· Private foundation
Maverick Capital Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k107 grants · $198k
- $10k–50k58 grants · $1.3M
- $50k–250k24 grants · $1.9M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MARSHALL PROJECT THE | $110,000 |
| KIPP NYC | $110,000 |
| BOTTOM LINE NEW YORK | $110,000 |
| PART OF THE SOLUTION | $110,000 |
| BARD PRISON INITIATIVE | $100,000 |
| KIPP NYC | $100,000 |
| SAFE HORIZON | $100,000 |
| DREAM | $95,000 |
| CRISTO REY NEW YORK HIGH SCHOOL | $85,000 |
| HOT BREAD KITCHEN | $85,000 |
| CLASSICAL CHARTER SCHOOLS | $85,000 |
| BASTA | $85,000 |
| CRISTO REY NEW YORK HIGH SCHOOL | $75,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $75,000 |
| CLASSICAL CHARTER SCHOOLS | $75,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $2.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
200 repeat relationships — 97 still active in FY2024, 103 since wound down; 41 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $271k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- POPART OF THE SOLUTION6× · 2019–2024 · $749k · revenue +198%
BARD COLLEGE5× · 2019–2024 · $630k · revenue +241%- TMTHE MARSHALL PROJECT INC6× · 2019–2024 · $560k · revenue +59%
Funded once
- SASUCCESS ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOLS INCgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue +137%
- IFINSTITUTE FOR AMERICAS FUTURE INCone grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue -82%
- BWBEGINNING WITH CHILDREN FOUNDATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue +146%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
Inspired by the gift of donation from our communities, allosource responsibly provides innovative cellular and tissue allografts to advance patient healing.
CITY REPORT, INC. serves the people of New York through independent journalism that answers their information needs and holds the powerful to account.
To provide multi-specialty surgical care, humanitarian aid and educational support to people in low- and middle-income countries.
Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…
Rockefeller philanthropy advisors aims to accelerate philanthropy in pursuit of a just world
Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…
The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.
Pact is a nonprofit organization that builds evidence-based, data-driven, and community-led solutions for human development (continued in schedule o)
Common impact's mission is to strengthen the capacity of social change organizations, enabling them to better run and scale their programs. through its partnership with companies, common impact taps into the business skills and expertise…
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
Water.org's goal is to bring safe water and sanitation to the world through access to small, affordable loans.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Success Academy Charter Schools Inc and the most unlike its peers is Conflict Awareness Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.6% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
317 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 317 of the 422 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PART OF THE SOLUTION ↗
- Who funds BARD COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds THE MARSHALL PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds SAFE HORIZON INC ↗
- Who funds CLASSICAL CHARTER SCHOOLS ↗
- Who funds HOT BREAD KITCHEN LTD ↗
- Who funds CRISTO REY NEW YORK HIGH SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds KIPP Texas Inc ↗
- Who funds NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds DALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
- Who funds FAMILY GATEWAY INC ↗
- Who funds The Family Place ↗
- Who funds MI ESCUELITA PRESCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds THE GO PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds South Bronx United Inc ↗
- Who funds RAPHAEL HOUSE OF SAN FRANCISCO INC ↗
- Who funds WEST DALLAS COMMUNITY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds 826 Valencia ↗
- Who funds Society of St Vincent De Paul ↗
- Who funds SAFE & SOUND ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S SCHOLARSHIP FUND PHILADELPHIA ↗
- Who funds CITY HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds MARCY LAB INC ↗
- Who funds THE POSSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Ambulatory Surgery Access Coalition ↗
- Who funds ROW NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds FUTURES IGNITE INC ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CORNERSTONE CROSSROADS ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds BLUE ENGINE INC ↗
- Who funds GATEWAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS ↗
- Who funds PROMISE HOUSE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: W P & Bulah Luse Foundation · United Way of Metropolitan Dallas Inc · The Dallas Foundation · Texas Women's Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · The Rees-Jones Foundation · Hillcrest Foundation · Roy and Christine Sturgis Charitable And · Capital for Kids · Texas Instruments Foundation · The Perot Foundation · The Addy Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Maverick Capital Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Hias Inc — 88% of income from government
- Christopher Reeve Foundation — 49% of income from government
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- Teensharp — 11% of income from government
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
- Best Buddies International Inc — 4% of income from government
- Impact Melanoma Inc — 3% of income from government
- Sandy Hook Promise Foundation — 0% of income from government
- Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc — 0% of income from government
- Global Empowerment Mission Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Maverick Capital Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Maverick Capital Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.