Skip to content
Endaoment Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Endaoment Inc

The mission of endaoment is to manage, encourage, and support the charitable giving of crypto assets.

$19M
Granted FY2025still arriving
100
Grants FY2025still arriving
24
States reached
$4.0M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Philanthropy$34MEducation$23MInternational$9.4MHealth$8.0MRecreation & Sports$2.7MEnvironment$2.2MScience & Tech$2.2MArts & Culture$2.1MOther$0
02FY2025 · 100 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k24 grants · $157k
  • $10k–50k42 grants · $733k
  • $50k–250k20 grants · $1.9M
  • $250k+14 grants · $16M
$16,500
Median grant
24
States reached
$22M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Athanatos World$4,000,000
DMT Quest$2,400,000
World Research Foundation$2,323,700
Endaoment$1,391,928
University of Arizona Foundation$1,000,000
Methodist Hospital$1,000,000
Stanford University$825,000
Project Backboard$507,500
Yale University$500,000
University of Rochester$500,000
Trustees Of Columbia University In The City Of New York$500,000
Sol Foundation for Advanced Scientific and Policy Research$325,000
President and Fellows of Harvard College$300,000
New Heights Youth Inc$250,000
JGIVE- Friends of Asor Fund USA Inc$167,428
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $3.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 25% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION INTERNATIONAL: $27k → 11%DMT Quest: $2.4M → 7%INTERNET ARCHIVE: $5k → 10%MEANING FOUNDATION: $8k → 5%MIDWEST FOOD BANK NFP: $6k → 11%Loudoun Volunteer Caregivers Inc: $7k → 4%DMT QUEST: $70k → 7%SISTERSONG WOMEN OF COLOR REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE COLLECTIVE: $32k → 13%LITTLE ESSENTIALS: $8k → 20%SISTERSONG WOMEN OF COLOR REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE COLLECTIVE: $28k → 13%HOUSING FAMILIES INC: $10k → 8%PROJECTS IN HUMANISTIC INQUIRY: $120k → 14%CHILDREN OF THE NIGHT INC: $27k → 14%ST PETE FOOLS CHARITIES INC: $5k → 12%TALL TREES FOUNDATION: $20k → 8%St Pete Fools Charities Inc: $5k → 12%TALL TREES FOUNDATION: $8k → 8%UPBRING: $31k → 10%SHOES THAT FIT: $9k → 14%Young Men's Christian Association of Greater St Petersburg Inc: $9k → 12%TONY'S PLACE: $20k → 16%GIRLS WHO CODE INC: $287k → 17%Girls Who Code Inc: $60k → 17%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $6k → 14%GIRLS WHO CODE INC: $7k → 17%CHINESE AMERICAN PLANNING COUNCIL INC: $108k → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $10k → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $10k → 17%THE BRIGID ALLIANCE: $13k → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
SD
IA
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
NM
KS
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 17% of Endaoment Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Endaoment Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 30% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$34M · 97 repeat orgs$18M to everyone else

97 repeat relationships: 44 still active in FY2025, 53 since wound down; 48 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

97
242

Total granted

$34M
$13M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+5%

Still filing today

94%
91%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5.4M went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationInternationalHealthHuman ServicesEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BS
    BRITISH SCHOOLS & UNIVERSITIES FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2022–2024 · $5.7M · revenue +133%
  • Trustees of Tufts College
    2× · 2022–2024 · $2.0M · revenue +9%
  • SP
    Shirley Proctor Puller Foundation Inc
    4× · 2022–2025 · $701k · revenue +90%

Funded once

  • US
    UC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $1.5M · revenue +33%
  • University of South Carolina Educational Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $1.0M · revenue +33%
  • TA
    THE AMERICAN FRIENDS OF FACTUM FOUNDATION INC C/O CARMODY TORRANCE
    one grant, 2024 · $600k · revenue -23% · 92% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
2
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
3
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
4
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
5
Fajr Scientific

To provide multi-specialty surgical care, humanitarian aid and educational support to people in low- and middle-income countries.

Science & Tech
6
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
7
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
8
Waterorg

Water.org's goal is to bring safe water and sanitation to the world through access to small, affordable loans.

International
9
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
10
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
11
Internet Society Foundation

At the internet society foundation, we focus on funding initiatives that strengthen the internet in function and reach so that it can effectively serve all people. our work advances the vision of the internet society (isoc): the internet…

International
12
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of America; the most unlike its peers is The Helene Wurlitzer Foundation of New Mexico. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

371 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 371 of the 407 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

24
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
45
Early backer (in before they grew)
369/371
Grantees still filing
190/371
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE DENVER FOUNDATION: $25,400,948 · PhilanthropyTHE DENVER FOUNDATIONEndaoment Inc: $3,541,442 · PhilanthropyEndaoment IncDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $1,972,819 · PhilanthropyDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INCTHE SAISEI FOUNDATION: $1,357,423 · Philanthropy+14 more: $1,376,375 · PhilanthropyTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $3,558,472 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEE…University of Arizona Foundation: $2,712,800 · EducationUniversity of Arizon…Trustees of Tufts College: $1,999,986 · EducationTrustees of Tufts Co…Yale University: $1,600,206 · EducationYale UniversityUC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $1,500,000 · EducationUC SAN DIEGO FOUNDAT…President and Fellows of Harvard College: $1,117,538 · EducationPresident and Fellow…University of South Carolina Educational Foundation: $1,000,000 · EducationUniversity of South …+16 more: $2,439,336 · Education+16 moreBRITISH SCHOOLS & UNIVERSITIES FOUNDATION INC: $5,700,101 · InternationalBRITISH SCHOOLS & …Athanatos World Inc: $4,200,000 · InternationalAthanatos World In…MYRIAD USA INC: $600,000 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE OF THE RED CROSS: $550,722 · InternationalWomen for Afghan Women Inc: $536,515 · International+25 more: $3,373,245 · International+25 moreWORLD RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $2,323,700 · HealthTHE METHODIST HOSPITAL: $1,000,000 · HealthTHE MULTIPLE MYELOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $499,985 · HealthLUNG CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $317,267 · Health+11 more: $756,398 · HealthDMT Quest: $2,470,000 · Human ServicesHOGAR DE NINAS DE CUPEY INC: $449,741 · Human ServicesGIRLS WHO CODE INC: $353,805 · Human Services+13 more: $687,644 · Human ServicesPROJECT BACKBOARD: $1,869,373 · Recreation & SportsNorthwestern University: $499,985 · Recreation & SportsCity Surf Project: $320,419 · Recreation & SportsSHOOTING TOUCH INC: $135,120 · Recreation & SportsSAN FRANCISCO JUNIOR GLENS SOCCER ASSOCIATION: $135,000 · Recreation & Sports+4 more: $157,110 · Recreation & SportsOUTRIGHT INTERNATIONAL: $652,108 · OtherShirley Proctor Puller Foundation Inc: $701,141 · OtherShirley Proctor …THE AMERICAN FRIENDS OF FACTUM FOUNDATION INC C/O CARMODY TORRANCE: $600,170 · OtherNEW HEIGHTS YOUTH INC: $558,396 · OtherMOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC: $1,062,611 · OtherMOBILE LOAVES & …BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $488,135 · Other+83 more: $8,895,458 · Other+83 more
Philanthropy$33,649,007Education$15,928,338International$14,960,583Health$4,897,350Human Services$3,961,190Recreation & Sports$3,117,007Other$12,958,019

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE DENVER FOUNDATION: $25,400,948 over 3y, 12% of budgetBRITISH SCHOOLS & UNIVERSITIES FOUNDATION INC: $5,700,101 over 2y, 24% of budgetAthanatos World Inc: $4,200,000 over 2y, 95% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $3,558,472 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetEndaoment Inc: $3,541,442 over 3y, 58% of budgetUniversity of Arizona Foundation: $2,712,800 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetDMT Quest: $2,470,000 over 2y, 6.5% of budgetWORLD RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $2,323,700 over 1y, 69% of budgetTrustees of Tufts College: $1,999,986 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $1,972,819 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT BACKBOARD: $1,869,373 over 4y, 52% of budgetYale University: $1,600,206 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $1,500,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTHE SAISEI FOUNDATION: $1,357,423 over 3y, 46% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $1,117,538 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC: $1,062,611 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetUniversity of South Carolina Educational Foundation: $1,000,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetShirley Proctor Puller Foundation Inc: $701,141 over 4y, 15% of budgetOUTRIGHT INTERNATIONAL: $652,108 over 3y, 3.5% of budgetTHE AMERICAN FRIENDS OF FACTUM FOUNDATION INC C/O CARMODY TORRANCE: $600,170 over 1y, 92% of budgetMYRIAD USA INC: $600,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetNEW HEIGHTS YOUTH INC: $558,396 over 4y, 6.4% of budgetINTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE OF THE RED CROSS: $550,722 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWomen for Afghan Women Inc: $536,515 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $500,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $500,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MULTIPLE MYELOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $499,985 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetNorthwestern University: $499,985 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $488,135 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetUkraine Childrens Aid Fund Inc: $484,293 over 2y, 74% of budgetHOGAR DE NINAS DE CUPEY INC: $449,741 over 2y, 21% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $446,075 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOALITION FOR RAINFOREST NATIONS SECRETARIAT: $420,621 over 2y, 6.4% of budgetLELEKA FOUNDATION: $417,406 over 2y, 6.0% of budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $384,589 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGIRLS WHO CODE INC: $353,805 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetNOVA UKRAINE: $343,273 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCity Surf Project: $320,419 over 3y, 36% of budgetLUNG CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $317,267 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetDaffy Charitable Fund: $300,153 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetAMERICANS FOR OXFORD INC: $300,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetANITA BORG INSTITUTE FOR TECHNOLOGY: $271,606 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetAmazon Watch Inc: $263,215 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetPEACEPLAYERS INTERNATIONAL: $260,535 over 4y, 2.0% of budgetThe Ujiri Foundation Inc: $260,339 over 1y, 17% of budgetQUALIA RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $248,961 over 4y, 47% of budgetBuffalo Bayou Partnership Inc: $247,485 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetHOPE FOR UKRAINE INC: $230,540 over 2y, 3.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Brown Foundation …Houston Endowment IncThe Lazard Charitable…Marin Community Found…The Yelp FoundationBright Funds Foundati…The San Francisco Fou…Jewish Community Fede…The William Stamps Fa…The Wortham Foundatio…Silicon Valley Commun…Houston Arts Alliance
The Brown Foundation IncTX30.1× affinity16 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Brown Foundation Inc · Houston Endowment Inc · The Lazard Charitable Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · The Yelp Foundation · Bright Funds Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · The William Stamps Farish Fund · The Wortham Foundation Inc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Houston Arts Alliance

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Endaoment Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Endaoment Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 190%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 16%
  • Hias Inc: 88% of income from government
  • Selah Freedom Inc: 53% of income from government
  • Mercy Corps: 47% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • The Coral Restoration Foundation Inc: 16% of income from government
  • Trustees of Tufts College: 13% of income from government
  • Yale University: 12% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • The Center for Independent Documentary Inc: 6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
19get no government money at all
37report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Endaoment Inc?

Find your warmest path to Endaoment Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 407 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Endaoment’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home