Skip to content

Washington, D.C. · Nonprofit

RURAL COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE PARTNERSHIP INCORPORATED

RURAL COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE PARTNERSHIP INCORPORATED (Washington, D.C.) receives grants from 9 organizations whose IRS filings report $2,124,268 to it, the largest being CHRIS LONG FOUNDATION ($480,584). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$37M
Funders on record
9
Grants received
$2.1M
Net assets
$945k
4/9 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 3%
01What it does

What Rural Community Assistance Partnership Incorporated does

Mission

Rcap works with rural communities across the country to elevate rural voices and build local capacity to improve quality of life, starting at the tap.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Drinking and waste water program and solid waste program:through the u.s. Department of agriculture (usda) rural development (rd), rural utilities service (rus), and the u.s. Environmental protection agency (epa)'s office of water, technical assistance and training programs are directed towards small water and waste disposal systems that are either current receivers of or are eligible for usda water and environmental program funding (small rural and tribal communities with populations under 10,000). Through this program, rcap worked with rural communities to provide technical assistance to build technical, managerial and financial capacity to achieve and maintain compliance with state and federal regulations as well as implement managerial and financial best practices to achieve long term sustainability. The environmental protection agency's (epa) national priority area 1: training and technical assistance for small public water systems to achieve and maintain compliance program is geared towards building local technical capacity for small community and non-community water systems serving less than 10,000 in population in all 50 states, the us territories and on tribal lands. The…

    $31,633,409 spentof which $27,622,763 as grants$133,119 earned by the program
    90% of program spending
  2. Research and economic development program:the u.s. Economic development administration (eda) research grants cover two projects that further develop research around rural innovation and urban and rural connectivity. These projects build out rcap's research portfolio with topics important to the rural communities it serves.one of rcap's strategic programs is regional utility collaboration, also known as regionalization. Rcap has been building internal capacity and national awareness to help to support and facilitate these on the ground partnerships so that small systems have an array of options to work with other nearby systems to help be more sustainable and resilient. Rcap supports voluntary partnerships and helps to facilitate regionalization opportunities on a sliding scale from the most informal, such as sharing equipment, to the most formal, such as full physical and/or managerial consolidation and everything in between.rcap's open for business hub helps rural entrepreneurs access free technical assistance and training to help launch and grow their small business. Powered by the wells fargo open for business fund and siegel family endowment, the e-learning hub provides…

    $1,907,468 spentof which $1,416,074 as grants$30,094 earned by the program
    5% of program spending
  3. Usda disaster relief:provide technical assistance, traininig and services under the calendar year 2022 circuit rider technical assistance (crta) grants program. Rcap and it's six partners provide deep-dive technical assistance and training to drinking water, waste water, stormwater and solid waste systems via 156 technical assistance projects in rural and tribal communities that are eligible under cy22 disaster crta. Program activites include intensive onsite ta to support post-disaster mitigation, emergency preparedness and recovery assistance, identifying and evaluating solutions to address disaster impacted systems' challenges, helping communities develop and prepare applications for water, waste water, solid waste and stormwater loans and grants (inlcuidngt the requisite predevelopment activities), and delivering training and resources to system personnel such as operators and managers as well as community leaders/decision makers.

    $1,419,324 spentof which $1,305,705 as grants
    4% of program spending

The 3 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $34,960,201.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($13M) Expenses 100 ($13M) Net assets 100 ($203k)2018 Revenue 114 ($15M) Expenses 114 ($15M) Net assets 98 ($198k)2019 Revenue 168 ($22M) Expenses 162 ($22M) Net assets 493 ($1000k)2020 Revenue 141 ($19M) Expenses 143 ($19M) Net assets 357 ($724k)2021 Revenue 179 ($24M) Expenses 163 ($22M) Net assets 1422 ($2.9M)2022 Revenue 191 ($26M) Expenses 202 ($27M) Net assets 727 ($1.5M)2023 Revenue 196 ($26M) Expenses 204 ($27M) Net assets 212 ($431k)2024 Revenue 223 ($30M) Expenses 223 ($30M) Net assets 216 ($439k)2025 Revenue 276 ($37M) Expenses 272 ($36M) Net assets 466 ($945k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (276)Expenses (272)Net assets (466)

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2019 to 2020, from $5.4M to $2.5M (−54%).

$2.2M
$2.6M
$5.4M
$2.5M
$4.9M
$4.0M
$5.7M
$6.0M
$7.5M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 100% · 2018 99% · 2019 94% · 2020 92% · 2021 85% · 2022 95% · 2023 97% · 2024 97% · 2025 94%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 5 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

−$1k
’17
−$5k
’18
$802k
’19
−$276k
’20
$2.2M
’21
−$1.4M
’22
−$1.0M
’23
$8k
’24
$506k
’25
0.6
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Olga Morales-Pate

CEO

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

The chief executive listed changed between the FY2022 and FY2023 filings.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed161818202021202022
Joined·+5+3+5+1+2+3+5+5
No longer listed·33311453
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2019 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 3 funders, grant income rose $5k → $105k.

2 of 9 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 16% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

Left out of every figure on this page: $450k from 3 payers (the payer shares this organization's board, largest Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation). These are real filings, and they are not money RURAL COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE PARTNERSHIP INCORPORATED raised.

From the IRS filings of RURAL COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE PARTNERSHIP INCORPORATED’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

RURAL COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE PARTNERSHIP INCORPORATED has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 23% of grant income, and it takes 3 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left

60% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund RURAL COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE PARTNERSHIP INCORPORATED.

23%
largest funder
64%
top three
~6
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2019 100% · 2020 100% · 2021 46% · 2022 42% · 2023 48% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

33% of RURAL COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE PARTNERSHIP INCORPORATED's funders are still giving 2 years after their first grant; 44% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

RURAL COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE PARTNERSHIP INCORPORATED draws 100% of its grant income from funders outside Washington, D.C., across 7 states in all.

NY
PA
NJ
CA
MO
NM
TX

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Washington, D.C. out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $335k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Government funding RURAL COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE PARTNERSHIP INCORPORATED receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $242.2M on record.

Federal$242.2M
grants $242.2Mcontracts $5k
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Top agencies
  • Environmental Protection Agency$151.8M
  • Department of Agriculture$85.3M
  • Department of Transportation$4.3M
  • Department of Commerce$905k
  • Appalachian Regional Commission$10k

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like RURAL COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE PARTNERSHIP INCORPORATED

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Washington, D.C.

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

96% of spending goes to programs.

Program 96%Management 3%Fundraising 1%

Governance

16
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 41 states

AK
ME
VT
NH
WA
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
FL

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for RURAL COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE PARTNERSHIP INCORPORATED: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds RURAL COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE PARTNERSHIP INCORPORATED?
RURAL COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE PARTNERSHIP INCORPORATED (Washington, D.C.) receives grants from 9 organizations whose IRS filings report $2,124,268 to it, the largest being CHRIS LONG FOUNDATION ($480,584). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does RURAL COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE PARTNERSHIP INCORPORATED have?
IRS filings report 9 organizations giving $2,124,268 in grants to RURAL COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE PARTNERSHIP INCORPORATED, 4 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of RURAL COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE PARTNERSHIP INCORPORATED?
CHRIS LONG FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $480,584 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like RURAL COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE PARTNERSHIP INCORPORATED find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington, D.C.. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 9 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing