· Community foundation
Permian Basin Area Foundation
Permian Basin Area Foundation exists to partner with donors in creating permanent charitable funds to enrich the quality of life in West Texas communities.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 162 grants below total $12,076,575 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $13,262,885 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,186,310 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k20 grants · $135k
- $10k–50k85 grants · $2.1M
- $50k–250k48 grants · $4.8M
- $250k+9 grants · $5.0M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Historic Cane Hill Inc | $1,227,000 |
| Trinity School of Midland | $1,071,965 |
| Alpine Independent School District | $732,000 |
| Midland Memorial Foundation | $363,599 |
| St Johns Episcopal Church | $345,834 |
| Manor Park Inc | $336,000 |
| Midland Childrens Rehabilitation Center | $322,500 |
| Communities In Schools of the Permian Basin | $300,000 |
| Texas A and M University 12th Man Foundation | $300,000 |
| Safe Place of the Permian Basin | $225,881 |
| Senior Life Midland | $207,213 |
| Buckner Children and Family Services | $203,075 |
| Frio Canyon EMS | $200,000 |
| The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center | $200,000 |
| West Texas Food Bank | $199,226 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $8.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 92% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +29% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.
243 repeat relationships — 130 still active in FY2024, 113 since wound down; 23 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.1M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TSTRINITY SCHOOL OF MIDLAND TEXAS8× · 2017–2024 · $3.5M · revenue +118%
- ECECTOR COUNTY ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION5× · 2017–2023 · $3.3M · revenue +189%
- MPMANOR PARK INC6× · 2018–2024 · $1.6M · revenue +62%
Funded once
- PBPERMIAN BASIN QUALITY OF PLACE CONSERVANCYone grant, 2022 · $8.1M · 89% of their budget
- PBPERMIAN BASIN BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CENTERone grant, 2023 · $1.0M · revenue -84%
- MEMonahans Economic Development Corporationone grant, 2021 · $425k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To receive contributions by means of donations, gifts, and bequests and to expend such funds for the advancement of the literary, scientific, and other educational endeavors of Midwestern State University, a tax exempt institution of…
To procure and distribute nutritional food to qualified agencies that feed the hungry of West Central Texas.
Permian Basin Area Foundation exists to partner with donors in creating permanent charitable funds to enrich the quality of life in West Texas communities.
Meals on Wheels of Odessa enables people to live with dignity by offering community support and sustenance through coordinated services and enable older adults to live in their own homes safely and independently as long as they are able.
To collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret the history of the North Texas Area to inspire an interest in the past for the education and enrichment of people of all ages.
To ensure that the student body experiences balanced intellectual, psychological, social and spiritual development, aimed at enabling them to become active productive members of society where they live and work.
The Progress Texas Institute provides research and strategic communications on issues with the ultimate goal of increasing civic engagement.
Operated exclusively for educational purposes specifically including to further educational activities at texas a& m university-central texas within the meaning of 501(c)(3).
To collect, preserve, catalog and exhibit scientific, geological and engineering data gathered by the petroleum industry - to be a working library for use by industry professionals, educators, students and other members of the interested…
The Organizations mission is to bring unity and efficiency to investigations of child abuse through the use of a multi-disciplinary team and, thereby, to provide the best possible services to victims of child abuse and their families.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Permian Basin Community Centers for Mhmr and the most unlike its peers is Caesar Kleberg Foundation for Wildlife Conservation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
313 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 313 of the 392 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PERMIAN BASIN QUALITY OF PLACE CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds TRINITY SCHOOL OF MIDLAND TEXAS ↗
- Who funds HISTORIC CANE HILL INC ↗
- Who funds ECTOR COUNTY ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE GRACE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MANOR PARK INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF THE PERMIAN BA ↗
- Who funds MARC INC ↗
- Who funds PERMIAN BASIN BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds BYNUM SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds REFLECTION MINISTRIES OF TEXAS INC ↗
- Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
- Who funds MIDLAND FAIR HAVENS ↗
- Who funds Ward County Greater Works Inc ↗
- Who funds WEST TEXAS FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds THE SPRINGBOARD CENTER ↗
- Who funds MIDLAND CHILDRENS REHABILITATION CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CENTERS FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC ↗
- Who funds BUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds BUFFALO TRAIL COUNCIL INC BSA 567 ↗
- Who funds SAFE PLACE OF THE PERMIAN BASIN ↗
- Who funds TEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Midland-Odessa Symphony & Chorale Inc ↗
- Who funds PARTNERS RELIEF & DEVELOPMENT ↗
- Who funds MIDLAND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP ↗
- Who funds HIGH SKY CHILDRENS RANCH INC ↗
- Who funds ODESSA COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MIDLAND COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MARFA PUBLIC RADIO CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds MARTIN COUNTY HISTORICAL MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds CHRISTMAS IN ACTION INC ↗
- Who funds SUL ROSS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Abell-Hanger Foundation · Scharbauer Foundation Inc · Fmh Foundation · Helen Greathouse Charitable Trust · Wayne & Jo Ann Moore Charitable Foundation · Beal Foundation · The Henry Foundation · Pevehouse Family Foundation · Yarborough Foundation · Warren Charitable Foundation · The Fasken Foundation · James a Buddy Davidson Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Permian Basin Area Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Shriners Hospitals for Children — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.