Skip to content
Maverick Capital Foundation at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Private foundation

Maverick Capital Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3.4M
Granted FY2024still arriving
189
Grants FY2024still arriving
20
States reached
$110k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Education$6.9MHuman Services$2.5MCrime & Legal$1.4MHealth$834kCommunity Improvement$749kHousing & Shelter$691kFood & Nutrition$623kYouth Development$509kOther$0
02FY2024 · 189 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k107 grants · $198k
  • $10k–50k58 grants · $1.3M
  • $50k–250k24 grants · $1.9M
$5,000
Median grant
20
States reached
$29M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOTTOM LINE NEW YORK$110,000
KIPP NYC$110,000
PART OF THE SOLUTION$110,000
MARSHALL PROJECT THE$110,000
SAFE HORIZON$100,000
BARD PRISON INITIATIVE$100,000
KIPP NYC$100,000
DREAM$95,000
BASTA$85,000
HOT BREAD KITCHEN$85,000
CLASSICAL CHARTER SCHOOLS$85,000
CRISTO REY NEW YORK HIGH SCHOOL$85,000
CRISTO REY NEW YORK HIGH SCHOOL$75,000
Individual grant recipient$75,000
CLASSICAL CHARTER SCHOOLS$75,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $2.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CITY HOUSE: $35k → 5%SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $30k → 16%CITY HOUSE: $30k → 5%SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $25k → 16%CITY HOUSE: $30k → 5%CITY HOUSE: $25k → 5%CITY HOUSE: $25k → 5%CITY HOUSE: $25k → 5%JUBILEE PARK & COMMUNITY CENTER: $25k → 14%SAFE HORIZON: $100k → 17%SAFE HORIZON: $75k → 17%SAFE HORIZON: $75k → 17%SAFE HORIZON: $50k → 17%SAFE HORIZON: $50k → 17%SAFE HORIZON: $50k → 17%SAFE HORIZON: $50k → 17%SAFE HORIZON: $25k → 17%RAPHAEL HOUSE OF SAN FRANCISCO: $35k → 10%RAPHAEL HOUSE OF SAN FRANCISCO: $35k → 10%RAPHAEL HOUSE OF SAN FRANCISCO: $30k → 10%RAPHAEL HOUSE OF SAN FRANCISCO: $25k → 10%RAPHAEL HOUSE OF SAN FRANCISCO: $25k → 10%RAPHAEL HOUSE OF SAN FRANCISCO: $25k → 10%RAPHAEL HOUSE OF SAN FRANCISCO: $25k → 10%GOOD SHEPHERD SERVICES: $25k → 17%DALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $60k → 14%DALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $55k → 14%DALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $55k → 14%DALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $50k → 14%DALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $50k → 14%DALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $50k → 14%JONATHAN'S PLACE: $30k → 14%FAMILY PLACE THE: $45k → 14%FAMILY PLACE THE: $40k → 14%FAMILY PLACE THE: $35k → 14%FAMILY PLACE THE: $35k → 14%FAMILY PLACE THE: $35k → 14%FAMILY PLACE THE: $35k → 14%FRIENDS OF WHEELS: $50k → 17%FRIENDS OF WHEELS: $50k → 17%FRIENDS OF WHEELS: $50k → 17%HOT BREAD KITCHEN: $85k → 17%HOT BREAD KITCHEN: $75k → 17%HOT BREAD KITCHEN: $75k → 17%HOT BREAD KITCHEN: $75k → 17%HOT BREAD KITCHEN: $75k → 17%HOT BREAD KITCHEN: $38k → 17%HOT BREAD KITCHEN: $38k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
ME
VT
WA
ID
MN
IL
NY
MA
OR
NV
IN
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
MO
VA
MD
DE
AR
TN
NC
DC
OK
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$15M · 200 repeat orgs$689k to everyone else

200 repeat relationships: 97 still active in FY2024, 103 since wound down; 41 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

200
174

Total granted

$15M
$418k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+22%

Still filing today

73%
74%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $271k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationAnimalsArts & CultureInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PO
    PART OF THE SOLUTION
    6× · 2019–2024 · $749k · revenue +198%
  • BARD COLLEGE
    5× · 2019–2024 · $630k · revenue +241%
  • TM
    THE MARSHALL PROJECT INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $560k · revenue +59%

Funded once

  • SA
    SUCCESS ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOLS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue +137%
  • VI
    VERA INSTITUTE OF JUSTICE INC
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue -77%
  • IF
    INSTITUTE FOR AMERICAS FUTURE INC
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue -82%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
2
Allosource

Inspired by the gift of donation from our communities, allosource responsibly provides innovative cellular and tissue allografts to advance patient healing.

Health
3
City Report Inc

CITY REPORT, INC. serves the people of New York through independent journalism that answers their information needs and holds the powerful to account.

Arts & Culture
4
Fajr Scientific

To provide multi-specialty surgical care, humanitarian aid and educational support to people in low- and middle-income countries.

Science & Tech
5
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
6
Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc

Rockefeller philanthropy advisors aims to accelerate philanthropy in pursuit of a just world

Philanthropy
7
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
8
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
9
Pact Inc

Pact is a nonprofit organization that builds evidence-based, data-driven, and community-led solutions for human development (continued in schedule o)

International
10
Common Impact Inc

Common impact's mission is to strengthen the capacity of social change organizations, enabling them to better run and scale their programs. through its partnership with companies, common impact taps into the business skills and expertise…

Unclassified
11
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
12
Waterorg

Water.org's goal is to bring safe water and sanitation to the world through access to small, affordable loans.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Success Academy Charter Schools Inc; the most unlike its peers is Conflict Awareness Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

317 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 317 of the 422 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
57
Early backer (in before they grew)
306/317
Grantees still filing
218/317
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BOTTOM LINE NEW YORK: $617,650 · OtherBOTTOM LINE NEW YORKKIPP NYC: $616,750 · OtherKIPP NYCDREAM: $520,000 · OtherDREAMIndividual grant recipient: $450,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBASTA: $435,300 · OtherBASTANORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $342,807 · OtherMI ESCUELITA PRESCHOOL INC: $260,345 · OtherFAMILY GATEWAY INC: $301,000 · Other+101 more: $3,043,746 · Other+101 moreBARD COLLEGE: $630,000 · EducationBARD COLLEGECLASSICAL CHARTER SCHOOLS: $466,000 · EducationCLASSICAL CHARTER SCHOOLSCRISTO REY NEW YORK HIGH SCHOOL: $460,000 · EducationCRISTO REY NEW YORK HIGH SCHOO…KIPP Texas Inc: $415,750 · EducationKIPP Texas IncTHE GO PROJECT INC: $260,000 · EducationTHE GO PROJECT INCWEST DALLAS COMMUNITY SCHOOL: $220,000 · Education826 Valencia: $219,700 · EducationCHILDREN'S SCHOLARSHIP FUND PHILADELPHIA: $185,000 · EducationMARCY LAB INC: $170,000 · EducationTHE POSSE FOUNDATION INC: $160,000 · Education+18 more: $1,178,364 · Education+18 moreSAFE HORIZON INC: $475,000 · Human ServicesSAFE HORIZON INCHOT BREAD KITCHEN LTD: $460,300 · Human ServicesHOT BREAD KITCHEN …DALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $340,750 · Human ServicesDALLAS CHILDREN'S …The Family Place: $271,500 · Human ServicesThe Family PlaceRAPHAEL HOUSE OF SAN FRANCISCO INC: $242,850 · Human ServicesRAPHAEL HOUSE OF S…Society of St Vincent De Paul: $211,500 · Human ServicesSociety of St Vinc…CITY HOUSE INC: $170,000 · Human ServicesCITY HOUSE INCFUTURES IGNITE INC: $150,150 · Human ServicesFUTURES IGNITE INC+20 more: $267,737 · Human Services+20 morePART OF THE SOLUTION: $749,225 · Food & NutritionPhilabundance: $40,000 · Food & Nutrition+3 more: $19,000 · Food & NutritionTHE MARSHALL PROJECT INC: $560,000 · Community Improvement+3 more: $30,552 · Community ImprovementAmbulatory Surgery Access Coalition: $153,155 · HealthTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION: $146,500 · HealthWRC Pregnancy Center of Ellis County DBA FirstLook: $75,000 · HealthANGELMAN SYNDROME FOUNDATION INC: $75,000 · HealthHELPHOPELIVE INC: $27,000 · HealthHEALTH TALENTS INTERNATIONAL INC: $20,175 · Health+12 more: $63,814 · HealthSouth Bronx United Inc: $245,000 · Recreation & SportsROW NEW YORK INC: $153,150 · Recreation & SportsSQUASHSMARTS INC: $60,000 · Recreation & SportsPHILADELPHIA YOUTH BASKETBALL INC: $47,500 · Recreation & Sports+4 more: $27,275 · Recreation & Sports
Other$6,587,598Education$4,364,814Human Services$2,589,787Food & Nutrition$808,225Community Improvement$590,552Health$560,644Recreation & Sports$532,925

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPART OF THE SOLUTION: $749,225 over 6y, 2.4% of budgetBARD COLLEGE: $630,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MARSHALL PROJECT INC: $560,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetSAFE HORIZON INC: $475,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCLASSICAL CHARTER SCHOOLS: $466,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetHOT BREAD KITCHEN LTD: $460,300 over 6y, 2.8% of budgetCRISTO REY NEW YORK HIGH SCHOOL: $460,000 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetKIPP Texas Inc: $415,750 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $342,807 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetDALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $340,750 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetFAMILY GATEWAY INC: $301,000 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetThe Family Place: $271,500 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetMI ESCUELITA PRESCHOOL INC: $260,345 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetTHE GO PROJECT INC: $260,000 over 6y, 14% of budgetSouth Bronx United Inc: $245,000 over 6y, 2.8% of budgetRAPHAEL HOUSE OF SAN FRANCISCO INC: $242,850 over 6y, 3.0% of budgetWEST DALLAS COMMUNITY SCHOOL: $220,000 over 6y, 1.1% of budget826 Valencia: $219,700 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetSociety of St Vincent De Paul: $211,500 over 6y, 3.1% of budgetSAFE & SOUND: $192,500 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetCHILDREN'S SCHOLARSHIP FUND PHILADELPHIA: $185,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetCITY HOUSE INC: $170,000 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetMARCY LAB INC: $170,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetTHE POSSE FOUNDATION INC: $160,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetAmbulatory Surgery Access Coalition: $153,155 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetROW NEW YORK INC: $153,150 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetFUTURES IGNITE INC: $150,150 over 3y, 13% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION: $146,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCORNERSTONE CROSSROADS ACADEMY: $130,450 over 6y, 3.4% of budgetBLUE ENGINE INC: $130,150 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetGATEWAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $130,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetPROMISE HOUSE INC: $125,150 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetNATIONAL COLLEGE ADVISING CORPS INC: $122,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetSCHOLARMATCH INC: $118,451 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetPRISON UNIVERSITY PROJECT INC DBA MOUNT TAMALPAIS COLLEGE: $116,500 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION: $101,700 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DALLAS FOUNDATION: $75,944 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWRC Pregnancy Center of Ellis County DBA FirstLook: $75,000 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetANGELMAN SYNDROME FOUNDATION INC: $75,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetBYERSCHOOL FOUNDATION: $75,000 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH MIAMI INC: $75,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetCollegespring Inc: $67,250 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER DALLAS INC: $65,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetSQUASHSMARTS INC: $60,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetTHE GESU SCHOOL INC: $55,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetPHILADELPHIA YOUTH BASKETBALL INC: $47,500 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetCOLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY: $45,810 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetANDREW MOREHOUSE TRUST ASSN INC: $45,000 over 5y, 25% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PART OF THE SOLUTION ↗
  • Who funds BARD COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds THE MARSHALL PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds SAFE HORIZON INC ↗
  • Who funds CLASSICAL CHARTER SCHOOLS ↗
  • Who funds HOT BREAD KITCHEN LTD ↗
  • Who funds CRISTO REY NEW YORK HIGH SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds KIPP Texas Inc ↗
  • Who funds NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds DALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY GATEWAY INC ↗
  • Who funds The Family Place ↗
  • Who funds MI ESCUELITA PRESCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE GO PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds South Bronx United Inc ↗
  • Who funds RAPHAEL HOUSE OF SAN FRANCISCO INC ↗
  • Who funds WEST DALLAS COMMUNITY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds 826 Valencia ↗
  • Who funds Society of St Vincent De Paul ↗
  • Who funds SAFE & SOUND ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S SCHOLARSHIP FUND PHILADELPHIA ↗
  • Who funds CITY HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds MARCY LAB INC ↗
  • Who funds THE POSSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Ambulatory Surgery Access Coalition ↗
  • Who funds ROW NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds FUTURES IGNITE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CORNERSTONE CROSSROADS ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds BLUE ENGINE INC ↗
  • Who funds GATEWAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS ↗
  • Who funds PROMISE HOUSE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

W P & Bulah Luse Foun…United Way of Metropo…The Dallas FoundationTexas Women's Foundat…Communities Foundatio…The Rees-Jones Founda…Hillcrest FoundationRoy and Christine Stu…Capital for KidsTexas Instruments Fou…The Perot FoundationThe Addy Foundation
W P & Bulah Luse FoundationTX44.6× affinity20 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: W P & Bulah Luse Foundation · United Way of Metropolitan Dallas Inc · The Dallas Foundation · Texas Women's Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · The Rees-Jones Foundation · Hillcrest Foundation · Roy and Christine Sturgis Charitable And · Capital for Kids · Texas Instruments Foundation · The Perot Foundation · The Addy Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Maverick Capital Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Maverick Capital Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 100%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Hias Inc: 88% of income from government
  • Christopher Reeve Foundation: 49% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Teensharp: 11% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Best Buddies International Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Impact Melanoma Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Sandy Hook Promise Foundation: 0% of income from government
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Global Empowerment Mission Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
10get no government money at all
52report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Maverick Capital Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Maverick Capital Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 422 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Maverick Capital’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home