California · Nonprofit
Mentoring and Partnership for Youth Development
Mentoring and Partnership for Youth Development (California) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $350,771 to it, the largest being STANLEY W EKSTROM FOUNDATION INC ($197,721). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
Mentoring and Partnership for Youth Development runs a healthier operating margin than half of the 3,185 youth development nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 3,185 youth development nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025
Three funders worth looking at
Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.
- The Rose Hills Foundationshared funderslocal
- Bay Area Community Resources Incportfolio match
- Go Campaignportfolio match
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
Government-grant reliance: 2017 82% · 2019 67% · 2020 75% · 2021 69% · 2022 66% · 2023 40% · 2024 55% · 2025 35%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.
100% of Mentoring and Partnership for Youth Development’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (83% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Who funds it, year by year
2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 2 funders, grant income rose $28k → $76k.
1 of 5 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 26% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of Mentoring and Partnership for Youth Development’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
Mentoring and Partnership for Youth Development leans on a few funders — its largest provides 56% of grant income and the top three 97%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
44% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund Mentoring and Partnership for Youth Development.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 100% · 2019 100% · 2020 100% · 2021 62% · 2022 72% · 2023 92% — diversifying over time.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Where its funders are
100% of Mentoring and Partnership for Youth Development's grant income comes from California funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $91k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Funders to approach
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 5 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.
- The Rose Hills Foundationshared funderslocalCA · backs 43 organizations that share your funders · funds 476 organizations near you
- Bay Area Community Resources Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Go Campaignportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Youth Leadership Instituteportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Bohannon Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- The Callison Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Chamberlin Education Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Miranda Lux Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Optimist Club of Country Clubportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Reach Higher Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- William McCaskey Chapman and Adaline Dinsmore Chapman Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Antioch Community Foundation Attn Keith Archuletaportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Organizations like Mentoring and Partnership for Youth Development
Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In California
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
100% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Public support
100%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Mentoring and Partnership for Youth Development: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds Mentoring and Partnership for Youth Development?
- Mentoring and Partnership for Youth Development (California) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $350,771 to it, the largest being STANLEY W EKSTROM FOUNDATION INC ($197,721). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does Mentoring and Partnership for Youth Development have?
- IRS filings report 5 organizations giving $350,771 in grants to Mentoring and Partnership for Youth Development, 2 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of Mentoring and Partnership for Youth Development?
- STANLEY W EKSTROM FOUNDATION INC is the largest funder on record, with $197,721 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like Mentoring and Partnership for Youth Development find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 5funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing