Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Community Partners

Community development and social enterprise organization.

$65M
Granted FY2025still arriving
565
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$3.9M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Health$50MHuman Services$36MEducation$19MFood & Nutrition$16MEnvironment$16MCommunity Improvement$6.3MArts & Culture$4.3MPublic Safety & Disaster$3.9MOther$0
02FY2025 · 565 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 565 grants below total $57,532,468 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $65,463,250 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $7,930,782 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $39k
  • $10k–50k319 grants · $8.2M
  • $50k–250k176 grants · $18M
  • $250k+65 grants · $31M
$30,075
Median grant
9
States reached
$86M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PUBLIC HEALTH ADVOCATES$3,904,645
GRID ALTERNATIVES GREATER LOS ANGELES INC$1,618,546
CITY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTION$1,360,083
HEALTH ACCESS FOUNDATION$950,000
OPTIONS FOR LEARNING$880,000
FIRST 5 SONOMA COUNTY$732,020
PUBLIC WORKS ALLIANCE$732,000
FULL CIRCLE HEALTH NETWORK$732,000
HEALTH ALLIANCE OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA$555,965
CHILDREN'S INSTITUTE INC$549,000
ALIADOS HEALTH$541,871
FRESNO METROPOLITAN MINISTRY$516,000
THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND$496,232
WFC LA IN$472,669
LUNDQUIST INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL INNOVATION AT HARBOR-UCLA MEDICAL CENTER$400,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $25.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%DIGNITY HEALTH ST JOSEPH MEDICAL CENTER: $250k → 11%EL SOL NEIGHBORHOOD EDUCATIONAL CENTER: $366k → 14%NORTH COAST OPPORTUNITIES INC: $200k → 18%FRESNO METROPOLITAN MINISTRY: $516k → 19%NORTH COAST OPPORTUNITIES INC: $200k → 18%FRESNO METRO MINISTRY: $200k → 19%FAMILY SERVICE AGENCY OF SANTA BARBARA: $200k → 14%NORTH COAST OPPORTUNITIES INC: $200k → 18%FAMILY SERVICE AGENCY OF SANTA BARBARA: $200k → 14%ADVANCE OC: $200k → 10%CHILDREN NOW: $325k → 10%CALIFORNIA CHILD CARE RESOURCE AND REFERRAL NETWORK: $350k → 10%CHILDREN NOW: $325k → 10%CALIFORNIA CHILD CARE RESOURCE & REFERRAL NETWORK: $290k → 10%CHILDREN NOW: $275k → 10%CALIFORNIA CHILD CARE RESOURCE & REFERRAL NETWORK: $250k → 10%CHILDREN NOW: $275k → 10%CHILDREN NOW: $250k → 10%TIDES CENTER: $200k → 10%PARA LOS NINOS: $366k → 14%INNERCITY STRUGGLE: $900k → 14%CHILD CARE RESOURCE CENTER INC: $500k → 14%CHILD CARE RESOURCE CENTER INC: $473k → 14%CHILD CARE RESOURCE CENTER: $350k → 14%BEYOND US AND THEM: $345k → 14%HOUSE OF YAHWEH SOUTH BAY OUTREACH CENTER: $275k → 14%BREASTFEEDING TASK FORCE OF GREATER LOS ANGELES: $225k → 14%GROWGOOD INC: $200k → 14%PARTNERSHIP FOR GROWTH: $400k → 14%WATTS LABOR COMMUNITY ACTION COMMITTEE: $400k → 14%CHINESE CHRISTIAN HERALD CRUSADES INC: $250k → 14%UNION STATION HOMELESS SERVICES: $400k → 14%CHILDREN'S INSTITUTE INC: $549k → 14%EASTMONT COMMUNITY CENTER: $400k → 14%HOPE THE MISSION: $300k → 14%HANDS FOR HOPE: $309k → 14%CHILD CARE ALLIANCE OF LOS ANGELES: $255k → 14%CHILD CARE ALLIANCE OF LOS ANGELES: $250k → 14%SPECIAL SERVICE FOR GROUPS INC: $406k → 14%ASIAN PACIFIC POLICY AND PLANNING COUNCIL: $350k → 14%ASIAN PACIFIC POLICY AND PLANNING COUNCIL: $350k → 14%URBAN STRATEGIES FOUNDATION: $1.5M → 14%THE CHILDREN'S PARTNERSHIP: $450k → 14%MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH ACCESS: $331k → 14%THE CHILDREN'S PARTNERSHIP: $250k → 14%THE THERAPEUTIC PLAY FOUNDATION INC: $250k → 14%THE MIDNIGHT MISSION: $400k → 14%THAI COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $400k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
VT
NH
WA
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
DC
HI
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

56%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$93M · 238 repeat orgs$72M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +27% since the first grant, against +1% for the ones you funded once.

238 repeat relationships — 128 still active in FY2025, 110 since wound down; 418 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

238
756

Total granted

$93M
$41M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+1%

Still filing today

74%
28%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 46% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $31M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationHealthArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PH
    PUBLIC HEALTH ADVOCATES
    3× · 2023–2025 · $11M · revenue +30% · 58% of their budget
  • CP
    COMMUNITY PARTNERS
    6× · 2020–2025 · $2.7M · revenue +111%
  • OF
    OPTIONS FOR LEARNING
    3× · 2023–2025 · $2.1M · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • NH
    NORTH HOLLYWOOD HIGH SCHOOL STUDENT BODY
    one grant, 2023 · $7.0M
  • HS
    Healthy Streets LA
    one grant, 2024 · $2.5M · revenue 0% · 96% of their budget
  • PB
    PURCHASER BUSINESS GROUP ON HEALTH
    one grant, 2023 · $1.0M · revenue +3%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Los Angeles Black Worker Center

The mission of the Los Angeles Black Worker Center is to increase access to quality jobs, reduce employment discrimination, and improve industries that employ black workers through action and unionization.

Employment
2
California Pan-Ethnic Health Network

To promote health equity by advocating for public policies and sufficient resources to address the health needs of communities of color.

Health
3
Trauma Informed La
Civil Rights
4
Cangress Dba Los Angeles Community Action Network

Community organizing, education, advocacy, leadership development, direct services and organizational development for communities faced with immense poverty.

Community Improvement
5
Cooperation L a

The L.A. Co-op Lab is a collective that builds capacity for worker ownership in Los Angeles as a pathway toward a more equitable and democratic economy.

Arts & Culture
6
California Donor Table

California Donor Table anchors a hub of donors, foundations, and community leaders. We pool together our resources to shape California into a truly democratic state that works for the people, not the powerful. Rooted in our commitment to…

Civil Rights
7
California School-Age Consortium Inc

The California School-Age Consortium (CalSAC) builds professional networks that provide training, leadership development and advocacy to ensure that all young people have access to high quality out-of-school time programs and to create a…

—
8
Water Education for Latino Leaders

Well educates and trains local latino elected officials about california water policy to promote timely and equitable actions that serve to develop a robust economy, healthy communities, and a resilient environment for all californians.

Human Services
9
Latino Media Collaborative

Latino Media Collaborative's mission is to leverage the power of Latino and community news media to impact policy, change narratives, and promote civic engagement, while also supporting advancement of the sector through capacity building,…

Arts & Culture
10
Children's Council of San Francisco

By advocating for quality early care and education, empowering families with information and financial support, and building the capabilities of educators, Children's Council of San Francisco ensures that every child in San Francisco has…

Human Services
11
La Forward Institute

Transform local communities into places that are fair and flourishing for everyone through education, community organization, and coalition-building.

Civil Rights
12
Los Angeles Education Partnership

To advance educational equity. together with families, schools and the community, facilitate access to and opportunities for quality educational and wellness practices so that children thrive from diapers to diplomas.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Partners and the most unlike its peers is Knowledge Shop. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyHomeless Services & HousingPerforming Arts Organizatio…Community Health CentersChildren & Family Mental He…Christian Evangelical Minis…Charter Schools and Youth E…Animal Rescue and Shelter S…Developmental Disabilities …Youth Sports ProgramsSenior Residential HousingSchool Support OrganizationsFamily Philanthropic Founda…Labor Union LocalsJewish Community Organizati…University Support Organiza…Local Business Advocacy Org…Early Childhood Care CentersPublic Interest Advocacy Or…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 24 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number25%10%<5yr16%14%5–10yr20%20%10–20yr17%24%20–35yr10%17%35–55yr12%15%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value25%5%<5yr16%7%5–10yr20%21%10–20yr17%30%20–35yr10%24%35–55yr12%14%55yr+

The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 10% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.7% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.7%10/1,411
the rest of the field
15%
11,138/72,620

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

585 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 585 of the 1,422 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

44
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
128
Early backer (in before they grew)
569/585
Grantees still filing
294/585
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NORTH HOLLYWOOD HIGH SCHOOL STUDENT BODY — $7,002,699 · OtherNORTH HOLLYWOOD HIGH SCHOOL STUDENT BODYHealthy Streets LA — $2,457,000 · OtherOPTIONS FOR LEARNING — $2,080,000 · OtherCATALYST CALIFORNIA — $2,420,500 · Other+102 more — $43,206,175 · Other+102 morePUBLIC HEALTH ADVOCATES — $10,750,174 · HealthPUBLIC HEALTH ADVOCA…SAN DIEGO HEALTHCARE QUALITY COLLABORATIVE — $1,100,000 · HealthPURCHASER BUSINESS GROUP ON HEALTH — $1,006,553 · HealthHEALTH EDUCATION COUNCIL — $925,000 · HealthAFRICAN COM PUBLIC HEALTH COALITION — $846,040 · HealthBLACK WOMEN FOR WELLNESS — $755,976 · HealthHEALTH ALLIANCE OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA — $755,965 · Health+16 more — $6,043,731 · Health+16 moreURBAN STRATEGIES INC — $1,639,310 · Human ServicesURBAN STRATEGIES IN…CHILD CARE RESOURCE CENTER INC — $1,497,670 · Human ServicesCHILD CARE RESOURCE…CHILDREN NOW — $1,450,000 · Human ServicesCHILDREN NOWCalifornia Child Care Resource and Referral Network — $1,339,924 · Human ServicesCalifornia Child Ca…INNERCITY STRUGGLE — $1,149,530 · Human ServicesTHE CHILDREN'S PARTNERSHIP — $944,579 · Human ServicesFresno Metropolitan Ministry — $891,000 · Human ServicesHANDS FOR HOPE — $720,040 · Human Services+32 more — $11,929,057 · Human Services+32 moreGRID ALTERNATIVES GREATER LOS ANGELES INC — $3,496,671 · EnvironmentPACOIMA BEAUTIFUL — $1,801,976 · EnvironmentNEW VENTURE FUND — $1,377,000 · EnvironmentTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND — $1,119,655 · EnvironmentTREEPEOPLE INC — $410,615 · EnvironmentGROWING COMMUNITIES INC — $400,000 · EnvironmentCOMMUNITY PARTNERS — $2,660,491 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY COALITION FOR SUBSTANCE ABUSE PREVENTION AND TREATMENT — $1,086,310 · Community ImprovementCalifornia Black Womens Collective Empowerment In — $825,000 · Community ImprovementPublic Works Alliance — $732,000 · Community ImprovementANTELOPE VALLEY PARTNERS FOR HEALTH — $664,879 · Community ImprovementALLIANCE FOR SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INNOVATION — $567,890 · Community ImprovementINCLUSIVE ACTION FOR THE CITY — $406,000 · Community ImprovementEAST BAY ASIAN LOCAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $400,000 · Community ImprovementUNITED WAYS OF CALIFORNIA — $325,000 · Community Improvement+1 more — $250,000 · Community ImprovementLOS ANGELES CONSERVATION CORPS — $1,549,351 · EmploymentMexican American Opportunity Foundation — $820,000 · EmploymentUNITE-LA INC — $625,000 · EmploymentThe Rightway Foundation — $510,591 · EmploymentOCCIDENTAL COLLEGE — $400,000 · EducationSAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION SDSU RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $300,000 · EducationGENTE ORGANIZADA — $291,327 · EducationEveryChild California — $279,884 · EducationUnited Parents and Students — $250,000 · EducationThe Education Trust Inc — $250,000 · EducationHUNGER ACTION LOS ANGELES INC — $250,000 · EducationLong Beach BLAST Better Learning for All Students Today — $234,999 · EducationOceanographic Teaching Stations Inc — $218,751 · EducationWhole Systems Learning — $213,415 · EducationGENERACIONES EN ACCION — $179,999 · Education
Other$57,166,374Health$22,183,439Human Services$21,561,110Environment$8,605,917Community Improvement$7,917,570Employment$3,504,942Education$2,868,375

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPUBLIC HEALTH ADVOCATES — $10,750,174 over 3y, 58% of budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERS — $2,660,491 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetHealthy Streets LA — $2,457,000 over 1y, 96% of budgetCATALYST CALIFORNIA — $2,420,500 over 8y, 3.9% of budgetOPTIONS FOR LEARNING — $2,080,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetPACOIMA BEAUTIFUL — $1,801,976 over 6y, 15% of budgetURBAN STRATEGIES INC — $1,639,310 over 2y, 22% of budgetLOS ANGELES CONSERVATION CORPS — $1,549,351 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetCHILD CARE RESOURCE CENTER INC — $1,497,670 over 4y, 26% of budgetCHILDREN NOW — $1,450,000 over 5y, 4.7% of budgetNEW VENTURE FUND — $1,377,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCalifornia Child Care Resource and Referral Network — $1,339,924 over 7y, 5.2% of budgetINNERCITY STRUGGLE — $1,149,530 over 3y, 15% of budgetTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND — $1,119,655 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetSAN DIEGO HEALTHCARE QUALITY COLLABORATIVE — $1,100,000 over 5y, 46% of budgetCOMMUNITY COALITION FOR SUBSTANCE ABUSE PREVENTION AND TREATMENT — $1,086,310 over 6y, 2.5% of budgetLOS ANGELES AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDATION — $1,050,000 over 3y, 59% of budgetPURCHASER BUSINESS GROUP ON HEALTH — $1,006,553 over 1y, 9.5% of budgetHEALTH ACCESS FOUNDATION — $950,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S PARTNERSHIP — $944,579 over 4y, 10% of budgetHEALTH EDUCATION COUNCIL — $925,000 over 5y, 8.7% of budgetFresno Metropolitan Ministry — $891,000 over 4y, 9.8% of budgetLOS ANGELES UNIVERSAL PRESCHOOL — $850,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetAFRICAN COM PUBLIC HEALTH COALITION — $846,040 over 4y, 15% of budgetCalifornia Black Womens Collective Empowerment In — $825,000 over 2y, 53% of budgetMexican American Opportunity Foundation — $820,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTIDES FOUNDATION — $778,882 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetDrumming for Your Life Institute — $776,679 over 4y, 82% of budgetFOSTERALL — $759,667 over 4y, 18% of budgetBLACK WOMEN FOR WELLNESS — $755,976 over 4y, 5.3% of budgetHEALTH ALLIANCE OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA — $755,965 over 2y, 52% of budgetHANDS FOR HOPE — $720,040 over 4y, 33% of budgetAAPI EQUITY ALLIANCE — $700,000 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetNORTH COAST HEALTH IMPROVEMENT AND INFORMATION NETWORK INC — $670,000 over 4y, 43% of budgetANTELOPE VALLEY PARTNERS FOR HEALTH — $664,879 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetLOS ANGELES GENERAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC — $650,000 over 4y, 6.7% of budgetUNITE-LA INC — $625,000 over 2y, 5.5% of budgetCHILD CARE RESOURCE CENTER INC — $602,871 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetNORTH COAST OPPORTUNITIES INC — $600,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetLancaster Homeless Group — $593,809 over 4y, 30% of budgetALLIANCE FOR SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INNOVATION — $567,890 over 4y, 19% of budgetPublic Health Institute — $550,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S INSTITUTE INC — $549,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetALIADOS HEALTH — $541,871 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetTIDES CENTER — $525,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCHILD CARE ALLIANCE OF LOS ANGELES — $510,842 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetThe Rightway Foundation — $510,591 over 3y, 14% of budgetCRYSTAL STAIRS INC — $500,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PUBLIC HEALTH ADVOCATES ↗
  • Who funds GRID ALTERNATIVES GREATER LOS ANGELES INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY PARTNERS ↗
  • Who funds Healthy Streets LA ↗
  • Who funds CATALYST CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds OPTIONS FOR LEARNING ↗
  • Who funds PACOIMA BEAUTIFUL ↗
  • Who funds URBAN STRATEGIES INC ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES CONSERVATION CORPS ↗
  • Who funds CHILD CARE RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN NOW ↗
  • Who funds NEW VENTURE FUND ↗
  • Who funds California Child Care Resource and Referral Network ↗
  • Who funds INNERCITY STRUGGLE ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND ↗
  • Who funds SAN DIEGO HEALTHCARE QUALITY COLLABORATIVE ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY COALITION FOR SUBSTANCE ABUSE PREVENTION AND TREATMENT ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PURCHASER BUSINESS GROUP ON HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds HEALTH ACCESS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S PARTNERSHIP ↗
  • Who funds HEALTH EDUCATION COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds Fresno Metropolitan Ministry ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES UNIVERSAL PRESCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds AFRICAN COM PUBLIC HEALTH COALITION ↗
  • Who funds California Black Womens Collective Empowerment In ↗
  • Who funds Mexican American Opportunity Foundation ↗
  • Who funds TIDES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Drumming for Your Life Institute ↗
  • Who funds FOSTERALL ↗
  • Who funds BLACK WOMEN FOR WELLNESS ↗
  • Who funds HEALTH ALLIANCE OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Weingart FoundationUnited Way IncCcf Community Initiat…The Ralph M Parsons F…Liberty Hill Foundati…Durfee FoundationGreat Public Schools …Cedars-Sinai Medical …The California Endowm…The Ahmanson Foundati…Community Health Coun…Southern California G…
Weingart FoundationCA73.4× affinity135 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Weingart Foundation · United Way Inc · Ccf Community Initiatives Fund · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · Liberty Hill Foundation · Durfee Foundation · Great Public Schools Now · Cedars-Sinai Medical Center · The California Endowment · The Ahmanson Foundation · Community Health Councils Inc · Southern California Grantmakers

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Community Partners funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    79report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 1422 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home