· Public charity
St David's Foundation
The foundation's mission is to advance health equity - meaning that all central texans have a fair and just opportunity to live as healthfully as possible regardless of their demographic or where they live.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $5k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $210k
- $50k–250k58 grants · $7.8M
- $250k+79 grants · $77M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FOUNDATION COMMUNITIES | $5,836,916 |
| LONE STAR CIRCLE OF CARE | $3,865,840 |
| PEOPLE'S COMMUNITY CLINIC | $3,717,536 |
| LIFEWORKS | $3,501,180 |
| THE SAFE ALLIANCE | $3,485,289 |
| BASTROP COUNTY EMERGENCY FOOD PANTRY INC | $3,075,600 |
| UNITED WAY FOR GREATER AUSTIN | $2,798,470 |
| COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF CENTRAL TEXAS | $2,074,640 |
| AUSTIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $1,986,000 |
| TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE | $1,918,724 |
| BASTROP COUNTY CARES | $1,689,679 |
| COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS OF SOUTH CENTRAL TEXAS INC | $1,678,840 |
| COMMUNITY ACTION INC OF CENTRAL TEXAS | $1,628,327 |
| CENTRAL TEXAS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $1,255,287 |
| ROUND ROCK AREA SERVING CENTER INCORPORATED | $1,186,840 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $66.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 7% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +45% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.
197 repeat relationships — 120 still active in FY2024, 77 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7.6M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LSLONE STAR CIRCLE OF CARE6× · 2017–2024 · $44M · revenue +29%
- PCPEOPLE'S COMMUNITY CLINIC INC6× · 2017–2024 · $34M · revenue +82%
- FCFOUNDATION COMMUNITIES INC6× · 2017–2024 · $27M · revenue +99%
Funded once
- COCAPITAL OF TEXAS PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS COUNCILone grant, 2020 · $1.4M · revenue +3%
- THTexas Higher Education Coordinating Boardone grant, 2017 · $1.3M
- MKMARATHON KIDS INCone grant, 2017 · $539k · revenue -20%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Good Work Austin's mission is to foster healthy careers in the local food and beverage industry through professional development and advocacy for more equitable practices.
To equip Austinites to make informed decisions through independent, in-depth reporting, diverse opinions, and civil dialogue. A strong local press is essential for a healthy community and democracy. We work to make Austin a more empowered…
To connect Central Texans to resources by reducing barriers expanding access and filling gaps in service.
Engage in building procted to provide emergency shelters, transitional housing, and permanent housing while offering job skills training and support to help residents move toward self-sufficiency.
ATX Helps was created to fill gaps in the spectrum of services available to people in Austin who are experiencing homelessness.
To provide comprehensive primary care and preventive care to all persons regardless of their ability to pay.
Preserve access to quality healthcare for all texans
The Austin Community Law Center is a nonprofit law firm. Our mission is to make legal representation radically more affordable, invest in a stronger community, and fight for justice.
To increase the collective impact of our member organization on improving education economic development outcomes within the Austin Community.
The ACLU of Texas works with communities, at the State Capitol, and in the courts to protect and advance civil rights and civil liberties for every Texan, no exceptions.
The mission of austin street center is to provide emergency shelter and related services to the homeless. programs provide crisis intervention, substance abuse awareness information and opportunities to improve present life situations to…
Provide a 3 share plan that offers low-cost premium assistance to pay part of the monthly health benefit cost for low income employees. The cost of the program is split between the employer, employee, and TexHealth.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mission Capital and the most unlike its peers is African American Mens Health Clinic. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 24 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 29% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
327 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 327 of the 389 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LONE STAR CIRCLE OF CARE ↗
- Who funds PEOPLE'S COMMUNITY CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION COMMUNITIES INC ↗
- Who funds YOUTH AND FAMILY ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS OF SOUTH CENTRAL TEXAS INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF CENTRAL TEXAS ↗
- Who funds THE SAFE ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY FOR GREATER AUSTIN ↗
- Who funds AUSTIN TRAVIS COUNTY MHMR CENTER DBA INTEGRAL CARE ↗
- Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS AND MORE INC ↗
- Who funds Barrio Comprehensive Family Health Care Center Inc ↗
- Who funds Ending Community Homelessness Coalition Inc ↗
- Who funds Capital Investing in Development and Employment of Adults Inc ↗
- Who funds AUSTIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds AUSTIN PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FAMILY ELDERCARE INC ↗
- Who funds AIDS SERVICES OF AUSTIN INC ↗
- Who funds AUSTIN GROUPS FOR THE ELDERLY ↗
- Who funds ANY BABY CAN OF AUSTIN INC ↗
- Who funds FII - NATIONAL ↗
- Who funds HOSPICE AUSTIN ↗
- Who funds Austin Child Guidance Center ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TEXAS INC ↗
- Who funds Bastrop County Emergency Food Pantry ↗
- Who funds HELPING THE AGING NEEDY AND DISABLED INC ↗
- Who funds Health Alliance for Austin Musicians ↗
- Who funds El Buen Samaritano Episcopal Mission ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION INC OF CENTRAL TEXAS ↗
- Who funds BASTROP COUNTY CARES ↗
- Who funds HEALTHY FUTURES OF TEXAS ↗
- Who funds MANOS DE CRISTO INC ↗
- Who funds HUSTON-TILLOTSON UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ECONSULT NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds HAYS-CALDWELL WOMEN'S CENTER ↗
- Who funds NETWORK FOR GOOD ↗
- Who funds AUSTIN RECOVERY INC ↗
- Who funds Round Rock Area Serving Center Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: United Way for Greater Austin · Austin Community Foundation Inc · Shield-Ayres Foundation · The Moody Foundation · Episcopal Health Foundation · Better Business Bureau · A Glimmer of Hope Foundation Austin · Topfer Family Foundation · Donald D Hammill Foundation · Harry E and Eda L Montandon Charitable Tr · Ascension Seton · Carl C Anderson Sr and Marie Jo Anderson Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization St David's Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.