Skip to content

Texas · Nonprofit

MISSION CAPITAL

MISSION CAPITAL (Texas) receives grants from 32 organizations whose IRS filings report $7,801,867 to it, the largest being Michael & Susan Dell Foundation ($3,016,666). 21 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$772k
Funders on record
32
Grants received
$7.8M
Net assets
$1.0M
21/32 repeat fundersgrants exceed reported revenue in one year
01What it does

What Mission Capital does

Mission

The organization's vision is a central texas where all have access to opportunity and can thrive. The organization equips and connects mission-driven leaders, organizations, and networks advancing equity and opportunity through their work.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Program

  1. The organization's program services include the following: consulting, trainings, membership, and collective impact collaborations. They help 400+ non-profits support 50,000+ underserved people in central texas. Consulting: through our consulting services, we add bandwidth and resources to nonprofits when and where they need it. From board development to executive transition management to strategic planning to customized trainings, we provide individuals with knowledge, skills and connections, help teams develop organizational sustainability, and collaborate with key players to create cultural shifts in our sector all so that you can build on your mission-driven potential and sustain it into the future. Trainings: Mission Capital provides workshops and trainings to nonprofit leaders, staff, and organizations looking to invest in their development and growth. Membership: Mission Capital offers our members connection opportunities, 101 workshops, mission-aligned collaboration formers, networking opportunities, jobs board, and other online resources. Collective impact collaborations: through multi-year partnerships in our good work, we bring together community partners to amplify…

    $1,124,980 spent$263,704 earned by the program
    100% of program spending

The program described on its FY2024 Form 990. Program spending in total: $1,124,980.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($2.4M) Expenses 100 ($2.6M) Net assets 100 ($760k)2019 Revenue 125 ($3.0M) Expenses 112 ($2.9M) Net assets 129 ($978k)2020 Revenue 125 ($3.0M) Expenses 100 ($2.6M) Net assets 180 ($1.4M)2021 Revenue 116 ($2.8M) Expenses 78 ($2.0M) Net assets 280 ($2.1M)2022 Revenue 80 ($1.9M) Expenses 79 ($2.1M) Net assets 260 ($2.0M)2023 Revenue 92 ($2.2M) Expenses 73 ($1.9M) Net assets 300 ($2.3M)2024 Revenue 57 ($1.4M) Expenses 66 ($1.7M) Net assets 253 ($1.9M)2025 Revenue 32 ($772k) Expenses 64 ($1.7M) Net assets 132 ($1.0M)
'17'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (32)Expenses (64)Net assets (132)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2024 to 2025, from $2.0M to $1.1M (−46%).

$932k
$1.2M
$1.6M
$2.3M
$2.1M
$2.4M
$2.0M
$1.1M
'17'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2020 13% · 2021 14% · 2023 23%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

61% of MISSION CAPITAL’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (84% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 3,561 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

−$221k
’17
$85k
’19
$390k
’20
$761k
’21
−$149k
’22
$299k
’23
−$352k
’24
−$921k
’25
7.4
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Ira Williams Iii

Chief executive officer

Board chair

Aaron Delao

Board chair

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

'17'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed2119201515111517
Joined··+5+0+5+2+6+7
No longer listed··455625
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base narrowed from 12 funders to 3 funders, grant income rose $135k → $475k.

7 of 32 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 6% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of MISSION CAPITAL’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 32 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

MISSION CAPITAL leans on a few funders — its largest provides 39% of grant income and the top three 82%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

51% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund MISSION CAPITAL.

39%
largest funder
82%
top three
~4
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 26% · 2018 24% · 2019 78% · 2020 43% · 2021 55% · 2022 64% · 2023 95% — growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

54% of MISSION CAPITAL's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 66% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

94% of MISSION CAPITAL's grant income comes from Texas funders.

WA
MI
NY
CA
MD
DE
NC
DC
AL
TX

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Texas out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $448k arriving through sponsors registered in 7 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

MISSION CAPITAL's funding has concentrated — grant income rose while the number of funders held roughly flat.

Operating margin−119% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve7.4mo · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)−13% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,934 public benefit nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Organizations like MISSION CAPITAL

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Texas

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

66% of spending goes to programs.

Program 66%Management 25%Fundraising 8%

Governance

14
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

43%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for MISSION CAPITAL: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds MISSION CAPITAL?
MISSION CAPITAL (Texas) receives grants from 32 organizations whose IRS filings report $7,801,867 to it, the largest being Michael & Susan Dell Foundation ($3,016,666). 21 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does MISSION CAPITAL have?
IRS filings report 32 organizations giving $7,801,867 in grants to MISSION CAPITAL, 21 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of MISSION CAPITAL?
Michael & Susan Dell Foundation is the largest funder on record, with $3,016,666 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like MISSION CAPITAL find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Texas. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 32 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing