Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Great Public Schools Now

The organization invests in schools, organizations and initiatives that catalyze excellence in public education, convenes leaders and uplifts public understanding to advocate for great public schools.

$9.8M
Granted FY2022
82
Grants FY2022
5
States reached
$677k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172022.

Education$61MYouth Development$6.0MHuman Services$2.3MCivil Rights$1.7MCommunity Improvement$1.3MPublic Benefit$1.2MRecreation & Sports$884kArts & Culture$793kOther$0
02FY2022 · 82 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k5 grants · $41k
  • $10k–50k23 grants · $625k
  • $50k–250k45 grants · $5.4M
  • $250k+9 grants · $3.7M
$75,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$7.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EDUCARE FOUNDATION$676,934
LA'S BEST$597,324
CITY OF LOS ANGELES - DEPARTMENT OF RECREATION AND PARKS$592,372
AFTER-SCHOOL ALL-STARS LOS ANGELES$411,388
THE CALIFORNIA CHARTER SCHOOLS ASSOCIATION$300,000
RAINBOW LABS$295,066
WOODCRAFT RANGERS$270,182
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF CARSON$262,300
CITIZENS OF THE WORLD LOS ANGELES$250,000
COMMUNITY PARTNERS$238,800
INNOVATE PUBLIC SCHOOLS$220,000
YMCA OF METROPOLITAN LOS ANGELES$211,272
THINK TOGETHER$210,595
INSTITUTE FOR EDUCATION RESEARCH AND SCHOLARSHIPS$207,025
EDUCATORS FOR EXCELLENCE INC$200,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $3.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%TIDES CENTER: $50k → 10%VISTA DEL MAR CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: $75k → 14%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN LOS ANGELES: $405k → 14%SHADETREE MULTICULTURAL FOUNDATION: $50k → 14%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN LOS ANGELES: $211k → 14%PARA LOS NINOS: $314k → 14%PARA LOS NINOS: $310k → 14%PARA LOS NINOS: $90k → 14%PARA LOS NINOS: $50k → 14%PARA LOS NINOS: $27k → 14%PARA LOS NINOS: $16k → 14%MOTHERS IN ACTION: $25k → 14%GOOD PLUS FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%EL CENTRO DEL PUEBLO: $70k → 14%EL CENTRO DEL PUEBLO: $50k → 14%NORTH VALLEY CARING SERVICES: $14k → 14%NORTH VALLEY CARING SERVICES: $5k → 14%PHEONIX HOUSE CALIFORNIA: $175k → 14%INNERCITY STRUGGLE: $257k → 14%INNERCITY STRUGGLE: $150k → 14%INNERCITY STRUGGLE: $75k → 14%PROYECTO PASTORAL: $50k → 14%ALL PEOPLES COMMUNITY CENTER: $25k → 14%INNERCITY STRUGGLE: $231k → 14%INNERCITY STRUGGLE: $225k → 14%THE CHILDREN'S PARTNERSHIP: $75k → 14%CENTRAL CITY NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERS: $50k → 14%CENTRAL AMERICAN RESOURCE CENTER: $91k → 14%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN LOS ANGELES: $80k → 14%CARECEN: $75k → 14%WEINGART YMCA AQUATIC AND WELLNESS CENTER: $15k → 14%UNITED IN HARMONY: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
IL
NY
MA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
DC

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$68M · 93 repeat orgs$8.3M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +67% since the first grant, against +31% for the ones you funded once.

93 repeat relationships — 65 still active in FY2022, 28 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

93
73

Total granted

$68M
$7.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+67%
+31%

Still filing today

96%
90%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $988k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
EducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KS
    KIPP SOCAL PUBLIC SCHOOLS
    8× · 2017–2025 · $4.8M · revenue +171%
  • EA
    EQUITAS ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL
    6× · 2017–2024 · $3.6M · revenue +245%
  • EI
    EDNOVATE INC
    5× · 2017–2024 · $3.2M · revenue +370%

Funded once

  • HL
    HIGHTECH LAgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $1.5M · revenue +122% · 33% of their budget
  • B
    BLUEPRINTgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $1.5M · revenue +104%
  • BI
    BES INC
    one grant, 2017 · $500k · revenue -55%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Alternative Schools Inc

To help each child reach his/her full potential by cultivating an active village of parents, community members, and stakeholders involved in providing an individual, personal, and conceptual learning environment for each student.

Education
2
The Language Academy of Sacramento

The las mission is to create a learning community where students: utilize bilingualism and biliteracy (spanish and english) to achieve academic excellence and apply skills in real-world situations and diverse settings; develop and exhibit…

Education
3
Tomorrow's Leadership Collaborative Charter School

The mission of tlc is to educate diverse students through a rigorous, standards-based, collegepreparatory program to become conscientious, caring, and responsible 21st century citizens. tlc is grounded in an inclusive vision of teaching…

4
Elite Public Schools

To ensure students reach their fullest potential through access to learning spaces that honor and celebrate students' rich cultural heritage and challenge them with rigorous and relevant learning experiences designed to make them active…

Education
5
Association of California School Administrators

The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.

6
New Los Angeles Charter School

New los angeles charter school develops a diverse community of students who are passionate about learning, engaged in their community, and have respect for themselves and others.

Education
7
Inspire Charter School - Los Angeles

Provide a high standard of education to students through comprehensive curriculum supported by energetic, dynamic, and caring teachers.

8
Los Angeles Education Partnership

To advance educational equity. together with families, schools and the community, facilitate access to and opportunities for quality educational and wellness practices so that children thrive from diapers to diplomas.

9
Fenton Charter Public Schools

To cultivate a love of learning by fostering an environment that promotes self-discovery, independence, and an awareness of the connection between self and others.

Education
10
Bridges Charter School

Our mission is to educate the whole child using a combination of innovative curriculum and instruction along with social/emotional education embedded in the program. students will be enabled to reach their innate intellectual, creative,…

Education
11
High Tech High

High tech high's mission is to develop and support innovative public schools where all students develop the academic, workplace and citizenship skills for postsecondary success.

Education
12
Leadership Public Schools

Our mission is to create inclusive, empowering, and college-preparatory experiences that equip students to succeed in college, career, and as leaders in their communities.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is After-School All-Stars Los Angeles and the most unlike its peers is Music & Arts Foundation in America. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyYouth Recreation & Sports P…Business & Downtown AdvocacyHomeless Services & HousingArts Support OrganizationsPerforming Arts ProductionNonprofit Capacity BuildingCommunity Health CentersPolicy Research & Advocacy …Youth Education and Develop…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 23 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number23%5%<5yr15%9%5–10yr20%29%10–20yr18%39%20–35yr11%12%35–55yr12%7%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value23%0%<5yr15%5%5–10yr20%43%10–20yr18%42%20–35yr11%6%35–55yr12%4%55yr+

The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 2% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%5/231
the rest of the field
14%
9,981/69,768

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

221 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

13
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
48
Early backer (in before they grew)
213/221
Grantees still filing
152/221
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CALIFORNIA CHARTER SCHOOLS ASSOCIATION — $5,390,000 · EducationCALIFORNIA CHARTER SCHOOLS ASSOCIATIONKIPP SOCAL PUBLIC SCHOOLS — $4,804,277 · EducationKIPP SOCAL PUBLIC SCHOOLSTeach for America Inc — $4,000,000 · EducationTeach for America IncEQUITAS ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL — $3,597,500 · EducationEQUITAS ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOLEDNOVATE INC — $3,228,484 · EducationEDNOVATE INCCitizens of the World Charter Schools Los Angeles — $2,762,400 · EducationPARENT REVOLUTION INC — $2,254,712 · Education+81 more — $29,569,762 · Education+81 moreLOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT — $3,092,410 · OtherLOS ANGELES UNIFI…SPEAK UP FOUNDATION — $1,001,190 · OtherSPEAK UP FOUNDATI…EDUCARE FOUNDATION — $992,984 · OtherEDUCARE FOUNDATIO…ALLIANCE FOR COLLEGE-READY PUBLIC SCHOOLS — $845,000 · OtherALLIANCE FOR COLL…WOODCRAFT RANGERS — $819,032 · OtherWOODCRAFT RANGERSLOS ANGELES PARKS FOUNDATION — $617,372 · Other+44 more — $4,252,064 · Other+44 moreINNERCITY STRUGGLE — $938,055 · Human ServicesPARA LOS NINOS — $806,329 · Human ServicesYoung Men's Christian Association of Metropolitan Los Angeles — $711,272 · Human ServicesPHOENIX HOUSES OF CALIFORNIA INC — $175,000 · Human ServicesCentral American Resource Center - CARECEN - of California — $166,050 · Human ServicesEL CENTRO DEL PUEBLO INC — $120,000 · Human Services+11 more — $434,000 · Human ServicesBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CARSON INC — $518,950 · Youth DevelopmentRAINBOW LABS MENTORING INC — $482,466 · Youth DevelopmentCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF LOS ANGELES INC — $414,308 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LOS ANGELES HARBOR — $251,236 · Youth DevelopmentTEAM PRIME TIME INC — $184,906 · Youth DevelopmentHEART OF LOS ANGELES YOUTH INC — $90,000 · Youth Development+4 more — $98,890 · Youth DevelopmentINNOVATE PUBLIC SCHOOLS — $1,494,684 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY INC — $340,000 · PhilanthropyCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $76,000 · PhilanthropyALLIANCE FOR A BETTER COMMUNITY — $968,764 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY PARTNERS — $493,800 · Community ImprovementPartnership for Children & Youth — $97,460 · Community Improvement+1 more — $50,000 · Community ImprovementTHE 74 MEDIA INC — $225,000 · Arts & CultureNO LIMITS THEATER GROUP INC — $175,000 · Arts & CultureTHE H E ART PROJECT dba ARTWORXLA — $164,975 · Arts & CultureMUSIC & ARTS FOUNDATION IN AMERICA — $101,640 · Arts & CultureLOS ANGELES COUNTY MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY FOUNDATION — $57,175 · Arts & CultureNEW EARTH ORGANIZATION — $50,000 · Arts & CultureARTS FOR HEALING AND JUSTICE NETWORK — $35,000 · Arts & CultureLATINO MEDIA COLLABORATIVE — $35,000 · Arts & CultureGIRLS IN FOCUS — $34,000 · Arts & Culture+4 more — $69,075 · Arts & Culture
Education$55,607,135Other$11,620,052Human Services$3,350,706Youth Development$2,040,756Philanthropy$1,910,684Community Improvement$1,610,024Arts & Culture$946,865

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCALIFORNIA CHARTER SCHOOLS ASSOCIATION — $5,390,000 over 9y, 7.7% of budgetKIPP SOCAL PUBLIC SCHOOLS — $4,804,277 over 8y, 1.7% of budgetTeach for America Inc — $4,000,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetEQUITAS ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL — $3,597,500 over 6y, 11% of budgetEDNOVATE INC — $3,228,484 over 5y, 7.4% of budgetCitizens of the World Charter Schools Los Angeles — $2,762,400 over 5y, 4.8% of budgetPARENT REVOLUTION INC — $2,254,712 over 5y, 53% of budgetLA'S BEST — $1,744,824 over 4y, 13% of budgetTNTP INC — $1,581,622 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetUnited Parents and Students — $1,518,010 over 9y, 27% of budgetHIGHTECH LA — $1,500,000 over 1y, 33% of budgetALDER GRADUATE SCHOOL OF EDUCATION — $1,500,000 over 3y, 8.5% of budgetBLUEPRINT — $1,500,000 over 1y, 22% of budgetINNOVATE PUBLIC SCHOOLS — $1,494,684 over 8y, 3.8% of budgetRELAY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF EDUCATION — $1,480,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetASPIRE PUBLIC SCHOOLS — $1,472,400 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetBRIGHT STAR EDUCATION GROUP — $1,448,155 over 2y, 21% of budgetAccelerate Institute — $1,250,000 over 2y, 26% of budgetGreen Dot Public Schools — $1,188,460 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetPARTNERSHIP FOR LOS ANGELES SCHOOLS — $1,187,000 over 6y, 2.5% of budgetAFTER-SCHOOL ALL-STARS LOS ANGELES — $1,116,188 over 5y, 5.8% of budgetSPEAK UP FOUNDATION — $1,001,190 over 5y, 33% of budgetEDUCARE FOUNDATION — $992,984 over 3y, 6.0% of budgetALLIANCE FOR A BETTER COMMUNITY — $968,764 over 9y, 43% of budgetINNERCITY STRUGGLE — $938,055 over 8y, 5.3% of budgetALLIANCE FOR COLLEGE-READY PUBLIC SCHOOLS — $845,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetWOODCRAFT RANGERS — $819,032 over 5y, 4.0% of budgetPARA LOS NINOS — $806,329 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetYoung Men's Christian Association of Metropolitan Los Angeles — $711,272 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetLOS ANGELES PARKS FOUNDATION — $617,372 over 5y, 18% of budgetCENTER FOR POWERFUL PUBLIC SCHOOLS — $595,000 over 4y, 45% of budgetBRIGHT STAR SCHOOLS — $572,748 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetFAMILIES IN SCHOOLS — $542,800 over 9y, 6.6% of budgetSTAR SPORTS THEATRE ARTS & RECREATION INC — $541,928 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetEDUCATORS FOR EXCELLENCE INC — $522,000 over 7y, 1.6% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CARSON INC — $518,950 over 3y, 8.8% of budgetSTEM PREPARATORY SCHOOLS INC — $506,400 over 3y, 3.3% of budgetBES INC — $500,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERS — $493,800 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetRAINBOW LABS MENTORING INC — $482,466 over 2y, 57% of budgetTHINK TOGETHER — $470,595 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF LOS ANGELES INC — $414,308 over 6y, 5.8% of budgetAdvancement Through Opportunity & Knowledge Inc — $376,549 over 3y, 14% of budgetLAUREL LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE — $376,000 over 6y, 30% of budgetOUR TURN INC — $375,000 over 5y, 4.6% of budgetUNITED WAY INC — $340,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetLOS ANGELES CONSERVATION CORPS — $332,984 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL CHARTER SCHOOLS — $330,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CALIFORNIA CHARTER SCHOOLS ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds KIPP SOCAL PUBLIC SCHOOLS
  • Who funds Teach for America Inc
  • Who funds EQUITAS ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL
  • Who funds EDNOVATE INC
  • Who funds Citizens of the World Charter Schools Los Angeles
  • Who funds PARENT REVOLUTION INC
  • Who funds LA'S BEST
  • Who funds TNTP INC
  • Who funds United Parents and Students
  • Who funds HIGHTECH LA
  • Who funds ALDER GRADUATE SCHOOL OF EDUCATION
  • Who funds BLUEPRINT
  • Who funds INNOVATE PUBLIC SCHOOLS
  • Who funds RELAY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF EDUCATION
  • Who funds ASPIRE PUBLIC SCHOOLS
  • Who funds BRIGHT STAR EDUCATION GROUP
  • Who funds Accelerate Institute
  • Who funds Green Dot Public Schools
  • Who funds PARTNERSHIP FOR LOS ANGELES SCHOOLS
  • Who funds AFTER-SCHOOL ALL-STARS LOS ANGELES
  • Who funds SPEAK UP FOUNDATION
  • Who funds EDUCARE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds ALLIANCE FOR A BETTER COMMUNITY
  • Who funds INNERCITY STRUGGLE
  • Who funds ALLIANCE FOR COLLEGE-READY PUBLIC SCHOOLS
  • Who funds WOODCRAFT RANGERS
  • Who funds PARA LOS NINOS
  • Who funds Young Men's Christian Association of Metropolitan Los Angeles
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES PARKS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CENTER FOR POWERFUL PUBLIC SCHOOLS
  • Who funds BRIGHT STAR SCHOOLS
  • Who funds FAMILIES IN SCHOOLS
  • Who funds STAR SPORTS THEATRE ARTS & RECREATION INC
  • Who funds EDUCATORS FOR EXCELLENCE INC
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CARSON INC
  • Who funds STEM PREPARATORY SCHOOLS INC
  • Who funds BES INC
  • Who funds COMMUNITY PARTNERS

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ralph M Parsons FoundationCA109× affinity64 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · Joseph Drown Foundation · Weingart Foundation · The Eli and Edythe Broad Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · California Community Foundation · Elbridge Stuart Foundation Dba Stuart Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · The Rose Hills Foundation · United Way Inc · Walton Family Foundation Inc · Charter Fund Inc D/B/A Charter School Growth Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Great Public Schools Now funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 11%
  • City Year Inc11% of income from government
  • Achievement First Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
85report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 185 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $2.2M of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2022, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph