Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Roy and Christine Sturgis Charitable And

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$2.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
82
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.

Education$3.6MHealth$1.9MHuman Services$1.7MPhilanthropy$1.1MHousing & Shelter$677kPublic Benefit$550kArts & Culture$540kYouth Development$428kOther$0
02FY2025 · 82 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k74 grants · $1.4M
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $455k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$20,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$34M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CLINTON FOUNDATION$250,000
UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOUNDATION$155,000
ARKANSAS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION$100,000
UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOUNDATION$100,000
REFUGE VILLAGE$50,000
BAPTIST HEALTH FOUNDATION$50,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF CENTRAL ARKANSAS$40,000
AUSTIN STREET CENTER$30,000
YOUTH HOME INC$30,000
UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOUNDATION$30,000
HENDERSON STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$28,200
METROCREST SERVICES INC$25,000
OUACHITA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY$25,000
YMCA OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS$25,000
HOPE CANCER RESOURCES$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $1.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 87% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CITY HOUSE: $25k → 5%RESPITE CARE OF SAN ANTONIO INC: $35k → 16%WHITE COUNTY AGING PROGRAM INC: $20k → 16%HOPE LANDING INC: $25k → 19%CITY HOUSE: $15k → 5%BLUEBIRDS HOPE INC: $15k → 10%FORT SMITH CHILDREN'S EMERGENCY: $15k → 17%HOPE LANDING INC: $25k → 19%HOPE LANDING INC: $20k → 19%SHEEP DOG IMPACT ASSISTANCE: $15k → 8%NORTHWEST ARKANSAS CHILDREN'S SHELTER: $25k → 8%HAVENWOOD: $22k → 8%DALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $35k → 14%MOMMIES IN NEED: $30k → 14%TRAC (TRANSITION RESOURCE ACTION CENTER): $25k → 14%JUBILEE PARK & COMMUNITY CENTER: $20k → 14%VERA LLOYD PRESBYTERIAN FAMILY SERVICES: $20k → 17%JUBILEE PARK & COMMUNITY CENTER: $15k → 14%NETWORK OF COMMUNITY MINISTRIES INC: $25k → 14%VOGEL ALCOVE: $25k → 14%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS: $25k → 14%GAINES HOUSE INC: $25k → 17%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS: $25k → 14%WHITE ROCK CENTER OF HOPE: $20k → 14%WHITE ROCK CENTER OF HOPE: $15k → 14%WESLEY-RANKIN COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $25k → 14%FRANCIS A ALLEN SCHOOL FOR: $20k → 17%HOUSING FORWARD: $30k → 14%CARELINK: $25k → 17%CARELINK: $20k → 17%DALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $35k → 14%COMMUNITY PARTNERS OF DALLAS: $15k → 14%PARK FOUNDATION INC: $25k → 17%JULIETTE FOWLER COMMUNITIES INC: $25k → 14%SHARING LIFE COMMUNITY OUTREACH: $20k → 14%METROCREST SERVICES INC: $25k → 14%SHARING LIFE COMMUNITY OUTREACH: $20k → 14%FAMILY PLACE INC: $25k → 14%WORLD SERVICES FOR THE BLIND: $25k → 17%WORLD SERVICES FOR THE BLIND: $25k → 17%WORLD SERVICES FOR THE BLIND: $25k → 17%ENCORE PARK DALLAS: $25k → 14%GENESIS WOMEN'S SHELTER & SUPPORT: $20k → 14%METRO DALLAS HOMELESS ALLIANCE: $20k → 14%HOPE SUPPLY CO: $15k → 14%METROCREST SERVICES INC: $50k → 14%HOPE SUPPLY CO: $15k → 14%METROCREST SERVICES: $25k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 5% of Roy and Christine Sturgis Charitable And’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Roy and Christine Sturgis Charitable Andlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$8.2M · 97 repeat orgs$3.9M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +9% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

97 repeat relationships — 44 still active in FY2025, 53 since wound down; 34 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

97
163

Total granted

$8.2M
$3.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
0%

Still filing today

86%
61%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $666k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $1.4M · revenue +52%
  • BH
    BILL HILLARY & CHELSEA CLINTON FOUNDATION
    4× · 2020–2025 · $1.0M · revenue +68%
  • HC
    HENDRIX COLLEGE
    4× · 2020–2023 · $400k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • AS
    ARKANSAS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA SOCIETY INC
    one grant, 2024 · $150k · revenue -21%
  • AC
    ASHDOWN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2022 · $69k · revenue -50% · 33% of their budget
  • BT
    BIG THOUGHTgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +35%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Leadership Austin

Leadership austin connects and develops leaders to courageously engage and transform our communities.

Youth Development
2
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
3
Raise Texas

RAISE Texas advances equitable policies and programs that foster financial security and economic mobility for low- and moderate-income Texans. We equip, innovate and advocate to reduce disparities, remove barriers and build opportunities…

Human Services
4
Goodwill Industries of Tulsa Inc

Goodwill empowers people to reach their full potential through work opportunities, training, and support services.

Employment
5
East Texas Community Clinic Inc

To provide comprehensive primary care and preventive care to all persons regardless of their ability to pay.

—
6
Shelterwell Inc

Shelterwell fosters a spirit of connected community, centered on the belief that housing is a human right.

Housing & Shelter
7
Opportunity Arkansas Foundation

Renewing the land of opportunity by simplifying government and solving generational problems for the next generation.

Philanthropy
8
Goodwill Industries of Dallas Inc

Goodwill Industries of Dallas, Inc. is a not-for-profit organization with a mission to help people with barriers to employment build skills, find jobs and reach their goals in life so that they can reach their full potential and experience…

Employment
9
Casa of North Arkansas

The organization and its volunteers serve as advocates for abused and neglected children.

Civil Rights
10
Texprotects-the Texas Association for the Protection of Children

TexProtects advances public policy and local implementation to strenghten families to prevent child abuse and neglect.

Youth Development
11
Downtown Dallas Inc

Downtown Dallas, Inc. (DDI), is the champion of a clean and safe Downtown and of the economic development and vibrancy of this community of diverse, unique neighborhoods. DDI: Mobilizes and amplifies the services of public agencies.…

—
12
The Arkansas Center for Independence

Habilitation and residential services for adults with developmental disabilities

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Promise House Inc and the most unlike its peers is Ashdown Community Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyArkansas Advocacy & Educati…Methodist Health System Net…Senior Residential CareDallas Community ServicesFraternal and Veterans Orga…Youth Education & Economic …Intellectual Disabilities S…Dog Rescue and AdoptionFaith-Based K-12 SchoolsProfessional Trade Associat…Crisis Housing & Family Sup…Property Title Holding Corp…Early Childhood Education C…Camps and Therapeutic Progr…Performing Arts Organizatio…Evangelical Christian Minis…Crisis Relief & Emergency A…Faith-Based Hospital SystemsFamily Support & Child Welf…Family Philanthropic Founda…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number28%2%<5yr17%7%5–10yr20%16%10–20yr15%21%20–35yr8%34%35–55yr12%20%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value28%1%<5yr17%4%5–10yr20%8%10–20yr15%26%20–35yr8%25%35–55yr12%36%55yr+

The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/222
the rest of the field
17%
4,970/29,334

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

215 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 215 of the 297 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
33
Early backer (in before they grew)
211/215
Grantees still filing
110/215
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BILL HILLARY & CHELSEA CLINTON — $550,000 · OtherBILL HILLARY & CHELSEA CLINTONSUBIACO ABBEY & ACADEMY — $300,000 · OtherSUBIACO ABBEY & ACADEMY+89 more — $3,121,576 · Other+89 moreUNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOUNDATION INC — $1,410,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOU…HENDRIX COLLEGE — $400,000 · EducationHENDRIX COLLEGESOUTHERN ARKANSAS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $135,000 · EducationTeach for America Inc — $100,000 · Education+16 more — $591,200 · Education+16 moreBILL HILLARY & CHELSEA CLINTON FOUNDATION — $1,025,000 · HealthBILL HILLARY & CHELSE…Baptist Health Foundation Inc — $110,000 · HealthHEALING HANDS MINISTRIES INC — $90,000 · HealthEASTERSEALS ARKANSAS — $85,000 · HealthVISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION OF TEXAS — $78,500 · Health+23 more — $740,000 · Health+23 moreMETROCREST SERVICES — $100,000 · Human ServicesMETROCREST SER…WORLD SERVICES FOR THE BLIND — $75,000 · Human ServicesWORLD SERVICES…DALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER — $70,000 · Human ServicesHOPE LANDING INC — $70,000 · Human ServicesIMMERSE ARKANSAS — $70,000 · Human ServicesCENTERS FOR YOUTH AND FAMILIES INC — $60,000 · Human ServicesHOUSING FORWARD — $50,000 · Human ServicesYMCA OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS INC — $50,000 · Human Services+31 more — $833,240 · Human Services+31 moreARKANSAS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA SOCIETY INC — $150,000 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF DISCOVERY — $50,000 · Arts & CultureARKANSAS MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS FOUNDATION — $50,000 · Arts & CultureBIG THOUGHT — $50,000 · Arts & CultureTHEATRE SQUARED INC — $40,000 · Arts & CultureSULTANA HISTORICAL PRESERVATION SOCIETY INC — $25,000 · Arts & CultureARKANSAS EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS NETWORK FOUNDATION — $25,000 · Arts & CultureFAIR PARK FIRST — $25,000 · Arts & CultureDALLAS SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION — $20,000 · Arts & CultureHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF CENTRAL ARKANSAS INC — $95,000 · Housing & ShelterDALLAS MISSION FOR LIFE Doing business as Dallas Life — $50,000 · Housing & ShelterOZARK MISSION PROJECT INC — $50,000 · Housing & ShelterFAMILY GATEWAY INC — $40,000 · Housing & ShelterDALLAS EVICTION ADVOCACY CENTER — $30,000 · Housing & ShelterTEXAS RAMP PROJECT — $30,000 · Housing & ShelterPROMISE HOUSE INC — $20,000 · Housing & ShelterREFUGE FOR WOMEN INC — $20,000 · Housing & ShelterCAMP SUMMIT INC — $50,000 · Youth DevelopmentNATURAL STATE COUNCIL — $50,000 · Youth DevelopmentCAFE MOMENTUM — $35,000 · Youth DevelopmentMomentous Institute — $35,000 · Youth DevelopmentAPPLE SEEDS INC — $20,000 · Youth Development
Other$3,971,576Education$2,636,200Health$2,128,500Human Services$1,378,240Arts & Culture$435,000Housing & Shelter$335,000Youth Development$190,000

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOUNDATION INC — $1,410,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetBILL HILLARY & CHELSEA CLINTON FOUNDATION — $1,025,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetHENDRIX COLLEGE — $400,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetARKANSAS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA SOCIETY INC — $150,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetSOUTHERN ARKANSAS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $135,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetBaptist Health Foundation Inc — $110,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetTeach for America Inc — $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMETROCREST SERVICES — $100,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF CENTRAL ARKANSAS INC — $95,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetHEALING HANDS MINISTRIES INC — $90,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetEASTERSEALS ARKANSAS — $85,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetARKANSAS FOODBANK — $85,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetVISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION OF TEXAS — $78,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD SERVICES FOR THE BLIND — $75,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetSENIOR CITIZENS OF GREATER DALLAS INC — $75,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetCAMP ALDERSGATE INC — $71,100 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetDALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER — $70,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetHOPE LANDING INC — $70,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetOUACHITA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY — $70,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED TO LEARN — $70,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetIMMERSE ARKANSAS — $70,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetASHDOWN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $68,846 over 1y, 33% of budgetALLEN COMMUNITY OUTREACH — $65,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetJOHN BROWN UNIVERSITY — $60,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTH HOME INC — $60,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCENTERS FOR YOUTH AND FAMILIES INC — $60,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF ARKANSAS & NORTH LOUISIANA INC — $60,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetAUSTIN STREET CENTER — $55,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMUSEUM OF DISCOVERY — $50,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetCAMP SUMMIT INC — $50,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetHOPE CLINIC OF GARLAND INC — $50,000 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetARKANSAS MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBIG THOUGHT — $50,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDALLAS MISSION FOR LIFE Doing business as Dallas Life — $50,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetNATURAL STATE COUNCIL — $50,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetOUR HOUSE INC — $50,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetHOUSING FORWARD — $50,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFOREST FORWARD — $50,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetHope Cancer Resources — $50,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $50,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetYMCA OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS INC — $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAUTISTIC TREATMENT CENTER INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER FOR NORTH TEXAS INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetOZARK MISSION PROJECT INC — $50,000 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetARKANSAS IMAGINATION LIBRARY — $48,000 over 3y, 5.5% of budgetGOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF ARKANSAS INC — $46,130 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWILKINSON CENTER — $45,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

W P & Bulah Luse Foun…Arkansas Community Fo…Hillcrest FoundationUnited Way of Metropo…Katherine C Carmody C…The Dallas FoundationHoblitzelle FoundationTexas Women's Foundat…The Moody FoundationThe Rees-Jones Founda…Arvest FoundationCommunities Foundatio…
W P & Bulah Luse FoundationTX107.8× affinity52 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: W P & Bulah Luse Foundation · Arkansas Community Foundation Inc · Hillcrest Foundation · United Way of Metropolitan Dallas Inc · Katherine C Carmody Charitable Tuw · The Dallas Foundation · Hoblitzelle Foundation · Texas Women's Foundation · The Moody Foundation · The Rees-Jones Foundation · Arvest Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Roy and Christine Sturgis Charitable And funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • City Year Inc — 11% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
76report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 297 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home