Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

St Vincent Hospital

St.

$1.9M
Granted FY2025still arriving
27
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$410k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Health$6.7MHuman Services$2.0MHousing & Shelter$1.6MCrime & Legal$665kPhilanthropy$648kFood & Nutrition$248kArts & Culture$78kEducation$58kOther$0
02FY2025 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 27 grants below total $1,689,619 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,946,837 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $257,218 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $362k
  • $50k–250k11 grants · $898k
  • $250k+1 grant · $410k
$41,873
Median grant
2
States reached
$592M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Santa Fe Recovery Center$409,575
NM Suicide Intervention Project - Sky Center Adolescent Hugs Project$143,940
Las Cumbres Community Infant Program$104,684
Growing Up New Mexico$104,684
St Elizabeth Shelter$104,684
Solace Crisis Treatment Center$75,896
Espanola Pathways Shelter$70,661
Dream Tree Project$70,661
Interfaith Community Shelter (Meal Services)$65,427
La Familia Medical Center$52,342
GERARD'S HOUSE$52,342
Youth Shelters & Family Services$52,342
Kitchen Angles$47,108
Esperanza Shelter for Battered Families$41,873
Sante Fe Public Schools Adelante Program$39,256
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Las Cumbres Community Infant Program: $112k → 18%Dream Tree Project: $71k → 18%Collins Lake Autism Center: $7k → 21%Las Cumbres Community Infant Program: $105k → 18%Dream Tree Project: $56k → 18%Las Cumbres Community Infant Program: $87k → 18%Community Against Violence: $7k → 18%Espanola Pathways Shelter: $71k → 18%Espanola Pathways Shelter: $56k → 18%Las Cumbres Community Infant Services: $44k → 18%Las Cumbres Community Services: $29k → 18%Las Cumbres Community Services: $29k → 18%Las Cumbres Community Infant Services: $29k → 18%COMING HOME CONNECTION: $66k → 12%Las Cumbres Community Services: $22k → 18%Coming Home Connection: $63k → 12%New Mexico Immigrant Center: $7k → 14%Coming Home: $30k → 12%COMING HOME CONNECTION: $30k → 12%Coming Home Connection: $30k → 12%Coming Home Connection: $17k → 12%Santa Fe Wine & Chili Fiesta: $10k → 12%Santa Fe Wine Chili Fiesta: $5k → 12%Casa Milagro: $56k → 12%Casa Milagro: $39k → 12%CASA MILAGRO: $33k → 12%Casa Milagro: $32k → 12%New Vistas: $20k → 12%Chainbreaker Collective: $7k → 12%The Food Depot: $7k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$12M · 33 repeat orgs$454k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +44% since the first grant, against +23% for the ones you funded once.

33 repeat relationships — 23 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
33

Total granted

$12M
$357k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+23%

Still filing today

91%
85%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $97k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationYouth DevelopmentArts & CulturePhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SF
    SANTA FE RECOVERY CENTER INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $3.5M · revenue +822%
  • GU
    GROWING UP NEW MEXICOINC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $1.2M · revenue +57%
  • SE
    SAINT ELIZABETH SHELTER CORPORATION
    8× · 2017–2025 · $650k · revenue +93%

Funded once

  • CH
    Christus Healthgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $83k · revenue +32%
  • PI
    PARTNERS IN EDUCATION FOR THE SANTA FE PUBLIC SCHOOLSgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $28k · revenue +60%
  • NV
    NEW VISTAS
    one grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue +24%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New Mexico Coalition to End Homelessness

To assist communities to create solutions to homelessness from prevention through permanent housing by using action, advocacy, and awareness.

Housing & Shelter
2
Southwest Care Center

To improve the health of people living in the culturally diverse communities of northern new mexico through access to the highest quality health care, education, research and advocacy.

—
3
Casa Fortaleza

Casa fortaleza provides advocacy, case management services, therapy, and outreach to victims/survivors of sexual violence.

Health
4
The Savila Collaborative

The svila collaborative dba centro savila is a treatment program devoted to the recovery and healing of individuals, families, and communities experiencing emotional and psychological distress. our vision is to create a healthy, engaged,…

Health
5
Community Power New Mexico
Community Improvement
6
La Casa Inc

Provide emergency shelter care for adult persons and their children who are victims of domestic violence, and educate the community about the problems related to domestic violence is all its forms.

—
7
Santa Fe Community Foundation

The santa fe community foundation inspires philanthropic generosity, strengthens nonprofits, and fosters positive change to build a more vibrant, healthy, and resilient region. the foundation's vision is a thriving northern new mexico,…

Philanthropy
8
Casa Partners 4NMKIDS Inc

The casa program is a community-based program that recruits, trains and supports citizen-volunteers to advocate for the best interests of abused and neglected children in courtrooms and communities. the organization serves children in…

Civil Rights
9
Santa Maria El Mirador

To provide quality supports and services for children, families, and individuals in northern new mexico. our programs and services include: community living support, meaningful day supports, and transportation. we promote and maintain an…

Human Services
10
Sexual Assault Services of Nwnm

Sas works in northwest new mexico and the surrounding four corners area to empower victims, provide crisis services and create a community focused on prevention.

Health
11
New Mexico Dream Center of Albuquerque

New mexico dream center's mission is to restore the dreams of the hopeless, the helpless, the hurting and the broken. specifically, albuquerque new mexico has a huge gaping hole in services for homeless youth and trafficked minor children.…

Religion
12
Santa Fe Family Service

Santa Fe Family Service helps individuals & families within the Santa Fe Independent School District by counsel, guidance, and other necessary assistance to achieve normal living, or the best possible adjustment for the welfare of the…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Mexico Center On Law and Poverty and the most unlike its peers is Villages of Santa Fe Incorporated. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number21%0%<5yr13%4%5–10yr20%15%10–20yr17%36%20–35yr16%26%35–55yr15%19%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value21%0%<5yr13%2%5–10yr20%1%10–20yr17%12%20–35yr16%60%35–55yr15%26%55yr+

The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%1/71
the rest of the field
12%
474/3,933

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

63 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 63 of the 71 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
19
Early backer (in before they grew)
61/63
Grantees still filing
49/63
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SANTA FE RECOVERY CENTER INC — $3,539,039 · HealthSANTA FE RECOVERY CENTER INCNEW MEXICO SUICIDE INTERVENTION PROJECT INC — $1,006,826 · HealthNEW MEXICO SUICIDE INTERVENTION PROJECT INCPRESBYTERIAN MEDICAL SERVICES — $501,875 · HealthPRESBYTERIAN MEDICAL SERVICESGERARD'S HOUSE — $303,650 · HealthCANCER FOUNDATION FOR NEW MEXICO — $254,500 · Health+5 more — $303,494 · HealthSOLACE SEXUAL ASSAULT SERVICES — $626,423 · OtherSOLACE SEXUAL ASSAU…LA FAMILIA MEDICAL CENTER — $434,505 · OtherLA FAMILIA MEDICAL …Esperanza Shelter Inc — $246,536 · OtherEsperanza Shelter I…KITCHEN ANGELS INC — $211,959 · OtherKITCHEN ANGELS INCAdvanced Teleservices Inc — $145,046 · OtherAdvanced Teleservic…SANTA FE PUBLIC SCHOOLS ADELANTE PROGRAM — $108,737 · Other+26 more — $349,119 · Other+26 moreLAS CUMBRES COMMUNITY SERVICES — $456,451 · Human ServicesLAS CUMBRES C…YOUTH SHELTERS & FAMILY SERVICES INC — $260,192 · Human ServicesYOUTH SHELTER…COMING HOME CONNECTION — $235,699 · Human ServicesCOMING HOME C…CASA MILAGRO — $160,693 · Human ServicesCASA MILAGRODREAM TREE PROJECT — $126,686 · Human ServicesDREAM TREE PR…ESPANOLA PATHWAYS SHELTER — $126,686 · Human ServicesESPANOLA PATH…+7 more — $71,030 · Human ServicesGROWING UP NEW MEXICOINC — $1,191,040 · PhilanthropyGROWING UP …+3 more — $25,328 · PhilanthropySAINT ELIZABETH SHELTER CORPORATION — $650,126 · Housing & ShelterSAINT ELIZ…INTERFAITH COMMUNITY SHELTER GROUP INC — $394,741 · Housing & ShelterINTERFAITH…+1 more — $21,614 · Housing & ShelterLOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY FOUNDATION — $140,000 · EducationPARTNERS IN EDUCATION FOR THE SANTA FE PUBLIC SCHOOLS — $28,147 · EducationSANTA FE CHAMBER OPPORTUNITIES FUND — $17,025 · EducationPAPER TIGER TELEVISION INC — $9,277 · EducationSOUTHWESTERN COLLEGE — $7,164 · EducationTHE LIFE LINK — $72,336 · Youth DevelopmentGIRLS INCORPORATED OF SANTA FE INC — $15,248 · Youth DevelopmentCOOKING WITH KIDS INC — $7,164 · Youth DevelopmentYOUTHWORKS — $7,164 · Youth Development
Health$5,909,384Other$2,122,325Human Services$1,437,437Philanthropy$1,216,368Housing & Shelter$1,066,481Education$201,613Youth Development$101,912

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSANTA FE RECOVERY CENTER INC — $3,539,039 over 9y, 13% of budgetGROWING UP NEW MEXICOINC — $1,191,040 over 8y, 5.1% of budgetNEW MEXICO SUICIDE INTERVENTION PROJECT INC — $1,006,826 over 8y, 30% of budgetSAINT ELIZABETH SHELTER CORPORATION — $650,126 over 8y, 4.8% of budgetSOLACE SEXUAL ASSAULT SERVICES — $626,423 over 8y, 7.6% of budgetPRESBYTERIAN MEDICAL SERVICES — $501,875 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetLAS CUMBRES COMMUNITY SERVICES — $456,451 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetLA FAMILIA MEDICAL CENTER — $434,505 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetINTERFAITH COMMUNITY SHELTER GROUP INC — $394,741 over 8y, 5.5% of budgetGERARD'S HOUSE — $303,650 over 8y, 10% of budgetYOUTH SHELTERS & FAMILY SERVICES INC — $260,192 over 8y, 1.7% of budgetCANCER FOUNDATION FOR NEW MEXICO — $254,500 over 7y, 5.4% of budgetEsperanza Shelter Inc — $246,536 over 6y, 2.3% of budgetCOMING HOME CONNECTION — $235,699 over 6y, 20% of budgetKITCHEN ANGELS INC — $211,959 over 8y, 3.0% of budgetCASA MILAGRO — $160,693 over 4y, 10% of budgetSANTA FE MOUNTAIN CENTER INC — $147,691 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetLOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY FOUNDATION — $140,000 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetDREAM TREE PROJECT — $126,686 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetESPANOLA PATHWAYS SHELTER — $126,686 over 2y, 8.1% of budgetChristus Health — $83,332 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LIFE LINK — $72,336 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetCONTIGO IMMIGRANT JUSTICE — $60,442 over 2y, 4.1% of budgetFriendship Club — $42,126 over 4y, 7.2% of budgetNew Mexico Center for Nursing Excellence — $39,300 over 3y, 4.1% of budgetPARTNERS IN EDUCATION FOR THE SANTA FE PUBLIC SCHOOLS — $28,147 over 1y, 7.4% of budgetMESA TO MESA — $21,614 over 2y, 11% of budgetNEW VISTAS — $20,210 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetBig Brothers Big Sisters Of America — $19,164 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSANTA FE CHAMBER OPPORTUNITIES FUND — $17,025 over 2y, 10.0% of budgetGIRLS INCORPORATED OF SANTA FE INC — $15,248 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSANTA FE WINE & CHILE FIESTA — $15,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetVILLAGES OF SANTA FE INCORPORATED — $13,085 over 1y, 8.1% of budgetSANTA FE FIESTA INC — $13,000 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetLENSIC PERFORMING ARTS CENTER — $11,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE SANTA FE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA & CHORUS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetNATIONAL DANCE INSTITUTE NM INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetIMPACT PERSONAL SAFETY — $8,084 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO SYMPHONY — $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPENCOLLECTIVE FOUNDATION — $7,164 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW MEXICO IMMIGRANT LAW CENTER — $7,164 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCOOKING WITH KIDS INC — $7,164 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCOLLINS LAKE AUTISM CENTER — $7,164 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetSANTA FE FARMERS MARKET INSTITUTE — $7,164 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetSOUTHWEST WOMEN'S LAW CENTER — $7,164 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetEARTH CARE INTERNATIONAL EARTH CARE NEW MEXICO — $7,164 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCHAINBREAKER COLLECTIVE — $7,164 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetSEARCHLIGHT NEW MEXICO NEWS — $7,164 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SANTA FE RECOVERY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds GROWING UP NEW MEXICOINC ↗
  • Who funds NEW MEXICO SUICIDE INTERVENTION PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds SAINT ELIZABETH SHELTER CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds SOLACE SEXUAL ASSAULT SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds PRESBYTERIAN MEDICAL SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds LAS CUMBRES COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds LA FAMILIA MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds INTERFAITH COMMUNITY SHELTER GROUP INC ↗
  • Who funds GERARD'S HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH SHELTERS & FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds CANCER FOUNDATION FOR NEW MEXICO ↗
  • Who funds Esperanza Shelter Inc ↗
  • Who funds COMING HOME CONNECTION ↗
  • Who funds KITCHEN ANGELS INC ↗
  • Who funds CASA MILAGRO ↗
  • Who funds SANTA FE MOUNTAIN CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DREAM TREE PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds ESPANOLA PATHWAYS SHELTER ↗
  • Who funds Christus Health ↗
  • Who funds THE LIFE LINK ↗
  • Who funds CONTIGO IMMIGRANT JUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds Friendship Club ↗
  • Who funds New Mexico Center for Nursing Excellence ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN EDUCATION FOR THE SANTA FE PUBLIC SCHOOLS ↗
  • Who funds Life Circle ↗
  • Who funds MESA TO MESA ↗
  • Who funds NEW VISTAS ↗
  • Who funds Big Brothers Big Sisters Of America ↗
  • Who funds SANTA FE CHAMBER OPPORTUNITIES FUND ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF SANTA FE INC ↗
  • Who funds SANTA FE WINE & CHILE FIESTA ↗
  • Who funds VILLAGES OF SANTA FE INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds SANTA FE FIESTA INC ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Santa Fe Community Fo…Anchorum St VincentCon Alma Health Found…Thornburg FoundationNancy Ann Mellen Foun…The Frost FoundationBrindle FoundationLos Alamos National L…New Mexico Community …Christus HealthMarshall L and Perrin…Nusenda Foundation
Santa Fe Community FoundationNM104.3× affinity51 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Santa Fe Community Foundation · Anchorum St Vincent · Con Alma Health Foundation Inc · Thornburg Foundation · Nancy Ann Mellen Foundation · The Frost Foundation · Brindle Foundation · Los Alamos National Laboratory Foundation · New Mexico Community Foundation · Christus Health · Marshall L and Perrine D McCune Charitable Foundation Inc · Nusenda Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization St Vincent Hospital funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 21%
  • Big Brothers Big Sisters of America — 21% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
15report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 71 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home