Skip to content
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

As a leading academic healthcare organization, our mission is to elevate the health status of the communities we serve.(see schedule o for continuation)(continued)-we deliver exceptional healthcare enhanced by research and education-we prioritize high-quality care for all with compassion-we transform biomedical discoveries and…

$22M
Granted FY2025still arriving
217
Grants FY2025still arriving
12
States reached
$1.8M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$68MPhilanthropy$43MHousing & Shelter$28MHuman Services$11MCommunity Improvement$10MEducation$9.6MFood & Nutrition$5.2MRecreation & Sports$5.0MOther$0
02FY2025 · 217 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k20 grants · $145k
  • $10k–50k89 grants · $1.8M
  • $50k–250k93 grants · $8.8M
  • $250k+15 grants · $11M
$40,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$13.2B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$1,805,624
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GRANTMAKERS$1,347,500
LULU'S PLACE INC$1,250,000
UNITED WAY OF GREATER LOS ANGELES$1,165,000
COMMUNITY INITIATIVES$1,003,000
THE REGENTS OF THE UNIV OF CA (UCSF)$850,000
SABAN COMMUNITY CLINIC$525,000
PUKUU CULTURAL COMMUNITY SERVICES$500,000
COMMUNITY CLINIC ASSOC LA (CCALAC)$450,000
COMMUNITY PARTNERS$430,500
CHILDREN'S INSTITUTE INC$405,000
CORO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA$374,800
LTSC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION$350,000
INCLUSIVE ACTION FOR THE CITY$270,000
DIDI HIRSCH PSYCHIATRIC SERVICE$251,118
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $26.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FIRST PLACE FOR YOUTH: $175k → 10%PARA LOS NINOS: $200k → 14%THE TIDES CENTER: $1.7M → 10%COVENANT HOUSE CALIFORNIA: $200k → 14%TIDES CENTER: $1.5M → 10%TIDES CENTER: $1.4M → 10%TIDES CENTER: $1.4M → 10%TIDES CENTER: $1.1M → 10%TIDES CENTER: $550k → 10%THE TIDES CENTER: $375k → 10%STEP UP ON SECOND STREET INC: $150k → 14%CHILDREN'S INSTITUTE INC: $560k → 14%CHILDREN'S INSTITUTE INC: $405k → 14%CHILDREN'S INSTITUTE INC: $200k → 14%CHILDREN'S INSTITUTE INC: $190k → 14%DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $230k → 14%DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $225k → 14%DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $160k → 14%DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $150k → 14%DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $150k → 14%THE PEOPLE CONCERN: $422k → 14%OCEAN PARK COMMUNITY CENTER DBA THE PEOPLE CONCERN: $345k → 14%THE PEOPLE CONCERN: $322k → 14%THE PEOPLE CONCERN: $230k → 14%THE PEOPLE CONCERN: $200k → 14%THE PEOPLE CONCERN: $152k → 14%INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF LOS ANGELES: $150k → 14%KOREAN AMERICAN FAMILY SERVICES INC: $200k → 14%KOREAN AMERICAN FAMILY SERVICE CENTER: $170k → 14%PUKUU CULTURAL COMMUNITY SERVICES: $500k → 14%IMAGINE LOS ANGELES INC: $150k → 14%SPECIAL SERVICE FOR GROUPS INC: $725k → 14%SPECIAL SERVICE FOR GROUPS INC: $305k → 14%SPECIAL SERVICE FOR GROUPS INC: $275k → 14%SPECIAL SERVICE FOR GROUPS INC: $250k → 14%SPECIAL SERVICE FOR GROUPS INC: $155k → 14%UNIVERSITY MUSLIM MEDICAL ASSOC INC DBA UMMA COMMUNITY CLINIC: $150k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $215k → 14%SAFE PLACE FOR YOUTH: $150k → 14%SAFE PLACE FOR YOUTH (SPY): $150k → 14%SAFE PLACE FOR YOUTH (SPY): $150k → 14%ST JOSEPH CENTER: $250k → 14%SAFE PLACE FOR YOUTH INC: $200k → 14%ST JOSEPH CENTER: $175k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $396k → 14%CENTER AT BLESSED SACRAMENT THE: $200k → 14%CENTER IN HOLLYWOOD THE: $175k → 14%SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COUNSELING CENTER: $190k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
OH
PA
NJ
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
AZ
KS
TN
NC
DC
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$140M · 255 repeat orgs$9.0M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.

255 repeat relationships: 162 still active in FY2025, 93 since wound down; 50 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

255
114

Total granted

$140M
$5.8M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+9%

Still filing today

93%
88%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.2M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementEducationPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GRANTMAKERS
    7× · 2019–2025 · $5.9M · revenue +418%
  • SJ
    SOCIAL JUSTICE PARTNERS LOS ANGELES
    2× · 2021–2024 · $5.3M · revenue +10% · 77% of their budget
  • UF
    UNIHEALTH FOUNDATION
    2× · 2019–2021 · $5.3M · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • TS
    THE SABAN CHARITABLE SUPPORT FUND
    one grant, 2018 · $936k · revenue -95% · 56% of their budget
  • ENTERPRISE COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC
    one grant, 2024 · $450k · revenue 0%
  • VC
    VENICE COMMUNITY HOUSING CORPORATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $350k · revenue +341%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children's Hospital Los Angeles

Promotion and advancement of children's health through patient care, research, and education.

Health
2
California Healthcare Foundation

Chcf is dedicated to advancing meaningful, measurable improvements in the way the health care delivery system provides care to the people of california, particularly those with low incomes and those whose needs are not well served by the…

—
3
Los Angeles County Medical Association

To enhance the professionalism and clinical autonomy of physicians to allow them to advocate for their patients and the health of the community of los angeles.

—
4
Los Angeles General Medical Center Foundation Inc

To support and enhance the mission of the los angeles general medical center (formerly the lac+usc medical center) and ensure it maintains its status as a leader in medicine, education and research, and continues to provide the highest…

—
5
Pasadena Hospital Association Ltd

Huntington Health stands for community. We stand for compassion. But more than anything, Huntington stands for health. Providing world-class health care is our specialty, and it's what we've been doing for the San Gabriel Valley since…

Health
6
La Clinica Del Valle Family Health Care Center Inc

La clinica provides primary and preventive medical, dental, behavioral health, and other health promotion services to underserved and low-income patients.

—
7
Health Access for All Inc Dba Angeles Community Health Center

Dedicated to providing comprehensive primary medical care, dental services and care coordination for the care and well-being of all los angeles residents. the organization provides high quality, comprehensive primary and preventative…

Health
8
Community Medical Centers Inc

The organization provides primary medical, behavior health, and dental care to the population of san joaquin, and solano counties without regard to patients' ability to pay.

Health
9
Asian Pacific Health Care Venture Inc

Asian Pacific Health Care Venture, Inc. is a family of community health centers whose mission is to be the medical home for our patients by providing personalized, quality health care services in a culturally accessible manner.

—
10
Family Health Care Centers of Greater Los Angeles

Family health care centers of greater los angeles aims to enchance the quality of life for men, women, and children in the greater los angeles through the provision of high quality, accessible and affordable health care services.

Health
11
The California Medical Innovations Institute Inc

The Institute is a scientific research center dedicated to conducting basic and applied research to advance the understanding of human disease and the improvement of human health. The Institute fosters an innovative research environment…

Education
12
Asian Health Services

Asian Health Services (AHS) provides a continuum of medical care, mental health care, dental care and other healthcare services for all, including health education; perinatal services; behavioral health; family and youth services;…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mental Health America of Los Angeles; the most unlike its peers is The Farrah Fawcett Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

413 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 413 of the 430 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

17
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
87
Early backer (in before they grew)
399/413
Grantees still filing
262/413
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $37,129,315 · PhilanthropyCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONUNITED WAY INC: $8,840,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY INCSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GRANTMAKERS: $5,875,400 · PhilanthropySOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GRANTMAKERS+11 more: $5,501,112 · Philanthropy+11 moreUNIHEALTH FOUNDATION: $5,250,000 · HealthUNIHEALTH FOUNDATIONCOMMUNITY CLINIC ASSOCIATION OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY: $4,812,300 · HealthCOMMUNITY CLINIC ASSOCIAT…THE LOS ANGELES FREE CLINIC: $3,029,496 · HealthTHE LOS ANGELES FREE CLIN…PLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES: $2,666,400 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS AN…MARTIN LUTHER KING JR COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION: $2,563,450 · HealthMARTIN LUTHER KING JR COM…+55 more: $24,743,671 · Health+55 moreTIDES CENTER: $8,038,917 · Human ServicesTIDES CENTERTHE PEOPLE CONCERN: $1,946,000 · Human ServicesTHE PEOPLE CONC…Special Service for Groups Inc: $1,760,250 · Human ServicesSpecial Service…CHILDREN'S INSTITUTE INC: $1,752,500 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S INST…DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $1,091,000 · Human ServicesKOREAN AMERICAN FAMILY SERVICES INC: $922,250 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES: $904,300 · Human Services+28 more: $9,929,820 · Human Services+28 moreUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO: $5,008,360 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFO…LA FAMILY HOUSING CORPORATION: $2,102,500 · OtherLA FAMILY HOUSING CO…LOS ANGELES LGBT CENTER: $1,619,973 · OtherTHE MAPLE COUNSELING CENTER: $1,486,000 · OtherJEWISH FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION: $1,412,500 · OtherSTUDENT HEALTH SERVICES SUPPORT FUND INC dba The LA Trust: $1,230,305 · OtherTRUE COLORS UNITED INC: $1,520,000 · Other+61 more: $20,205,334 · Other+61 moreSOCIAL JUSTICE PARTNERS LOS ANGELES: $5,300,000 · EducationBRILLIANT CORNERS: $2,700,000 · EducationCHARLES R DREW UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND SCIENCE: $2,564,025 · EducationLOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $1,439,315 · EducationUCLA FOUNDATION: $692,210 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $618,000 · Education+3 more: $470,000 · EducationCOMMUNITY PARTNERS: $3,416,958 · Community ImprovementNONPROFIT FINANCE FUND: $2,050,000 · Community ImprovementSUSTAINABLE ECONOMIC ENTERPRISES OF LA DBA FOOD ACCESS LOS ANGELES: $788,027 · Community ImprovementINCLUSIVE ACTION FOR THE CITY: $646,750 · Community ImprovementLOS ANGELES SECTION NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN: $505,000 · Community ImprovementENTERPRISE COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC: $450,000 · Community Improvement+4 more: $547,543 · Community ImprovementLULU'S PLACE INC: $5,000,000 · Recreation & SportsTeam Heal Foundation Inc: $1,005,000 · Recreation & Sports+2 more: $266,000 · Recreation & Sports
Philanthropy$57,345,827Health$43,065,317Human Services$26,345,037Other$34,584,972Education$13,783,550Community Improvement$8,404,278Recreation & Sports$6,271,000

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $37,129,315 over 8y, 2.7% of budgetUNITED WAY INC: $8,840,000 over 8y, 7.5% of budgetTIDES CENTER: $8,038,917 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GRANTMAKERS: $5,875,400 over 7y, 6.0% of budgetSOCIAL JUSTICE PARTNERS LOS ANGELES: $5,300,000 over 2y, 77% of budgetUNIHEALTH FOUNDATION: $5,250,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetLULU'S PLACE INC: $5,000,000 over 4y, 12% of budgetCOMMUNITY CLINIC ASSOCIATION OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY: $4,812,300 over 9y, 15% of budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERS: $3,416,958 over 9y, 1.5% of budgetTHE LOS ANGELES FREE CLINIC: $3,029,496 over 7y, 3.0% of budgetBRILLIANT CORNERS: $2,700,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES: $2,666,400 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetCHARLES R DREW UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND SCIENCE: $2,564,025 over 8y, 2.3% of budgetMARTIN LUTHER KING JR COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION: $2,563,450 over 9y, 15% of budgetLA FAMILY HOUSING CORPORATION: $2,102,500 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetNONPROFIT FINANCE FUND: $2,050,000 over 4y, 5.1% of budgetTHE PEOPLE CONCERN: $1,946,000 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetSpecial Service for Groups Inc: $1,760,250 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetCHILDREN'S INSTITUTE INC: $1,752,500 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetLOS ANGELES LGBT CENTER: $1,619,973 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetTRUE COLORS UNITED INC: $1,520,000 over 3y, 16% of budgetTHE MAPLE COUNSELING CENTER: $1,486,000 over 9y, 26% of budgetLOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $1,439,315 over 3y, 67% of budgetJEWISH FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION: $1,412,500 over 6y, 21% of budgetVENICE FAMILY CLINIC: $1,322,500 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetPLUNUM HEALTH: $1,250,000 over 3y, 85% of budgetSTUDENT HEALTH SERVICES SUPPORT FUND INC dba The LA Trust: $1,230,305 over 7y, 23% of budgetPEDIATRIC AND FAMILY MEDICAL CENTER DBA EISNER HEALTH: $1,197,500 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetDOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $1,091,000 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetST JOHN'S COMMUNITY HEALTH: $1,070,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetTeam Heal Foundation Inc: $1,005,000 over 4y, 89% of budgetDIDI HIRSCH PSYCHIATRIC SERVICE: $1,003,929 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY INITIATIVES: $1,003,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetCORO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INC: $976,300 over 6y, 16% of budgetTHE CLINIC INC: $975,000 over 8y, 1.8% of budgetTHE SABAN CHARITABLE SUPPORT FUND: $935,762 over 1y, 56% of budgetKOREAN AMERICAN FAMILY SERVICES INC: $922,250 over 9y, 3.0% of budgetOPEN PATHS COUNSELING CENTER: $918,000 over 7y, 21% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES: $904,300 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COUNSELING CENTER: $850,000 over 9y, 11% of budgetThe Hastings Center Inc: $850,000 over 6y, 4.4% of budgetKOREAN HEALTH EDUCATION INFORMATION AND RESEARCH CENTER: $845,000 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetLOS ANGELES CHRISTIAN HEALTH CENTERS: $814,500 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetCLAREMATRIX: $796,000 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetSUSTAINABLE ECONOMIC ENTERPRISES OF LA DBA FOOD ACCESS LOS ANGELES: $788,027 over 5y, 7.5% of budgetJWCH INSTITUTE INC: $780,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION COUNCIL OF GREATER LA: $772,500 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetNORTHEAST VALLEY HEALTH CORPORATION: $757,842 over 6y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY INC ↗
  • Who funds TIDES CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GRANTMAKERS ↗
  • Who funds SOCIAL JUSTICE PARTNERS LOS ANGELES ↗
  • Who funds UNIHEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LULU'S PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY CLINIC ASSOCIATION OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY PARTNERS ↗
  • Who funds THE LOS ANGELES FREE CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds BRILLIANT CORNERS ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES ↗
  • Who funds CHARLES R DREW UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND SCIENCE ↗
  • Who funds MARTIN LUTHER KING JR COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LA FAMILY HOUSING CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds NONPROFIT FINANCE FUND ↗
  • Who funds THE PEOPLE CONCERN ↗
  • Who funds Special Service for Groups Inc ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES LGBT CENTER ↗
  • Who funds TRUE COLORS UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MAPLE COUNSELING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds VENICE FAMILY CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds PLUNUM HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds STUDENT HEALTH SERVICES SUPPORT FUND INC dba The LA Trust ↗
  • Who funds PEDIATRIC AND FAMILY MEDICAL CENTER DBA EISNER HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ST JOHN'S COMMUNITY HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds Team Heal Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds DIDI HIRSCH PSYCHIATRIC SERVICE ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY INITIATIVES ↗
  • Who funds CORO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SABAN CHARITABLE SUPPORT FUND ↗
  • Who funds KOREAN AMERICAN FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds OPEN PATHS COUNSELING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ralph M Parsons F…Weingart FoundationThe Rose Hills Founda…United Way IncCalifornia Community …The Ahmanson Foundati…The Annenberg Foundat…Kaiser Foundation Hos…Liberty Hill Foundati…Shelter Partnership I…Unihealth FoundationQueensCare
The Ralph M Parsons FoundationCA122.1× affinity80 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · Weingart Foundation · The Rose Hills Foundation · United Way Inc · California Community Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Liberty Hill Foundation · Shelter Partnership Inc · Unihealth Foundation · QueensCare

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Cedars-Sinai Medical Center funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Cedars-Sinai Medical Center. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 18%
  • Jewish Vocational Service Inc: 39% of income from government
  • Enterprise Community Partners Inc: 22% of income from government
  • Capital Link Inc: 18% of income from government
  • City Year Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Sharsheret Inc: 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
71report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 430 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Cedars-Sinai Medical Center’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home