· Public charity
Great Public Schools Now
The organization invests in schools, organizations and initiatives that catalyze excellence in public education, convenes leaders and uplifts public understanding to advocate for great public schools.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2022.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2022
- Under $10k5 grants · $41k
- $10k–50k23 grants · $625k
- $50k–250k45 grants · $5.4M
- $250k+9 grants · $3.7M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| EDUCARE FOUNDATION | $676,934 |
| LA'S BEST | $597,324 |
| CITY OF LOS ANGELES - DEPARTMENT OF RECREATION AND PARKS | $592,372 |
| AFTER-SCHOOL ALL-STARS LOS ANGELES | $411,388 |
| THE CALIFORNIA CHARTER SCHOOLS ASSOCIATION | $300,000 |
| RAINBOW LABS | $295,066 |
| WOODCRAFT RANGERS | $270,182 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF CARSON | $262,300 |
| CITIZENS OF THE WORLD LOS ANGELES | $250,000 |
| COMMUNITY PARTNERS | $238,800 |
| INNOVATE PUBLIC SCHOOLS | $220,000 |
| YMCA OF METROPOLITAN LOS ANGELES | $211,272 |
| THINK TOGETHER | $210,595 |
| INSTITUTE FOR EDUCATION RESEARCH AND SCHOLARSHIPS | $207,025 |
| EDUCATORS FOR EXCELLENCE INC | $200,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $3.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +67% since the first grant, against +31% for the ones you funded once.
93 repeat relationships — 65 still active in FY2022, 28 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2022, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $988k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- KSKIPP SOCAL PUBLIC SCHOOLS8× · 2017–2025 · $4.8M · revenue +171%
- EAEQUITAS ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL6× · 2017–2024 · $3.6M · revenue +245%
- EIEDNOVATE INC5× · 2017–2024 · $3.2M · revenue +370%
Funded once
- HLHIGHTECH LAgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $1.5M · revenue +122% · 33% of their budget
- BBLUEPRINTgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $1.5M · revenue +104%
- BIBES INCone grant, 2017 · $500k · revenue -55%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To help each child reach his/her full potential by cultivating an active village of parents, community members, and stakeholders involved in providing an individual, personal, and conceptual learning environment for each student.
The las mission is to create a learning community where students: utilize bilingualism and biliteracy (spanish and english) to achieve academic excellence and apply skills in real-world situations and diverse settings; develop and exhibit…
The mission of tlc is to educate diverse students through a rigorous, standards-based, collegepreparatory program to become conscientious, caring, and responsible 21st century citizens. tlc is grounded in an inclusive vision of teaching…
To ensure students reach their fullest potential through access to learning spaces that honor and celebrate students' rich cultural heritage and challenge them with rigorous and relevant learning experiences designed to make them active…
The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.
New los angeles charter school develops a diverse community of students who are passionate about learning, engaged in their community, and have respect for themselves and others.
Provide a high standard of education to students through comprehensive curriculum supported by energetic, dynamic, and caring teachers.
To advance educational equity. together with families, schools and the community, facilitate access to and opportunities for quality educational and wellness practices so that children thrive from diapers to diplomas.
To cultivate a love of learning by fostering an environment that promotes self-discovery, independence, and an awareness of the connection between self and others.
Our mission is to educate the whole child using a combination of innovative curriculum and instruction along with social/emotional education embedded in the program. students will be enabled to reach their innate intellectual, creative,…
High tech high's mission is to develop and support innovative public schools where all students develop the academic, workplace and citizenship skills for postsecondary success.
Our mission is to create inclusive, empowering, and college-preparatory experiences that equip students to succeed in college, career, and as leaders in their communities.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is After-School All-Stars Los Angeles and the most unlike its peers is Music & Arts Foundation in America. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 23 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
221 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CALIFORNIA CHARTER SCHOOLS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds KIPP SOCAL PUBLIC SCHOOLS ↗
- Who funds Teach for America Inc ↗
- Who funds EQUITAS ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds EDNOVATE INC ↗
- Who funds Citizens of the World Charter Schools Los Angeles ↗
- Who funds PARENT REVOLUTION INC ↗
- Who funds LA'S BEST ↗
- Who funds TNTP INC ↗
- Who funds United Parents and Students ↗
- Who funds HIGHTECH LA ↗
- Who funds ALDER GRADUATE SCHOOL OF EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds BLUEPRINT ↗
- Who funds INNOVATE PUBLIC SCHOOLS ↗
- Who funds RELAY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds ASPIRE PUBLIC SCHOOLS ↗
- Who funds BRIGHT STAR EDUCATION GROUP ↗
- Who funds Accelerate Institute ↗
- Who funds Green Dot Public Schools ↗
- Who funds PARTNERSHIP FOR LOS ANGELES SCHOOLS ↗
- Who funds AFTER-SCHOOL ALL-STARS LOS ANGELES ↗
- Who funds SPEAK UP FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds EDUCARE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ALLIANCE FOR A BETTER COMMUNITY ↗
- Who funds INNERCITY STRUGGLE ↗
- Who funds ALLIANCE FOR COLLEGE-READY PUBLIC SCHOOLS ↗
- Who funds WOODCRAFT RANGERS ↗
- Who funds PARA LOS NINOS ↗
- Who funds Young Men's Christian Association of Metropolitan Los Angeles ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES PARKS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR POWERFUL PUBLIC SCHOOLS ↗
- Who funds BRIGHT STAR SCHOOLS ↗
- Who funds FAMILIES IN SCHOOLS ↗
- Who funds STAR SPORTS THEATRE ARTS & RECREATION INC ↗
- Who funds EDUCATORS FOR EXCELLENCE INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CARSON INC ↗
- Who funds STEM PREPARATORY SCHOOLS INC ↗
- Who funds BES INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY PARTNERS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · Joseph Drown Foundation · Weingart Foundation · The Eli and Edythe Broad Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · California Community Foundation · Elbridge Stuart Foundation Dba Stuart Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · The Rose Hills Foundation · United Way Inc · Walton Family Foundation Inc · Charter Fund Inc D/B/A Charter School Growth Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Great Public Schools Now funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- City Year Inc — 11% of income from government
- Achievement First Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.