· Public charity
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
As a leading academic healthcare organization, our mission is to elevate the health status of the communities we serve.(see schedule o for continuation)(continued)-we deliver exceptional healthcare enhanced by research and education-we prioritize high-quality care for all with compassion-we transform biomedical discoveries and…
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k20 grants · $145k
- $10k–50k89 grants · $1.8M
- $50k–250k93 grants · $8.8M
- $250k+15 grants · $11M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $1,805,624 |
| SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GRANTMAKERS | $1,347,500 |
| LULU'S PLACE INC | $1,250,000 |
| UNITED WAY OF GREATER LOS ANGELES | $1,165,000 |
| COMMUNITY INITIATIVES | $1,003,000 |
| THE REGENTS OF THE UNIV OF CA (UCSF) | $850,000 |
| SABAN COMMUNITY CLINIC | $525,000 |
| PUKUU CULTURAL COMMUNITY SERVICES | $500,000 |
| COMMUNITY CLINIC ASSOC LA (CCALAC) | $450,000 |
| COMMUNITY PARTNERS | $430,500 |
| CHILDREN'S INSTITUTE INC | $405,000 |
| CORO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA | $374,800 |
| LTSC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION | $350,000 |
| INCLUSIVE ACTION FOR THE CITY | $270,000 |
| DIDI HIRSCH PSYCHIATRIC SERVICE | $251,118 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $26.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.
255 repeat relationships — 162 still active in FY2025, 93 since wound down; 50 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.2M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GRANTMAKERS7× · 2019–2025 · $5.9M · revenue +418%- SJSOCIAL JUSTICE PARTNERS LOS ANGELES2× · 2021–2024 · $5.3M · revenue +10% · 77% of their budget
- UFUNIHEALTH FOUNDATION2× · 2019–2021 · $5.3M · revenue +21%
Funded once
- TSTHE SABAN CHARITABLE SUPPORT FUNDone grant, 2018 · $936k · revenue -95% · 56% of their budget
ENTERPRISE COMMUNITY PARTNERS INCone grant, 2024 · $450k · revenue 0%- CCCCF COMMUNITY INITIATIVES FUNDone grant, 2024 · $350k · revenue 0%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Promotion and advancement of children's health through patient care, research, and education.
To enhance the professionalism and clinical autonomy of physicians to allow them to advocate for their patients and the health of the community of los angeles.
Chcf is dedicated to advancing meaningful, measurable improvements in the way the health care delivery system provides care to the people of california, particularly those with low incomes and those whose needs are not well served by the…
La clinica provides primary and preventive medical, dental, behavioral health, and other health promotion services to underserved and low-income patients.
To support and enhance the mission of the los angeles general medical center (formerly the lac+usc medical center) and ensure it maintains its status as a leader in medicine, education and research, and continues to provide the highest…
The organization provides primary medical, behavior health, and dental care to the population of san joaquin, and solano counties without regard to patients' ability to pay.
Huntington Health stands for community. We stand for compassion. But more than anything, Huntington stands for health. Providing world-class health care is our specialty, and it's what we've been doing for the San Gabriel Valley since…
Dedicated to providing comprehensive primary medical care, dental services and care coordination for the care and well-being of all los angeles residents. the organization provides high quality, comprehensive primary and preventative…
The Institute is a scientific research center dedicated to conducting basic and applied research to advance the understanding of human disease and the improvement of human health. The Institute fosters an innovative research environment…
To distribute public affairs and other educational information in order to create an electronic bridge between californians and their public officials, and, in the process educate a new generation of voting citizens and civic leaders who…
The league of california community foundations promotes and strengthens community foundations in california. through collaboration and shared learning among member foundations and building partnerships with private and public entities, we…
Iha's mission is to bring the healthcare community together to solve industry-wide challenges that stand in the way of high-value care. as a non-profit industry association, we use objective data, our decades of expertise, and our unique…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is South Central Family Health Center and the most unlike its peers is The Farrah Fawcett Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
413 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 413 of the 430 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY INC ↗
- Who funds TIDES CENTER ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GRANTMAKERS ↗
- Who funds SOCIAL JUSTICE PARTNERS LOS ANGELES ↗
- Who funds UNIHEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LULU'S PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY CLINIC ASSOCIATION OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY PARTNERS ↗
- Who funds THE LOS ANGELES FREE CLINIC ↗
- Who funds BRILLIANT CORNERS ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES ↗
- Who funds CHARLES R DREW UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND SCIENCE ↗
- Who funds MARTIN LUTHER KING JR COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LA FAMILY HOUSING CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds NONPROFIT FINANCE FUND ↗
- Who funds THE PEOPLE CONCERN ↗
- Who funds Special Service for Groups Inc ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES LGBT CENTER ↗
- Who funds TRUE COLORS UNITED INC ↗
- Who funds THE MAPLE COUNSELING CENTER ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds VENICE FAMILY CLINIC ↗
- Who funds PLUNUM HEALTH ↗
- Who funds STUDENT HEALTH SERVICES SUPPORT FUND INC dba The LA Trust ↗
- Who funds PEDIATRIC AND FAMILY MEDICAL CENTER DBA EISNER HEALTH ↗
- Who funds DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER ↗
- Who funds ST JOHN'S COMMUNITY HEALTH ↗
- Who funds Team Heal Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds DIDI HIRSCH PSYCHIATRIC SERVICE ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY INITIATIVES ↗
- Who funds CORO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INC ↗
- Who funds THE CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds THE SABAN CHARITABLE SUPPORT FUND ↗
- Who funds KOREAN AMERICAN FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds OPEN PATHS COUNSELING CENTER ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · Weingart Foundation · The Rose Hills Foundation · United Way Inc · California Community Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Liberty Hill Foundation · Shelter Partnership Inc · Unihealth Foundation · QueensCare
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Cedars-Sinai Medical Center funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Jewish Vocational Service Inc — 39% of income from government
- Enterprise Community Partners Inc — 22% of income from government
- Capital Link Inc — 18% of income from government
- City Year Inc — 11% of income from government
- Sharsheret Inc — 4% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.