and their families.
To support and compliment the work of Workforce Solutions of West Central Texas Board, which is responsible for the planning, oversight, and evaluation of a consolidated workforce system for the 19 County West Central Texas region.
To collect, preserve, catalog and exhibit scientific, geological and engineering data gathered by the petroleum industry - to be a working library for use by industry professionals, educators, students and other members of the interested…
To meet the growing housing needs of people with special needs throughout Midland County - we want to offer them stability and affordability and help them become integrated into the community.
Operate a non-profit medical clinic exclusively for charitable purposes to provide medical health services to uninsured and low income adults in the Abilene area.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Midland Inc and the most unlike its peers is Greenwood Volunteer Fire Department. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.9% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
114 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 114 of the 168 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PERMIAN BASIN BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds MIDLAND COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MIDLAND ATHLETIC SYNDICATE INC ↗
- Who funds MIDLAND CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC ↗
- Who funds MIDLAND ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HARMONY PUBLIC SCHOOLS ↗
- Who funds SENIOR LIFE MIDLAND INC ↗
- Who funds SAFE PLACE OF THE PERMIAN BASIN ↗
- Who funds WEST TEXAS FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds HIGH SKY CHILDRENS RANCH INC ↗
- Who funds MIDLAND COMMUNITY THEATRE INC ↗
- Who funds MARC INC ↗
- Who funds THE HOLDSWORTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds MUSEUM OF THE SOUTHWEST ↗
- Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF MIDLAND TEXAS INC ↗
- Who funds MANOR PARK INC ↗
- Who funds The Nonprofit Management Center of the Permian Basin Inc ↗
- Who funds ELLEN NOEL ART MUSEUM OF THE PERMIAN BASIN ↗
- Who funds ODESSA COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHEAST MIDLAND COUNTY VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF MIDLAND INC ↗
- Who funds BYNUM SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds THE SPRINGBOARD CENTER ↗
- Who funds CENTERS FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC ↗
- Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
- Who funds MIDLAND CHILDRENS REHABILITATION CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds The Fields Edge ↗
- Who funds CASA DE AMIGOS OF MIDLAND TEXASINC ↗
- Who funds PERMIAN BASIN AREA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Young Men's Christian Association of Midland Texas ↗
- Who funds BUSH TENNIS CENTER ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Abell-Hanger Foundation · Permian Basin Area Foundation · Helen Greathouse Charitable Trust · The Henry Foundation · Beal Foundation · Wayne & Jo Ann Moore Charitable Foundation · Pevehouse Family Foundation · Fmh Foundation · Warren Charitable Foundation · The Fasken Foundation · Yarborough Foundation · Bryant Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Scharbauer Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.