· Public charity
Endaoment Inc
The mission of endaoment is to manage, encourage, and support the charitable giving of crypto assets.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2022–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k24 grants · $157k
- $10k–50k42 grants · $733k
- $50k–250k20 grants · $1.9M
- $250k+14 grants · $16M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Athanatos World | $4,000,000 |
| DMT Quest | $2,400,000 |
| World Research Foundation | $2,323,700 |
| Endaoment | $1,391,928 |
| Methodist Hospital | $1,000,000 |
| University of Arizona Foundation | $1,000,000 |
| Stanford University | $825,000 |
| Project Backboard | $507,500 |
| Trustees Of Columbia University In The City Of New York | $500,000 |
| Yale University | $500,000 |
| University of Rochester | $500,000 |
| Sol Foundation for Advanced Scientific and Policy Research | $325,000 |
| President and Fellows of Harvard College | $300,000 |
| New Heights Youth Inc | $250,000 |
| JGIVE- Friends of Asor Fund USA Inc | $167,428 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $3.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 25% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 17% of Endaoment Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
97 repeat relationships — 44 still active in FY2025, 53 since wound down; 48 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5.4M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BSBRITISH SCHOOLS & UNIVERSITIES FOUNDATION INC2× · 2022–2024 · $5.7M · revenue +133%
Trustees of Tufts College2× · 2022–2024 · $2.0M · revenue +9%- SPShirley Proctor Puller Foundation Inc4× · 2022–2025 · $701k · revenue +90%
Funded once
- USUC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $1.5M · revenue +33%
University of South Carolina Educational Foundationgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $1.0M · revenue +33%- TATHE AMERICAN FRIENDS OF FACTUM FOUNDATION INC C/O CARMODY TORRANCEone grant, 2024 · $600k · revenue -23% · 92% of their budget
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…
Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…
Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…
The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.
To provide multi-specialty surgical care, humanitarian aid and educational support to people in low- and middle-income countries.
The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.
To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.
Water.org's goal is to bring safe water and sanitation to the world through access to small, affordable loans.
The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…
A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.
At the internet society foundation, we focus on funding initiatives that strengthen the internet in function and reach so that it can effectively serve all people. our work advances the vision of the internet society (isoc): the internet…
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of America and the most unlike its peers is The Helene Wurlitzer Foundation of New Mexico. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
371 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 371 of the 407 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE DENVER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BRITISH SCHOOLS & UNIVERSITIES FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Athanatos World Inc ↗
- Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Endaoment Inc ↗
- Who funds University of Arizona Foundation ↗
- Who funds DMT Quest ↗
- Who funds WORLD RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Trustees of Tufts College ↗
- Who funds DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC ↗
- Who funds PROJECT BACKBOARD ↗
- Who funds Yale University ↗
- Who funds UC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE SAISEI FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
- Who funds MOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC ↗
- Who funds THE METHODIST HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds University of South Carolina Educational Foundation ↗
- Who funds Shirley Proctor Puller Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds OUTRIGHT INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds THE AMERICAN FRIENDS OF FACTUM FOUNDATION INC C/O CARMODY TORRANCE ↗
- Who funds MYRIAD USA INC ↗
- Who funds NEW HEIGHTS YOUTH INC ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE OF THE RED CROSS ↗
- Who funds Women for Afghan Women Inc ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER ↗
- Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds THE MULTIPLE MYELOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Northwestern University ↗
- Who funds BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds Ukraine Childrens Aid Fund Inc ↗
- Who funds HOGAR DE NINAS DE CUPEY INC ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds COALITION FOR RAINFOREST NATIONS SECRETARIAT ↗
- Who funds LELEKA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ↗
- Who funds GIRLS WHO CODE INC ↗
- Who funds NOVA UKRAINE ↗
- Who funds THE SOL FOUNDATION FOR ADVANCED SCIENTIFIC AND RESEARCH POLICY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Brown Foundation Inc · Houston Endowment Inc · The Lazard Charitable Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · The Yelp Foundation · Bright Funds Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · The William Stamps Farish Fund · The Wortham Foundation Inc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Houston Arts Alliance
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Endaoment Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Hias Inc — 88% of income from government
- Selah Freedom Inc — 53% of income from government
- Mercy Corps — 47% of income from government
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- The Coral Restoration Foundation Inc — 16% of income from government
- Trustees of Tufts College — 13% of income from government
- Yale University — 12% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
- The Center for Independent Documentary Inc — 6% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Endaoment Inc?
Find your warmest path to Endaoment Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.