How much did ANCHORUM ST VINCENT grant in FY2023?

Health$8.5MPhilanthropy$3.1MEducation$2.4MHuman Services$1.5MHousing & Shelter$925kCrime & Legal$806kCommunity Improvement$305kArts & Culture$141kYouth Development$98kOther$2.7M

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

attainment careerpathways workforceworkforce mentorshipbehavioral mentalmental traumatrauma recoveryrecovery adult

2020

legalchfapatientsfreecanceremotionallow-income

2021

rapid responseadult physicalchfa healthyhealthy neighborhoodschfa adultinternshipattainment chfa

2022

wildfire reliefchfa socialsocial determinantschfa ageage childrenchildren adolescentschfa adult

2023

healthcareresiliencypositiveplanningtechnicalpersonalyouth adults

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2023 · 32 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

$10k–50k7 grants · $180k
$50k–250k20 grants · $2.2M
$250k+5 grants · $2.4M

$90,000

Median grant

States reached

$144M

Total assets

Largest grants

SANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$870,000
ANCHORUM HEALTH FOUNDATION$635,000
NEW MEXICO LEGAL AID$305,000
HOMEWISE$300,000
ESPANOLA PATHWAYS SHELTER$300,000
NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION$215,000
COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF NM$215,000
DREAMTREE PROJECT INC$190,000
LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY FOUNDATION$170,000
GROWING UP NEW MEXICO INC$150,000
MCCURDY MINISTRIES$140,000
SANTA FE RECOVERY CENTER$125,000
GROUNDWORKS NEW MEXICO FKA NEW MEXICO ASSOCIATION OF GRANTMAKERS$100,000
TAOS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$100,000
501(C)PA$100,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–23, $1.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 16% — the area typically sits at 13%. 57% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$20M · 65 repeat orgs$575k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +78% since the first grant, against +38% for the ones you funded once.

65 repeat relationships — 28 still active in FY2023, 37 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$20M

$490k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+78%

+38%

Still filing today

88%

79%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $85k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthHuman ServicesEducationPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

SV
ST VINCENT HOSPITAL DBA CHRISTUS ST VINCENT REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
3× · 2018–2020 · $6.1M · revenue +21%
SF
SANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
5× · 2018–2023 · $1.9M · revenue +88%
CI
COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF NM
5× · 2019–2023 · $971k · revenue +151%

Funded once

SF
SANTA FE COMMUNITY COLLEGE
one grant, 2019 · $68k
LV
LAS VEGAS NM COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONgraduated
one grant, 2022 · $65k · revenue +924%
HN
HELP NEW MEXICO INC
one grant, 2022 · $65k · revenue +5%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Thrive in Southern New Mexico

Funding to local impact partners as part of the organization's multi-year community plan focused on achieving outcomes in the four specific areas determined to be essential in improving people's lives and strengthening our community: 1)…

Philanthropy

New Mexico Child Advocacy Networks

Nmcan partners with young people to build community, promote equity and lead change.

—

New Mexico Ballet Company

To create and promote professional and innovative dance productions for New Mexico audiences while providing the highest caliber of education and training for young artists in the community.

Arts & Culture

New Mexico Center for Nursing Excellence

The mission of NMCNE is to advance and engage the nursing community to promote excellence and improve the health of all New Mexicans.

Health

Santa Maria El Mirador

To provide quality supports and services for families and individuals in northern new mexico. our programs and services include: community living support, meaningful day supports, and transportation. we promote and maintain an array of…

Human Services

New Mexico Broadcasters Association

Education

New Mexico Casa Association Inc

To strengthen, support, and unify Court Appointed Special Advocate (CASA) Programs at the local, state, and national level, who advocate for children involved in any children's court proceeding.

Philanthropy

The Savila Collaborative

The Svila Collaborative d.b.a. Centro Svila is a treatment program devoted to the recovery and healing of individuals, families, and communities suffering from emotional and psychological distress. Our vision is to create a healthy,…

Health

Community Foundation of Southern

The Community Foundation of Southern New Mexico serves as a community resource, connects donors to needs, and supports charitable organizations in their work.

Philanthropy

Enlace Comunatario

Enlace comunitario transforms lives of individuals and their families experiencing domestic violence by working to decrease gender inequity and intimate partner violence in the latino immigrant community in central new mexico. enlace…

Community Improvement

Santa Fe Chamber of Commerce

The santa fe chamber of commerce's mission is to strengthen the local economy and serve as the voice of business in community affairs.

—

Southwest Care Center

To improve the health of people living in the culturally diverse communities of northern new mexico.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Mexico Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Big Brothers Big Sisters Mountain. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 8% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

2%2/93

the rest of the field

10%

428/4,119

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

82 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

79/82

Grantees still filing

71/82

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Health$8,513,339Philanthropy$3,096,782Other$3,281,406Education$2,443,804Human Services$1,529,349Housing & Shelter$925,477Crime & Legal$805,750

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Santa Fe Community FoundationNM147.5× affinity74 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Santa Fe Community Foundation · St Vincent Hospital · Con Alma Health Foundation Inc · Los Alamos National Laboratory · Thornburg Foundation · Marshall L and Perrine D McCune · Albuquerque Community Foundation · Brindle Foundation · New Mexico Community Foundation · The Frost Foundation · Battelle Memorial Institute · Nancy Ann Mellen Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation ANCHORUM ST VINCENT funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: ANCHORUM HEALTH FOUNDATION.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

high risk

~2 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 2 filed years.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

2 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 4.3× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 873194433 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on ANCHORUM HEALTH FOUNDATION, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 2 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2023; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 100% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Anchorum St Vincent?

Find your warmest path to Anchorum St Vincent through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

ANCHORUM ST VINCENT

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

82 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Anchorum St Vincent?

More from the funding graph

ANCHORUM ST VINCENT

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

82 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Anchorum St Vincent?

More from the funding graph